“Events and failures are our only means for making policy changes”: learning in disaster and emergency management policies in Manitoba, Canada

Natural Hazards volume 98, pages137–162(2019)Cite this article

Abstract

The Canadian Province of Manitoba has experienced many severe floods and other natural disasters, and in response municipal, provincial, and federal governments have developed various disaster and emergency management (DEM) policies and programs over the years to protect and preserve lives and resources. In this context, the present study examined how various disaster management institutions and policies in Manitoba have changed over the years, drawing insights from the existing literature. Framing devices employed included Birkland’s policy change and learning framework, Peter May’s categorization of policy learning, and other social learning literature. A total of 21 key informant interviews (KIIs), comprising 3 senior provincial political leaders, 10 senior bureaucrats, and 8 municipal emergency coordinators, were conducted to collect primary data. Our findings reveal that significant policy changes were made in response to events such as the droughts of the 1930s; the floods of 1950, 1966, 1997, and 2011; and the wildfires of 1989. However, these were largely “reactive” initiatives driven by “top-down” decision-making processes. While natural as well as technological disasters [such as the 1979 Mississauga (Ontario) train derailment and 1984 Bhopal (India) chemical plant disaster] led to the successful implementation of institutional learning provisions within Manitoba DEM policy, the achievement of similar provisions for responding to climate change and other emerging threats has been impeded by numerous barriers such as a lack of political will and/or financial constraints.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in to check access.

Access options

Buy single article

Instant access to the full article PDF.

US$ 39.95

Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Fig. 1

References

  1. Albright EA, Crow DA (2015) Learning processes, public and stakeholder engagement: analyzing responses to Colorado’s extreme flood events of 2013. Urban Clim 14:79–93. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.uclim.2015.06.008

    Article  Google Scholar 

  2. Angeler DG, Allen CR, Garmestani AS et al (2016) Panarchy use in environmental science for risk and resilience planning. Environ Syst Decis 36:225–228. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10669-016-9605-6

    Article  Google Scholar 

  3. Aradau C, Van Munster R (2012) The time/space of preparedness: anticipating the “next terrorist attack”. Sp Cult 15:98–109. https://doi.org/10.1177/1206331211430015

    Article  Google Scholar 

  4. Arbuthnot K, Schmutz JK (2013) Saskatchewan notes-PFRA community pastures: history and drama of a prairie commons. Canadian Centre for Policy Alternatives, Regina, Saskatchewan, Canada. Retrieved from https://www.policyalternatives.ca/publications/reports/sasknotes-pfra-community-pastures. Accessed 14 Nov 2017

  5. Argyris C (1977) Double loop learning in organizations. Harv Bus Rev 55:115–125. https://doi.org/10.1007/BF02013415

    Google Scholar 

  6. Barley SR, Tolbert PS (1997) Institutionalization and structuration: Studying the links between action and institution. Organ Stud 18:93–117

    Article  Google Scholar 

  7. Bateson G (1972) Steps to an ecology of mind: collected essays in anthropology, psychiatry, evolution, and epistemiology. Intertext Books, London

    Google Scholar 

  8. Beland D (2007) Ideas and institutional change in social security: conversion, layering, and policy drift. Soc Sci Q 88(1):20–38. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1540-6237.2007.00444.x

    Article  Google Scholar 

  9. Berkes F (2007) Understanding uncertainty and reducing vulnerability: lessons from resilience thinking. Nat Hazards 41:283–295. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11069-006-9036-7

    Article  Google Scholar 

  10. Berkes F, Ross H (2013) Community resilience: toward an integrated approach. Soc Nat Resour 26:5–20. https://doi.org/10.1080/08941920.2012.736605

    Article  Google Scholar 

  11. Berkes F, Ross H (2016) Panarchy and community resilience: sustainability science and policy implications. Environ Sci Policy 61:185–193. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.envsci.2016.04.004

    Article  Google Scholar 

  12. Birkland TA (2009) Disasters, lessons learned, and fantasy documents. J Conting Crisis Manage 17:146–156. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1468-5973.2009.00575.x

    Article  Google Scholar 

  13. Brody SD, Zahran S, Highfield WE et al (2009) Policy learning for flood mitigation: a longitudinal assessment of the community rating system in Florida. Risk Anal 29:912–929. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1539-6924.2009.01210.x

