Skip to main content
Log in

Rainfall threshold determination for flash flood warning in mountainous catchments with consideration of antecedent soil moisture and rainfall pattern

  • Original Paper
  • Published:
Natural Hazards Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

Flash flood disaster is a prominent issue threatening public safety and social development throughout the world, especially in mountainous regions. Rainfall threshold is a widely accepted alternative to hydrological forecasting for flash flood warning due to the short response time and limited observations of flash flood events. However, determination of rainfall threshold is still very complicated due to multiple impact factors, particular for antecedent soil moisture and rainfall patterns. In this study, hydrological simulation approach (i.e., China Flash Flood-Hydrological Modeling System: CNFF-HMS) was adopted to capture the flash flood processes. Multiple scenarios were further designed with consideration of antecedent soil moisture and rainfall temporal patterns to determine the possible assemble of rainfall thresholds by driving the CNFF-HMS. Moreover, their effects on rainfall thresholds were investigated. Three mountainous catchments (Zhong, Balisi and Yu villages) in southern China were selected for case study. Results showed that the model performance of CNFF-HMS was very satisfactory for flash flood simulations in all these catchments, especially for multimodal flood events. Specifically, the relative errors of runoff and peak flow were within ± 20%, the error of time to peak flow was within ± 2 h and the Nash–Sutcliffe efficiency was greater than 0.90 for over 90% of the flash flood events. The rainfall thresholds varied between 93 and 334 mm at Zhong village, between 77 and 246 mm at Balisi village and between 111 and 420 mm at Yu village. Both antecedent soil moistures and rainfall temporal pattern significantly affected the variations of rainfall threshold. Rainfall threshold decreased by 8–38 and 0–42% as soil saturation increased from 0.20 to 0.50 and from 0.20 to 0.80, respectively. The effect of rainfall threshold was the minimum for the decreasing hyetograph (advanced pattern) and the maximum for the increasing hyetograph (delayed pattern), while it was similar for the design hyetograph and triangular hyetograph (intermediate patterns). Moreover, rainfall thresholds with short time spans were more suitable for early flood warning, especially in small rural catchments with humid climatic characteristics. This study was expected to provide insights into flash flood disaster forecasting and early warning in mountainous regions, and scientific references for the implementation of flash flood disaster prevention in China.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Subscribe and save

Springer+ Basic
€32.70 /Month
  • Get 10 units per month
  • Download Article/Chapter or eBook
  • 1 Unit = 1 Article or 1 Chapter
  • Cancel anytime
Subscribe now

Buy Now

Price includes VAT (France)

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Fig. 1
Fig. 2
Fig. 3
Fig. 4
Fig. 5
Fig. 6
Fig. 7
Fig. 8
Fig. 9

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  • Adamovic M, Branger F, Braud I, Kralisch S (2016) Development of a data-driven semi-distributed hydrological model for regional scale catchments prone to Mediterranean flash floods. J Hydrol 541:173–189

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • An J, Zheng FL, Han Y (2014) Effects of rain storm patterns on runoff and sediment yield processes. Soil Sci 179(6):293–303

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • ASCE (1993) Criteria for evaluation of watershed models. J Irrig Drain Eng 119(3):429–442

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Bezak N, Šraj M, Mikoš M (2016) Copula-based IDF curves and empirical rainfall thresholds for flash floods and rainfall-induced landslides. J Hydrol 541:272–284

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Borga M, Anagnostou EN, Bloschl G, Creutin JD (2011) Flash flood forecasting, warning and risk management: the HYDRATE project. Environ Sci Policy 14(7):834–844

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Camarasa-Belmonte AM (2016) Flash floods in Mediterranean ephemeral streams in Valencia Region (Spain). J Hydrol 541:99–115

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Chow VT (1959) Open-channel hydraulics. McGraw-Hill, New York

    Google Scholar 

  • Cunge JA (1969) On the subject of a flood propagation computation method (Muskingum method). J Hydraul Res 7(2):205–230

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • de Zeeuw JW (1973) Hydrograph analysis for areas with mainly groundwater runoff. In: Drainage principle and applications, vol 2, chapter 16, theories of field drainage and watershed runoff. Publication 16. International Institute for Land Reclamation and Improvement (ILRI), Wageningen

  • Douinot A, Roux H, Garambois PA, Larnier K, Labat D, Dartus D (2015) Accounting for rainfall systematic spatial variability in flash flood forecasting. J Hydrol 541:359–370

