Advertisement

Natural Hazards

, Volume 87, Issue 1, pp 213–235 | Cite as

Numerical investigation of the influence of extreme hydrodynamic forces on the geometry of structures using OpenFOAM

  • Samieh SarjameeEmail author
  • Ioan Nistor
  • Abdolmajid Mohammadian
Original Paper

Abstract

The main focus of the present study is to numerically examine the effects of tsunami-like-induced hydrodynamic loading applied to free-standing structures with various architectural geometries. To accomplish these goals, the authors employed a multi-phase numerical model utilizing the volume of fluid method in the three-dimensional space. The second objective of the present study is to improve the understanding of hydrodynamic loads on structural components in order to develop practical guidelines for the engineering design of structures located in areas with a high risk of tsunami hazards. In order to evaluate the performance of the numerical model, the results of the simulation are compared with various available experimental data and physical modeling studies. The tsunami-like wave was reproduced via a sudden release of water located in an impounding reservoir located at the upstream part of a flume in the form of a dambreak wave. The shear force exerted by the hydrodynamic force on the square and round structures in the downstream area is estimated to obtain the value of tsunami loading. Finally, the validated numerical model is employed to examine the influence of the structure’s geometry on the hydrodynamic loads exerted on it.

Keywords

Hydrodynamic loading Tsunami Extreme hydrodynamic forces OpenFOAM Force time-histories 

