Skip to main content
Log in

Numerical modelling of coastal inundation from Cascadia Subduction Zone tsunamis and implications for coastal communities on western Vancouver Island, Canada

  • Original Paper
  • Published:
Natural Hazards Aims and scope Submit manuscript


In the present study, numerical simulations were conducted to estimate the spatio-temporal characteristics of tsunami inundation for municipalities on Vancouver Island, Canada, as a result of various potential Cascadia Subduction Zone earthquake deterministic scenarios. By varying the earthquake magnitude and associated slip distance, the influence of these parameters on the tsunami wave propagation, inundation, and the possible damage on infrastructure and buildings was investigated. A numerical tsunami inundation model based on nonlinear shallow water equations was constructed using publically available bathymetric and topographic data and applied to three study areas: the City of Port Alberni, the District of Ucluelet, and the District of Tofino. The numerical results obtained in this study show that the maximum tsunami inundation depth and spatial extent of inundation are sensitive to the earthquake magnitude, whereas the tsunami arrival time is not. For the worst-case earthquake scenario investigated (MW 9.3), all of the three study areas were extensively inundated. Results of tsunami wave amplitude and overland inundation depth, flow velocity, hydrodynamic force, and depth–velocity product are analysed in detail to assess the impacts of the tsunami on inland buildings. The potential damage was estimated with previously proposed fragility curves for wood, reinforced concrete, and steel frame buildings. In conjunction with a site reconnaissance visit by the authors for better understanding the general characteristics of these areas, model results suggest that significant damage to buildings would occur, especially to wooden constructions, with considerable risk of loss of human life.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Subscribe and save

Springer+ Basic
EUR 32.99 /Month
  • Get 10 units per month
  • Download Article/Chapter or Ebook
  • 1 Unit = 1 Article or 1 Chapter
  • Cancel anytime
Subscribe now

Buy Now

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Fig. 1
Fig. 2
Fig. 3
Fig. 4
Fig. 5
Fig. 6
Fig. 7
Fig. 8
Fig. 9
Fig. 10
Fig. 11
Fig. 12
Fig. 13

Similar content being viewed by others


  • AECOM (2013) Modeling of potential tsunami inundation limits and run-up. Report for the capital region district. Project Number: 60242933

  • Atwater BF, Musumi-Rokkaku S, Satake K, Tsuji Y, Ueda K, Yamaguchi DK (2005) The orphan tsunami of 1700—Japanese clues to a parent earthquake in North America. US Geol Surv Prof Pap 1707:144p

    Google Scholar 

  • Bricker JD, Gibson S, Takagi H, Imamura F (2015) On the need for larger manning’s roughness coefficients in depth-integrated tsunami inundation models. Coast Eng J 57(2):1550005.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Cherniawsky JY, Titov VV, Wang K, Li JY (2007) Numerical simulations of tsunami waves and currents for southern Vancouver Island from a Cascadia megathrust earthquake. Pure Appl Geophys 164:465–492.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Chock G (2014) The ASCE 7 tsunami loads and effects design standard for the U.S. In: Esteban M, Takagi H, Shibayama T (eds) Handbook of coastal disaster mitigation for engineers and planners. Butterworth-Heinemann (Elsevier), Oxford, pp 437–489

    Google Scholar 

  • Chock G (2016) Design for tsunami loads and effects in the ASCE 7-16 standard. J Struct Eng ASCE 142(11):1–12.

    Google Scholar 

  • Clague JJ, Bobrowsky PT, Hutchinson I (2000) A review of geological records of large tsunamis at Vancouver Island, British Columbia, and implications for hazard. Quat Sci Rev 19(9):849–863.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Clague JJ, Munro A, Murty T (2003) Tsunami hazard and risk in Canada. Nat Hazards 28(2):435–461.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Cox RJ, Shand TD, Blacka MJ (2010) Australian rainfall and runoff revision projects project 10: appropriate safety criteria for people. Accessed 27 Feb 2018

  • Fine IV, Cherniawsky JY, Rabinovich AB, Stephenson F (2008) Numerical modeling and observations of tsunami waves in Alberni Inlet and Barkley Sound, British Columbia. Pure Appl Geophys 165:2019–2044.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Frankel AD, Petersen MD (2008) Cascadia Subduction Zone, Appendix L in The Uniform California Earthquake Rupture Forecast, version 2 (UCERF 2): U.S. Geological Survey open-file report 2007-1437L and California Geological Survey special report 203L. Accessed 20 Aug 2018

  • Gao D, Wang K, Riedel M, Sun T, Insua TL, Goldfinger C, Priest G (2015) On the possibility of slip-to-trench rupture in Cascadia megathrust earthquakes. Poster TD21D-2854, Fall Meeting, AGU 2015, San Francisco

