Skip to main content
Log in

Selection of representative shear modulus reduction and damping curves for rock, gravel and sand sites from the KiK-Net downhole array

  • Original Paper
  • Published:
Natural Hazards Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

Representative computation of ground response parameters requires accurate information about nonlinear dynamic behavior of the soil column, commonly incorporated in site response analysis through shear modulus reduction and damping curves which are functions of the strain level. Most site response studies are carried out by considering a set of existing shear modulus and damping curves, without knowing its suitability for the in situ soil type. In this study, an attempt has been made to identify suitable shear modulus and damping curves for soil grouped into different classes viz. sand, gravel and rock. Soil profiles of sites having surface and bedrock motion recordings are selected from the KiK-Net downhole array database and equivalent linear and total stress nonlinear site response analysis has been carried out by varying the shear modulus and damping curves for different sites. Estimated surface response spectra for each set of shear modulus and damping curves are compared with the observed response spectra at each site, and a detailed analysis is made to find out which set of curves gives a best match with the recorded data. Based on this study, representative property curves for rock, gravel and sand are suggested, which could be used for further site response studies in the region. This study shows that only a set of shear modulus and damping curves ensure a compatible spectrum with the recorded data from the KiK-Net downhole array sites, among the many available shear modulus and damping curves in the literature.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Institutional subscriptions

Fig. 1
Fig. 2
Fig. 3
Fig. 4
Fig. 5
Fig. 6
Fig. 7
Fig. 8
Fig. 9
Fig. 10
Fig. 11
Fig. 12
Fig. 13

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  • Anbazhagan P, Sitharam TG (2008) Seismic microzonation of Bangalore’. J Earth Syst Sci 117(S2):833–852

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Anbazhagan P, Thingbaijam KKS, Nath SK, Narendara Kumar JN, Sitharam TG (2010) Multi-criteria seismic hazard evaluation for Bangalore city, India. J Asian Earth Sci 38:186–198

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Anbazhagan P, Uday A, Moustafa SR, Al-Arifi SN (2016) Correlation of densities with shear wave velocities and SPT N values. J Geophys Eng 13:320

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Anderson DG, Richart FE Jr (1976) Effects of straining on shear modulus of clays’. J Geotech Eng Div ASCE 102(9):975–987

    Google Scholar 

  • Andrus RD, Zhang J, Ellis BS, Juang CH (2003) Guide for estimating the dynamic properties of South Carolina soils for ground response analysis. Report No. FHWA-SC-03-07, South Carolina Department of Transportation, Columbia, S.C

  • Assimaki D, Steidl J (2007) Inverse analysis of weak and strong motion borehole array data from the Mw7.0 Sanriku-Minami earthquake’. Soil Dyn Earthq Eng 27:73–92

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Assimaki D, Steidl J, Liu PC (2006) Attenuation and velocity structure for site response analyses via downhole seismogram inversion. Pure appl Geophys 163:81–118

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Assimaki D, Li W, Steidl JH, Tsuda K (2008a) Site amplification and attenuation via downhole array seismogram inversion: a comparative study of the 2003 Miyagi-Oki aftershock sequence. Bull Seismol Soc Am 98:301–330

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Assimaki D, Li W, Schmedes J, Steidl J (2008b) Quantifying nonlinearity susceptibility via site-response modeling uncertainty at three sites in the Los Angeles Basin. Bull Seismol Soc Am 98:2364–2390

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Assimaki D, Li W, Kalos A (2011) A wavelet-based seismogram inversion algorithm for the in situ characterization of nonlinear soil behavior. Pure appl Geophys 168(10):1669–1691

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Boominathan A, Dodagoudar GR, Suganthi A, Maheswari RU (2008) Seismic hazard assessment of Chennai city considering local site effects’. J Earth Syst Sci 117(S2):853–863

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Boore DM (2007) Some thoughts on relating density to velocity. 12 p. http://daveboore.com/dave_notes.php. Accessed June 2016

  • Boore DM, Atkinson GM (2008) Ground-motion prediction equations for the average horizontal component of PGA, PGV, and 5%-damped PSA at spectral periods between 0.1 s and 10.0 s’. Earthq Spectra 24(1):99–138

