A historical geomorphological approach to flood hazard management along the shore of an alpine lake (northern Italy)

A Correction to this article is available

This article has been updated


A project to develop a flood hazard management plan along the east shore of Lago Maggiore was carried out. Several municipal territories along a coastal stretch have been analysed, identifying the rate of water rise and the limits of the submerged areas. This study discusses the overall methodological approach and presents the results for Porto Valtravaglia, as a significant case study. The first step was a detailed analysis of historical events to locate the most frequently damaged sites. Thousands of historical documents on past floods were collected, selected and validated, to map the most vulnerable sites. The second step was a morphological analysis of the studied coastal stretch. Multi-temporal aerial snap-shots were used and field surveys were conducted to verify the reliability of the historical data and to identify the critical hydraulic conditions along the shore. The third step was a review of the general urban development plans of the 17 studied municipalities. Aerophotogrammetric and cadastral maps were used to evidence and define the eight classes of land use destinations. In addition, the floodable areas were divided into three vulnerability and exposure categories considering different peculiarities of social and working life. Finally, using GIS spatial analysis tools, these data were compiled into risk maps and wielded as the municipal emergency plans’ baseline scenarios. For each studied municipality was hypothesised the alarm thresholds upon which were activated the flood emergency procedures.


Floods are the most widespread natural events affecting people and infrastructures worldwide (Luino 2016). Every year, there are many floods in populated areas all over the world causing the death of thousands of people and destroying crops, facilities, and infrastructure. More than 20 million people worldwide are affected by floods annually, and this number could increase to 54 million by 2030 due to climate change and socioeconomic development (WRI 2015).

Within Europe, Italy ranks highest in the variety of geohydrological hazards: these processes claim victims and cause damage amounting to billions of Euros every year (Canuti et al. 2001). Historical research has shown that 11,000 landslides and 5400 floods have occurred in the last 80 years. The costs for these processes are extremely high. In the period 1980–2000, the Italian government has paid 42.4 billion Euros, that is, 5.7 million Euros per day (Luino 2005).

Lombardy is the most important region of Italy, not only from an economic point of view: it has a surface of 23,844 km2 and occupies the middle part of the Po plain. Milan is its chief town with over than 3 million inhabitants. This region is historically vulnerable to both riverine and lacustrine floods.

According to a recent research of the Italian National System for Environmental Protection-ISPRA (ISPRA 2015), in Lombardy, 80.8% of the towns are exposed to high level of geohydrological hazard; as a matter of fact, landslides, debris flows, and floods, caused numerous casualties and heavy losses of infrastructures, over the past few decades (1983, 1987, 1988, 1992, 1993, 1994, 1997, 2000, 2002 and 2014) (Cancelli and Nova 1985; Ceriani et al. 1992; Govi and Turitto 1994a; Govi et al. 2002; Tropeano et al. 2006; Luino and Turconi 2017).

Despite a seeming increase in event frequency, the most significant impacts are evenly distributed over time (Luino 2005). On the contrary, the rate of damage of these events is constantly increasing (Luino et al. 2014). Inappropriate land use policies, especially the post-WW2, played a more important role, letting the urban expansion occupy floodplains (Luino et al. 2012) and areas vulnerable to debris flows and landslides.

The recognition of flood-prone areas has been, and still is, an ongoing debate within the scientific community both in Italy (Caroni et al. 1990; Govi and Turitto 1994b; Dutto 1994; Giacomelli et al. 1998; Oliveri et al. 1998; Sole and D’Angelo 1999; De Martino et al. 2000; Luino et al. 2002b; Aronica et al. 2002; Aureli et al. 2006; Castellarin et al. 2011; Faccini et al. 2015; Luino et al. 2016) and worldwide (Oya 1971; Wolman 1971; Waananen et al. 1977; Tag-Eldeen and Nilsson 1979; Leroi 1996; Faisal et al. 1999; Bates and De Roo 2000; Sharma and Priya 2001; Horritt and Bates 2002; Hardmeyer and Spencer 2007; Pappenberger et al. 2007; Gilles et al. 2012; Okoye and Ojeh 2015).

Nowadays, technical and scientific public bodies develop multi-disciplinary analysis to detect flood-prone areas (Disse and Engel 2001), draw up emergency management plans, and provide guidelines for revising the existing urban plans or informing the design of future ones.

With this study, we contribute to the process of enhancing safety for the people and assets located along the lake shore. A multi-disciplinary approach formed by a historical investigation and a geomorphological study superimposed on an updated land use and planning map will facilitate the definition and visualizing flood-prone areas along the lake shores. If properly used, this information will help reducing future flood damage on the existing urban areas and possibly limit the proliferation of new buildings over inundable areas.

Study area: the eastern bank of the Lago Maggiore

Lago Maggiore, the second largest lake (210 km2) of Italy, lies at the foot of the Alps, bordering the Italian Regions of Piedmont to the West and Lombardy to the East and Switzerland to the North (Fig. 1). The Swiss territory houses just its extreme northern end (42.6 km2). The lake’s large catchment basin (6598 km2) includes the valleys of the Ticino and Toce Rivers (the principal tributaries), and the Maggia and the Tresa torrents. It also receives water from the lakes of Lugano, Orta, Varese and Mergozzo. The Ticino River is its only outlet from Lago Maggiore at Sesto Calende (close to the Miorina Dam) and then after 110 km flows into the Po River near the town of Pavia. This study analyses the Lombardy shore (highlighted with an azure line in Fig. 1), comprising 17 municipal territories along a coastal stretch of about 56 km. In this paper, by way of example, are shown maps and tables of suggested emergency procedures only for one of the town studied, the urban area of Porto Valtravaglia. The little town is here analysed both because morphologically it is suitable to be analysed properly to an analysis of the hydraulic risk, and because it suffered serious damage during the flood of October 2000 and finally since, in the oldest part of the town, it is possible to find a marble plaque indicating the height reached by the floodwaters during the greatest flood of October 1868 (see box in Fig. 9).

