Advertisement

Natural Hazards

, Volume 97, Issue 2, pp 683–726 | Cite as

Prioritization of cyclone preparedness activities in humanitarian supply chains using fuzzy analytical network process

  • Devendra K. YadavEmail author
  • Akhilesh Barve
Original Paper
  • 81 Downloads

Abstract

During recent years, the importance of preparedness has increased with increasing frequency of disasters and the cost associated with relief and response activities. Therefore, this study is designed to present the identification and evaluation process of cyclone disaster’s preparedness activities also termed as measures. In this study, 27 cyclone preparedness activities have been prioritized considering six criteria—effective and immediate response, last mile connectivity, disaster resilient community, risk and vulnerability reduction, life safety and property protection, and sustainable recovery and rehabilitation. Moreover, the evaluation process for prioritization of preparedness activities involves significant uncertainty and subjectivity. Therefore, this study integrates the fuzzy logic with analytical network process, a multi-criteria decision-making tool to analyze and present the ranking of selected preparedness activities. Results of this research indicate that human resource management activities are the most needed preparedness activities to mitigate the risk of cyclone disasters in the Indian context. Lastly, sensitivity analysis has also accompanied to reveal the importance of weighing on the ranking of preparedness activities.

Keywords

Disaster preparedness Humanitarian supply chains Fuzzy analytical network process (fuzzy ANP) 

Notes

Acknowledgements

Authors world like to express their sincere gratitude to the experts from Odisha State Disaster Management Authority (OSDMA), Indian Red Cross Society, and IAG Odisha for their kind support. Author also extends acknowledge to two anonymous reviewers for their constructive suggestion to improve this manuscript.