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Boore DM, Bommer JJ (2005) Processing of strong-motion accelerograms: needs, options and consequences’. Soil Dyn Earthq Eng 25:93–115

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Boore DM, Stewart JP, Seyhan E, Atkinson GM (2014) NGA-West2 equations for predicting response spectral accelerations for shallow crustal earthquakes’. Earthq Spectra 30:1057–1086

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Bradley BA (2011) A framework for validation of seismic response analyses using seismometer array recordings’. Soil Dyn Earthq Eng 31:512–520

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Building Seismic Safety Council (BSSC) (2001) NEHRP recommended provisions for seismic regulations for new buildings and other structures, 2000 edition, part 1—provisions, part 2—commentary, Report Nos. FEMA-368 and FEMA-369, Federal Emergency Management Agency, Washington, DC

  • Comité Européen de Normalisation (CEN) (2004) Eurocode 8, design of structures for earthquake resistance. Part 5: foundations, retaining structures and geotechnical aspects, EN 1998-5, Brussels, Belgium

  • Chang CY, Mok CMW, Tang HT (1996) Inference of dynamic shear modulus from lotung downhole data. J Geotech Eng ASCE 122(8):657–665

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Choi WK (2008) Dynamic properties of ash-flow tuffs. Ph.D. thesis, Department of Civil Engineering, University of Texas, Austin, Texas

  • Choi Y, Stewart JP (2005) Nonlinear site amplification as function of 30 m shear wave velocity. Earthq Spectra 21(1):1–30

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Darendeli MB (2001) Development of a new family of normalized modulus reduction and material damping curves. Ph.D. dissertation, University of Texas at Austin, Austin, Texas

  • Dawood HM, Rodriguez-Marek Adrian, Bayless J, Goulet C, Thompson E (2016) A flatfile for the KiK-net database processed using an automated protocol’. Earthq Spectra 32(2):1281–1302

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Dickenson SE (1994) Dynamic response of soft and deep cohesive soils during the loma prieta earthquake of October 17, 1989. Ph.D. thesis, Department of Civil and Environmental Engineering, University of California, Berkeley, CA

  • Electric Power Research Institute (EPRI) (1993) Guidelines for Site specific ground motions, Palo Alto, California, November, TR-102293

  • Elgamal AW, Zeghal M, Tang HT, Stepp JC (1995) Lotung downhole array I: evaluation of site dynamic properties’. J Geotech Eng 121(4):350–362

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Elgamal AW, Zeghal M, Parra E (1996) Liquefaction of reclaimed island in Kobe, Japan. J Geotech Eng ASCE 122(1):39–49

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Elgamal A, Lai T, Yang Z, He L (2001) Dynamic soil properties, seismic downhole arrays and applications in practice. In: International conferences on recent advances in geotechnical earthquake engineering and soil dynamics, Paper No. 6

  • Evans MD, Zhou S (1995) Liquefaction behavior ofsand-gravel composites. J Geotech Eng ASCE 121(3):287–298

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Gardner GHF, Gardner LW, Gregory AR (1974) Formation velocity and density—the diagnostic basics for stratigraphic traps’. Geophysics 39:770–780

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Glaser S (1995) System identification and its application to estimating soil properties. J Geotech Eng 121(7):553–560

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Glaser SD (2006) Downhole seismic arrays and system identification of soil response. In: Proceedings of the 4th international conference of earthquake engineering, Taipei, Taiwan

  • Glaser SD, Baise LG (2000) System identification estimation of soil properties at the lotung site’. Soil Dyn Earthq Eng 19:521–531

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Goto S, Suzuki Y, Nishio S, Ohoka H (1992) Mechanical properties of undisturbed Tone river gravel obtained by in situ freezing method. Soils Found Tokyo Jpn 32(3):15–25

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Goto S, Nisho S, Yoshimi Y (1994) Dynamic properties of gravels sampled by ground freezing. Ground failures under seismic conditions, ASCE GSP no. 44, pp 141–157

  • Govindaraju L, Bhattacharya S (2008) Site response studies for seismic hazard analysis of Kolkata city. In: Proceedings of the 12th international conference of international association for computer methods and advances in geomechanics (IACMAG), Oct 1–6, Goa, pp 2899–2907

