Skip to main content
SpringerLink
Log in

Selection of the best fit probability distribution in rainfall frequency analysis for Qatar

  • Original Paper
  • Published:
Natural Hazards Aims and scope Submit manuscript

A Correction to this article was published on 24 September 2018

This article has been updated

Abstract

Design rainfall is widely used in urban infrastructure planning and design such as culverts and urban drainage systems. In design rainfall estimation, one of the primary steps is the selection of a suitable probability distribution that fits the observed rainfall data adequately. This study examines the selection of the best fit probability distribution in design rainfall estimation. The annual maximum (AM) rainfall data from 29 rainfall stations in Qatar are used in this study. The rainfall record lengths of these stations are in the range of 24–49 years (average of 36 years). Fourteen different distributions and three goodness-of-fit tests (Kolmogorov–Smirnov, Anderson–Darling and Chi-squared) are considered. Based on a relative scoring method, the GEV distribution is found to be the best fit distribution. Results from bootstrapping and simulation analyses show that sample estimates of skewness of the AM rainfall series are subject to a higher degree of sensitivity to data length compared with standard deviation and mean as expected. Since the rainfall quantile estimates of higher return periods are greatly influenced by skewness, a longer data length is needed in reducing the uncertainty in rainfall quantile estimates for higher return periods, which is currently unavailable in Qatar.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Log in via an institution

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Institutional subscriptions

Fig. 1
Fig. 2
Fig. 3
Fig. 4
Fig. 5

Similar content being viewed by others

Change history

  • 24 September 2018

    The original article was published with two typographical errors found in the unit of Y-axis in Figs. 4 and 5 of the original article. The author would like readers to know that the units should be changed from “mm/hr” to “mm/day”. This correction stands to correct the original article.

References

  • Batanouny KH (1981) Ecology and Flora of Qatar. University of Qatar, Qatar

    Google Scholar 

  • Bobee B, Cavidas G, Ashkar F, Bernier J, Rasmussen P (1993) Towards a systematic approach to comparing distributions used in flood frequency analysis. J Hydrol 142:121–136

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Cunnane, C. (1989). Statistical distributions for flood frequency analysis. Operational hydrological report, No. 5/33, World Meteorological Organization (WMO), Geneva.

  • Efron B (1979a) Bootstrap methods: another look at the jackknife. Ann Stat 3:1189–1242

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Efron B (1979b) Computers and theory of statistics: thinking the unthinkable. SIAM Rev 21:460–480

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Efron B, Tibshirani R (1993) An introduction to the bootstrap. Chapman & Hall/CRC, Boca Raton

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • Fadhilah Y, Zalina MD, Nguyen V-T-V, Suhaila S, Zulkifli Y (2007) Fitting the best fit distribution for the hourly rainfall amount in the Wilayah Persekutuan. J Teknol 46(C):49–58

    Google Scholar 

  • Green J, Xuereb K, Johnson F, Moore G. (2012). The revised intensity–frequency–duration (IFD) design rainfall estimates for Australia—an overview. In: Proceeding of 34th hydrology and water resources symposium 19–22 November 2012, Sydney, Australia

  • Haddad K, Rahman A (2010) Selection of the best fit flood frequency distribution and parameter estimation procedure: a case study for Tasmania in Australia. Stoch Environ Res Risk Assess. doi:10.1007/s00477-010-0412-1

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Haddad K, Johnson F, Rahman A, Kuczera G, Green J (2015) Comparing three methods to form regions for design rainfall statistics: two case studies in Australia. J Hydrol 527:62–76

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Johnson F, Haddad K, Rahman A, Green J (2012) Application of Bayesian GLSR to estimate sub-daily rainfall parameters for the IDF revision project, hydrology and water resources symposium, 19–22 Nov 2012. Australia, Sydney

    Google Scholar 

  • Kwaku SS, Duke O (2007) Characterization and frequency analysis of one day annual maximum and two to five consecutive days maximum rainfall of Accra, Ghana, ARPN. J Eng Appl Sci 2(5):27–31

    Google Scholar 

  • Lee C (2005) Application of rainfall frequency analysis on studying rainfall distribution characteristics of Chia-nan plain in Southern Taiwan. J Crop Environ Bioinform 2:31–38