  • Ghobarah A, Saatcioglu M, Nistor I (2006) The impact of 26 December 2004 earthquake and tsunami on structures and infrastructure. Eng Struct 28(2):312–326.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Goldfinger C, Nelson CH, Morey AE, Johnson JE, Patton JR, Karabanov E et al (2012) Turbidite event history—methods and implications for Holocene paleoseismicity of the Cascadia subduction zone. US Geological Survey professional paper 1661–F. Accessed 21 Feb 2018

  • Gonzalez FI, Geist EL, Jaffe B, Kanoglu U, Mofjeld H, Synolakis CE et al (2009) Probabilistic tsunami hazard assessment at Seaside, Oregon, for near- and far-field seismic sources. J Geophys Res 114:1–19.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Grilli ST, Insua TL, Grilli AR, Douglas KL, Shelby MR, Wang K, Gao D (2016) Tsunami hazard assessment at Port Alberni, BC, Canada: preliminary model results. Poster NH43B-1846, Fall Meeting, AGU 2016, San Francisco

  • Hayashi S, Koshimura S (2013) The 2011 Tohoku tsunami flow velocity estimation by the aerial video analysis and numerical modeling. J Disaster Res 8(4):561–572

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Hayashi S, Narita Y, Koshimura S (2013) Developing tsunami fragility curves from the surveyed data and numerical modeling of the 2011 Tohoku earthquake tsunami. J Jpn Soc Civ Eng Ser B2 (Coast Eng) 69(2):I_386–I_389. (in Japanese with English abstract)

    Google Scholar 

  • Imamura F (1989) Tsunami numerical simulation with the staggered leap-frog scheme (numerical code of TUNAMI-N1). School of Civil Engineering, Asian Institute of Technology and Disaster Control Research Center, Tohoku University

  • Insua TL, Grilli A, Grilli S, Shelby M, Wanf K, Gao D et al (2015) Preliminary tsunami hazard assessment in British Columbia. Poster NH23C-1890, Fall Meeting, AGU 2015, San Francisco

  • Johnstone WM, Lence BJ (2009) Assessing the value of mitigation strategies in reducing the impacts of rapid-onset, catastrophic floods. J Flood Risk Manag 2(3):209–221.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Johnstone WM, Lence BJ (2012) Use of flood, loss, and evacuation models to assess exposure and improve a community tsunami response plan: Vancouver Island. Nat Hazards Rev 13(2):162–171.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Kagan Y, Jackson DD (2013) Tohoku earthquake: a surprise? Bull Seismol Soc Am 103:1181–1194.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Koshimura S, Oie T, Yanagisawa H, Imamura F (2009) Developing fragility functions for tsunami damage estimation using numerical model and post-tsunami data from Banda Ache, Indonesia. Coast Eng J 51(3):243–273.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Kukita S, Shibayama T (2012) Simulation and video analysis of the 2011 Tohoku tsunami in Kesennuma. J Jpn Soc Civ Eng Ser B3 (Ocean Eng) 68(2):I_49–I_54. (in Japanese with English abstract)

    Google Scholar 

  • Kulkarni R, Wong I, Zachariasen J, Goldfinger C, Lawrence M (2013) Statistical analyses of great earthquake recurrence along the Cascadia subduction zone. Bull Seismol Soc Am 103(6):3205–3221.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Leonard LJ, Rogers GC, Mazzotti S (2014) Tsunami hazard assessment of Canada. Nat Hazards 70(1):237–274

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Ministry of Land, Infrastructure, Transport and Tourism in Japan (2012) Guide to determining the potential tsunami inundation (version 2.00). Accessed 14 Aug 2018

  • Mori N, Goda K, Cox DT (2018) recent progress in probabilistic tsunami hazard assessment (PTHA) for mega thrust subduction earthquakes. In: Santiago-Fandino V, Sato S, Maki N, Iuchi K (eds) The 2011 Japan earthquake and tsunami: reconstruction and restoration. Insights and assessment after 5 years. Advances in natural and technological hazards, vol 47. Springer, pp 469–485.