  • Govindaraju L, Bhattacharya S (2012) “Site-specific earthquake response study for hazard assessment in Kolkata city, India. Nat Hazards 61(3):943–965

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Govindaraju L, Ramana GV, HanumanthaRao C, Sitharam TG (2004) Site-specific ground response analysis. Curr Sci 87(10):1354–1362

    Google Scholar 

  • Groholski DR, Hashash YMA, Musgrove M, Harmon J, Kim B (2015) Evaluation of 1-D non-linear site response analysis using a general quadratic/hyperbolic strength-controlled constitutive model. In: 6th international conference on earthquake geotechnical engineering 1–4 November 2015 Christchurch, New Zealand

  • Hanumantha Rao C, Ramana GV (2009) Site specific ground response analyses at Delhi, India. EJGE, 16 http://www.ejge.com/2009/Ppr0936/Ppr0936.pdf. Accessed 26 Dec 2014

  • Hanumantharao C, Ramana GV (2008) Dynamic soil properties for microzonation of Delhi, India. J Earth Syst Sci 117(S2):719–730

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Hardin BO, Drnevich VP (1972) Shear modulus and damping in soils: design equations and curves. Soil Mech Found Div ASCE 98(7):667–692

    Google Scholar 

  • Hartzell S, Bonilla LF, Williams RA (2004) Prediction of nonlinear soil effects. Bull Seismol Soc Am 94(5):1609–1629

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Hashash YMA, Park D (2001) Non-linear one-dimensional seismic ground motion propagation in the Mississippi embayment. Eng Geol 62(1–3):185–206

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Hashash YMA, Phillips C, Groholski DR (2010) Recent advances in non-linear site response analysis. In: Proceedings of the 5th international conference on recent advances in geotechnical earthquake engineering and soil dynamics, San Diego, California

  • Hashash YMA, Musgrove MI, Harmon JA, Groholski DR, Phillips CA, Park D (2015) DEEPSOIL 6.1, user manual. Board of Trustees of University of Illinois at Urbana-Champaign, Urbana

    Google Scholar 

  • Hatanaka M, Uchida A (1995) Effects of test methods on the cyclic deformation characteristics of high quality undisturbed gravel samples. In: Static and dynamic properties of gravelly soils, Geotechnical Special Publication No. 56, ASCE, Reston, Va. pp 136–161

  • Hatanaka M, Suzuki Y, Kawasaki T, Endo M (1988) Cyclic undrained shear properties of high quality undisturbed Tokyo gravel. Soils Found 28(4):57–68

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Hynes ME (1988) Pore water pressure generation characteristics of gravels under undrained cyclic loadings, Ph.D. dissertation, University of California, Berkeley, California

  • IBC (2009) International building code, 5th edn. International Code Council: Inc, Falls Church

    Google Scholar 

  • Idriss IM (1990) Response of soft soil sites during earthquakes. In: Duncan JM (ed) Proceedings in H. Bolton seed memorial symposium, vol 2, pp 273–290

  • Idriss IM, Seed HB (1970) Seismic response of soil deposits. J Soil Mech Found Div Proc ASCE 96:9–103

    Google Scholar 

  • Iida R, Matsumoto N, Yasuda N, Watanabe K, Sakaino N, Ohno K (1984) Large-scale tests for measuring dynamic shear moduli and damping ratios of rockfill materials, sixteenth joint meeting. Japan Panel on Wind and Seismic Effects, Washington

    Google Scholar 

  • Inazaki T (2006) Relationship between S-wave velocities and geotechnical properties of alluvial sediments In: Proceedings of 19th annual symposium on application of geophysics to engineering and environmental problems (SAGEEP2006) pp 1296–303

  • Ishibashi I, Zhang X (1993) Unified dynamic shear moduli and damping ratios of sand and clay. Soils Found 33(1):182–191

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Iwasaki T, Tatsuoka F, Takagi Y (1978) Shear moduli of sands under cyclic torsional shear loading. Soils Found 18(1):39–56