    Google Scholar 

  • Mamoon AA, Rahman A (2016) Rainfall in Qatar: is it changing? Nat Hazards. doi:10.1007/s11069-016-2576-6

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Mamoon AA, Jeorgensen NE, Rahman A, Qasem H (2014) Derivation of new design rainfall in Qatar using L-moments based index frequency approach. Int J Sustain Built Environ 3:111–118

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Noy-Meir I (1973) Desert ecosystems: environment and producers. Annu Rev Ecol Syst 4:25–51

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Ogunlela AO (2001) Stochastic analysis of rainfall events in Ilorin,Nigeria. J Agric Res Dev 1:39–50

    Google Scholar 

  • Olofintoye OO, Sule BF, Salami AW, Phien HN, Ajirajah TJ (2009) Best–fit probability distribution model for peak daily rainfall of selected cities in Nigeria. N Y Sci J 2(3):3–12

    Google Scholar 

  • Phien HN, Ajirajah TJ (1984) Applications of the log-Pearson type-3 distributions in hydrology. J Hydrol 73:359–372

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Qi W, Zhang C, Fu G, Zhou H (2016a) Quantifying dynamic sensitivity of optimization algorithm parameters to improve hydrological model calibration. J Hydrol 533:213–223

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Qi W, Zhang C, Fu G, Zhou H (2016b) Imprecise probabilistic estimation of design floods with epistemic uncertainties. Water Resour Res. doi:10.1002/2015WR017663

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Sen Z, Eljadid AG (1999) Rainfall distribution functions for libya and rainfall prediction. Hydrol Sci J 4(5):665–680

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Sharma MA, Singh JB (2010) Use of probability distribution in rainfall analysis. N Y Sci J 3(9):40–49

    Google Scholar 

  • Subyani AM, Al-Amri NS (2015) IDF curves and daily rainfall generation for Al-Madinah city, western Saudi Arabia. Arab J Geosci. doi:10.1007/s12517-015-1999-9

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Tao DQ, Nguyen VT, Bourque A (2002). On selection of probability distributions for representing extreme precipitations in Southern Quebec. In: Annual conference of the Canadian Society for Civil Engineering, 5–8th June, p 1–8

  • Tortorelli RL, Alan R, Asquith WH (1999). Depth-duration frequency of precipitation for Oklahoma, US geological survey. Water resources investigation report 99–4232

  • Tung Y, Wong C (2014) Assessment of design rainfall uncertainty for hydrologic engineering applications in Hong Kong. Stoch Environ Res Risk Assess 28:583–592

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Wan Zin W, Jemain AA, Ibrahim K (2008) The best fitting distribution of annual maximum rainfall in Peninsular Malaysia based on methods of L-moment and LQ-moment. Theor Appl Climatol 96:337–344. doi:10.1007/s00704-008-0044-2

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Zalina MD, Desa MNM, Nguyen V-T-V, Kassim AHM (2002) Selecting a probability distribution for extreme rainfall series in Malaysia. Water Sci Technol 45(2):63–68

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Zhang C, Chu J, Fu G (2013) Sobols sensitivity analysis for a distributed hydrological model of Yichun River Basin. China J Hydrol 480(1–4):58–68

    Article  Google Scholar 

Download references

Acknowledgements

The data for this study were obtained from Ministry of Municipality and Environment Qatar.

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

  1. Ministry of Municipality and Environment, Doha, Qatar

    Abdullah Al Mamoon

  2. School of Computing, Engineering and Mathematics, Western Sydney University, Building XB, Room 2.48, Kingswood, Penrith, Locked Bag 1797, Sydney, NSW, 2751, Australia

    Abdullah Al Mamoon & Ataur Rahman

Authors
  1. Abdullah Al Mamoon
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  2. Ataur Rahman
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Ataur Rahman.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Mamoon, A.A., Rahman, A. Selection of the best fit probability distribution in rainfall frequency analysis for Qatar. Nat Hazards 86, 281–296 (2017). https://doi.org/10.1007/s11069-016-2687-0

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s11069-016-2687-0

Keywords

Search

Navigation