    Article  Google Scholar 

  14. Bumsted JM (1987) Developing a Canadian disaster relief policy: the 1950 Manitoba flood. Can Hist Rev 68:347–373

    Article  Google Scholar 

  15. Burtch AP (2009) If we are attacked, let us be prepared: Canada and the failure of civil defence, 1945–1963. Unpublished doctoral dissertation, Carlton University, Ottawa

  16. Burton I, Kates RW, White GF (1993) The environment as hazard, 2nd edn. The Guilford Press, New York

    Google Scholar 

  17. Childs A (2011) Environmental learning: insight from research into the student experience. Environ Educ Res 17(3):429–431. https://doi.org/10.1080/13504622.2010.548157

    Article  Google Scholar 

  18. Choudhury MUI (2016) Wetland-community resilience to flash flood hazards (Bonna) in Sunamganj district, Bangladesh. Unpublished Masters thesis, University of Manitoba, Winnipeg. Retrieved from http://hdl.handle.net/1993/30998. Accessed 14 Nov 2017

  19. Choudhury MUI, Haque CE (2018) Interpretations of resilience and change and the catalytic roles of media: a case of Canadian daily newspaper discourse on natural disasters. Environ Manag 61:236–248. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00267-017-0980-7

    Article  Google Scholar 

  20. DeLeo RA (2010) Anticipatory-conjectural policy problems: a case study of the avian influenza. Risk Hazards Crisis Public Policy 1:144–181. https://doi.org/10.2202/1944-4079.1002

    Article  Google Scholar 

  21. DeLeo RA (2017) Anticipatory policymaking in global venues: policy change, adaptation, and the UNFCCC. Futures 92:39–47. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.futures.2016.09.001

    Article  Google Scholar 

  22. Mileti DS, Drabek, TE, Hass JE (1975) Human systems in extreme environments: a sociological perspective. Program on technology, environment and man (Monograph #21). Institute of Behavioral Sciences, University of Colorado, Boulder

  23. Dunlop CA (2017) Policy learning and policy failure: definitions, dimensions and intersections. Policy Polit 45:3–18. https://doi.org/10.1332/030557316X14824871742750

    Article  Google Scholar 

  24. Elliott D, Macpherson A (2010) Policy and practice: recursive learning from crisis. Group Organ Manag 35:572–605. https://doi.org/10.1177/1059601110383406

    Article  Google Scholar 

  25. Epp D, Haque CE, Peers B (1998) Emergency preparedness and First Nation Communities. Westarc Group Inc., Brandon, Manitoba, Canada

    Google Scholar 

  26. Etkin D (1999) Risk transference and related trends: driving forces towards more mega-disasters. Global Environ Change Part B Environ Hazards 1:69–75. https://doi.org/10.3763/ehaz.1999.0109

    Article  Google Scholar 

  27. Etkin D, Haque CE, Brooks GR (2003) An assessment of natural hazards and disasters in Canada. Springer, Dordrecht

    Google Scholar 

  28. Fazey I, Carmen E, Chapin F et al (2018) Community resilience for a 1.5°C world. Curr Opin Environ Sustain 31:30–40. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cosust.2017.12.006

    Article  Google Scholar 

  29. Ferrier N, Haque CE (2003) Hazards risk assessment methodology for emergency managers: a standardized framework for application. Nat Hazards 28:271–290. https://doi.org/10.1023/A:1022986226340

    Article  Google Scholar 

  30. Folke C, Carpenter SR, Walker B et al (2010) Resilience thinking: integrating resilience, adaptability and transformability. Ecol Soc 15(4):20 (online). http://www.ecologyandsociety.org/vol15/iss4/art20. Accessed 16 Dec 2017

  31. Gibbs M, Hawkins-Bowman P, Newbury RW (1999) Review of red river floodplain management policies and programs. A report presented to the flood strategies subgroup of the Red River Basin task force of the international joint commission. Slmcleod Consulting and Brian Wilkes and Associates. http://www.ijc.org/rel/pdf/floodplain.pdf. Accessed 20 Oct 2017

  32. Gidley JM (2016) Understanding the breadth of futures studies through a dialogue with climate change. World Future Rev 8:24–38. https://doi.org/10.1177/1946756715627369

