Skip to main content

Advertisement

Log in

Ecological efficiency of coal cities in China: evaluation and influence factors

  • Original Paper
  • Published:
Natural Hazards Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

China’s energy consumption and environmental problems are becoming increasingly urgent issues as the nation’s economy continues its rapid development. A further investigation of ecological efficiency would assist the healthy development of China’s “coal cities.” In this study, the stochastic frontier analysis based on the assumptions of the trans-log production function is employed to assess the ecological efficiency and potential promotion of 28 typical coal cities in China. The Tobit method is used to analyze the influence factors in ecological efficiency. The results show that the ecological efficiency of coal cities is not high but increased overall from 2007 to 2014. In regional terms, coal cities in the east have the highest ecological efficiency while coal cities in the west have the highest potential promotion; coal cities in the northeast have the lowest ecological efficiency and potential promotion. Moreover, ownership structure and environmental regulations have significant inhibitory effects on the improvement in ecological efficiency, while marketization level and technological innovation have significantly positive impacts.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Fig. 1
Fig. 2
Fig. 3
Fig. 4
Fig. 5
Fig. 6

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  • Battese GE, Coelli TJ (1992) Frontier production functions, technical efficiency and panel data: with application to paddy farmers in India. J Prod Anal 3(1–2):153–169

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Bi X, Shan S, Xue Y (2012) Assessing ecological efficiency of Zhejiang Province-from the perspective of circular economy innovation. In: International Symposium on Management of Technology, pp 614–618

  • Chen Y, Liu B, Shen Y, Wang X (2016) The energy efficiency of china’s regional construction industry based on the three-stage DEA model and the DEA-DA model. Ksce J Civil Eng 20(1):34–47

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Cui W, Zhu Z, Feng J, Zou W (2015) Urban construction land deployment based on ecological efficiency Malmquist index. Metall Min Ind 7(8):114–122

    Google Scholar 

  • Du L, Hanley A, Zhang N (2016) Environmental technical efficiency, technology gap and shadow price of coal-fueled power plants in china: a parametric meta-frontier analysis. Resour Energy Econ 43:14–32

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Fan Y, Bai B, Qiao Q, Kang P, Zhang Y, Guo J (2017) Study on eco-efficiency of industrial parks in china based on data envelopment analysis. J Environ Manag 192:107–115

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Jia YP, Liu RZ (2012) Study of the energy and environmental efficiency of the Chinese economy based on a DEA model. Procedia Environ Sci 13(10):2256–2263

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Lampe HW, Hilgers D (2015) Trajectories of efficiency measurement: a bibliometric analysis of DEA and SFA. Eur J Oper Res 240(1):1–21

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Middelaar CEV, Berentsen PBM, Dolman MA, Boer IJMD (2011) Eco-efficiency in the production chain of Dutch semi-hard cheese. Livest Sci 139(1–2):91–99

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Molinos-Senante M, Gémar G, Gómez T, Caballero R, Sala-Garrido R (2016) Eco-efficiency assessment of wastewater treatment plants using a weighted Russell directional distance model. J Clean Prod 137:1066–1075

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Robaina-Alves M, Moutinho V, Macedo P (2015) A new frontier approach to model the eco-efficiency in European countries. J Clean Prod 103:562–573

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Sproedt A, Plehn J, Schönsleben P, Herrmann C (2015) A simulation-based decision support for eco-efficiency improvements in production systems. J Clean Prod 105(3):389–405

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Storto CL (2016) Ecological efficiency based ranking of cities: a combined DEA cross-efficiency and Shannon’s entropy method. Sustainability 8(2):1–29

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Svoboda N, Taube F, Kluss C, Wienforth B, Sieling K, Hasler M et al (2015) Ecological efficiency of maize-based cropping systems for biogas production. Bioenergy Res 8(4):1621–1635

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Wang ZH, Zeng HL, Wei YM, Zhang YX (2012) Regional total factor energy efficiency: an empirical analysis of industrial sector in china. Appl Energy 97(9):115–123

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Wang D, Li J, Wang Y, Wan K, Song X, Liu Y (2017a) Comparing the vulnerability of different coal industrial symbiosis networks under economic fluctuations. J Clean Prod 149:636–652

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Wang D, Zheng J, Song X, Ma G, Liu Y (2017b) Assessing industrial ecosystem vulnerability in the coal mining area under economic fluctuations. J Clean Prod 142:4019–4031

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Wang D, Wan K, Song X (2018a) Quota allocation of coal overcapacity reduction among provinces in china. Energy Policy 116:170–181

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Wang D, Wang Y, Song X, Liu Y (2018b) Coal overcapacity in china: multiscale analysis and prediction. Energy Econ 70:244–257

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Wenbo L (2011) Comprehensive evaluation research on circular economic performance of eco-industrial parks. Energy Procedia 5:1682–1688

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Wu Y, Chen Z, Xia P (2018) An extended DEA-based measurement for eco-efficiency from the viewpoint of limited preparation. J Clean Prod 195:721–733

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Zhou C, Shi C, Wang S, Zhang G (2017) Estimation of eco-efficiency and its influencing factors in Guangdong province based on super-SBM and panel regression models. Ecol Ind 86:67–80

    Article  Google Scholar 

Download references

Acknowledgements

This research is supported by the National Natural Science Foundation of China (No. 71573252) and the Fundamental Research Funds for the Central Universities (No. 2017XKQY085).

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Delu Wang.

Electronic supplementary material

Below is the link to the electronic supplementary material.

Supplementary material 1 (DOCX 142 kb)

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Wang, D., Wan, K. & Yang, J. Ecological efficiency of coal cities in China: evaluation and influence factors. Nat Hazards 95, 363–379 (2019). https://doi.org/10.1007/s11069-018-3441-6

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s11069-018-3441-6

Keywords

Navigation