Abstract
Tunnel water inrush disaster is a serious problem in karst tunnel construction and occurs extensively in southwestern China. To prevent water inrush, hydraulic lining has been utilized extensively in karst tunnel construction. The failure of the hydraulic lining in the Tongxi tunnel is an example of a typical failure case that has yet to be fully analyzed. In this paper, the failure of the waterproof liner was studied by theoretical and numerical methods. By field investigation, the failure of the tunnel lining was attributed to a high hydraulic pressure head converging in the large karst caves behind the lining. The corresponding mechanical model can be simplified as a “karst cave water pressure” model. The key to the mechanical model was to determine the water pressure of the karst caves produced by the lining. The variation in water pressure was directly related to the cave’ reservoir volume, catchment flow and catchment time. Thus, volume calculation formulas for two types of karst caves (strike and oblique caves) in the studied tunnel were constructed based on the engineering geological conditions. Considering the precipitation, the flow rate in the karst caves was regarded as nearly constant during the catchment period. Hence, reservoir volumes during different periods can be calculated and converted to the stress boundary conditions of the lining. Then, the mechanical response of the tunnel under different water levels was calculated by numerical simulation. Combining the field investigation and monitoring data, the tunnel lining failure was mainly believed to be triggered by hydraulic fracturing failure due to a high-pressure head. Finally, prevention measures were proposed based on the results of this study.
Similar content being viewed by others
References
Arjnoi P, Jeong JH, Kim CY, Park KH (2009) Effect of drainage conditions on porewater pressure distributions and lining stresses in drained tunnels. Tunn Undergr Space Technol 24:376–389
de Rooij R, Perrochet P, Graham W (2013) From rainfall to spring discharge: coupling conduit flow, subsurface matrix flow and surface flow in karst systems using a discrete–continuum model. Adv Water Resour 61:29–41
Fang Y, Guo JN, Grasmick J, Mooney M (2016) The effect of external water pressure on the liner behavior of large cross-section tunnels. Tunn Undergr Space Technol 60:80–95
Holter KG (2014) Loads on sprayed waterproof tunnel linings in jointed hard rock: a study based on norwegian cases. Rock Mech Rock Eng 47:1003–1020
Huang Y, Fu ZM, Chen J, Zhou ZF, Wang JG (2015) The external water pressure on a deep buried tunnel in fractured rock. Tunn Undergr Space Technol 48:58–66
Huangfu M, Wang MS, Tan ZS, Wang XY (2010) Analytical solutions for steady seepage into an underwater circular tunnel. Tunnel Undergr Space Technol 25:391–396
Jiang HM, Li L, Rong XL, Wang MY, Xia YP, Zhang ZC (2017) Model test to investigate waterproof-resistant slab minimum safety thickness for water inrush geohazards. Tunn Undergr Space Technol 62:35–42
Johnson RP, Swallow FE, Psomas S (2016) Structural properties and durability of a sprayed waterproofing membrane for tunnels. Tunn Undergr Space Technol 60:41–48
Li XP, Li YA (2014) Research on risk assessment system for water inrush in the karst tunnel construction based on GIS: case study on the diversion tunnel groups of the Jinping II Hydropower Station. Tunn Undergr Space Technol 40:182–191
Li SC, Li SC, Zhang QS, Xue YG, Liu B, Su MX, Wang ZC, Wang SG (2010) Predicting geological hazards during tunnel construction. J Rock Mech Geotech Eng 2:232–242
Li SC, Zhou ZQ, Li LP, Xu ZH, Zhang QQ, Shi SS (2013) Risk assessment of water inrush in karst tunnels based on attribute synthetic evaluation system. Tunn Undergr Space Technol 38:50–58
Li SC, Liu RT, Zhang QS, Zhang X (2016) Protection against water or mud inrush in tunnels by grouting: a review. J Rock Mech Geotech Eng 8:753–766
Li XZ, Zhang PX, He ZC, Huang Z, Cheng ML, Guo L (2017) Identification of geological structure which induced heavy water and mud inrush in tunnel excavation: a case study on Lingjiao tunnel. Tunn Undergr Space Technol 69:203–208