    Article  Google Scholar 

  33. Gidley JM, Fien J, Smith JA et al (2009) Participatory futures methods: towards adaptability and resilience in climate-vulnerable communities. Environ Policy Gov 19:427–440. https://doi.org/10.1002/eet.524

    Article  Google Scholar 

  34. Government of Manitoba (2013) Manitoba 2011 Flood review task force report. Report to the Minister of Infrastructure and Transportation. Accessed at https://www.gov.mb.ca/asset_library/en/2011flood/flood_review_task_force_report.pdf. Accessed 10 Oct 2017

  35. Government of Manitoba (2014) Flood fighting in Manitoba. Retrieved from http://www.gov.mb.ca/flooding/fighting/index.html. Accessed 10 Dec 2014

  36. Government of Manitoba (2018a) Manitoba laws-S.M. 1991, c.28. The emergency measures amendment and consequential amendments act. Winnipeg, Manitoba. Accessed 23 Aug 2018. https://web2.gov.mb.ca/laws/statutes/1997/c02897e.php#8

  37. Government of Manitoba (2018b) Manitoba laws: consolidated regulations of Manitoba: Manitoba Infrastructure, Winnipeg, Manitoba. Accessed on 23 Aug 2018. https://web2.gov.mb.ca/laws/regs/index.php?min=J

  38. Hacker JS (2004) Review article: dismantling the health care state? Political institutions, public policies and the comparative politics of health reform. Br J Polit Sci 34:693–724. https://doi.org/10.1017/S0007123404000250

    Article  Google Scholar 

  39. Halliday R and Associates (2009) How are we living with the Red?. Saskatoon, Sasketchewan

    Google Scholar 

  40. Haque CE (1996) Population of Manitoba: patterns and trends. In: Welsted J, Everitt J, Stadel C (eds) The geography of Manitoba. The University of Manitoba Press, Winnipeg, pp 108–124

    Google Scholar 

  41. Haque CE (2000) Risk assessment, emergency preparedness and response to hazards: the case of the 1997 Red River Valley flood, Canada. Nat Hazards 21:225–245. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-94-017-2386-2_8

    Article  Google Scholar 

  42. Healy A, Malhotra N (2009) Myopic voters and natural disaster policy. Am Polit Sci Rev 103:387–406. https://doi.org/10.1017/S0003055409990104

    Article  Google Scholar 

  43. Henstra D (2006) Evaluating and explaining local emergency management policies in Ontario. Paper presented at the annual meeting of the Canadian political science association. York University, Toronto, 1–3 June 2006

  44. Henstra D (2011) The dynamics of policy change: a longitudinal analysis of emergency management in Ontario, 1950–2010. J Policy Hist 23:399–428. https://doi.org/10.1017/S0898030611000169

    Article  Google Scholar 

  45. Hirsch KG (1991) A chronological overview of the 1989 fire season in Manitoba. For Chron 67(4):358–365. https://doi.org/10.5558/tfc67358-4

    Article  Google Scholar 

  46. Hirsch KG, Fuglem P (2006) Canadian wildland fire strategy: background synthesis, analyses, and perspectives. Natural Resources Canada, Ottawa, Canada

    Google Scholar 

  47. Hoverman S, Ross H, Chan T, Powell B (2011) Social learning through participatory integrated catchment risk assessment in the Solomon Islands. Ecol Soc 16(2):17 (online). http://www.ecologyandsociety.org/vol16/iss2/art17/

  48. IJC (International Joint Commission) (1997) Red River flooding, short-term measures: interim report to the International Red River Basin Task Force to the International Joint Commission. IJC, Ottawa, Canada and Washington DC, USA

    Google Scholar 

  49. IPCC (2013) Climate change 2013: the physical science basis. In: Stocker TF, Qin D, Plattner G-K et al (eds) Contribution of working group I to the fifth assessment report of the intergovernmental panel on climate change. Cambridge University Press, Cambridge

    Google Scholar 

  50. IPCC (2014) Summary for policymakers. In: Field CB, Barros VR, Dokken DJ et al (eds) Climate Change 2014: Impacts, adaptation, and vulnerability. Part A: Global and sectoral aspects. Contribution of Working Group II to the Fifth Assessment Report of the Intergovernmental Panel on Climate Change. Cambridge University Press, Cambridge