Fig. 1

Source: Google Earth

Map of Lago Maggiore with the 17 studied municipalities (red dots) along the Lombard shore. A = 460858.92N 85118.41E, B = 45454336.75N 83610.29E.

Study about lacustrine flooding

Lacustrine flooding mechanisms are not as widely studied as are those of river flooding. The available scientific literature shows a decidedly higher number of articles dealing with river floods. Most likely, this is due to river floods being a more frequent occurrence and often with sudden onset causing victims and large damage. Lake floods, on the other hand, have slow onset allowing people to escape and almost completely save their movable property.

Among the papers dealing with lacustrine floods, some tackle the phenomena from a climate change perspective (Gilli et al. 2013), or provide geomorphic evidence and analysis of historical fluctuations (Atwood 1994). While others provide forecast of future flooding by analyzing precipitation, evaporation, inflow and water levels (Vecchia 2008). Insurance companies have also supported studies to assess the economic impacts of lacustrine floods (Wang et al. 2011; Grahn and Nyberg 2014). Many studies point to the rising of the lakes not being caused by natural processes, but being the consequences of dam and levee’s construction or bad watershed management (Shankman and Liang 2003; Shankman et al. 2006; Tucci 2006; Wang et al. 2015).

The cost of lacustrine flood mitigation is also greatly studied (Cummings et al. 2012; Zheng et al. 2014; Gulbin 2017), along with the consequent socio-environmental impacts (Aragón-Durand 2007). Vulnerability of lifelines along lake shores has been studied and appropriate protective actions proposed (Keith 2008). Overall, it can be said that lacustrine flood hazard is studied through uncertainty propagation of the rainstorm control model (Fu et al. 2013), and by geological–geomorphological studies aimed at comprehending the local lake watershed system, to help designing flood control structures to protect the exposed urban area (Ferrario et al. 2015).

Materials and methodological approach

In the last two decades, the Istituto di Ricerca per la Protezione Idrogeologica (IRPI) of the Consiglio Nazionale delle Ricerche (CNR) located in Turin has studied several areas of Lombardy using a multi-disciplinary approach (historical, morphological and land use/town planning) with the goal to identify flood-prone areas along some important watercourses to inform the revision of the existing urban and emergency plans (Luino et al. 1999, 2002a, b; Lumbroso et al. 2011). Building on these prior studies, the CNR-IRPI has applied the same multi-disciplinary approach to the analysis of flood risk along the Lago Maggiore shores. This study comprises: (1) historical investigation of past flooding data, (2) geomorphological study, (3) land use and urban planning analysis. The resulting maps were joined through GIS software to create a risk map which was used to revise and update municipal emergency plans.

Historical investigations are becoming increasingly important for a correct prediction and prevention of future floods. It is, therefore, essential to search, select and analyse all the documents describing past floods and their effects (Benito et al. 2004; Kadetova and Radziminovich 2014).

For this study, the gathering of historical documentation about past flood events, was carried out in different places: (a) Italian national technical office archives, searching for unpublished reports on past inundations. Useful pieces of information were collected about flood dynamics and timing, discharges, hydrometric levels, flooded areas, water depths in the towns, number of victims and economic damage; (b) municipal libraries, searching for papers, technical and historical books about Lago Maggiore; (c) newspaper and magazines archives, searching for local articles about flood events; (d) municipal archives and registry of the 17 villages examined, searching for reports and other documents detailing the city or village councils’ activities. At the end of the research, more than 400 old documents dealing with past floods, going back to the 17th–18th centuries, were collected.

A morphological study was carried out along the whole shore, with a particular detail for the urbanized areas. For this study, different maps have been consulted and used since the end of the 18th century: maps of the Theresian Cadastral realized at the mid-eighteenth century, maps of the Lombard–Venetian Kingdom Stabile cadastre (1841) and the maps of the Istituto Geografico Militare Italiano from 1880. For the last few decades, a good historical scientific support has been provided by aerial photographs taken in the years 1954, 1968 and 1978, black and white or colour, at different scale.

The analysis of the old maps and the photointerpretation of snap-shots highlighted the natural and anthropic changes of the coastline. The reliability of the evidence from the aerial photographs was verified through field surveys along the shore. During the surveys, all buildings, roads, bridges, bank protections and protecting walls located along the coast were photo-documented and their maintenance status and conditions were described. Also the mouth of the streams crossing the urban areas was considered: their critical hydraulic conditions along the shore were indicated.

With the aim of acquiring the existing status of the built environment and verifying areas for future building expansions, a territorial and urban analysis was carried out for all the municipalities along the coast. In a first phase of the work, after having collected the necessary maps in the Municipal Technical Offices, the urban planning instruments in force (that is mainly the general urban development plan) were analysed and subsequently a grouping was carried out for the different areas.

The collected maps refer to the municipal land use plans or their general variations: they are cadastral maps, aerophotogrammetric maps at 1:2000 and 1:5000 scale. Their use can help to identify the critical areas from a hydraulic point of view, to forbid the construction of new buildings and hence, to limit the increase of new risk situations along the coast.

For each municipal territory, a careful and updated analysis was carried out of the urbanized areas. The different land uses have been highlighted based on importance of the buildings and of the activities carried out inside: residential, tourist, public services, commercial/industrial, sports, agricultural, etc. Then these categories have been merged.