References

  1. Adivar B, Mert A (2010) International disaster relief planning with fuzzy credibility. Fuzzy Optim Decis Making 9(4):413–433CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  2. Alcantara-Ayala I (2002) Geomorphology, natural hazards, vulnerability and prevention of natural disasters in developing countries. Geomorphology 47(2–4):107–124CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  3. Altay N, Green WG (2006) OR/MS research in disaster operations management. Eur J Oper Res 175(1):475–493CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  4. Altay N, Prasad S, Sounderpandian J (2009) Strategic planning for disaster relief logistics: lessons from supply chain management. Int J Ser Sci 2(2):142–161Google Scholar
  5. Andharia J (2015) Humanitarian logistics in Asia: a missing link in disaster management and practice. In: Strategic disaster risk management in Asia. Springer India, pp 179–192Google Scholar
  6. Asadzadeh A, Kötter T, Zebardast E (2015) An augmented approach for measurement of disaster resilience using connective factor analysis and analytic network process (F’ANP) model. Int J Disaster Risk Reduct 14:504–518CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  7. Ayağ Z, Özdemir RG (2012) Evaluating machine tool alternatives through modified TOPSIS and alpha-cut based fuzzy ANP. Int J Prod Econ 140(2):630–636CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  8. Baade RA, Baumann R, Matheson V (2007) Estimating the economic impact of natural and social disasters, with an application to Hurricane Katrina. Urban Stud 44(11):2061–2076CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  9. Bahinipati CS (2014) Assessment of vulnerability to cyclones and floods in Odisha, India: a district-level analysis. Curr Sci 107(12):1997–2007Google Scholar
  10. Banomyong R, Beresford A, Pettit S (2009) Logistics relief response model: the case of Thailand’s tsunami affected area. Int J Serv Technol Manage 12 (4):414–429CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  11. Benson C, Twigg J, Myers M (2001) NGO initiatives in risk reduction: an overview. Disasters 25(3):199–215CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  12. Berke PR, Kartez J, Wenger D (1993) Recovery after disaster: achieving sustainable development, mitigation and equity. Disasters. 17(2):93–109CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  13. Blake ES, Zelinsky DA (2018) National Hurricane Center, Tropical Cyclone Report, Hurricane Harvey (Al092017). https://www.nhc.noaa.gov/data/tcr/AL092017_Harvey.pdf. Accessed 10 Feb 2018
  14. Buckley JJ (1985) Fuzzy hierarchical analysis. Fuzzy Sets Syst 17(3):233–247CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  15. Büyüközkan G, Feyzıoglu O (2004) A fuzzy-logic-based decision-making approach for new product development. Int J Prod Econ 90(1):27–45CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  16. Büyüközkan G, Ertay T, Kahraman C, Ruan D (2004) Determining the importance weights for the design requirements in the house of quality using the fuzzy analytic network approach. Int J Intell Syst 19(5):443–461CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  17. Calabrese A, Costa R, Menichini T (2013) Using fuzzy AHP to manage intellectual capital assets: an application to the ICT service industry. Expert Syst Appl 40(9):3747–3755CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  18. Chan FT, Kumar N, Tiwari MK, Lau HC, Choy KL (2008) Global supplier selection: a fuzzy-AHP approach. Int J Prod Res 46(14):3825–3857CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  19. Chang DY (1992) Extent analysis and synthetic decision. Optim Tech Appl 1(1):352–355Google Scholar
  20. Chang DY (1996) Applications of the extent analysis method on fuzzy AHP. Eur J Oper Res 95(3):649–655CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  21. Chang CW, Wu CR, Lin CT, Chen HC (2007) An application of AHP and sensitivity analysis for selecting the best slicing machine. Comput Ind Eng 52(2):296–307CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  22. Chang CW, Wu CR, Lin HL (2009) Applying fuzzy hierarchy multiple attributes to construct an expert decision making process. Expert Syst Appl 36(4):7363–7368CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  23. Charles A, Lauras M (2011) An enterprise modelling approach for better optimisation modelling: application to the humanitarian relief chain coordination problem. OR Spectrum 33(3):815–841CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  24. Chen JF, Hsieh HN, Do QH (2015) Evaluating teaching performance based on fuzzy AHP and comprehensive evaluation approach. Appl Soft Comput 28:100–108CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  25. Cheng CH, Yang KL, Hwang CL (1999) Evaluating attack helicopters by AHP based on linguistic variable weight. Eur J Oper Res 116(2):423–435CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  26. Chhotray V, Few R (2012) Post-disaster recovery and ongoing vulnerability: ten years after the super-cyclone of 1999 in Orissa, India. Glob Environ Change 22(3):695–702CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  27. Chittibabu P, Dube SK, Macnabb JB, Murty TS, Rao AD, Mohanty UC, Sinha PC (2004) Mitigation of flooding and cyclone hazard in Orissa, India. Nat Hazards 31(2):455–485CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  28. Chui C, Feng JY, Jordan L (2014) From good practice to policy formation—The impact of third sector on disaster management in Taiwan. Int J Disaster Risk Reduct 10:28–37CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  29. Cozzolino A (2012) Humanitarian logistics: cross-sector cooperation in disaster relief management. Springer Science & Business MediaGoogle Scholar