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Du JK, Xie H, Hu YJ, Xu YP, Xu CY (2009) Development and testing of a new storm runoff routing approach based on time variant spatially distributed travel time method. J Hydrol 369(1–2):44–54

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Flanagan DC, Foster GR, Moldenhauer WC (1988) Storm pattern effect on infiltration, runoff, and erosion. Trans ASABE 31(2):414–420

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Flash Flood Early Warning System Reference Guide 2010 (2010) University Corporation for Atmospheric Research

  • Fread D (1993) Chapter 10: flow routing. In: Maidment DR (ed) Handbook of hydrology. McGraw-Hill, New York

    Google Scholar 

  • GB/T 22482-2008 (2008) Standard for hydrological information and hydrological forecasting (in Chinese)

  • Gourley JJ, Erlingis JM, Hong Y, Wells EB (2012) Evaluation of tools used for monitoring and forecasting flash floods in the United States. Weather Forecast 27(1):158–173

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Gourley JJ, Flamig ZL, Hong Y, Howard KW (2014) Evaluation of past, present and future tools for radar-based flash-flood prediction in the USA. Hydrol Sci J 59(7):1377–1389

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Grillakis MG, Koutroulis AG, Komma J, Tsanis IK, Wagner W, Bloschl G (2016) Initial soil moisture effects on flash flood generation-a comparison between basins of contrasting hydro-climatic conditions. J Hydrol 541:206–217

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Hapuarachchi HAP, Wang QJ, Pagano TC (2011) A review of advances in flash flood forecasting. Hydrol Process 25:2771–2784

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • IWHR (Institute of Water Resources and Hydropower Research) (2014) China Flash Flood-Hydrological Modeling System (CNFF-HMS). 2016SR344483, 2016SR344708, 2016SR344187 (in Chinese)

  • Javelle P, Demargne J, Defrance D, Pansu J, Arnaud P (2014) Evaluating flash-flood warnings at ungauged locations using post-event surveys: a case study with the AIGA warning system. Hydrol Sci J 59(7):1390–1402

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Kumar R, Chatterjee AK, Lohani AK, Kumar S, Singh RD (2002) Sensitivity analysis of the GIUH based Clark model for a catchments. Water Resour Manag 16:263–278

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Legates DR, McCabe GJ (1999) Evaluating the use of “goodness-of-fit” measures in hydrologic and hydroclimatic model validation. Water Resour Res 35(1):233–241

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Longobardi A, Villani P, Grayson RB, Western AW (2003) On the relationship between runoff coefficient and catchment initial conditions. Proc Int Congr Model Simul 2:867–872

    Google Scholar 

  • Maidment DR, Olivera F, Calver A, Eatherall A, Fraczek W (1996) Unit hydrograph derived from a spatially distributed velocity field. Hydrol Process 10(6):831–844

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Martina MLV, Todini E, Libralon A (2006) A Bayesian decision approach to rainfall thresholds based flood warning. Hydrol Earth Syst Sci 10(3):413–426

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Miao QH, Yang DW, Yang HB, Li Z (2016) Establishing a rainfall threshold for flash flood warnings in China’s mountainous areas based on a distributed hydrological model. J Hydrol 541:371–386

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Moriasi DN, Arnold JG, Van Liew MW, Bingner RL, Harmel RD, Veith TL (2007) Model evaluation guidelines for systematic quantification of accuracy in watershed simulations. Trans ASABE 50(3):885–900

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Muzik I (1996) Flood modeling with GIS-derived distributed unit hydrograph. Hydrol Process 10:1401–1409

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • NFFDPCP (National Flash Flood Disaster Prevention and Control Program) (2014) Technical requirements of flash flood disaster investigation (in Chinese)

  • Nguyen P, Thorstensen A, Sorooshian S, Hsu K, AghaKouchak A, Sanders B, Koren V, Cui ZT, Smith M (2016) A high resolution coupled hydrologic–hydraulic model (HiResFlood-UCI) for flash flood modeling. J Hydrol 541:401–420

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Nikolopoulos EI, Anagnostou EN, Borga M, Vivoni ER, Papadopoulos A (2011) Sensitivity of a mountain basin flash flood to initial wetness condition and rainfall variability. J Hydrol 402:165–178

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Norbiato D, Borga M, Esposti SD, Gaume E, Anquetin S (2008) Flash flood warning based on rainfall thresholds and soil moisture conditions: an assessment for gauged and ungauged basins. J Hydrol 362(3–4):274–290