In the study, another important factor has been considered, in fact, the categories are not subject to the same degree of vulnerability. It was, therefore, important to attribute to these categories several levels of vulnerability according to different parameters: (a) presence or concentration of people over a 24-h period or during particular hours of the day; (b) presence of machineries or properties; (c) presence of social–recreational activities and/or loss of profit due to damage to the agricultural zones; (d) presence of environmentally attractive areas.

This result was reported on the Regional Technical Map (scale 1:10,000), supplemented by the information drawn from recent aerial photogrammetric shots. It is also necessary to emphasize how often the lack of homogeneous and updated reference cartography created numerous problems during field surveys and in the drafting of summary maps.


Historical research highlighted that over the period 1826–2017, the Lago Maggiore coast was affected by at least 148 damaging floods (Fig. 2). In terms of monthly distribution, October–November appears to be the months recording the highest number of damage-provoking events (47% of the total).

Fig. 2

Lago Maggiore flood events affecting the Lombard shore, from 1826 to 2017 (compiled into a 25-year period). This chart considers only the 148 top levels that reached or exceeded 2 m above the level zero of the Sesto Calende’s staff gauge, located at 192.87 m a.s.l. Inset, monthly distribution: October (red) and November (orange) are the months with the highest number of floods (together reach 47.1% of the total). No floods occurred in January, February, March and December

The systematic measurements of the Lago Maggiore water level date back to 1829, with the installation of the Sesto Calende hydrometric station on the Lombardy shore (see Fig. 1). Another historic hydrometric station from which we gathered data is the Pallanza hydrometer (Cantoni 1869), located on the opposite shore of the lake, in Piedmont (see Fig. 1). Data from the Sesto Calende station are pivotal for any hydrometric series analysis because it records the main changes occurred in the structure of the Ticino riverbed as it exits Lago Maggiore.

The most severe inundation recorded, occurred on 3 and 4 October 1868 (Fig. 3): all towns and villages along the studied shore were heavily flooded. Water levels reached the maximum height ever recorded. At Sesto Calende, waters rose to 6.94 m (199.81 m a.s.l.) above the level zero of staff gauge (located at 192.87 m a.s.l.). This height was 2.32 m higher than the second historical level, reached on 17 October 2000.

Fig. 3

An antique print of the 1868 flood depicting the main square of Sesto Calende. The colour thumbnail image at the top left displays the present situation: the “Albergo Tre Re” Hotel is clearly identifiable (yellow asterisk), even if slightly modified. In the thumbnail’s background, indicated with a red arrow is the Lago Maggiore; the red oval pinpoint is the location of the marble plaque shown in Fig. 4

The rate of water rise was also carefully studied, as this is a very important information upon which drew new emergency management plans (Krausmann et al. 2011) (Fig. 4). During the October 1868 floods, the Sesto Calende hydrometric station recorded a maximum rising rate of 16.3 cm/h; this was twice as much the values recorded during the previous month (September 1868), when over a period of 24 h, the maximum rising rate value was 7.3 cm/h. As a matter of fact, the exceptional flood of October 1868 caused an erosion of the Miorina threshold (channel outlet), essentially altering the scale of lake flooding. The erosional change occurred is comparable to a general lowering of the lake bottom of about 30–36 cm (De Marchi 1950; Baccarini 1973).

Fig. 4

Sesto Calende: a photo shooted a few meters from the lake during the November 2002 flood (see shore road and pathway inundate). The marble plaque indicates the heights and dates of the main flood events occurred from 1705 to 2000

Another important event that greatly affected the outflow of Lago Maggiore was the construction of the mobile barrier of the Miorina Dam, toward the end of 1942. As a consequence, to perform comparisons between homogeneous series of hydrometric measurements, the flood level’s series taken before or after the construction of such dam must be examined separately. All statistical considerations aimed at informing the revision of the existing urban and emergency plans should only consider data of the lake flood events that occurred after 1943.

In the period 1943–2017, about 54 flood events exceeded the 2.13 m mark at the Sesto Calende staff gauge (located at 192.87 m a.s.l.); at this mark, corresponding to 195.00 m a.s.l., some municipalities on the Lombard shoreline begins to be inundated.

Unlike riverine floods, lacustrine floods can last many days. During this period, as it often happens during lacustrine flood events, the lake has several altimetric fluctuations during the same event: for this analysis, only the maximum level reached in each flood was considered, corresponding also to the maximum annual. The 54 flood events cited have thus reduced to 31 (Fig. 5). Thirteen of these events reached or exceeded the level of 196.00 m, while only two inundations exceeded the level of 197.00 m (September 1993 and October 2000). The maximum of 197.49 m a.s.l. was registered on October 2000 (historical maximum since the construction of the Miorina Dam).

Fig. 5

Lago Maggiore’s floods: maximum water levels reached over the period 1943–2017 measured at the Sesto Calende hydrometric station. The red line indicates the height of 195.00 m a.s.l., to which inundation begins in some of the coastal municipalities on the Lombard shores

All gathered instrumental data and information (newspaper articles, flood maps, photographs, and interviews with local residents) were verified and analysed to draw a historical map of all damaged sites along the shore. In Fig. 6, as methodological output example, the hazard map of the small town called Porto Valtravaglia is shown. The limit of the inundated areas recorded in each Municipality during the severe event of October 2000 (the maximum inundation documented since the flood of October 1868), is set as the current flood marker (blue line in Fig. 6).