  30. Cutter SL, Boruff BJ, Shirley WL (2003) Social vulnerability to environmental hazards. Soc Sci Quart 84(2):242–261CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  31. FathiZahraei M, Marthandan G, Raman M, Asadi A (2015) Reducing risks in crisis management by GIS adoption. Nat Hazards 76(1):83–98CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  32. Forcael E, González V, Orozco F, Vargas S, Pantoja A, Moscoso P (2014) Ant colony optimization model for tsunamis evacuation routes. Comput Aided Civ Infrastruct Eng 29(10):723–737CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  33. GoO (2013) Memorandum on the very severe cyclone Phailin and the subsequent flood 12-15 October 2013. The Revenue and Disaster Management Department, Government of Odisha(GoO). http://www.osdma.org/userfiles/file/MEMORANDUMPhailin.pdf. Accessed 19 Aug 2016
  34. Govindan K, Kaliyan M, Kannan D, Haq AN (2014) Barriers analysis for green supply chain management implementation in Indian industries using analytic hierarchy process. Int J Prod Econ 147:555–568CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  35. Guha-Sapir D, Hoyois Ph, Below R (2017) Annual disaster statistical review 2016: the numbers and trends. Centre for Research on the Epidemiology of Disasters (CRED), BrusselsGoogle Scholar
  36. Hsu TH, Yang TH (2000) Application of fuzzy analytic hierarchy process in the selection of advertising media. J Manag Syst 7(1):19–39Google Scholar
  37. Hsu TH, Hung LC, Tang JW (2012) A hybrid ANP evaluation model for electronic service quality. Appl Soft Comput 12(1):72–81CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  38. Hus TH, Nian SH (1997) Interactive fuzzy decision aided systems—a case on public transportation system operations. J Transp Taiwan 10(4):79–96Google Scholar
  39. IFRC (2012) Disaster risk reduction: a global advocacy guide. In: International federation of red cross and red crescent societies (IFRC), Geneva, Switzerland. http://www.ifrc.org/Global/Publications/disasters/reducing_risks/DRR-advocacy-guide.pdf. Accessed 14 Mar 2017
  40. IPCC (2012) Managing the risks of extreme events and disasters to advance climate change adaptation. In: A special report of working groups I and II of the intergovernmental panel on climate change (IPCC). Cambridge University Press, Cambridge, UK, and New York, NYGoogle Scholar
  41. Jahre M, Jensen LM, Listou T (2009) Theory development in humanitarian logistics: a framework and three cases. Manag Res News 32(11):1008–1023CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  42. Jahre M, Pazirandeh A, Van Wassenhove LN (2016) Defining logistics preparedness: a framework and research agenda. J Humanit Log Supply Chain Manag 6(3):372–398CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  43. Kannan G, Sarkis J, Palaniappan M (2013) An analytic network process-based multicriteria decision making model for a reverse supply chain. Int J Adv Manuf Technol 68(1–4):863–880Google Scholar
  44. Kiriş Ş (2013) Multi-criteria inventory classification by using a fuzzy analytic network process (ANP) approach. Informatica. 24(2):199–217Google Scholar
  45. Kovács G, Spens K (2007) Humanitarian logistics in disaster relief operations. Int J Phys Distrib Logist Manage 37(2):99–114CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  46. Kovács G, Spens K (2009) Identifying challenges in humanitarian logistics. Int J Phys Distrib Logist Manage 39(6):506–528CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  47. Kumar TS, Mahendra RS, Nayak S, Radhakrishnan K, Sahu KC (2010) Coastal vulnerability assessment for Orissa State, east coast of India. J Coastal Res 26(3):523–534CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  48. Kunz N, Reiner G (2012) A meta-analysis of humanitarian logistics research. J Humanit Logist Supply Chain Management. 2(2):116–147CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  49. Kunz N, Reiner G, Gold S (2014) Investing in disaster management capabilities versus pre-positioning inventory: a new approach to disaster preparedness. Int J Prod Econ 157:261–272CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  50. Lai AYH (2012) Towards a collaborative cross-border disaster management: a comparative analysis of voluntary organizations in Taiwan and Singapore. J Comp Policy Anal Res Pract 14(3):217–233CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  51. Laukkonen J, Blanco PK, Lenhart J, Keiner M, Cavric B, Kinuthia-Njenga C (2009) Combining climate change adaptation and mitigation measures at the local level. Habitat Int 33(3):287–292CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  52. Lee SH (2010) Using fuzzy AHP to develop intellectual capital evaluation model for assessing their performance contribution in a university. Exp Syst Appl 37(7):4941–4947CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  53. Leiras A, de Brito Jr I, Queiroz Peres E, Rejane Bertazzo T, Tsugunobu Yoshida Yoshizaki H (2014) Literature review of humanitarian logistics research: trends and challenges. J Humanit Logist Supply Chain Manage 4(1):95–130CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  54. Liou TS, Wang MJJ (1992) Ranking fuzzy numbers with integral value. Fuzzy Sets Syst 50(3):247–255CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  55. Long DC, Wood DF (1995) The logistics of famine relief. J Bus Logist 16(1):213Google Scholar