    Google Scholar 

  51. IVEY Energy Policy and Management Centre (2018) The Paris agreement on climate change: an overview and implications for Canada. Policy brief, March 2018. IVEY Business School, Western University, London, Ontario, Canada. Retrieved from https://www.ivey.uwo.ca/cmsmedia/3780635/iveyenergycentre_parisagreement_march1.pdf. Accessed 25 Jan 2018

  52. Johannessen Å, Hahn T (2013) Social learning towards a more adaptive paradigm? Reducing flood risk in Kristianstad municipality, Sweden. Glob Environ Chang 23:372–381. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.gloenvcha.2012.07.009

    Article  Google Scholar 

  53. Jones RL (1992) Canadian disasters: an historical survey. Nat Hazards 5(1):43–51. https://doi.org/10.1007/BF00127138

    Article  Google Scholar 

  54. Keen M, Brown VA, Dyball R (2005) Social learning in environmental management: towards a sustainable future. Earthscan, London

    Google Scholar 

  55. KGS Group (2001) Flood protection studies for Winnipeg. Report prepared for the governments of Canada, Manitoba and Winnipeg. KGS Group, Winnipeg

    Google Scholar 

  56. Khan MR, Rahman MA (2007) Partnership approach to disaster management in Bangladesh: a critical policy assessment. Nat Hazards 41:359–378. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11069-006-9040y

    Article  Google Scholar 

  57. Krasny ME, Plummer LC (2013) Resilience in social-ecological systems: the role of learning and education. Routledge, London

    Google Scholar 

  58. Krasny ME, Lundholm C, Plummer R (2010) Environmental education, resilience, and learning: reflection and moving forward. Environ Educ Res 16(5–6):665–672. https://doi.org/10.1080/13504622.2010.505445

    Article  Google Scholar 

  59. Lee E, Krasny ME (2015) The role of social learning for social-ecological systems in Korean village groves restoration. Ecol Soc 20(1):42. https://doi.org/10.5751/ES-07289-200142

    Article  Google Scholar 

  60. Lehr JC (1996) Settlement: the making of landscape. In: Welsted J, Everitt J, Stadel C (eds) The geography of Manitoba. The University of Manitoba Press, Winnipeg, pp 92–107

    Google Scholar 

  61. Lehr J, Selwood HJ (eds) (1998) Prarie perspectives: geographical essays. Department of Geography, University of Winnipeg, Winnipeg

    Google Scholar 

  62. Lindsay J (2014) The power to react: review and discussion of Canada’s emergency measures legislation. Int J Hum Rights 18:159–177. https://doi.org/10.1080/13642987.2014.889392

    Article  Google Scholar 

  63. Liu J, Dietz T, Carpenter SR et al (2007) Complexity of coupled human and natural systems. Science 317(80):1513–1516. https://doi.org/10.1126/science.1144004

    Article  Google Scholar 

  64. Löf A (2010) Exploring adaptability through learning layers and learning loops. Environ Educ Res 16:529–543. https://doi.org/10.1080/13504622.2010.505429

    Article  Google Scholar 

  65. Maciunas S, Saint-Geniès de GL (2018) The evolution of Canada’s international and domestic climate policy: from divergence to consistency? Paper No. 21. Centre for International Governance Innovation, Waterloo, ON

  66. Mahmud KH (2015) Community vulnerability and resilience to floods and prospects of enhancing it by the HAZUS model, Unpublished master’s thesis, University of Manitoba, Winnipeg. Retrieved from http://hdl.handle.net/1993/30799. Accessed 20 Oct 2017

  67. Manitoba Clean Environment Commission (2005) Annual report 2004–2005. Accessed 20 Dec 2017. Web link http://www.cecmanitoba.ca/resource/reports/Annual-Reports2004-2005.pdf

  68. Manitoba Hydro (2015) Manitoba hydro climate change report: fiscal year 2014–15. Winnipeg. Retrieved from https://www.hydro.mb.ca/environment/pdf/climate_change_report_2014_15.pdf. Accessed 27 Nov 2017

  69. Lake Manitoba/Lake St. Martin Regulation Review (2013) Finding the right balance: a report to the minister of infrastructure and transportation, vol. 1 main report. Accessed 6 Nov 2017. Web link https://www.gov.mb.ca/asset_library/en/2011flood/regulation_review_report.pdf