Fig. 6

Porto Valtravaglia hazard map. Sites damaged by flood events registered over the last 100 years (1907, 1977, 1981, 1983, 1986, 1987, 1993, 2000 and 2002) are highlighted with different symbols: the labels refer to the event code (alphanumeric in ascending order) related to a single historical report. The blue line delineates the limit reached by the flood waters during the 2000 flood event. The big red circle marks the areas flooded multiple times (almost nine times), while the blue circles pinpoint the hydraulic critical sites (mainly bridges with insufficient span). Within the red circle is located the wharf of Porto Valtravaglia, named “scalo”

Concurrently, reports about past flood events were entered into a catalogue file and associated with a symbol linked to the map. The symbols differ in form and colour to show exact or approximate location of the damaged sites (structure, infrastructure, stretch, etc.). A red dot denotes a record referring to an exact location for the damaged site. A yellow triangle, situated at the midpoint of a bank or a damaged road, indicates that the record has no clear reference to repair or consolidation works. A green square next to the name of the village means that the record contains only general information of the flooded area. This kind of map was done for each studied municipality of the coast.

The morphological study was based on the analysis of the old maps and multi-temporal aerial photographs integrated by morphological surveys, which allowed identification of evidence for all the sites critically exposed to inundation, e.g. low-lying areas, unstable walls, bridges with insufficient spans, covered channels and other features that could create severe problems for the public safety. The most important tributaries had also their final stretch analysed, to highlight the built-up sectors that are mostly exposed to backwater phenomena.

The production of the land use maps for the areas near the shore required an in-depth study of the 17 municipalities. The urban planning mosaic is generally composed of eight categories defined by their principal functions: (A) residential settlement: existing and anticipated residential areas; (B) hotel/residences and tourist facilities: residences, hotels, health resorts, etc.; (C) public services areas: municipal buildings, garrisons, schools, hospitals, churches, dumping areas and storage platforms, etc.; (D) sport areas, utilities and standards: public gardens, parks, athletics grounds, private and public sport clubs, etc. All areas occupied by roads, railways and cemeteries were marked in the same colour; (E) industrial and handicraft areas: existing and anticipated industrial, craft and commercial buildings; (F) agricultural areas: sheds, stables, and other old farming buildings; (G) woods: forests, grassland, pastures; (H) lake areas/beaches: natural areas along the lake defined as flood-safeguard zones. Only five of these eight categories are present in the Porto Valtravaglia urban area (Fig. 7).

Fig. 7

Urban planning map of Porto Valtravaglia municipal area: the land use planning categories are indicated by different colours

The final step, the result of all the analyses previously developed, concerned the production of a “risk map”. Each of the eight land use categories was assigned an index according to the following vulnerability parameters: (i) presence/concentration of people over the 24-h period and in particular hours of the day; (ii) presence of machineries or properties; (iii) presence of social–recreational and agricultural areas; (iv) presence of environmentally attractive areas. Indeed, to define the risk level of the studied shores, analysis was also performed to evaluate the construction characteristics and structural behaviour of exposed buildings. The vulnerable buildings were assessed in terms of expected damage (Luino et al. 2014; Glas et al. 2017), also considering the related costs of any improvement or restructuring measures envisaged for flood mitigation.

Joining the hazard map (see Fig. 6), defining the maximum heights reached by the floodwaters along the lake shore, with the urban planning map (see Fig. 7) enriched with these further information, a simplified risk map was obtained (Fig. 8). Three classes of different flood risk levels were defined: HIGH level (comprising the A–C land use categories); MEDIUM level (D–F), and LOW level (G and H).

Fig. 8

Porto Valtravaglia’s final map indicating the shore areas with different flood risk levels

Emergency planning in the Lago Maggiore area

Emergency management within the study area had to consider two distinct governmental jurisdictions. The northern segment of the lake shore, from the Swiss border to Laveno (Fig. 1), is under the jurisdiction of the “Valli del Verbano Mountain Community” (a territorial association of mountain and foothill municipalities). This intermediate government body was required by the Lombardy Regional Law no. 16 of 22/5/2005 (Unified Text about Civil Protection), to, inter-alia, develop and coordinate an emergency plan for all the municipalities included in its jurisdiction. The southern segment of the shore, stretching from Laveno down to Sesto Calende (Fig. 1), is not included in the Mountain Community, and the emergency plans have been drafted independently by each individual municipalities. To guarantee the coordination among the various emergency plans, the Regional Government of Lombardy ordered its civil protection technicians to harmonize the alert and emergency management procedures in such area. This study contributed to this goal providing alert thresholds, extension and limits of the previously inundated areas around Lago Maggiore.

The worst case flooding scenario was again defined as the maximum extension of the area flooded during the event of October 2000, the most important event of the twentieth century, not only for Porto Valtravaglia (Fig. 9), but for all the small towns along the shore.

Fig. 9

October 2000: Dock square and ticket office of Porto Valtravaglia (photo Luino F.). In the small photograph, the marble plaque shows the height of the floodwaters during the 1868 event, 2.32 m higher than the 2000 event level

To prepare an emergency scenario map, the authors have considered: the hazard analysis map (with the boundaries of the expected inundation based on the 2000 flood) and the infrastructures analysis map, with the critical evaluation of the vulnerable buildings including the strategic infrastructures (useful for emergency management operations).