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Johnson LR, Silva W (1981) The effects of unconsolidated sediments upon the ground motion during local earthquakes. Bull Seismol Soc Am 71:127–142

    Google Scholar 

  • Kaklamanos J, Bradley BA, Thompson EM, Baise LG (2013) Critical parameters affecting bias and variability in site response analyses using KiK-net downhole array data. Bull Seismol Soc Am 103:1733–1749

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Kaklamanos J, Baise LG, Thompson EM, Dorfmann L (2015) Comparison of 1D linear, equivalent-linear, and nonlinear site response models at six KiK-net validation sites. Soil Dyn Earthq Eng 69:207–219

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Kamatchi P, Ramana GV, Nagpal AK, Lakshmanan N (2008) Site-specific analysis of delhi region for scenario earthquakes. In: Proceedings of the 14th world conference on earthquake engineering, Beijing, October pp 12–17

  • Karastathis VK, Papadopoulos GA, Novikova T, Roumelioti Z, Karmis P, Tsombos P (2010) Prediction and evaluation of nonlinear site response with potentially liquefiable layers in the area of Nafplion (Peloponnesus, Greece) for a repeat of historical earthquakes. Nat Hazards Earth Syst Sci 10(11):2281–2304

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Kishida T, Boulanger R, Abrahamson N, Wehling T, Driller M (2009) Regression models for dynamic properties of highly organic soils. J Geotech Geoenviron Eng ASCE 135(4):533–543

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Kokusho T (1980) Cyclic triaxial test of dynamic soil properties for wide strain range’. Soils Found 20:45–60

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Kokusho T, Tanaka Y (1994) Dynamic properties of gravel layers investigated by in situ freezing sampling. In: Ground failures under seismic conditions, Geotechnical Special Publication No. 44, ASCE, Reston, Va. pp 121–140

  • Konder RL, Zelasko JS (1963) A hyperbolic stress-strain formulation for sands. In: Proceedings of 2nd Pan American conference on soil mechanics and foundation engineering, Brazil, pp 289–324

  • Konno T, Hatanaka M, Ishihara K, Ibe Y, Iizuka S (1994) Gravelly soil properties evaluation by large scale in situ cyclic shear tests. In: Ground failures under seismic conditions, Geotechnical Special Publication No. 44, ASCE, Reston, Va. pp 177–200

  • Kramer SL (1996) Geotechnical earthquake engineering. Prentice Hall, Upper Saddle River, p 653

    Google Scholar 

  • Kumar A, Anbazhagan P, Sitharam TG (2012) Site specific ground response study of deep Indo-Gangetic basin using representative regional ground motion. Geo-Congress, State of art and practise in Geotechnical Engineering, Oakland California, Paper No. 1065, pp 1888–1897

  • Kwok AOL, Stewart JP, Hashash YMA (2008) Nonlinear ground-response analysis of Turkey flat shallow stiff-soil site to strong ground motion. Bull Seismol Soc Am 98(1):331–343

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Laird JP, Stokoe KH (1993) Dynamic properties of remolded and undisturbed soil samples tested at high confining pressures. Geotechnical Engineering Report GR93-6, Electrical Power Research Institute

  • Lee CJ, Sheu SF (2007) The stiffness degradation and damping ratio evolution of Taipei silty clay under cyclic straining’. Soil Dyn Earthq Eng 27:730–740

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Mahajan AK, Sporry RJ, Champati Ray PK, Ranjan R, Slob S, Van WC (2007) Methodology for site-response studies using multi-channel analysis of surface wave technique in Dehradun city’. Curr Sci 92(7):945–955

    Google Scholar 

  • Matasovic N (1993) Seismic response of composite horizontally-layered soil deposits. Ph.D. thesis, University of California, Los Angeles

  • Menq FY (2003) Dynamic properties of sandy and gravelly soils. Ph.D. thesis, Department of Civil Engineering, University of Texas, Austin, TX

  • Milne J (1898) Seismology, 1st edn. Kegan Paul, Trench, Truber, London

    Google Scholar 

  • Mohanty WK, Walling MY, Nath SK, Pal I (2007) First order seismic microzonation of Delhi, India using geographic information system (GIS). Nat Hazards 40(2):245–260

