Natural Hazards

, Volume 92, Issue 1, pp 1–17 | Cite as

Vertical drains to minimize duration of seasonal waterlogging in Eastern Ganges Basin flood plains: a field experiment

  • S. A. Prathapar
  • N. Rajmohan
  • B. R. Sharma
  • P. K. Aggarwal
Original Paper
  • 32 Downloads

Abstract

In the Ganges basin, 8268.6 km2 of irrigation command area is waterlogged following monsoon rains. In this study, vertical drain (VD) (L × D, 7 × 1 m) filled with drainage gravel (6.5 m) and coarse sand (0.5 m) is installed in farmer’s agricultural field to minimize the duration of seasonal waterlogging and tested in Mukundpur village, Vaishalli District, Bihar, India. At the experimental site, inundation of rainfall and runoff from surrounding areas along with the seepage from an earthen canal start in September and remain till February, every year which prevents timely planting of wheat in November-end/December. Drainage due to percolation and recharge to groundwater is constrained by 6.4-m thick clay layer, below 0.5-m root-zone, and the groundwater level, which rises to the surface level. VDs were installed to provide a path and allow inundated water to recharge the aquifer, as groundwater level recedes. Groundwater level drop, floodwater infiltration rate, groundwater discharge, and VD capability were estimated through field data. Results show that VDs connected the floodwater to groundwater and transferred the floodwater to the aquifer when groundwater level started to recede. The site was fully drained by the end of December, permitting farmers to plant wheat in January providing cool nights at germination, thus increasing yields.

Keywords

Seasonal waterlogging Agriculture land Drainage Vertical drains Bihar Eastern Ganges Basin 

Notes

Acknowledgements

Authors would like to thank ICAR Research Complex for Eastern Region, Patna, Bihar for their help in soil samples analysis and the CGIAR Research Program on Climate Change, Agriculture and Food Security (CCAFS) and its donors for funding this research study. Authors wish to thank Dr. Dipankar Saha, Member, CGWB, India, for periodic consultations, and Mr. Anoj Kumar, IWMI, Hajipur office, Bihar, for his help in data collection.

Compliance with ethical standards

Conflict of interest

The authors declare that they have no conflict of interest.