The emergency scenario map layouts the infrastructures likely to be damaged and the possible consequences on the population. These scenarios are defined on the basis of spatial exposure and vulnerability data as well as past events. The definition of an “emergency scenario” contributes to the definition of the possible areas likely to be hit by the next extreme event, thus providing important information, such as the location and extent of the most flooded area, the structures (including strategic ones) that may be involved, the functionality (more or less compromised) of the transport networks involved, the routes of communication and the distribution lines, as well as the expected losses in terms of human lives, injuries, homelessness, collapsed and damaged buildings along with the corresponding economic damages. This information allows to identify and describe the potential impact to organize the human resources, the materials to be used and their allocation. In the latter, the information on the evolving event provides a timely description of the ongoing impact, thus informing the decision on which supporting activities pursue for overcoming the emergency.

Using historical data, three emergency thresholds have been defined for each municipality, assessing different rates of water rise (5–10–15 cm/h). To each threshold was linked the estimated flooded areas. Table 1 shows the alert levels and their spatial references, while Table 2 details the emergency procedures. This information along with a detailed town-planning analysis allowed highlighting the critical situations existing in the various municipal territories. Figure 10 represents an excerpt of the coordinated emergency scenario map in the municipality of Porto Valtravaglia: operative indications, such as escape routes, blocks on the road network, buildings to be evacuated are shown. Unfortunately the urban area of Porto Valtravaglia is very low, and indeed the town has been flooded several times, even after minor meteorological events.

Table 1 Important thresholds for Porto Valtravaglia
Table 2 Specific flood emergency procedures in Porto Valtravaglia
Fig. 10

Extract of the emergency scenario map for Porto Valtravaglia (town centre)

Discussion and conclusions

Despite the numerous and frequent flooding of Lago Maggiore (Luino et al. 2005), urban development of its shores continues unabated. Future development policies should avoid the phenomenon referred to as the “safe development paradox” (Stevens et al. 2010). Indeed, the lake shores have been undermined by intensive and unorganised urbanization since the 1950s (Luino et al. 2012). In such densely inhabited areas, risk mitigation is no longer deferrable and should be implemented through: (i) in-depth analysis of the territorial hazards (Karmakar et al. 2010; Cuya-Antonio and Antonio 2017), (ii) empowerment and accountability of the residents; (iii) compulsory flood insurance. The historical geomorphological approach to flood risk reduction proposed in this paper is a valid method to identify flood-prone areas. Particularly, this method can be useful not only to formulate guidelines for future urban development, but also to outline risk scenarios for developing or updating emergency plans (Frigerio et al. 2013). The second and third aspects are more problematic in Italy. The empowerment and accountability of citizens in terms disaster reduction require a profound cultural change. Who is responsible for flood risk and who should pay for its mitigation are still unsettled questions. Quite often the responsibilities for the creation of risk lie both in the public and private sectors (poor planning and building speculation), yet the costs to repair past errors are expected to be paid off by the government. Namely, the feast tab (nefarious urban development of these last 80 years or so) is expected to be split among both attendees and non-attendees, i.e. among the entire national community. For this reason, the idea of developing a flood insurance programme (Kron 2005, 2009; Priest et al. 2005; Luino et al. 2009; Surminski et al. 2015) to distribute the cost of flood mitigation only among those who expose themselves to flood hazard, possibly to make them more responsible during future choices, is being resisted. Until this cultural change happens, the practical solution is to keep enhancing flood hazard and flood risk assessment methodologies and fostering emergency planning and management to reduce the loss of lives and infrastructures.

Change history

  • 24 July 2018

    This correction stands to correct mistakes presented in the original article due to a lag in the e-proofing system and the correction handling for this article. The original article has been corrected.


  1. Aragón-Durand F (2007) Urbanisation and flood vulnerability in the peri-urban interface of Mexico City. Disasters 31:477–494. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1467-7717.2007.01020.x

    Article  Google Scholar 

  2. Aronica G, Bates PD, Horritt MS (2002) Assessing the uncertainty in distributed model predictions using observed binary pattern information within GLUE. Hydrol Process 16(10):2001–2016

    Article  Google Scholar 

  3. Atwood G (1994) Geomorphology applied to flooding problems of closed-basin lakes… specifically Great Salt Lake, Utah. Geomorphology 10(1–4):197–219

    Article  Google Scholar 

  4. Aureli F, Mignosa P, Ziveri C et al (2006) Fully-2D and quasi-2D modelling of flooding scenarios due to embankment failure, river flow. Taylor and Francis Group, London. ISBN 0-415-40815-6

    Google Scholar 

  5. Baccarini A (1973) Relazione generale sulle piene dei fiumi dell’anno 1872. Camera dei Deputati

  6. Bates PD, De Roo APJ (2000) A simple raster based model for flood inundation simulation. J Hydrol 236:54–77

    Article  Google Scholar 

  7. Benito G, Lang M, Barriendos M et al (2004) Use of systematic, palaeoflood and historical data for the improvement of flood risk estimation. Review of scientific methods. Nat Hazards 31:623. https://doi.org/10.1023/B:NHAZ.0000024895.48463.eb

    Article  Google Scholar 

  8. Cancelli A, Nova R (1985) Landslides in soil debris cover triggered by rainstorms in Valtellina (Central Alps-Italy). In: Proceedings of 4th international conference and field workshop on landslides, Tokyo, pp 267–272

  9. Cantoni G (1869) Su le piogge dell’autunno 1868 nell’alta Italia. Rend. R. Ist. Lombardo di Scienze e Lettere, serie II 2(6–7):403–415

  10. Canuti P, Casagli N, Pellegrini M et al (2001) Geo-hydrological hazards. In: Vai GB, Martini IP (eds) Anatomy of an orogen: the apennines and adjacent mediterranean basins, chapter 28. Kluwer Academic Publishers, Dordrecht, pp 513–532