  56. Mathbor GM (2007) Enhancement of community preparedness for natural disasters: the role of social work in building social capital for sustainable disaster relief and management. Int Soc Work 50(3):357–369CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  57. NDMA (2008) National disaster management guidelines: management of cyclones, National Disaster Management Authority (NDMA), Govt. of IndiaGoogle Scholar
  58. NDMA (2015) Cyclone hudhud: strategies and lessons for preparing better & strengthening risk resilience in coastal regions of India. National Disaster Management Authority (NDMA), India. http://ndma.gov.in/images/pdf/Hudhud-lessons.pdf. Accessed 07 Oct 2016
  59. NDRRM (2013) Final report re effect of typhoon “YOLANDA” (Haiyan). National Disaster Risk Reduction and Management Council (NDRRM), Philippines. http://ndrrmc.gov.ph/attachments/article/1329/FINAL_REPORT_re_Effects_of_Typhoon_YOLANDA_%28HAIYAN%29_06-09NOV2013.pdf. Accessed 23 Mar 2017
  60. Norris FH, Stevens SP, Pfefferbaum B, Wyche KF, Pfefferbaum RL (2008) Community resilience as a metaphor, theory, set of capacities, and strategy for disaster readiness. Am J Community Psychol 41(1–2):127–150CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  61. Oloruntoba R (2010) An analysis of the Cyclone Larry emergency relief chain: some key success factors. Int J Prod Econ 126(1):85–101CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  62. Oloruntoba R (2015) A planning and decision-making framework for sustainable humanitarian logistics in disaster response. In: Humanitarian logistics and sustainability. Springer International Publishing, pp 31–48Google Scholar
  63. OSDMA (2013) The response, Odisha State Disaster Management Authority (OSDMA), Odisha, India, October 2013 (Vol. XIII), 1–36Google Scholar
  64. OSDMA (2014a) Managing cyclone Phailin: converting experience to action. Odisha State Disaster Management Authority (OSDMA), Bhubaneswar, Odisha, IndiaGoogle Scholar
  65. OSDMA (2014b) Towards a disaster resilient Odisha. Odisha state disaster management authority (OSDMA), Bhubaneswar, Odisha, IndiaGoogle Scholar
  66. OSDMA (2016) State disaster management plan, Government of Odisha, Odisha State Disaster Management Authority (OSDMA), http://osdma.org/Download/State_Disaster_ManagementPlanLatest.pdf. Accessed 23 Sept 2016)
  67. Özdemir A, Tüysüz F (2017) An integrated fuzzy DEMATEL and fuzzy ANP based balanced scorecard approach: application in Turkish higher education institutions. J Multiple-Valued Logic Soft Comput 28(2–3):251–287Google Scholar
  68. Paul BK (2009) Why relatively fewer people died? The case of Bangladesh’s Cyclone Sidr. Nat Hazards 50(2):289–304CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  69. Perry M (2007) Natural disaster management planning: a study of logistics managers responding to the tsunami. Int J Phys Distrib Logist Manage 37(5):409–433CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  70. Pettit SJ, Beresford AK (2005) Emergency relief logistics: an evaluation of military, non-military and composite response models. Int J Logist Res Appl 8(4):313–331CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  71. Quarantelli EL (1997) Ten criteria for evaluating the management of community disasters. Disasters. 21(1):39–56CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  72. Rodríguez-Espíndola O, Albores P, Brewster C (2017) Disaster preparedness in humanitarian logistics: a collaborative approach for resource management in floods. Eur J Oper Res 264(3):978–993CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  73. Ruiz-Padillo A, Ruiz DP, Torija AJ, Ramos-Ridao Á (2016) Selection of suitable alternatives to reduce the environmental impact of road traffic noise using a fuzzy multi-criteria decision model. Environ Impact Assess Rev 61:8–18CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  74. Russell TE (2005) The humanitarian relief supply chain: analysis of the 2004 South East Asia earthquake and tsunami (Doctoral dissertation, Massachusetts Institute of Technology)Google Scholar
  75. Saaty TL (1980) Analytic hierarchy process. McGraw-Hill, New YorkGoogle Scholar
  76. Saaty TL (1996) Decision making with dependence and feedback: The analytic network process. RWS Publications, PittsburghGoogle Scholar
  77. Saaty TL (2004) Fundamentals of the analytic network process—multiple networks with benefits, costs, opportunities and risks. J Syst Sci Syst Eng 13(3):348–379CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  78. Saaty TL (2006) The Analytic Network Process. In: Decision Making with the Analytic Network Process. International Series in Operations Research & Management Science, 95. Springer, Boston, MAGoogle Scholar
  79. Saaty TL (2008) Decision making with the analytic hierarchy process. Int J Serv Sci 1(1):83–98Google Scholar
  80. Shafiee M (2015) A fuzzy analytic network process model to mitigate the risks associated with offshore wind farms. Expert Syst Appl 42(4):2143–2152CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  81. Shah Alam Khan M (2008) Disaster preparedness for sustainable development in Bangladesh. Disaster Prev Manag 17(5):662–671CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  82. Shamsuddoha M, Chowdhury RK (2007) Climate change impact and disaster vulnerabilities in the coastal areas of Bangladesh. COAST Trust, DhakaGoogle Scholar
