Natural Hazards

, Volume 88, Issue 3, pp 1503–1521 | Cite as

Changes in coastal land use and the reasons for selecting places to live in Banda Aceh 10 years after the 2004 Indian Ocean tsunami

  • Syamsidik
  • Rina Suryani Oktari
  • Khairul Munadi
  • Suhada Arief
  • Inayah Zhiaul Fajri
Original Paper

Abstract

Ten years after the Indian Ocean tsunami in 2004 and following a long process of rehabilitation and reconstruction, Aceh has finally recovered. After the tsunami, Aceh experienced a dramatic migration of its coastal population away from the city; however, after 10 years, the population has mostly recovered. As new houses have been built and new economic activities commenced in the coastal areas, there is now concern regarding potential future tsunami risks for the city. The initial rehabilitation and reconstruction plan sought to prevent the construction of any new houses 500 m from the coastline; however, this failed to happen. This paper elucidates the reasons why these new coastal communities chose their new housing areas and examines the coastal land use changes around Banda Aceh 10 years after the Indian Ocean tsunami. Questionnaires were distributed to 457 respondents, and multiple logistic regressions were used to examine the reasons for household location selection and whether a possible future tsunami was a deciding factor. To examine the coastal land use changes, a series of aerial images from the Banda Aceh coastal area were digitised. It was found that tsunami history was not a major factor in new household selection; rather, rents and land prices, distance from work, and family connections were the top three reasons motivating households to select new living places. These changes and new settlements have given the city’s disaster management agency the challenge of building more emergency infrastructure in the coastal areas.

Keywords

Coastline Population Spatial analysis Coastal Tsunami Migration 

Notes

Acknowledgements

The authors acknowledge support from the Partnership Enhanced Engagement in Research (PEER) Cycle 5 funded by USAID and the National Academy of Sciences (NAS) under the research title: “Incorporating Climate Change Induced Sea Level Rise Information into Coastal Cities’ Preparedness towards Coastal Hazards” under Federal Award Identification Number (FAIN): AID-OAA-A-11-00012 (subaward Number 2000007546). We would like to thank to anonymous reviewers for their insightful inputs to this article. The authors also wish to acknowledge the assistance given by the surveyors, Bahrijal, Yasir, and from our friends during the data collection. The authors are grateful for the assistance given by the Banda Aceh Government (such as DISDUKCAPIL and BAPPEDA Banda Aceh) during this research. Thank you to Mr. Musa Al’ala and Mr. Ikramullah M. Zein for contributing some photos in this article.