    Google Scholar 

  11. Caroni E, Maraga F, Turitto O (1990) La delimitazione di aree soggette a rischio di inondazione: un approccio multidisciplinare. In: XXII Convegno di Idraulica e Costruzioni Idrauliche, Cosenza 4–7 ottobre 1990, 9–21

  12. Castellarin A, Domeneghetti A, Brath A (2011) Identifying robust large-scale flood risk mitigation strategies: a quasi-2d hydraulic model as a tool for the Po river. Phys Chem Earth 36(7–8):299–308

    Article  Google Scholar 

  13. Ceriani M, Lauzi S, Padovan N (1992) Rainfall and landslides in the Alpine area of Lombardia Region, Central Alps, Italy. In: Interpraevent 1992, Bern, vol 2, 9–20

  14. Cummings CA, Todhunter PE, Rundquist BC (2012) Using the Hazus-MH flood model to evaluate community relocation as a flood mitigation response to terminal lake flooding: the case of Minnewaukan, North Dakota, USA. Appl Geogr 32(2):889–895

    Article  Google Scholar 

  15. Cuya-Antonio O, Antonio H (2017) Effectiveness of the Barangay Disaster Risk Reduction and Management Committees (BDRRMCs) in flood-prone Barangays in Cabanatuan City, Philippines. Open Access Library J 4:1–16. https://doi.org/10.4236/oalib.1103635

    Article  Google Scholar 

  16. De Marchi G (1950) Ripercussioni della regolazione del Lago Maggiore sulle piene del lago e su quelle del Ticino a Sesto Calende, Consorzio del Ticino, pubbl. 4, Milano

  17. De Martino G, Fontana N, Giugni M (2000) Un modello bidimensionale per la delimitazione di aree inondabili. In: Atti XXVII Convegno di Idraulica e Costruzioni idrauliche, Genova, 12–15 Settembre 2000, vol. 3, pp 41–48

  18. Disse M, Engel H (2001) Nat Hazards 23:271. https://doi.org/10.1023/A:1011142402374

    Article  Google Scholar 

  19. Dutto F (1994) Proposta metodologica per la definizione della fascia di pertinenza fluviale (FPF) lungo il tratto piemontese del Po”. Approccio geomorfologico. Atti del IV Convegno Internazionale di Geoingegneria su “Difesa e valorizzazione del suolo e degli acquiferi”, Torino 10–11 marzo 1994, Associazione Mineraria Subalpina, Torino

  20. Faccini F, Luino F, Sacchini A et al (2015) Geohydrological hazards and urban development in the Mediterranean area: an example from Genoa (Liguria, Italy). Nat Hazards Earth Syst Sci 15:2631–2652. https://doi.org/10.5194/nhess-15-2631-2015

    Article  Google Scholar 

  21. Faisal IM, Kabir MR, Nishat A (1999) Non-structural flood mitigation measures for Dhaka City. Urban Water 1:145–153

    Article  Google Scholar 

  22. Ferrario MF, Bonadeo L, Brunamonte F et al (2015) Late Quaternary environmental evolution of the Como urban area (Northern Italy): a multidisciplinary tool for risk management and urban planning. Eng Geol 193:384–401

    Article  Google Scholar 

  23. Frigerio I, Roverato S, De Amicis M (2013) A proposal for a geospatial database to support emergency management. J Geogr Inf Syst 5(4):396–403. https://doi.org/10.4236/jgis.2013.54037

    Article  Google Scholar 

  24. Fu X, Tao T, Wang H, Hu T (2013) Risk assessment of lake flooding considering propagation of uncertainty from rainfall. J Hydrol Eng 18(8):1041–1047

    Article  Google Scholar 

  25. Giacomelli A, Mancini M, Rosso R (1998) Integration of ERS-1 PRI imagery and digital terrain models for the assessment of flooded areas: the case of Alessandria (Italy), November 1994. La prevenzione delle catastrofi idrogeologiche: il contributo della ricerca scientifica (Luino Ed.), Atti Convegno Internazionale, Alba (CN), 5-7 Novembre 1996, vol II, 43–50

  26. Gilles D, Young N, Schroeder H, Piotrowski J, Chang Y (2012) Inundation mapping initiatives of the Iowa flood center: statewide coverage and detailed urban flooding analysis. Water 4(1):85–106. https://doi.org/10.3390/w4010085

    Article  Google Scholar 

  27. Gilli A, Anselmetti FS, Glur L et al (2013) Lake sediments as archives of recurrence rates and intensities of past flood events. In: Schneuwly-Bollschweiler M, Stoffel M, Rudolf-Miklau F (eds) Dating torrential processes on fans and cones. Advances in global change research, vol 47. Springer, Dordrecht, pp 225–242. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-94-007-4336-6_15

    Google Scholar 

  28. Glas H, Jonckheere M, Mandal A et al (2017) A GIS-based tool for flood damage assessment and delineation of a methodology for future risk assessment: case study for Annotto Bay, Jamaica. Nat Hazards 88:1867–1891

    Article  Google Scholar 

  29. Govi M, Turitto O (1994a) Ricerche bibliografiche per un catalogo sulle inondazioni, piene torrentizie frane in Valtellina e Valchiavenna. Associazione Mineraria Subalpina, Quaderni di Studi e di Documentazione, n. 16, 3 all. Torino

  30. Govi M, Turitto O (1994b) Problemi di riconoscimento delle fasce di pertinenza fluviale. Atti del IV Convegno Internazionale di Geoingegneria “Difesa e valorizzazione del suolo e degli acquiferi”, Associazione Mineraria Subalpina, Torino 10–11 marzo 1994, pp 161–172