References

  1. Abuel-naga HM, Bouazza A, Bergado DT (2012) Numerical assessment of equivalent diameter equations for prefabricated vertical drains. Can Geotech J 49(12):1427–1433CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  2. Allen RG, Pereira LS, Raes D, Smith M (1998) Crop evapotranspiration: guidelines for computing crop water requirements—FAO irrigation and drainage paper 56. Food Agric Organ UN, RomeGoogle Scholar
  3. Arguello MN, Mason RE, Roberts TL, Subramanian N, Acuna A, Addison CK, Lozada DN, Miller RG, Gbur E (2016) Performance of soft red winter wheat subjected to field soil waterlogging: grain yield and yield components. Field Crop Res 194:57–64CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  4. Arulrajah A, Bo MW, Leong M, Disfani MM (2013) Piezometer measurements of prefabricated vertical drain improvement of soft soils under land reclamation fill. Eng Geol 162:33–42CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  5. Aslam K, Rashid S, Saleem R, Aslam RMS (2015) Use of geospatial technology for assessment of waterlogging and salinity conditions in the Nara Canal Command area in Sindh, Pakistan. J Geogr Inf Syst 7(4):438–447Google Scholar
  6. Bihar Through Figures (2011) Directorate of statistics and economics, Patna, Bihar. http://dse.bih.nic.in/New-Publications/Bihar%20Through%20figures%202011.pdf. Accessed March 2017
  7. Bo MW (2004) Discharge capacity of prefabricated vertical drain and their field measurements. Geotext Geomembr 22(1):37–48CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  8. Bo MW, Chu J, Choa V (2000) Discharge capacity of prefabricated vertical drain. In: Proceedings of the 2nd Asian geosynthetics conference, Kuala Lumpur, Malaysia, pp 29–31Google Scholar
  9. Bouyoucos GJ (1962) Hydrometer method improved for making particle size analysis of soils. Agron J 54(5):464–465CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  10. CGWB (2007) Groundwater information booklet. Central Groundwater Board, Ministry of Water Resources, Govt. of India, Vaishali DistrictGoogle Scholar
  11. Chandio AS, Lee TS, Mirjat MS (2013) Simulation of horizontal and vertical drainage systems to combat waterlogging problems along the Rohri Canal in Khairpur District, Pakistan. J Irrig Drain Eng 139(9):710–717CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  12. Chowdary VM, Chandran RV, Neeti N, Bothale RV, Srivastava YK, Ingle P, Ramakrishnan D, Dutta D, Jeyaram A, Sharma JR, Singh R (2008) Assessment of surface and sub-surface waterlogged areas in irrigation command areas of Bihar state using remote sensing and GIS. Agric Water Manag 95:754–766CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  13. Dutta D, Sharma JR, Bothale RV, Bothale V (2004) Assessment of waterlogging and salt affected soils in the command areas of all major and medium irrigation projects in India, Technical document. Regional Remote Sensing Service Centre, Jodhpur, pp 1–74Google Scholar
  14. Gebrehiwot KA (2017) A review on waterlogging, salinization and drainage in Ethiopian irrigated agriculture. Sustain Water Resour Manag.  https://doi.org/10.1007/s40899-017-0121-8 Google Scholar
  15. Groundwater Resources Estimation methodology (2009) Report of the groundwater resource estimation committee. Ministry of Water Resources, Government of India, New DelhiGoogle Scholar
  16. Han D, Song X, Currell MJ, Cao G, Zhang Y, Kang Y (2011) A survey of groundwater levels and hydrogeochemistry in irrigated fields in the Karamay agricultural development area, northwest China: implications for soil and groundwater salinity resulting from surface water transfer for irrigation. J Hydrol 405(3–4):217–234CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  17. Healy R, Cook P (2002) Using groundwater levels to estimate recharge. Hydrogeol J 10:91–109CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  18. Houk E, Frasier M, Schuck E (2006) The agricultural impacts of irrigation induced waterlogging and soil salinity in the Arkansas Basin. Agric Water Manag 85(1–2):175–183CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  19. Jeet R et al (2007) Bio-drainage potential of Eucalyptus tereticoornis for reclamation of shallow water table areas in North-West India. Agrofor Syst 69(2):147–165CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  20. Kamon M, Pradahon TBS, Suwa S, Hanyo T, Akai T, Imanishi H (1994) The evaluation of discharge capacity of prefabricated bond shaped drains. In: Proceedings symposium on geotexile test methods. JSSMFE, Tokyo, pp 77–82Google Scholar