Liang DX, Jiang ZQ, Zhu SY, Sun Q, Qian ZW (2016) Experimental research on water inrush in tunnel construction. Nat Hazards 1:467–480
Liu B, Liu ZY, Li SC, Fan KR, Nie LC, Zhang XX (2017) An improved Time-Lapse resistivity tomography to monitor and estimate the impact on the groundwater system induced by tunnel excavation. Tunn Undergr Space Technol 66:107–120
Meng W, Wang Y (2016) A diagnostic study on heavy rainfall induced by Typhoon Utor (2013) in South China: 1. Rainfall asymmetry at landfall. J Geophys Res Atmos 21:12781–12802
Parise M, Lollino P (2011) A preliminary analysis of failure mechanisms in karst and man-made underground caves in Southern Italy. Geomorphology 134(1–2):132–143
Peng Y, Wu L, Su Y, Zhou RF (2016) Risk prediction of tunnel water or mud inrush based on disaster forewarning grading. Geotech Geol Eng 6:1923–1932
Perne M, Aarler B, Gabrovšek F (2012) Calculating transport of water from a conduit to the porous matrix by boundary distributed source method. Eng Anal Bound Elem 36:1649–1659
Qin CB, Chian SC (2017) 2D and 3D stability analysis of tunnel roof collapse in stratified rock: a kinematic approach. Int J Rock Mech Min Sci 100:269–277
Shi S, Xie X, Bu L, Li L, Zhou Z (2018) Hazard-based evaluation model of water inrush disaster sources in karst tunnels and its engineering application. Environ Earth Sci 77:141–153
Shin HS, Youn DJ, Chae SE, Shin JH (2009) Effective control of pore water pressures on tunnel linings using pin-hole drain method. Tunn Undergr Space Technol 24:555–561
Tan YQ, Smith JV, Li CQ, Currell M, Wu YF (2018) Predicting external water pressure and cracking of a tunnel lining by measuring water inflow rate. Tunn Undergr Space Technol 71:115–125
Tian Q, Zhang J, Zhang Y (2018) Similar simulation experiment of expressway tunnel in karst area. Constr Build Mater 176:1–13
Vogel F, Sovják R, Pešková Š (2017) Static response of double shell concrete lining with a spray-applied waterproofing membrane. Tunn Undergr Space Technol 68:106–112
Wang XY, Tan ZS, Wang MS, Zhang M, Huangfu M (2008) Theoretical and experimental study of external water pressure on tunnel lining in controlled drainage under high water level. Tunn Undergr Space Technol 23(5):552–560
Wu HC, Huang GR, Meng QQ, Zhang MZ, Li LC (2016) Deep tunnel for regulating combined sewer overflow pollution and flood disaster: a case study in Guangzhou City, China. Water 8:329–342
Wu GJ, Chen WZ, Yuan JQ, Yang DS, Bian HB (2017) Formation mechanisms of water inrush and mud burst in a migmatite tunnel: a case study in China. J Mt Sci 1:188–195
Xu Q, Liu HX, Ran JX, Li WH, Sun X (2016) Field monitoring of groundwater responses to heavy rainfalls and the early warning of the Kualiangzi landslide in Sichuan Basin, southwestern China. Landslides 6:1555–1570
Zhang W, Cai FL, Zhou JX, Hua YL (2017) Experimental Investigation on air–water interaction in a hydropower station combining a diversion tunnel with a tailrace tunnel. Water 9:274–287
Zhao Y, Li PF, Tian SM (2013) Prevention and treatment technologies of railway tunnel water inrush and mud gushing in China. J Rock Mech Geotech Eng 5:468–477
Zhou FF, Cui XP (2015) The adjoint sensitivity of heavy rainfall to initial conditions in debris flow areas in China. Atmos Sci Lett 4:485–491
Acknowledgements
This work is supported by the study on the application of three-dimensional hydrogeological modeling technology in the planning and construction of mountain tunnels (cstc2016shmszx30021, Chongqing Science and Technology Commission).
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Corresponding author
Additional information
Publisher's Note
Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.
Rights and permissions
About this article
Cite this article
Liu, Y., Feng, Y., Xu, M. et al. Effect of an incremental change in external water pressure on tunnel lining: a case study from the Tongxi karst tunnel. Nat Hazards 98, 343–377 (2019). https://doi.org/10.1007/s11069-019-03692-3
Received:
Accepted:
Published:
Issue Date:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s11069-019-03692-3