References

  1. Al-Faesly T, Palermo D, Nistor I, Cornett A (2012) Experimental modeling of extreme hydrodynamic forces on structural models. Int J Protect Struct 3(4):477–505CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  2. Andrillon Y, Alessandrini B (2004) A 2D + T VOF fully coupled formulation for calculation of breaking free surface flow Laboratoire de Mécanique des Fluides, Ecole Centrale de Nantes, BP 92101, 1 rue de la Nöe, 44321 Nantes, FranceGoogle Scholar
  3. Árnason H (2005) Interactions between an incident bore and a free-standing coastal structure. Doctoral dissertation, University of Washington, Seattle, WAGoogle Scholar
  4. Berberovic E (2010) Investigation of free-surface flow associated with drop impact: numerical simulations and theoretical modeling. Doctoral dissertation, TU Darmstadt/FG Strömungslehre und AerodynamikGoogle Scholar
  5. Biscarini C, Francesco SD, Manciola P (2010) CFD modelling approach for dam break flow studies. Hydrol Earth Syst Sci 14(4):705–718CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  6. Chamani MR, Dehghani AA, Beirami MK, Gholipour R (2013) Fluid mechanics, 2nd edn. IUT Publishing, Iran, p 613Google Scholar
  7. Chanson H (2006) Tsunami surges on dry coastal plains: application of dam break wave equations. Coast Eng J 48(04):355–370CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  8. Chinnarasri C, Thanasisathit N, Ruangrassamee A, Weesakul S, Lukkunaprasit P (2013) The impact of tsunami-induced bores on buildings. In: Proceedings of the institution of civil engineers-maritime engineering, vol 166, no 1, pp 14–24. Thomas Telford LtdGoogle Scholar
  9. Chock G, Robertson I, Kriebel D, Francis M, Nistor I (2012) Tohoku Japan Tsunami of March 11, 2011—performance of structures, final report, ASCEGoogle Scholar
  10. Cross RH (1967) Tsunami surge forces. J Waterw Harb Div 93(4):201–234Google Scholar
  11. Douglas S, Nistor I (2015) On the effect of bed condition on the development of tsunami-induced loading on structures using OpenFOAM. Nat Hazards 76(2):1335–1356CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  12. FEMA P646 (2012) Guidelines for design of structures for vertical evacuation from tsunamis. Federal Emergency Management Agency, Washington, DCGoogle Scholar
  13. Fourie JG, Du Plessis JP (2003) A two-equation model for heat conduction in porous media (I: theory). Transp Porous Media 53(2):145–161CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  14. Fukui I, Nakaraura M, Shiraishi H, Sasaki Y (1963) Hydraulic study on tsunami. Coast Eng Jpn VI:68–82Google Scholar
  15. Harlow FH, Nakayama PI (1968) Transport of turbulence energy decay rate (no. LA–3854). Los Alamos Scientific Lab., N. MexGoogle Scholar
  16. Heyns JA, Malan AG, Harms TM, Oxtoby OF (2013) Development of a compressive surface capturing formulation for modelling free-surface flow by using the volume-of-fluid approach. Int J Numer Meth Fluids 71(6):788–804CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  17. Jasak H, Jemcov A, Tukovic Z (2007) OpenFOAM: a C++ library for complex physics simulations. In: International workshop on coupled methods in numerical dynamics, vol 1000, pp 1–20. IUC Dubrovnik, CroatiaGoogle Scholar
  18. Kolmogorov AN (1942) Equations of motion of an incompressible turbulent fluid. Izv Akad Nauk SSSR Ser Phys 6:56–58Google Scholar
  19. Lukkunaprasit P, Ruangrassamee A, Thanasisathit N (2009) Tsunami loading on buildings with openings. Sci Tsunami Hazards 28(5):303Google Scholar
  20. Matsutomi H (1991). An experimental study on pressure and total force due to bore. In: Proceedings of coastal engineering, JSCE, vol 38, pp 626–630Google Scholar
  21. Menter FR (1993) Zonal two equation k-turbulence models for aerodynamic flows. AIAA paper, 2906Google Scholar
  22. Nistor I, Palermo D, Nouri Y, Murty T, Saatcioglu M (2009) Tsunami-induced forces on structures. Handbook of coastal and ocean engineering, 261–286Google Scholar
  23. Nouri Y, Nistor I, Palermo D, Cornett A (2010) Experimental investigation of tsunami impact on free standing structures. Coast Eng J 52(01):43–70CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  24. OpenFOAM (2014) OpenFOAM: the open source CFD toolbox. http://www.openfoam.com
  25. Ramsden JD (1993) Tsunamis: forces on a vertical wall caused by long waves, bores, and surges on a dry bed. Doctoral dissertation, California Institute of TechnologyGoogle Scholar
  26. Ramsden JD, Raichlen F (1990) Forces on vertical wall caused by incident bores. J Waterw Port Coast Ocean Eng 116(5):592–613CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  27. Rodi W (1993) Turbulence models and their application in hydraulics. CRC Press, Boca RatonGoogle Scholar
  28. Soares Frazão S (2002) Dam-break induced flows in complex topographies. Theoretical, numerical and experimental approaches. Louvain-la-Neuve, Belgium: Université catholique de Louvain. PhD ThesisGoogle Scholar
  29. St-Germain P, Nistor I, Townsend R (2012) Numerical modeling of the impact with structures of tsunami bores propagating on dry and wet beds using the SPH method. Int J Protect Struct 3(2):221–256CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  30. Stoker JJ (1957) Water waves. The mathematical theory with applications. Interscience Publishers Inc, New YorkGoogle Scholar
  31. The 2011 Tohoku Earthquake Tsunami Joint Survey Group (2011) Field survey of 2011 Tohoku earthquake tsunami by the Nationwide Tsunami Survey. Jpn Soc Civ Eng TokyoGoogle Scholar
  32. Thusyanthan NI, Gopal Madabhushi SP (2008) Tsunami wave loading on coastal houses: a model approach. In: Proceedings of the institution of civil engineers-civil engineering, vol 161, no 2, pp 77–86. Thomas Telford LtdGoogle Scholar
  33. Xing T, Shao J, Stern F (2007) BKW-RS-DES of unsteady vortical flow for KVLCC2 at large drift angles. In: Proceedings of the 9th international conference on numerical ship hydrodynamics, pp 5–8Google Scholar
  34. Yeh H (2007) Design tsunami forces for onshore structures. J Disaster Res 2(6):531–536CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer Science+Business Media Dordrecht 2017

Authors and Affiliations

  • Samieh Sarjamee
    • 1
    Email author
  • Ioan Nistor
    • 1
  • Abdolmajid Mohammadian
    • 1
  1. 1.Department of Civil EngineeringUniversity of OttawaOttawaCanada

Personalised recommendations