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Parsons AJ, Stone PM (2006) Effects of intra-storm variations in rainfall intensity on interrill runoff and erosion. CATENA 67:68–78

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Ramírez JA (2000) Chapter 11: prediction and modeling of flood hydrology and hydraulics. In: Wohl EE (ed) Inland flood hazards: human, riparian and aquatic communities. Cambridge University Press, Cambridge

    Google Scholar 

  • Reed S, Schaake J, Zhang ZY (2007) A distributed hydrologic model and threshold frequency-based method for flash flood forecasting at ungauged locations. J Hydrol 337:402–420

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Sangati M, Borga M, Rabuffetti D, Bechini R (2009) Influence of rainfall and soil properties spatial aggregation on extreme flash flood response modelling: an evaluation based on the Sesia river basin, North Western Italy. Adv Water Resour 32:1090–1106

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • SCS (1985) National Engineering handbook. Section 4 hydrology. Soil Conservation Service, US Department of Agriculture, Washington, DC

    Google Scholar 

  • Špitalar M, Gourley JJ, Lutoff C, Kirstetter PE, Brilly M, Carr N (2014) Analysis of flash flood parameters and human impacts in the US from 2006 to 2012. J Hydrol 519:863–870

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Strauch AM, MacKenzie RA, Giardina CP, Bruland GL (2015) Climate driven changes to rainfall and streamflow patterns in a model tropical island hydrological system. J Hydrol 523:160–169

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • UNEP (2012) Early warning systems: a state of the art analysis and future directions. Division of Early Warning and Assessment (DEWA), United Nations Environment Programme (UNEP), Nairobi

    Google Scholar 

  • Van Steenbergen N, Willems P (2013) Increasing river flood preparedness by real-time warning based on wetness state conditions. J Hydrol 489:227–237

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Vincendon B, Édouard S, Dewaele H, Ducrocq V, Lespinas F, Delrieu G, Anquetin S (2016) Modeling flash floods in southern France for road management purposes. J Hydrol 541:190–205

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Wang WT, Yin SQ, Xie Y, Liu BY, Liu YN (2016) Effects of four storm patterns on soil loss from five soils under natural rainfall. CATENA 141:56–65

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Yang TH, Yang SC, Ho JY, Lin GF, Hwang GD, Lee CS (2015) Flash flood warnings using the ensemble precipitation forecasting technique: a case study on forecasting floods in Taiwan caused by typhoons. J Hydrol 520:367–378

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Zhang ZT (2016) Mountain torrent disaster prevention and control measures and their effects. Water Resour Hydropower Eng 47(1):1–5 (in Chinese)

    Google Scholar 

  • Zhang XC, Norton LD, Hickman M (1997) Rain pattern and soil moisture content effects on Atrazine and Metolachlor losses in runoff. J Environ Qual 26:1539–1547

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Zhang YY, Shao QX, Xia J, Bunn SE, Zuo QT (2011) Changes of flow regimes and precipitation in Huai River Basin in the last half century. Hydrol Process 25(2):246–257

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Zhang YY, Shao QX, Ye AZ, Xing HT, Xia J (2016) Integrated water system simulation by considering hydrological and biogeochemical processes: model development, with parameter sensitivity and autocalibration. Hydrol Earth Syst Sci 20(1):529–553

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Zhao RJ (1984) Watershed hydrological simulation: Xinanjiang model and Shanbei model. Water Resources and Electric Power Press, Beijing (in Chinese)

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Acknowledgements

This study was supported by Key Laboratory of Water Cycle and Related Land Surface Processes, Institute of Geographic Sciences and Natural Resources Research, Chinese Academy of Sciences (No. WL2017002), China National Flash Flood Disaster Prevention and Control Project (126301001000150068), the China Youth Innovation Promotion Association CAS (No. 2014041) and the Program for “Bingwei” Excellent Talents in IGSNRR CAS (No. 2015RC201). Thanks also to the Editor and the anonymous referees for their constructive comments.

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Yongyong Zhang.

Ethics declarations

Conflict of interest

The authors declare that they have no conflict of interest.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Zhai, X., Guo, L., Liu, R. et al. Rainfall threshold determination for flash flood warning in mountainous catchments with consideration of antecedent soil moisture and rainfall pattern. Nat Hazards 94, 605–625 (2018). https://doi.org/10.1007/s11069-018-3404-y

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s11069-018-3404-y

Keywords

Navigation