  83. Sujatha ER, Sridhar V (2017) Mapping debris flow susceptibility using analytical network process in Kodaikkanal Hills, Tamil Nadu (India). J Earth Syst Sci 126(8):116CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  84. Sun H, Cheng X, Dai M (2016) Regional flood disaster resilience evaluation based on analytic network process: a case study of the Chaohu Lake Basin, Anhui Province, China. Nat Hazards 82(1):39–58CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  85. Sutton J, Tierney K (2006) Disaster preparedness: concepts, guidance, and research. In: Fritz institute assessing disaster preparedness conference, sebastopol, California, November 3–4, 1–41Google Scholar
  86. Taubenböck H, Goseberg N, Setiadi N, Lämmel G, Moder F, Oczipka M, Klüpfel H, Wahl R, Schlurmann T, Strunz G, Birkmann J (2009) “Last-Mile” preparation for a potential disaster–Interdisciplinary approach towards tsunami early warning and an evacuation information system for the coastal city of Padang, Indonesia. Nat Hazard Earth Syst Sci 9(4):1509–1528CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  87. Thakur PK, Maiti S, Kingma NC, Prasad VH, Aggarwal SP, Bhardwaj A (2012) Estimation of structural vulnerability for flooding using geospatial tools in the rural area of Orissa, India. Nat Hazards 61(2):501–520CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  88. Thomalla F, Larsen RK (2010) Resilience in the context of tsunami early warning systems and community disaster preparedness in the Indian Ocean region. Environ Hazards 9(3):249–265CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  89. Thomas AS, Kopczak LR (2005) From logistics to supply chain management: the path forward in the humanitarian sector. Fritz Inst 15:1–15Google Scholar
  90. Tomasini RM, Van Wassenhove LN (2004) Pan-American health organization’s humanitarian supply management system: de-politicization of the humanitarian supply chain by creating accountability. J Pub Procure 4(3):437–449CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  91. UNDP (2015) Act now—Save later.United Nations Development Programme (UNDP). http://www.dk.undp.org/content/undp/en/home/ourwork/get_involved/ActNow/. Accessed 15 May 2016
  92. UNEP (2013) Cyclone Phailin in India: Early warning and timely action saved lives. United Nations Environment Planning (UNEP). http://na.unep.net/geas/archive/pdfs/GEAS_Nov2013_Phailin.pdf. Accessed 11 Jan 2017
  93. Van Wassenhove LN (2006) Humanitarian aid logistics: supply chain management in high gear. J Oper Res Soc 57(5):475–489CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  94. Wang YM, Chin KS (2006) An eigenvector method for generating normalized interval and fuzzy weights. Appl Math Comput 181(2):1257–1275Google Scholar
  95. Wang YM, Elhag TM (2006) On the normalization of interval and fuzzy weights. Fuzzy Sets Syst 157(18):2456–2471CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  96. Waugh WL, Streib G (2006) Collaboration and leadership for effective emergency management. Public Adm Rev 66(s1):131–140CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  97. Wildasin D (2006) Disaster relief and preparedness: intergovernmental fiscal and regulatory structures. University of Kentucky, MimeoGoogle Scholar
  98. World Bank (2013) Rapid damage and needs assessment report: cyclone Phailin in Odisha. World Bank, Washington, DCGoogle Scholar
  99. Wu CI, Kung HY, Chen CH, Kuo LC (2014) An intelligent slope disaster prediction and monitoring system based on WSN and ANP. Expert Syst Appl 41(10):4554–4562CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  100. Yadav DK, Barve A (2016) Modeling post-disaster challenges of humanitarian supply chains: a TISM approach. Glob J Flex Syst Manage 17(3):321–340CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  101. Yadav DK, Barve A (2017) Analysis of socioeconomic vulnerability for cyclone-affected communities in coastal Odisha, India. Int J Disast Risk Reduct 22:387–396CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  102. Yadav DK, Barve A (2018) Segmenting critical success factors of humanitarian supply chains using Fuzzy-DEMATEL. Benchmark An Int J 25(2):400–425CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  103. Yi P, George SK, Paul JA, Lin L (2010) Hospital capacity planning for disaster emergency management. Soc Econ Plan Sci 44(3):151–160CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  104. Yüksel İ, Dağdeviren M (2010) Using the fuzzy analytic network process (ANP) for Balanced Scorecard (BSC): a case study for a manufacturing firm. Expert Syst Appl 37(2):1270–1278CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  105. Zaim S, Sevkli M, Camgöz-Akdağ H, Demirel OF, Yayla AY, Delen D (2014) Use of ANP weighted crisp and fuzzy QFD for product development. Expert Syst Appl 41(9):4464–4474CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  106. Zhang X, Zhang Z, Zhang Y, Wei D, Deng Y (2013) Route selection for emergency logistics management: a bio-inspired algorithm. Saf Sci 54:87–91CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer Nature B.V. 2019

Authors and Affiliations

  1. 1.School of Mechanical SciencesIndian Institute of Technology BhubaneswarBhubaneswarIndia
  2. 2.Department of Mechanical EngineeringMaulana Azad National Institute of Technology (MANIT) BhopalBhopalIndia

Personalised recommendations