Advertisement

Natural Hazards

, Volume 87, Issue 1, pp 237–254 | Cite as

Deterministic strong ground motion study for the Sitamarhi area near Bihar–Nepal region

  • M. L. Burnwal
  • A. BurmanEmail author
  • P. Samui
  • D. Maity
Original Paper
  • 250 Downloads

Abstract

Deterministic seismic hazard assessment based study using various attenuation relationships has been taken up to find out the peak ground acceleration (PGA) for Sitamarhi region situated near the Bihar Nepal border. Seismicity data were collected from Indian Meteorological Department, New Delhi and Seismotectonic Atlas of India (GSI 2000) and 38 seismotectonic sources were identified in the region. The results show that the Main Central Thrust and West Patna subsurface fault are the two main faults, which contribute to maximum PGA values for Sitamarhi region. The calculated PGA values are in confirmation with the observed values from other sources.

Keywords

Deterministic Seismic Hazard Assessment (DSHA) Peak ground acceleration (PGA) Sitamarhi Bihar Nepal border Attenuation relations 

References

  1. Abrahamson NA, Litehiser JJ (1989) Attenuation of vertical peak accelerations. Bull Seismol Soc Am 79:549–580Google Scholar
  2. Agrawal RK (1977) Structure and tectonics of Indo-Gangetic plains. In: Bhimsankarau VLS, Gaur VK (eds) Geophysical case histories of India. AEG Seminar, Hyderabad, pp 29–46Google Scholar
  3. Anbazhagan P, Bajaj K, Patel S (2015) Seismic hazard maps and spectrum for Patna considering region-specific seismotectonic parameters. Nat Hazards 78:1163–1195CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  4. Atkinson G, Boore D (1997) Stochastic point-source modeling of ground motions in the Cascadia region. Seism Res Lett 68:74–85CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  5. Banghar AR (1991) Mechanism solution of Nepal–Bihar earthquake of August 20, 1988. J Geol Soc India 37:25–30Google Scholar
  6. Boore DM, Joyner WB (1982) The empirical prediction of ground motion. Bull Seismol Soc Am 72(6):S43–S60Google Scholar
  7. Campbell KW (1985) Strong motion attenuation relations: a ten-year perspective. Earthq Spectra 1(4):759–804CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  8. Campbell KW (2003) Strong-motion attenuation relations. In: Lee WHK, Kanamori H, Jennings PC, Kisslinger C (eds) International handbook of earthquake and engineering seismology, Part B. Academic Press, Burlington, pp 1003–1012CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  9. Dasgupta S (1993) Tectono-geologic framework of the eastern Gangetic foredeep. Spec Publ Geol Survey India 31:61–69Google Scholar
  10. Dasgupta S, Mukhopadyay M, Nand DR (1987) Active transverse features in the central portion of the Himalaya. Tectonophysics 136(1987):255–264CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  11. Dunn JA, Auden JB, Ghosh AMN, Wadia DN (1939) The Bihar–Nepal earthquake of 1934, India. Geol Survey India Mem 73:1–391Google Scholar
  12. Fukushima Y, Tanaka T (1990) A new attenuation relation for peak horizontal acceleration of strong earthquake ground motion in Japan. Bull Seismol Soc Am 80(4):757–783Google Scholar
  13. Ghosh T, Mukhopadhyay A (2013) Schematic Natural Hazard Zonation of Bihar using Geoinformatics. No. id: 5444 IGC Working Paper. http://www.esocialsciences.org/Download/repecDownload.aspx?fname=A201381215453_20.pdf&fcategory=Articles&AId=5444&fref=repec
  14. GSI (2000) Seismotectonic Atlas of India and its environs. Geological Survey of India, IndiaGoogle Scholar
  15. IS 1893 (2002) Indian standard criteria for earthquake resistant design of structures, part 1-general provisions and buildings. Bureau of Indian Standards, New DelhiGoogle Scholar
  16. Indian Meteorological Department, New DelhiGoogle Scholar
  17. Jain V, Sinha R (2005) Response of active tectonics on the alluvial Baghmati River, Himalayan foreland basin, eastern India. Geomorphology 70:339–356CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  18. Jain SK, Roshan AD, Arlekar JN, Basu PC (2000) Empirical attenuation relationships for the Himalayan earthquakes based on Indian strong motion data. In: Proceedings of the sixth international conference on seismic zonationGoogle Scholar