  70. May PJ (1992) Policy learning and failure. J Public Policy 12:331–354

    Article  Google Scholar 

  71. May PJ (2015) Implementation failures revisited: policy regime perspectives. Public Policy Admin 30(3–4):277–299. https://doi.org/10.1177/095207671456150

    Article  Google Scholar 

  72. Milly PCD, Wetherald RT, Dunne KA, Delworth TL (2002) Increasing risk of great floods in a changing climate. Nature 415:514–517. https://doi.org/10.1038/415514a

    Article  Google Scholar 

  73. Nakamura I, Llasat MC (2017) Policy and systems of flood risk management: a comparative study between Japan and Spain. Nat Hazards 87:919–943. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11069-017-2802-x

    Article  Google Scholar 

  74. Nelson D (2018) 10 Canadian provinces and 3 Canadian territories: map and list. Retrieved from https://sciencetrends.com/10-canadian-provinces-3-territories-map-list/. Accessed 27 Jan 2018

  75. Ng S (2016) Governance beyond the government: responding to a reactionary flood governance regime in Ayutthaya, Thailand. Habitat Int 52:11–19. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.habitatint.2015.08.029

    Article  Google Scholar 

  76. Ngar-yin Mah D, Hills PR (2014) Policy learning and central-local relations: a case study of the pricing policies for wind energy in China (from 1994 to 2009). Environ Policy Gov 24:216–232. https://doi.org/10.1002/eet.1639

    Article  Google Scholar 

  77. O’Brien G, O’Keefe P, Gadema Z, Swords J (2010) Approaching disaster management through social learning. Disaster Prev Manag Int J 19:498–508. https://doi.org/10.1108/09653561011070402

    Article  Google Scholar 

  78. O’Donovan K (2017) Policy failure and policy learning: examining the conditions of learning after disaster. Rev Policy Res 34:537–558. https://doi.org/10.1111/ropr.12239

    Article  Google Scholar 

  79. Pahl-Wostl C, Mostert E, Tàbara D (2008). The growing importance of social learning in water resources management and sustainability science. Ecol Soc 13(1):24 (online). http://www.ecologyandsociety.org/vol13/iss1/art24/

  80. Province of Manitoba (2018). A made-in-Manitoba climate and green plan. Retrieved from http://www.gov.mb.ca/climateandgreenplan/index.html. Accessed 30 Jan 2018

  81. Public Safety Canada (2018). Canadian disaster database. Ottawa, Canada. Retrieved from http://cdd.publicsafety.gc.ca/

  82. Rankin M (1990) Dangerous moves: the law responds to the transportation of dangerous goods. Univ BC Law Rev 24:191–227

    Google Scholar 

  83. Rashid H (2011) Interpreting flood disasters and flood hazard perceptions from newspaper discourse: tale of two floods in the Red River valley, Manitoba, Canada. Appl Geogr 31:35–45. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.apgeog.2010.03.010

    Article  Google Scholar 

  84. Rayner J, Howlett M (2009) Introduction: understanding integrated policy strategies and their evolution. Policy Soc 28:99–109. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.polsoc.2009.05.001

    Article  Google Scholar 

  85. Rickinson M, Lundholm C, Hopwood N (2009) Environmental learning: insights from research into the student experience. Springer, Dordrecht

    Google Scholar 

  86. Robinson D, Cruikshank K (2007) Hurricane hazel: disaster relief, politics, and society in Canada, 1954–55. Journal of Canadian Studies 40(1):37–70

    Article  Google Scholar 

  87. Schreyögg G (2002) Organisationaler Wandel und organisationales Lernen. Doppelkurseinheit. Lehrbrief für Kurseinheit “Organisation IV”, FernUniversität in Hagen

  88. Scolobig A, Linnerooth-Bayer J, Pelling M (2014) Drivers of transformative change in the Italian landslide risk policy. Int J Disaster Risk Reduct 9:124–136. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijdrr.2014.05.003

    Article  Google Scholar 

  89. Shrubsole D (2001) The cultures of flood management in Canada: insights from the 1997 Red River experience. Can Water Resour J 26(4):461–479. https://doi.org/10.4296/cwrj2604461

    Article  Google Scholar 

  90. Slovic P, Fischhoff E, Lichtenstein S (1979) Rating the risks. Environments 2(3):14–39. https://doi.org/10.1080/00139157.1979.9933091