  31. Govi M, Gullà G, Nicoletti PG (2002) Val Pola rock avalanche of July 28, 1987, in Valtellina (Central Italian Alps). In: Evans SG, Degraff JV (eds) Catastrophic landslides. https://doi.org/10.1130/REG15-p71

    Google Scholar 

  32. Grahn T, Nyberg R (2014) Damage assessment of lake floods: insured damage to private property during two lake floods in Sweden 2000/2001. IJDRR 10:305–314

    Google Scholar 

  33. Gulbin S (2017) Impact of wetlands loss on the long-term flood risks of devils lake in a changing climate. The University of North Dakota, ProQuest Dissertations Publishing

  34. Hardmeyer K, Spencer MA (2007) Using risk-based analysis and geographic information systems to assess flooding problems in an urban watershed in Rhode island. Environ Manage 39:563–574

    Article  Google Scholar 

  35. Horritt MS, Bates PD (2002) Evaluation of 1D and 2D numerical models for predicting river flood inundation. J Hydrol 268:87–99

    Article  Google Scholar 

  36. ISPRA (2015) Dissesto idrogeologico in Italia: pericolosità e indicatori di rischio. Istituto Superiore per la Protezione e la Ricerca Ambientale, Rapporto 233/2015

  37. Kadetova AV, Radziminovich YB (2014) The catastrophic flood in Transbaikalia (Central Asia) in 1897: case study. Nat Hazards 72:423. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11069-013-1019-x

    Article  Google Scholar 

  38. Karmakar S, Simonovic SP, Peck A et al (2010) An information system for risk-vulnerability assessment to flood. J Geogr Inf Syst 2(3):129–146. https://doi.org/10.4236/jgis.2010.23020

    Article  Google Scholar 

  39. Keith HD (2008) Disaster management and response: a lifelines study for the Queenstown Lakes District. Unpublished thesis, Master of Science in Hazard and Disaster Management, University of Canterbury (NZ)

  40. Krausmann E, Renni E, Campedel M et al (2011) Industrial accidents triggered by earthquakes, floods and lightning: lessons learned from a database analysis. Nat Hazards 59:285. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11069-011-9754-3

    Article  Google Scholar 

  41. Kron W (2005) Flood risk = hazard·values·vulnerability. Water Int 30(1):58–68. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1753-318X.2008.01015.x

    Article  Google Scholar 

  42. Kron W (2009) Flood insurance: from clients to global financial markets. J Flood Risk Manag 2(1):68–75

    Article  Google Scholar 

  43. Leroi E (1996) Landslide hazard-risk maps at different scales: objectives, tools and development. In: Senneset K (ed), Landslides-Glissements de Terrain, 7th international symposium on landslides. Balkema, Trondheim, Norway, pp 35–51

  44. Luino F (2005) Sequence of instability processes triggered by heavy rainfall in the northern Italy. Geomorphology 66(1–4):13–39. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.geomorph.2004.09.010

    Article  Google Scholar 

  45. Luino F (2016) Floods. In: Bobrowsky P, Marker B (eds) Encyclopedia of engineering geology. Encyclopedia of earth sciences series. Springer, Cham. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-12127-7

    Google Scholar 

  46. Luino F, Belloni A, Padovan N in collaboration with Bassi M, Bossuto P and Fassi P (2002b) Historical and geomorphological analysis as a research tool for the identification of flood-prone zones and its role in the revision of town planning: the Oglio basin (Valcamonica—Northern Italy). In: 9th Congress of the international association for engineering geology and the environment. Durban, South Africa, 16–20 September 2002, pp 191–200

  47. Luino F, Turconi L (2017) Eventi di piena e frana in Italia settentrionale nel periodo 2005–2016. Ed. SMI, ISBN 978-88-903023-8-1

  48. Luino F, Tetamo G, Belloni A et al (1999) An application of historical analysis to define flooding risk in the Staffora basin (Lombardy-Northern Italy). Poster session, Annales Geophysicae of European Geophysical Society, XXIV General Assembly, The Hague (Holland), 19–23 April 1999

  49. Luino F, Bassi M, Fassi P et al (2002) L’importanza delle notizie pregresse quale supporto allo studio geomorfologico per l’individuazione delle aree potenzialmente inondabili ai fini urbanistici: il fondovalle del Torrente Pioverna (Lombardia). J AIGA-Ital As Appl Geol Environ 1:95–109

    Google Scholar 

  50. Luino F, Fassi P, Lerbini M et al (2005) Individuazione delle zone potenzialmente inondabili della sponda lombarda del Lago Maggiore. Ricerca storica, studio geomorfologico ed analisi urbanistica ai fini della pianificazione di emergenza comunale e intercomunale. P.I.C. INTERREG IIIA Italia/Svizzera 2000–2006. Regione Lombardia, Protezione Civile, vol 4

  51. Luino F, Biddoccu M, Cirio CG et al (2009) Application of a model for the evaluation of flood damage. GeoInformatica 13(3):339–353

    Article  Google Scholar 

  52. Luino F, Turconi L, Petrea C et al (2012) Uncorrected land-use planning highlighted by flooding: the Alba case study (Piedmont, Italy). Nat Hazards Earth Syst Sci 12:2329–2346. https://doi.org/10.5194/nhess-12-2329-2012

    Article  Google Scholar 

  53. Luino F, Agangi A, Biddoccu M et al (2014) Project damage: Développement d’Actions pour le Marketing et la Gestion post-évènement. Book in three languages. 978-88-903023-7-4

  54. Luino F, Nigrelli G, Turconi L et al (2016) A proper land-use planning through the use of historical research. Disaster Adv 9(1):8–19