References

  1. Anton CE, Lawrence C (2014) Home is where the heart is: the effect of place of residence on place attachment and community participation. J Environ Psychol 40:451–461. doi: 10.1016/j.jenvp.2014.10.007 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  2. BAPPENAS (Indonesia National Development Planning Agency) (2005) Master plan of Aceh-Nias rehabilitation and reconstruction: the main book. BAPPENAS, JakartaGoogle Scholar
  3. Black R, Arnell NW, Adger WN, Thomas D, Geddes A (2013) Migration, immobility and displacement outcomes following extreme events. Environ Sci Policy 27S:S32–S43. doi: 10.1016/j.envsci.2012.09.001 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  4. Boen T (2006) Observed reconstruction of houses in Aceh seven months after the Great Sumatra Earthquake and Indian Ocean tsunami of December 2004. Earthq Spectra 22(S3):S803–S818. doi: 10.1193/1.2211369 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  5. Borrero JC (2005) Field data and satellite imagery of tsunami effects in Banda Aceh. Science 308(5728):1596. doi: 10.1126/science.1110957 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  6. BPN NAD (Aceh Province Land Agency) (2005) Map of damage levels due to tsunami waves in Banda Aceh (in Bahasa Indonesia). BPN NAD, Banda AcehGoogle Scholar
  7. BPS Banda Aceh (Statistical Bureau of Banda Aceh City) (2016) Banda Aceh in figures 2016. BPS, Banda AcehGoogle Scholar
  8. BRR (Aceh Nias Rehabilitation and Reconstruction Agency) (2009a) Housing, roofing the pillars of hope. Multi-Donor Trust Funds and UNDP, Banda AcehGoogle Scholar
  9. BRR (Aceh Nias Rehabilitation and Reconstruction Agency) (2009b) Tsunami, from disaster to the emergence of light. Multi-Donor Trust Funds and UNDP, Banda AcehGoogle Scholar
  10. Cheng MH (2007) Health and housing after the Indian Ocean tsunami. A special report. The Lancet 369(9579):2066–2068. doi: 10.1016/S0140-6736(07)60961-1 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  11. Danar OR, Pushpalal D (2014) Building community resilience: a conceptual framework and its application in post-tsunami resettlement. Procedia Econ Financ 18:489–496. doi: 10.1016/S2212-5671(14)00967-8 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  12. DISDUKCAPIL (Civic Records and Citizenship Department of Banda Aceh) (2014) Banda Aceh Residents Mobility Data 2010–2012. DISDUKCAPIL, Banda AcehGoogle Scholar
  13. Esteban M, Tsimopoulou V, Mikami T, Yun NY, Suppasri A, Shibayama T (2013) Recent tsunami events and preparedness: development of tsunami awareness in Indonesia, Chile, and Japan. Int J Disaster Risk Reduct 5:84–97. doi: 10.1016/j.ijdrr.2013.07.002 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  14. Findlay AM (2011) Migrant destinations in an era of environmental change. Glob Environ Change 21S:S50–S58. doi: 10.1016/j.gloenvcha.2011.09.004 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  15. Fussel E, Sastry N, Van Landingham M (2010) Race, socioeconomic status, and return migration to New Orleans after Hurricane Katrina. Popul Environ 31(1–3):20–42. doi: 10.1007/s11111-009-0092-2 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  16. Gaillard J-C, Clave E, Vilber O et al (2008) Ethnic groups’ response to the 26 December 2004 earthquake and tsunami in Aceh, Indonesia. Nat Hazards 47:17–38. doi: 10.1007/s11069-007-9193-3 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  17. Ghobarah A, Saatcioglu M, Nistor I (2006) The impact of the 26 December 2004 earthquake and tsunami on structures and infrastructure. Eng Struct 28:312–326. doi: 10.1016/j.engstruct.2005.09.028 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  18. Gray C, Frankenberg E, Thomas G, Sumantri C, Thomas D (2014) Studying displacement after a disaster using large-scale survey methods: Sumatra after the 2004 tsunami. Ann As Am Geogr 104(3):594–612. doi: 10.1080/00045608.2014.892351 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  19. Helton WS, Kemp S, Walton D (2013) September. Individual differences in movements in response to natural disasters tsunami and earthquake case studies. In: Proceedings of the human factors and ergonomics society annual meeting, vol 57(1), pp 858–862. SAGE Publications, LondonGoogle Scholar
  20. Hiwasaki L, Luna E, Syamsidik, Shaw R (2014) Local & Indigenous knowledge for community resilience: hydro-meteorological disaster risk reduction and climate change adaptation in coastal and small island communities. UNESCO, JakartaGoogle Scholar
  21. Huda K, Yamamoto N, Maki N, Funo S (2007) Rehabilitation of urban settlements in the early reconstruction stage after a tsunami—a case study of Banda Aceh Municipality in Indonesia. J Asian Archit Build 6(1):103–110. doi: 10.3130/jaabe.6.103 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  22. IFRC (International Federation of Red Cross and Red Crescent Societies) (2010) Indonesia-Integrated Community-Based Risk Reduction Project. http://www.rcrc-resilience-southeastasia.org/wp-content/uploads/2016/01/2010IFRCIndonesia-DRRgender-1.pdf. Accessed 30 March 2017
  23. Iman AHM, Pieng FY, Gan C (2012) A conjoint analysis of buyers’ preferences for residential property. Int Real Estate Rev 15(1):73–105Google Scholar