    Google Scholar 

  91. Smith K (2009) Environmental hazards: assessing risk and reducing disaster, 6th edn. Routledge, London

    Google Scholar 

  92. Sterling S (2010) Learning for resilience, or the resilient learner? Towards a necessary reconciliation in a paradigm of sustainable education. Environ Educ Res 16(5–6):511–528. https://doi.org/10.1080/13504622.2010.505427

    Article  Google Scholar 

  93. Streeck W, Thelen K (2005) Introduction: institutional change in advancing political economies. In: Streeck W, Thelen K (eds) Beyon continuity: institutional change in advancing political economies. Oxford University Press, Oxford, pp 1–39

    Google Scholar 

  94. Thiele LP (2000) Limiting risks: environmental ethics as a policy primer. Policy Stud J 28:540–557. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1541-0072.2000.tb02047.x

    Article  Google Scholar 

  95. Thompson S (2015) Flooding of First Nations and environmental justice in Manitoba: case studies of the impacts of the 2011 flood and hydro development in Manitoba. Man Law J 38:220

    Google Scholar 

  96. Torjman S (2005) What is policy? Caledon Inst Soc Policy 1–20

  97. Voss M, Wagner K (2010) Learning from (small) disasters. Nat Hazards 55:657–669

    Article  Google Scholar 

  98. Wang GL (2013) Lessons learned from protective measures associated with the 2010 Zhouqu debris flow disaster in China. Nat Hazards 69:1835–1847. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11069-013-0772-1

    Article  Google Scholar 

  99. Webler T, Kastenholz H, Renn O (1995) Public participation in impact assessment: a social learning perspective. Environ Impact Assess Rev 15:443–463. https://doi.org/10.1016/0195-9255(95)00043-E

    Article  Google Scholar 

  100. Wenger E (1998) Communities of practice: learning, meaning, and identity. Cambridge University Press, New York

    Google Scholar 

  101. Wenger E (2006) Communities of practice: a brief introduction. Available at www.ewenger.com/research. Accessed 10 Oct 2017

  102. Wolensky RP, Wolnesky KC (1990) Local government’s problem with disaster management: a literature review and structural analysis. Policy Stud Rev 9(4):703–725

    Article  Google Scholar 

  103. Yin RK (2003) Case study research: design and methods, 3rd edn. Sage Publications, Thousand Oaks

    Google Scholar 

  104. Zevenbergen C, van Herk S, Rijke J, Kabat P, Bloemen P, Ashley R, Speers A, Gersonius B, Veerbeek W (2013) Taming global flood disasters: lessons learned from Dutch experience. Nat Hazards 65:1217–1225. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11069-012-0439-3

    Article  Google Scholar 

Download references

Acknowledgements

This research was made possible through funding from the Social Science and Humanities Research Council’s (SSHRC) (Ottawa, Canada) InSight grant (Grant #435-2012-1748) and the Earth Science Division of Natural Resources Canada (Ottawa, Canada) to the first author. Further financial assistance was received from the University of Manitoba through the University of Manitoba Graduate Fellowship (UMGF) to the second author. The authors are grateful to the Manitoba Emergency Measures Organization and the Manitoba Infrastructure department of the Government of Manitoba; Jeremy Angus, Acting Assistant Deputy Minister, Emergency Management and Public Safety Division, Government of Manitoba, for facilitating this research. We are also thankful to all participants from the government departments, NGOs, and municipalities of Manitoba, Canada.

Author information

Affiliations

  1. Natural Resources Institute, University of Manitoba, Winnipeg, R3T 2N2, Canada

    C. Emdad Haque, Mahed-Ul-Islam Choudhury & Md. Sowayib Sikder

Authors
  1. C. Emdad Haque
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  2. Mahed-Ul-Islam Choudhury
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  3. Md. Sowayib Sikder
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

Corresponding author

Correspondence to C. Emdad Haque.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and Permissions

About this article

Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Haque, C.E., Choudhury, MUI. & Sikder, M.S. “Events and failures are our only means for making policy changes”: learning in disaster and emergency management policies in Manitoba, Canada. Nat Hazards 98, 137–162 (2019). https://doi.org/10.1007/s11069-018-3485-7

Download citation

Keywords

  • Emergency and disaster management
  • Flood control
  • Policy formulation and change
  • Institutional learning
  • Social learning
  • Resilience
  • Canada