  21. Kazmi SF, Ertsen MW, Asi MR (2012) The impact of conjunctive use of canal and tube well water in Lagar irrigated area, Pakistan. Phys Chem Earth 47:86–98CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  22. Konukcu F, Gowing JW, Rose DA (2006) Dry drainage: A sustainable solution to waterlogging and salinity problems in irrigation areas? Agric Water Manag 83(1–2):1–12CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  23. Marti J, Savin R, Slafer G (2015) Wheat yield as affected by length of exposure to waterlogging during stem elongation. J Agron Crop Sci 201(6):473–486CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  24. Misak RF, Baki AAA, El-Hakim MS (1997) On the causes and control of the waterlogging phenomenon, Siwa Oasis, northern Western Desert, Egypt. J Arid Environ 37(1):23–32CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  25. MoEF (Ministry of Environment and Forests) (2007) State of environment report, Bihar. Bihar State Pollution Control Board, Patna, and Department of Environment and Forest, Government of Bihar. http://moef.nic.in/soer/state/SoE%20report%20of%20Bihar.pdf. Accessed March 2016
  26. Muirhead WA, Humphreys E, Jayawardane NS, Moll JL (1996) Shallow subsurface drainage in an irrigated vertisol with a perched water table. Agric Water Manag 30(3):261–282CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  27. NGRBA (National Ganga river basin authority) (2011) Volume 1-environmental and social analysis. Environmental and social management framework (ESMF); 165. http://moef.nic.in/downloads/public-information/Draft%20ESA%20Volume%20I.pdf. Accessed March 2017
  28. Pandey AC, Singh SK, Nathawat MS (2012) Analysing the impact of anthropogenic activities on waterlogging dynamics in Indo-Gangetic Plains, northern Bihar, India. Int J Remote Sens 33(1):135–149CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  29. Pandey AC, Singh SK, Nathawat MS, Saha D (2013) Assessment of surface and subsurface waterlogging, water level fluctuations, and lithological variations for evaluating groundwater resources in Ganga Plains. Int J Digit Earth 6(3):276–296CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  30. Ponnamperuma FN (1972) The chemistry of submerged soils. Adv Agron 24:29–96CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  31. Ritzema HP (2016) Drain for gain: managing salinity in irrigated lands—a review. Agric Water Manag 176:18–28CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  32. Ritzema HP, Satyanarayana TV, Raman S, Boonstra J (2008) Subsurface drainage to combat waterlogging and salinity in irrigated lands in India: lessons learned in farmers’ fields. Agric Water Manag 95(3):179–189CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  33. Scanlon B, Healy R, Cook P (2002) Choosing appropriate techniques for quantifying groundwater recharge. Hydrogeol J 10:18–39CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  34. Sharda VN, Kurothe RS, Sena DR, Pande VC, Tiwari SP (2006) Estimation of groundwater recharge from water storage structures in a semi-arid climate of India. J Hydrol 329:224–243CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  35. Singh A (2012a) Validation of SaltMod for a semi-arid part of northwest India and some options for control of waterlogging. Agric Water Manag 115:194–202CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  36. Singh A (2012b) Development and application of a watertable model for the assessment of waterlogging in irrigated semi-arid regions. Water Resour Manag 26(15):4435–4448CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  37. Singh A (2016) Hydrological problems of water resources in irrigated agriculture: a management perspective. J Hydrol 541:1430–1440CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  38. Singh A (2017) Waterlogging and salinity management for sustainable irrigated agriculture. II: engineering measures and biodrainage. J Irrig Drain Eng 143(9):04017036CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  39. Singh JP, Shakya SK (2006) Drainage of ponded land through irrigation well in a leaky aquifer. J Hydrol 321(1–4):377–389CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  40. Singh A et al (2016) Optimization modeling for conjunctive use planning of surface water and groundwater for irrigation. J Irrig Drain Eng 142(3):04015060-1-9Google Scholar
  41. Vaishali at a Glance (2014) Vaishali at a glance. http://vaishali.bih.nic.in/glance.htm. Accessed March 2016
  42. Velmurugan A, Swarnam TP, Ambast SK, Kumar N (2016) Managing waterlogging and soil salinity with a permanent raised bed and furrow system in coastal lowlands of humid tropics. Agric Water Manag 168:56–67CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  43. Xiao F et al (2014) Monitoring perennial sub-surface waterlogged croplands based on MODIS in Jianghan Plain, middle reaches of the Yangtze River. J Integr Agric 13(8):1791–1801CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  44. Yang H, Zhai S, Li Y, Zhou J, He R, Liu J, Xue Y, Meng Y (2017) Waterlogging reduction and wheat yield increase through long-term ditch-buried straw return in a rice—wheat rotation system. Field Crops Res 209:189–197CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer Science+Business Media B.V., part of Springer Nature 2018

Authors and Affiliations

  1. 1.NSP Pty LtdSydneyAustralia
  2. 2.Water Research CenterKing Abdulaziz University (KAU)JeddahSaudi Arabia
  3. 3.International Water Management InstituteNew DelhiIndia
  4. 4.CGIAR Research Program on Climate ChangeAgriculture and Food Security (CCAFS), Borlaug Institute for South Asia (BISA)New DelhiIndia

Personalised recommendations