  19. Joshi A, Mohan K (2011) Expected peak ground acceleration in Uttarakhand Himalaya, India region from a deterministic hazard model. Nat Hazards 52:299–317CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  20. Joshi A, Patel RC (1997) Modeling of active lineaments for predicting a possible earthquake scenario around Dehradun, Garhwal Himalaya, India. Tectonophysics 283:289–310CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  21. Joyner WB, Boore DM (1981) Peak horizontal acceleration and velocity from strong motion records including records from the 1979 Imperial Valley, California, earthquake. Bull Seismol Soc Am 71(6):2011–2038Google Scholar
  22. Krishnaswamy VS (1962) Significance of the Moradabad fault in the Indo-Gangetic Basin and other faults in the sub-Himalaya in relation to the Ramganga River project. In: Proceedings of the 2nd symposium on earthquake engineering. University of Roorkee, Roorkee, pp 411–422Google Scholar
  23. Kumar A, Jain R, Gupta SC (2004) Seismic hazard estimation from the isoseismals of three great Indian earthquakes. In: 13th world conference on earthquake engineering, Vancouver, BC, Canada, August 1–6, 2004, Paper No. 2362Google Scholar
  24. Kumar M, Wason HR, Das R (2013) Deterministic seismic hazard assessment of Dehradun city. In: Proceedings of Indian geotechnical conference, December 22–24, 2013, RoorkeeGoogle Scholar
  25. Kumar A, Anbazhagan P, Sitharam TG (2013b) Seismic hazard analysis of Lucknow considering local and active seismic gaps. Nat Hazards 69:327–350CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  26. Mark RK (1977) Application of linear statistical models of earthquake magnitude versus fault length in estimating maximum expectable earthquakes. Geology 5:464–466CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  27. Mithal RS, Srivastava LS (1962) Seismicity of the area around Barauni, Bihar. In: Proceedings of the second symposium on earthquake engineering, 2nd, University of Roorkee, Roorkee, India, pp 527–538Google Scholar
  28. Nath SK, Raj A, Thingbaijam KKS, Kumar A (2009) Ground motion synthesis and seismic scenario in Guwahati city—a stochastic approach. Seismol Res Lett 80(2):233–242CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  29. Rajaram C, Narender B, Satyam ND, Kumar PR (2010) Preliminary seismic hazard map of Peninsular India. In: 14SEE conferenceGoogle Scholar
  30. Richter CF (1957) Introduction to seismology. Eurasia publishing house, New Delhi, p 768Google Scholar
  31. Sharma ML (2000) Attenuation relationship for estimation of peak ground vertical acceleration using data from strong motion arrays in India. In: Proceedings of twelfth world conference on earthquake engineering, Paper No. 1964Google Scholar
  32. Shiuly A, Narayan JP (2012) Deterministic seismic microzonation of Kolkata city. Nat Hazards 60:223–240CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  33. Singh DD, Gupta HK (1980) Source dynamics of two great earthquakes of the Indian subcontinent: the Bihar–Nepal earthquake of January 15, 1934 and the Quetta earthquake of May 30, 1935. Bull Seismol Soc Am 70:757–773Google Scholar
  34. Singh RP, Aman A, Prasad YJJ (1996) Attenuation relations for strong seismic ground motion in Himalayan Region. Pure Appl Geophys PAGEOPH 147(1):161–180CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  35. Valdiya KS (1976) Himalayan transverse faults and folds and their parallelism with subsurface structures of north Indian Plains. Tectonophysics 32:353–386CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  36. Verma M, Singh RJ, Bansal BK (2014) Soft sediments and damage pattern: a few case studies from large Indian earthquakes vis-a-vis seismic risk evaluation. Nat Hazards 74:1829–1851CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  37. Wells DL, Coppersmith KJ (1994) New empirical relationships among magnitude, rupture length, rupture area, and surface displacement. Bull Seismol Soc Am 84(4):974–1002Google Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer Science+Business Media Dordrecht 2017

Authors and Affiliations

  1. 1.Department of Civil EngineeringNational Institute of TechnologyPatnaIndia
  2. 2.Department of Civil EngineeringIndian Institute of TechnologyKharagpurIndia

Personalised recommendations