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Moss RES, Thompson EM, Kieffer DS, Tiwari B, Hashash YMA, Acharya I, Adhikari B, Assimaki D, Clahan KB, Collins BD (2015) Geotechnical effects of the 2015 Mw 7.8 Gorkha, Nepal, earthquake and aftershocks. Seismol Res Lett 86(6):1514–1523

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Mugnier JL, Huyghe P, Gajurel AP, Upreti BN, Jouanne F (2011) Seismites in the Kathmandu basin and seismic hazard in central Himalaya’. Tectonophysics 509:33–49

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Okur DV, Ansal A (2007) Stiffness degradation of natural fine grained soils during cyclic loading. Soil Dyn Earthq Eng 27:843–854

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Park D, Hashash Y (2005) Evaluation of seismic site factors in the Mississippi embayment. II. Probabilistic seismic hazard analysis with nonlinear site effects. Soil Dyn Earthq Eng 25:145–156

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Pecker A (1995) Validation of small strain properties from recorded weak seismic motions. Soil Dyn Earthq Eng 14(6):399–408

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Phanikanth VS, Deepankar Choudhury, Reddy GR (2011) Equivalent-linear seismic ground response analysis of some typical sites in Mumbai. Geotech Geol Eng Int J 29(6):1109–1126

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Phillips C, Hashash YM (2009) Damping formulation for nonlinear 1D site response analyses. Soil Dyn Earthq Eng 29(7):1143–1158

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Prakash S, Puri VK (1981) Dynamic properties of soils from in-situ tests. Geotech Eng Div ASCE 107(7):943–964

    Google Scholar 

  • Raghu Kanth STG, Dixit J, Dash SK (2009) Estimation of site amplification factors for Guwahati City. IGC, Guntur

    Google Scholar 

  • Roblee C, Chiou B (2004) A proposed geoindex model for design selection of non-linear properties for site response analyses. In: International workshop on uncertainties in nonlinear soil properties and their impact on modeling dynamic soil response, PEER Headquarters, UC Berkeley

  • Rollins K, Evans M, Diehl N, III W (1998) Shear modulus and damping relationships for gravels. J Geotech Geoenviron Eng 124(5):396–405

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Schnabel PB (1973) Effects of local geology and distance from source on earthquake ground motions. Ph.D. thesis, University of California, Berkeley

  • Schnabel PB, Lysmer J, Seed HB (1972) SHAKE—a computer program for earthquake response analysis of horizontally layered soils. Report No. EERC-72/12, University of California, Berkeley

  • Seed HB, Idriss IM (1970) Soil moduli and damping factors for dynamic response analyses. Technical Report EERRC-70-10, University of California, Berkeley

  • Seed HB, Idriss IM (1984) Ground motions and soil liquefaction during earthquake. Earthquake Engineering Research Institute, Berkeley

    Google Scholar 

  • Seed HB, Sun JH (1989) Implication of site effects in the Mexico City earthquake of September 19, 1985 for earthquake-resistance-design criteria in the San Francisco Bay Area of California. Report No. UCB/EERC-89/03, University of California, Berkeley, California

  • Seed HB, Wong RT, Idriss IM, Tokimatsu K (1984) Moduli and damping factors for dynamic analyses of cohesionless soils. Report No. EERC 84-14, Earthquake Engineering Research Center, University of California, Berkeley, California

  • Seed H, Wong R, Idriss I, Tokimatsu K (1986) Moduli and damping factors for dynamic analyses of cohesionless soils. J Geotech Eng 112(11):1016–1032

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Seed HB, Romo MP, Sun JJ, Lysmer J (1987) Relationships between soil conditions and earthquake ground motions in Mexico City in the earthquake of september 19, 1985. Report No. UCB/EERC-87/15, Earthquake Engineering Research Center, College of Engineering, University of California, Berkeley, CA

  • Shamoto Y, Nishio S, Baba K (1986) Cyclic stress strain behaviour and liquefaction strength of diluvial gravels utilizing freezing sampling, symposium on deformation and strength characteristics and testing methods of coarse grained granular materials. JSSMFE, Tokyo, Japan, pp 89–94