  • National Police Agency of Japan (2017) Damage report national police agency Japan (December 8 2017). Accessed 21 Feb 2018

  • Okada Y (1985) Surface deformation due to shear and tensile faults in a half-space. Bull Seismol Soc Am 75(4):1135–1154

    Google Scholar 

  • Park H, Cox DT (2016) Probabilistic assessment of near-field tsunami hazards: inundation depth, velocity, momentum flux, arrival time, and duration applied to Seaside, Oregon. Coast Eng 117:79–96.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Park H, Wiebe DM, Cox DT, Cox K (2014) Tsunami inundation modeling: sensitivity of velocity and momentum flux to bottom friction with application to building damage at Seaside, Oregon. In: International conference of coastal engineering (ICCE2014), ASCE, Soul, Korea

  • Rabinovich AB, Richard ET, Fine IV (2013) The 2010 Chilean tsunami off the west coast of Canada and the northwest coast of the United States. Pure Appl Geophys 170:1529–1565.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Satake K, Wang K, Atwater BF (2003) Fault slip and seismic moment of the 1700 Cascadia earthquake inferred from Japanese tsunami descriptions. J Geophys Res 108(B11):2535.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Sekine Y, Shibayama T (2012) Simulation of tsunami inundation over Sendai Plain for 2011 Tohoku earthquake and tsunami. Conference of Japanese Association for Coastal Zone Studies in 2012, Tohoku University, Japan (in Japanese)

  • Shand TD, Cox RJ, Blacka MJ, Smith GP (2010) Australian rainfall and runoff revision projects project 10: appropriate safety criteria for vehicles. Accessed 27 Feb 2018

  • Shibayama T (2015) 2004 Indian Ocean Tsunami. In: Esteban M, Takagi H, Shibayama T (eds) Handbook of coastal disaster mitigation for engineers and planners. Butterworth-Heinemann (Elsevier), Oxford, pp 3–19

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  • Stephenson FE, Rabinovich AB (2009) Tsunamis on the Pacific coast of Canada recorded in 1994–2007. Pure Appl Geophys 166:177–210.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Stephenson FE, Rabinovich AB, Solovieva ON, Kulikov EA, Yakovenko OI (2007) Catalogue of tsunamis, British Columbia, Canada: 1700–2007. Preprint P.P. Shirshov Inst. Oceanology, Moscow

  • Stolle J, Takabatake T, Mikami T, Shibayama T, Goseberg N, Nistor I, Petriu E (2017) Experimental investigation of debris-induced loading in tsunami-like flood events. Geosciences 7(3):74.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Suppasri A, Latcharote P, Bricker JD, Leelawat N, Hayashi A, Yamashita K et al (2016) Improvement of tsunami countermeasures based on lessons from the 2011 Great East Japan earthquake and tsunami—situation after five years. Coast Eng J 58(4):1650011.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Synolakis CE, Bernard EN, Titov VV, Kânoğlu U, González FI (2008) Validation and verification of tsunami numerical models. Pure Appl Geophys 165:2197–2228.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Takabatake T, Shibayama T, Esteban M, Ishii H, Hamano G (2017) Simulated tsunami evacuation behavior of local residents and visitors in Kamakura, Japan. Int J Disaster Risk Reduct 23:1–14.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Takabatake T, Shibayama T, Esteban M, Ishii H (2018) Advanced casualty estimation based on tsunami evacuation intended behavior: Case study at Yuigahama Beach, Kamakura, Japan. Nat Hazards.

    Google Scholar 

  • Thomson RE (1981) Oceanography of the British Columbia Coast. Canada department of fisheries and oceans, Canadian Special Publication of Fisheries and Aquatic Sciences, 56

  • Wang K, Wells R, Mazzotti S, Hyndman RD, Sagiya T (2003) A revised dislocation model of interseismic deformation of the Cascadia subduction zone. J Geophys Res 108(B1):2026.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Wiebe DM, Cox DT (2014) Application of fragility curves to estimate building damage and economic loss at a community scale: a case study of Seaside, Oregon. Nat Hazards 71(3):2043–2061.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Witter RC, Zhang YJ, Wang K, Priest GR, Goldfinger C, Stimely L, English JT, Ferro PA (2013) Simulated tsunami inundation for a range of Cascadia megathrust earth- quake scenarios at Bandon, Oregon, USA. Geosphere 9(6):1783–1803.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Xie J, Nistor I, Murty T (2012) Tsunami risk for Western Canada and numerical modelling of the Cascadia fault tsunami. Nat Hazards 60(1):149–159.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Yamashita K, Suppasri A, Oishi Y, Imamura F (2018) Development of a tsunami inundation analysis model for urban areas using a porous body model. Geosciences 8(1):12.

    Article  Google Scholar 

Download references


A part of the present work was performed as a part of activities of Research Institute of Sustainable Future Society, Waseda Research Institute for Science and Engineering, Waseda University. This work was also supported by JSPS Overseas Challenge Program for Young Researchers (Tomoyuki Takabatake, No. 201780164).

Author information

Authors and Affiliations


Corresponding author

Correspondence to Tomoyuki Takabatake.

Additional information

Publisher's Note

Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Takabatake, T., St-Germain, P., Nistor, I. et al. Numerical modelling of coastal inundation from Cascadia Subduction Zone tsunamis and implications for coastal communities on western Vancouver Island, Canada. Nat Hazards 98, 267–291 (2019).

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: