Skip to main content

Advertisement

SpringerLink
Log in

Synergistic effects of environmental regulations on carbon productivity growth in China’s major industrial sectors

  • Original Paper
  • Published:
Natural Hazards Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

It is crucial that the implementation of environmental regulations have a positive synergistic effect on carbon productivity growth (i.e., environmentally adjusted productivity growth with the consideration of carbon emissions) for China to realize its sustainable development goals because the country is currently under tripartite pressures of economic growth, carbon emissions control, and environmental pollution reduction. This paper investigates the impact of changes in environmental regulation stringency on industrial-level carbon productivity growth in China. Through utilizing the information entropy method, a new index of environmental regulation stringency is established by taking into account the effects of both pollution reduction consequences and pollution reduction measures. In addition, based on the data envelopment analysis method, a Malmquist carbon productivity index is proposed to estimate the industrial carbon productivity growth of 21 major industrial sectors in China’s 30 provinces over 2004–2014. Finally, an econometric regression model is applied to test the synergistic effects of environmental regulations on carbon productivity in China’s major industrial sectors. The results show that (1) a stringent environmental regulation is associated with an increase in overall industrial carbon productivity growth in China; (2) there exist significant pass-through effects in China’s major industrial sectors that technology can transmit effectively from leader to follower; (3) there also exist obvious follow-up effects in China’s major industrial sectors, i.e., the industrial sectors that have larger technological gaps with the leaders catch up faster than others; and (4) the environmental regulations have different effects on industrial sectors with different polluting levels, i.e., there is a positive linear relationship between environmental regulation stringency and industrial-level carbon productivity growth in low-polluting industrial sectors, a parabolic nonlinear relationship between them in high-polluting industrial sectors, and an inverted U-shaped relationship between them in moderate-polluting industrial sectors.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Log in via an institution

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Institutional subscriptions

Fig. 1
Fig. 2
Fig. 3

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  • Ambec S, Cohen M, Elgie S, Lanoie P (2013) The Porter Hypothesis at 20: can environmental regulation enhance innovation and competitiveness? Rev Environ Econ Policy 7(1):2–22

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Bourlès R, Cette G, Lopez J, Mairesse J, Nicoletti G (2013) Do product market regulations in upstream sectors curb productivity growth? panel data evidence for OECD countries. Rev Econ Stat 95(5):1750–1768

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • BP (2017) Statistical review of world energy. http://bp.com/statisticalreview. Accessed 20 Dec 2017

  • Caves DW, Christensen LR, Diewert WE (1982) The economic theory of index numbers and the measurement of input, output, and productivity. Econometrica 50(6):1393–1414

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Chen Y, Li XP (2006) Construction of panel data of china’s industries and evaluation on it’s capital deepening: 1985–2003. J Quant Tech Econ 23(10):57–68 (in Chinese)

    Google Scholar 

  • Färe R, Grosskopf S, Lindgren B, Roos P (1992) Productivity changes in Swedish pharmacies 1980–1989: a non-parametric Malmquist approach. J Prod Anal 3(1–2):85–101

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Färe R, Grosskopf S, Lovell CAK (1994) Production frontiers. Cambridge University Press, Cambridge, pp 58–72

    Google Scholar 

  • Färe R, Grosskopf S, Norris M (1997) Productivity growth, technical progress, and efficiency change in industrialized countries: reply. Am Econ Rev 87(5):1040–1044

    Google Scholar 

  • Gordon RJ (2012) Is U.S. economic growth over? Faltering innovation confronts the six headwinds. NBER Working Papers, 4

  • He K (2014) Environmental regulation intensity, industry heterogeneity and china’s industrial total factor of carbon emission performance. Forum Sci Technol China 20(4):62–67 (in Chinese)

    Google Scholar 

  • Jaffe AB, Palmer K (1997) Environmental regulation and innovation: a panel data study. Rev Econ Stat 79(4):610–619

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Levinson A, Taylor MS (2008) Unmasking the pollution haven effect. Int Econ Rev 49(1):223–254

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Li XP, Lu XX (2010) International trade, pollution industry transfer and CO2, emissions in Chinese industries. China Econ 3:89–99 (in Chinese)

    Google Scholar 

  • Li XP, Wang SB, Zhou JS (2014) Changes of carbon productivity and the evolution of export sophistication: 1992–2009. J Quant Tech Econ 9:22–39 (in Chinese)

    Google Scholar 

  • OECD (2010) Linkages between Environmental Policy and Competitiveness, OECD Environment Working Paper No. 13

  • Palmer K, Portney P (1995) Tightening environmental standards: the benefit-cost or the no-cost paradigm? J Econ Perspect 9(4):119–132

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Pan JH, Zhuang G, Zheng Y (2010) Clarification of the concept of low-carbon economy and analysis of its core elements. Int Econ Rev 4:88–101 (in Chinese)

    Google Scholar 

  • Porter ME (1991) America’s green strategy. Scientific American, New York, pp 193–246

    Google Scholar 

  • Porter ME, van der Linde C (1995) Toward a new conception of the environment–competitiveness relationship. J Econ Perspect 94:97–118

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Rajan RG, Zingales L (1998) Financial dependence and growth. Soc Sci Electron Publ 88(3):559–586

    Google Scholar 

  • Tu Z (2008) The coordination of industrial growth with environment and resource. Econ Res J 2:93–105 (in Chinese)

    Google Scholar 

  • Wang J, Liu B (2014) Environmental regulation and enterprises’ TFP—an empirical analysis based on china’s industrial enterprises data. China Ind Econ 3:44–56 (in Chinese)

    Google Scholar 

  • Wang K, Wei YM (2016) Sources of energy productivity change in China during 1997–2012: a decomposition analysis based on the Luenberger productivity indicator. Energy Econ 54:50–59

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Wang B, Wu Y, Yan P (2010) Environmental efficiency and environmental total factor productivity growth in china’s regional economies. Econ Res J 5:95–109 (in Chinese)

    Google Scholar 

  • Wang H, Wang SQ, University H, Office D (2015) A study on dynamic evolution of industrial carbon emissions performance and its factors in china. China Popul Resour Environ 25(9):29–36 (in Chinese)

    Google Scholar 

  • Wang K, Wei YM, Huang Z (2016a) Potential gains from carbon emissions trading in China: a DEA based estimation on abatement cost savings. OMEGA-Int J Manag Sci 63:48–59

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Wang K, Xian Y, Zhang J, Li Y, Che L (2016b) Potential carbon emission abatement cost recovery from carbon emission trading in China: an estimation of industry sector. J Model Manag 11(3):842–854

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Wang K, Zhang X, Yu X, Wei YM, Wang B (2016c) Emissions trading and abatement cost savings: An estimation of China’s thermal power industry. Renew Sustain Energy Rev 65:1005–1017

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Wang K, Mi Z, Wei YM (2018a) Will pollution taxes improve joint ecological and economic efficiency of thermal power industry in China? A DEA-based materials balance approach. J Ind Ecol. https://doi.org/10.1111/jiec.12740

  • Wang K, Wei YM, Huang Z (2018b) Environmental efficiency and abatement efficiency measurements of China’s thermal power industry: a data envelopment analysis based materials balance approach. Eur J Oper Res 269(1):35–50

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Xian Y, Wang K, Shi X, Zhang C, Wei YM, Huang Z (2018) Carbon emissions intensity reduction target for China’s power industry: an efficiency and productivity perspective. J Clean Prod 197:1022–1034

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Zhang C, Lu Y, Guo L et al (2011) The intensity of environmental regulation and technological progress of production. Econ Res J 2:113–124 (in Chinese)

    Google Scholar 

  • Zhang W, Zhu Q, Li H (2013) Energy use, carbon emission and china’s total factor carbon emission reduction efficiency. Econ Res J 10:138–150 (in Chinese)

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Acknowledgement

We gratefully acknowledge the financial supports from the National Natural Science Foundation of China (Grant Nos. 71471018, 71521002, 71761137001), the Fok Ying Tung Education Foundation (161076), the Social Science Foundation of Beijing (Grant No. 16JDGLB013), the Joint Development Program of Beijing Municipal Commission of Education, the International Clean Energy Talent Program of Chinese Scholarship Council, and the National Key R&D Program (Grant No. 2016YFA0602603).

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

  1. Center for Energy and Environmental Policy Research & School of Management and Economics, Beijing Institute of Technology, Beijing, 100081, China

    Ge Gao, Ke Wang & Yi-Ming Wei

  2. Sustainable Development Research Institute for Economy and Society of Beijing, Beijing, 100081, China

    Ke Wang & Yi-Ming Wei

  3. Beijing Key Lab of Energy Economics and Environmental Management, Beijing, 100081, China

    Ke Wang & Yi-Ming Wei

  4. School of Chemical Science and Engineering, Royal Institute of Technology, Teknikringen 42, 100 44, Stockholm, Sweden

    Chi Zhang

Authors
  1. Ge Gao
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  2. Ke Wang
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  3. Chi Zhang
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  4. Yi-Ming Wei
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Ke Wang.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Gao, G., Wang, K., Zhang, C. et al. Synergistic effects of environmental regulations on carbon productivity growth in China’s major industrial sectors. Nat Hazards 95, 55–72 (2019). https://doi.org/10.1007/s11069-018-3446-1

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s11069-018-3446-1

Keywords

Search

Navigation