  • Shearer PM, Orcutt JA (1987) Surface and near-surface effects on seismic-waves—theory and borehole seismometer results’. Bull Seismol Soc Am 77:1168–1196

    Google Scholar 

  • Shibuya S, Kong XJ, Tatsuoka E (1990) Deformation characteristics of gravels subjected to monotonic and cyclic loadings. In: Proceedings of the 8th Japan earthquake engineering symposium, 1, pp 771–776

  • Shukla J, Choudhury D (2012) Seismic hazard and site-specific ground motion for typical ports of Gujarat. Nat Hazards 60:541–565

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Souto A, Hartikainen J, Özudogru K (1994) Measurement of dynamic parameters of road pavement materials by the bender element and resonant column tests. Géotechnique 44(3):519–526

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Stewart J, Kwok A.(2009) Nonlinear seismic ground response analysis: protocols and verification against array data. PEER Annual Meet in San Francisco, Present 84

  • Stewart J, Afshari K, Hashash YMA (2014) Guidelines for perfoming hazard consistent one dimensional ground response analysis for ground motion prediction. PEER Report

  • Sun JI, Golesorkhi R, Seed HB (1988) Dynamic moduli and damping ratios for cohesive soils. EERC Report No. UCB/EERC-88/15

  • Thompson EM, Baise LG, Tanaka Y, Kayen RE (2012) A taxonomy of site response complexity. Soil Dyn Earthq Eng 41:32–43

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Vucetic M, Dobry R (1991) Effect of soil plasticity on cyclic response. J Geotech Eng 117(1):89–107

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Wang GX, Kuwano J (1999) Modeling of strain dependency of shear modulus and damping of clayey sand. Soil Dyn Earthq Eng 18(6):463–471

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Yamada S, Hyodo M, Orense R, Dinesh SV, Hyodo T (2008a) Strain-dependent dynamic properties of remoulded sand-clay mixtures. J Geotech Geoenviron Eng 134(7):972–981

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Yamada S, Hyodo M, Orense R, Dinesh SV (2008b) Initial shear modulus of remolded sand-clay mixtures. J Geotech Geoenviron Eng 134(7):960–971

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Yasuda N, Matsumoto N (1993) Dynamic deformation characteristics of sand and rockfill materials. Can Geotech J 30:747–757

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Yasuda N, Matsumoto N (1994) Comparisons of deformation characteristics of rockfill materials using monotonic and cyclic loading laboratory tests and in situ tests. Can Geotech J 31(2):162–174

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Zeghal M, Elgamal AW (1994) Analysis of site liquefaction using earthquake records. J Geotech Eng ASCE 120(6):996–1017

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Zeghal M, Elgamal AW, Tang HT, Stepp JC (1995) Lotung downhole array: evaluation of soil nonlinear properties. J Geotech Eng ASCE 121(4):363–378

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Zeghal M, Elgamal AW, Parra E (1996) Identification and modeling of earthquake ground response II: site liquefaction. Soil Dyn Earthq Eng 15(8):523–547

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Zhang J, Andrus R, Juang C (2005) Normalized shear modulus and material damping ratio relationships. J Geotech Geoenviron Eng ASCE 131:453–464

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Zorapapel GT, Vucetic M (1994) The effect of pore-pressure on ground motion. Earthq Spectra 10(2):403–438

    Article  Google Scholar 

Download references

Acknowledgements

The authors wish to thank the Kyoshin Net Strong Motion Network of Japan for providing an excellent earthquake database and valuable feedback for conducting this research. The authors extend their sincere appreciation to the Deanship of Scientific Research at King Saud University for its funding for this Prolific Research Group (PRG-1436-06).

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to P. Anbazhagan.

Electronic supplementary material

Below is the link to the electronic supplementary material.

Supplementary material 1 (DOCX 47 kb)

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Anbazhagan, P., Prabhakaran, A., Madhura, H. et al. Selection of representative shear modulus reduction and damping curves for rock, gravel and sand sites from the KiK-Net downhole array. Nat Hazards 88, 1741–1768 (2017). https://doi.org/10.1007/s11069-017-2944-x

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s11069-017-2944-x

Keywords

Navigation