    Google Scholar 

  55. Lumbroso D, Stone K, Vinet F (2011) An assessment of flood emergency plans in England and Wales, France and the Netherlands. Nat Hazards 58:341. http://eprints.hrwallingford.co.uk/607/1/HRPP555_An_assessment_of_flood_emergency_plans_in_England_and_Wales%2C_France_and_the_Netherlands.pdf

    Article  Google Scholar 

  56. Okoye C, Ojeh V (2015) Mapping of flood prone areas in Surulere, Lagos, Nigeria: a GIS approach. J Geogr Inf Syst 7:158–176. https://doi.org/10.4236/jgis.2015.72014

    Article  Google Scholar 

  57. Oliveri E, Noto L, Calabro P (1998) Metodologie semplificate per la delimitazione di aree a rischio di inondazione. Atti XXVII Convegno di Idraulica e Costruzioni idrauliche, Catania, 9–12 Settembre 1998, vol 3, pp 27–39

  58. Oya M (1971) Geomorphological land classification map of the Neyagawa River basin (Osaka and surrounding area), 1:25,000, indicating areas subject to will be flooding. Publ Nat Res Centre f. Disaster Prevention, Science and Technology Agency, 1971, Tokyo

  59. Pappenberger F, Frodsham K, Beven K, Romanowicz R, Matgen P (2007) Fuzzy set approach to calibrating distributed flood inundation models using remote sensing observations, Hydrol Earth Syst Sci Discuss 3:2243–2277. https://www.hydrol-earth-syst-sci.net/11/739/2007/hess-11-739-2007.pdf

  60. Priest SJ, Clark MJ, Treby EJ (2005) Flood insurance: the challenge of the uninsured. Area 37:295–302. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1475-4762.2005.00633.x

    Article  Google Scholar 

  61. Shankman D, Liang Q (2003) Landscape changes and increasing flood frequency in China’s Poyang lake region. Prof Geogr 55(4):434–445

    Article  Google Scholar 

  62. Shankman D, Keim BD, Song J (2006) Flood frequency in China’s Poyang Lake region: trends and teleconnections. Int J Climatol 26:1255–1266. https://doi.org/10.1002/joc.1307

    Article  Google Scholar 

  63. Sharma VK, Priya T (2001) Development strategies for flood prone areas, case study: Patna, India. Disaster Prev Manag 10(2):101–109

    Article  Google Scholar 

  64. Sole A, D’Angelo L (1999) Urban areas flooding processes. In: Proceedings 3rd DHI software conference and courses. Helsingor, Denmark, June 7–11, 1999

  65. Stevens MR, Song Y, Berke PR (2010) New Urbanist developments in flood-prone areas: safe development, or safe development paradox? Nat Hazards 53:605–629. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11069-009-450-8

    Article  Google Scholar 

  66. Surminski S, Aerts JCJH, Botzen WJW et al (2015) Reflections on the current debate on how to link flood insurance and disaster risk reduction in the European Union. Nat Hazards 79:1451. http://eprints.lse.ac.uk/61758/

    Article  Google Scholar 

  67. Tag-Eldeen M, Nilsson LY (1979) Planning processes in disaster prone areas with reference to floods in Tunisia. Disasters 3(1):89–94

    Article  Google Scholar 

  68. Tropeano D, Luino F, Turconi L (2006) Eventi di piena e frana in Italia settentrionale nel periodo 2002-2004. Ed. SMS, Torino

  69. Tucci CEM (2006) Urban flood management. In: WMO/ TD - No. 1372

  70. Vecchia AV (2008) Climate simulation and flood risk analysis for 2008–40 for Devils Lake, North Dakota. Scientific Investigations Report, Series number: 2008-5011, U.S. Geological Survey. https://pubs.er.usgs.gov/publication/sir20085011

  71. Waananen AO, Limerinos JT, Kockelman WJ et al (1977) Flood-prone areas and land-use planning: selected examples from San Francisco Bay Region, California. In: USGS, Professional paper no. 942. U.S. Government Printing Office

  72. Wang Y, Li Z, Tang Z, Zeng G (2011) A GIS-based spatial multi-criteria approach for flood risk assessment in the Dongting Lake Region, Hunan, Central China. Water Resour Manage 25:3465. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11269-011-9866-2

    Article  Google Scholar 

  73. Wang ZY, Lee JHW, Melching CS (2015) Dams and impounded rivers. In: River dynamics and integrated river management. Springer, Berlin. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-642-25652-3_8

    Google Scholar 

  74. Wolman MG (1971) Evaluating alternative techniques of flood-plain mapping. Water Resour Res 7:1383–1392

    Article  Google Scholar 

  75. World Resources Institute (WRI) (2015) www.wri.org/blog/2015/03/world%E2%80%99s-15-countries-most-people-exposed-river-floods

  76. Zheng H, Barta D, Zhang X (2014) Lesson learned from adaptation response to Devils Lake flooding in North Dakota, USA. Reg Environ Change 14(1):185–194. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10113-013-0474-y

    Article  Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information



Corresponding author

Correspondence to F. Luino.

Additional information

The original version of this article was revised.

This correction stands to correct mistakes presented in the original article due to a lag in the e-proofing system and the correction handling for this article. The original article has been corrected.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and Permissions

About this article

Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Luino, F., Belloni, A., Turconi, L. et al. A historical geomorphological approach to flood hazard management along the shore of an alpine lake (northern Italy). Nat Hazards 94, 471–488 (2018). https://doi.org/10.1007/s11069-018-3398-5

Download citation


  • Lacustrine floods
  • Historical geomorphology
  • Emergency plans
  • Lago Maggiore
  • Northern Italy