Abstract
To investigate the impact of carbon emission reduction paths on energy demand and CO2 emissions in China, in this study, quantitative carbon emission reduction paths in the period 2014–2020 are established by decomposing the target for emissions reduction. An optimization model of energy demand, into which reduction paths are incorporated, is then constructed from a goal-oriented perspective. The results suggest that energy consumption varies under different emission reduction paths. Coal demand is found to be much more sensitive to the choice of emission reduction path than other forms of energy; in particular, it responds strongly to the decreasing reduction path. We conclude that the decreasing reduction path is a better means than the increasing reduction path of achieving China’s emission reduction target for 2020 with the least amount of energy and the least amount of CO2 emissions.
This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.
Similar content being viewed by others
References
Andersson FNG, Karpestam P (2013) CO2 emissions and economic activity: short- and long-run economic determinants of scale, energy intensity and carbon intensity. Energ Policy 61:1285–1294. doi:10.1016/j.enpol.2013.06.004
Auffhammer M, Carson RT (2008) Forecasting the path of China’s CO2 emissions using province-level information. J Environ Econ Manag 55(3):229–247. doi:10.1016/j.jeem.2007.10.002
Cao J, Karplus VJ (2014) Firm-level determinants of energy and carbon intensity in China. Energy Policy 75:167–178. doi:10.1016/j.enpol.2014.08.012
Grunewald N, Jakob M, Mouratiadou I (2014) Decomposing inequality in CO2 emissions: the role of primary energy carriers and economic sectors. Ecol Econ 100:183–194. doi:10.1016/j.ecolecon.2014.02.007
Liu X, Mao G, Ren J, Li RYM, Guo J, Zhang L (2015) How might China achieve its 2020 emissions target? A scenario analysis of energy consumption and CO2 emissions using the system dynamics model. J Clean Prod 103:401–410. doi:10.1016/j.jclepro.2014.12.080
Nordhaus W (2007) Critical assumptions in the Stern review on climate change. Science 317:201–202. doi:10.1126/science.1137316
Olmstead SM, Stavins RN (2006) An international policy architecture for the post-Kyoto era. Am Econ Rev 96(2):35–38. doi:10.1257/000282806777212413
Stern NH (2007) The economics of climate change: the Stern review. Cambridge University Press, Cambridge
Wang R, Liu W, Xiao L, Liu J, Kao W (2011) Path towards achieving of China’s 2020 carbon emission reduction target—a discussion of low-carbon energy policies at province level. Energy Policy 39:2740–2747. doi:10.1016/j.enpol.2011.02.043
Weitzman ML (2009) On modeling and interpreting the economics of catastrophic climate change. Rev Econ Stat 91:1–19. doi:10.1162/rest.91.1.1
Yue T, Long R, Chen H, Zhao X (2013) The optimal CO2 emissions reduction path in Jiangsu province: an expanded IPAT approach. Appl Energy 112:1510–1517. doi:10.1016/j.apenergy.2013.02.046
Zhou P, Wang M (2016) Carbon dioxide emissions allocation: a review. Ecol Econ 125:47–59. doi:10.1016/j.ecolecon.2016.03.001
Zhou P, Sun ZR, Zhou DQ (2014) Optimal path for controlling CO2 emissions in China: a perspective of efficiency analysis. Energy Econ 45:99–110. doi:10.1016/j.eneco.2014.06.019
Zhu B, Wang K, Chevallier J, Wang P, Wei Y-M (2015) Can China achieves its carbon intensity target by 2020 while sustaining economic growth? Ecol Econ 119:209–216. doi:10.1016/j.ecolecon.2015.08.015
Acknowledgements
This research was supported by the National Natural Science Foundation of China (Nos. 71271074, 71573069, 71373099). The authors would like to thank the comments and suggestions from the reviewers.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Corresponding author
Rights and permissions
About this article
Cite this article
Han, X., Jiao, J., Liu, L. et al. China’s energy demand and carbon dioxide emissions: do carbon emission reduction paths matter?. Nat Hazards 86, 1333–1345 (2017). https://doi.org/10.1007/s11069-017-2747-0
Received:
Accepted:
Published:
Issue Date:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s11069-017-2747-0