  24. Joshi A, Nishimura M (2016) Impact of disaster relief policies on the cooperation of residents in a post-disaster housing relocation program: a case study of the 2004 Indian Ocean Tsunami. Int J Disaster Risk Reduct 19:258–264. doi: 10.1016/j.ijdrr.2016.08.018 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  25. Lavigne F, Paris R, Grancher D et al (2009) Reconstruction of tsunami inland propagation on December 26, 2004 in Banda Aceh, Indonesia, through field investigations. Pure Appl Geophys 166:259–281. doi: 10.1007/s00024-008-0431-8 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  26. Løvholt F, Setiadi NJ, Birkman J et al (2014) Tsunami risk reduction—are we better prepared today than in 2004? Int J Disaster Risk Reduct 10:127–142. doi: 10.1016/j.ijdrr.2014.07.008 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  27. Lyons M (2009) Building back better: the large-scale impact of small-scale approaches to reconstruction. World Dev 37(2):385–398. doi: 10.1016/j.worlddev.2008.01.006 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  28. Marcucci D (2014) Coastal resilience: new perspectives of spatial and productive development for the Chilean caletas exposed to tsunami risk. Procedia Econ Financ 18:39–46. doi: 10.1016/S2212-5671(14)00911-3 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  29. Matsubara C, Murakami H, Imai K, Mizoue T, Akashi H, Miyoshi C, Nakasa T (2014) Prevalence and risk factors for depressive reaction among resident survivors after the tsunami following the Great East Japan Earthquake, March 11, 2011. PLoS ONE 9(10):e109240. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0109240 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  30. Matsumaru R, Nagami K, Takeya K (2012) Reconstruction of the Aceh Region following the 2004 Indian Ocean tsunami disaster: a transportation perspective. IATSS Res 36:11–19. doi: 10.1016/j.iatssr.2012.07.001 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  31. McAdoo BG, Dengler L, Prasetya G, Titov V (2006) Smong: how an oral history saved thousands on Indonesia’s Simeulue Island during the December 2004 and March 2005 Tsunamis. Earthq Spectra 22(S3):S661–S669. doi: 10.1193/1.2204966 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  32. MDF (Multi-Donor Trust Funds) (2010) Six years after the tsunami: from recovery to sustainable economic growth (in Bahasa Indonesia). PT Lumbung Kencana Makmur, JakartaGoogle Scholar
  33. Mikami T, Shibayama T, Esteban M, Matsumaru R (2012) Field survey of the 2011 Tohoku Earthquake and Tsunami in Miyagi and Fukushima Prefectures. Coast Eng J 54(1):1250011. doi: 10.1142/S0578563412500118 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  34. Nazara S, Resosudarmo BP (2007) Aceh-Nias reconstruction and rehabilitation: progress and challenges at the end of 2006. Asian Development Bank Institute, Tokyo. http://www.adbi.org/discussion-paper/2007/06/26/2288.acehnias.reconstruction.rehabilitation/. Accessed 26 June 2016
  35. Oktari RS, Shiwaku K, Munadi K, Syamsidik, Shaw R (2015) A conceptual model of a school-community collaborative network in enhancing coastal community resilience in Banda Aceh, Indonesia. Int J Disaster Risk Reduct 12:300–310. doi: 10.1016/j.ijdrr.2015.02.006 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  36. Pasupuleti RS (2013) Designing culturally responsive built environments in post-disaster contexts: tsunami-affected fishing settlements in Tamil Nadu, India. Int J Disaster Risk Reduct 6:28–39. doi: 10.1016/j.ijdrr.2013.03.008 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  37. Scolobig A, Prior T, Schroter D, Jorin J, Patt A (2015) Towards people-centered approaches for effective disaster risk management: balancing rhetoric with reality. Int J Disaster Risk Reduct 12:202–212. doi: 10.1016/j.ijdrr.2015.01.006 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  38. Suppasri A, Shuto N, Imamura F, Koshimura S, Mas E, Yalciner AC (2013) Lessons learned from the 2011 Great East Japan Tsunami: performance of tsunami countermeasures, coastal buildings, and tsunami evacuation in Japan. Pure Appl Geophys 170(6):993–1018. doi: 10.1007/s00024-012-0511-7 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  39. Syafwina S (2014) Recognizing indigenous knowledge for disaster management: Smong, early warning system from Simeulue Island, Aceh. Procedia Environ Sci 20:573–582. doi: 10.1016/j.proenv.2014.03.070 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  40. Syamsidik, Agustina S (2009) Risk assessment of coastal front resettlement in Aceh, Indonesia. In: Proceedings 3rd South China Sea Tsunami Workshop. University of Science Malaysia Press, Penang-Malaysia, pp 1–12Google Scholar
  41. Syamsidik, Fikri F (2017) The Indian Ocean Tsunami and land use changes in Indonesia. In: Banba M, Shaw R (eds) Land use management in disaster risk reduction, disaster risk reduction. Springer, Tokyo, pp 297–310. doi: 10.1007/978-4-431-56442-3_16 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  42. Syamsidik, Rasyif TM, Kato S (2015) Development of accurate tsunami estimated times of arrival for tsunami-prone cities in Aceh, Indonesia. Int J Disaster Risk Reduct 14(4):403–410. doi: 10.1016/j.ijdrr.2015.09.006 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  43. Syamsidik, Iskandar A, Rasyif TM (2014) Progress of coastal line rehabilitation after the Indian Ocean tsunami around Banda Aceh coasts. In: Shaw R (ed) Recovery from the Indian Ocean Tsunami, disaster risk reduction. Springer, Tokyo, pp 175–189. doi: 10.1007/978-4-431-55117-1_13 Google Scholar
  44. TKCB (Tim Kaji Cepat Bersama) (2012) Evaluation on tsunami early warning system for Aceh earthquake and tsunami on April 11, 2012 (in Bahasa, Indonesia). http://www.gitews.org/tsunami-kit/en/E4/further_resources/case_study/Evaluasi%20Sistem%20Peringatan%20Dini%20Tsunami%20pada%20Kejadian%20Gempabumi%20&%20Tsunami%20Aceh%2011%20April%202012.pdf. Accessed 10 June 2016
  45. Willroth P, Massmann F, Wehrhahn R, Diez JR (2012) Socio-economic vulnerability of coastal communities in the southern Thailand: the development of adaptation strategies. Nat Hazards Earth Syst Sci 12:2647–2658. doi: 10.5194/nhess-12-2647-2012 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  46. Yanagisawa H, Koshimura S, Miyagi T, Imamura F (2010) Tsunami damage reduction performance of a mangrove forest in Banda Aceh, Indonesia inferred from field data and a numerical model. J Geophys Res 115:C06032. doi: 10.1029/2009JC005587 CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer Science+Business Media Dordrecht 2017

Authors and Affiliations

  1. 1.Tsunami and Disaster Mitigation Research Center (TDMRC)Syiah Kuala UniversityBanda AcehIndonesia
  2. 2.Civil Engineering DepartmentSyiah Kuala UniversityBanda AcehIndonesia
  3. 3.Faculty of MedicineSyiah Kuala UniversityBanda AcehIndonesia

Personalised recommendations