Skip to main content
Log in

Fidelity of the integrated kinetic energy factor as an indicator of storm surge impacts

  • Original Paper
  • Published:
Natural Hazards Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

After the devastating hurricane season of 2005, shortcomings with the Saffir–Simpson Hurricane Scale’s (SSHS) ability to characterize a tropical cyclone’s potential to generate storm surge became widely apparent. As a result, several alternative surge indices were proposed to replace the SSHS, including Powell and Reinhold’s integrated kinetic energy (IKE) factor, Kantha’s Hurricane Surge Index (HSI), and Irish and Resio’s Surge Scale (SS). Of the previous, the IKE factor is the only surge index to date that truly captures a tropical cyclone’s integrated intensity, size, and wind field distribution. However, since the IKE factor was proposed in 2007, an accurate assessment of this surge index has not been performed. This study provides the first quantitative evaluation of the IKEs ability to serve as a predictor of a tropical cyclone’s potential surge impacts as compared to other alternative surge indices. Using the tightly coupled Advanced Circulation and Simulating Waves Nearshore models, the surge and wave responses of Hurricane Ike in 2008 and 78 synthetic tropical cyclones were evaluated against the SSHS, IKE, HSI, and SS. Results along the northwestern Gulf of Mexico coastline demonstrate that the HSI performs best in capturing the peak surge response of a tropical cyclone, while the IKE accounting for winds greater than tropical storm intensity (IKETS) provides the most accurate estimate of a tropical cyclone’s regional surge impacts. These results demonstrate that the appropriate selection of a surge index ultimately depends on what information is of interest to be conveyed to the public and/or scientific community.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Institutional subscriptions

Fig. 1
Fig. 2
Fig. 3
Fig. 4
Fig. 5
Fig. 6

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  • Berg R (2009) Tropical cylone report: hurricane ike 1–14 September 2008. National Hurricane Center, University Park

    Google Scholar 

  • Booij N, Ris RC, Holthuijsen LH (1999) A third-generation wave model for coastal regions: 1. Model description and validation. J Geophys Res 104(C4):7649–7666. doi:10.1029/98JC02622

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Cañizares R, Irish JL (2008) Simulation of storm-induced barrier island morphodynamics and flooding. Coast Eng 55:1089–1101

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Cobell Z, Zhao H, Roberts HJ, Clark FR, Zou S (2013) Surge and wave modeling for the Louisiana 2012 coastal master plan. J Coast Res 67:88–108

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Dietrich JC, Bunya S, Westerink JJ, Ebersole BA, Smith JM, Atkinson JH, Jensen R, Resio DT, Luettich RA, Dawson C, Cardone VJ, Cox AT, Powell MD, Westerink HJ, Roberts HJ (2010) A high-resolution coupled riverine flow, tide, wind, wind wave, and storm surge model for Southern Louisiana and Mississippi. Part II: synoptic description and analysis of hurricanes Katrina and Rita. Mon Weather Rev 138:378–404

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Dietrich JC, Westerink JJ, Kennedy AB, Smith JM, Jensen RE, Zijlema M, Holthuijsen LH, Dawson C, Luettich RA, Powell MD, Cardone VJ, Cox AT, Stone GW, Pourtaheri H, Hope ME, Tanaka S, Westerink LG, Westerink HJ, Cobell Z (2011a) Hurricane Gustav (2008) waves and storm surge: hindcast, synoptic analysis, and validation in Southern Louisiana. Mon Weather Rev 139:2488–2522

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Dietrich JC, Zijlema M, Westerink JJ, Holthuijsen LH, Dawson C, Luettich RA, Jensen RE, Smith JM, Stelling GS, Stone GW (2011b) Modeling hurricane waves and storm surge using integrally-coupled, scalable computations. Coast Eng 58(1):45–65

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Dorst N (2014) What is the average forward speed of a hurricane?. In: Hurricane research division frequently asked questions. National Oceanic and Atmospheric Administration. http://www.aoml.noaa.gov/hrd/tcfaq/G16.html. Accessed 15 Dec 2015

  • Dresback KM, Fleming JG, Blanton BO, Kaiser C, Gourley JJ, Tromble EM, Luettich RA, Kolar RL, Hong Y, Van Cooten S, Vergara HJ, Flamig ZL, Lander HM, Kelleher KE, Nemunaitis-Monroe KL (2013) Skill assessment of a real-time forecast system utilizing a coupled hydrologic and coastal hydrodynamic model during hurricane irene (2011). Cont Shelf Res 71:78–94

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Federal Emergency Management Agency (FEMA) and U.S. Army Corps of Engineers (USACE) (2011) Flood insurance study: coastal counties. Texas

  • Glahn B, Taylor A, Kurkowski N, Shaffer WA (2009) The role of the SLOSH model in National Weather Service storm surge forecasting. Natl Weather Dig 33(1):4–14

    Google Scholar 

  • Grzegorzewski AS, Cialone MA, Wamsley TV (2011) Interaction of barrier islands and storms: implications for flood risk reduction in Louisiana and Mississippi. J Coast Res 59:156–164

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Holland G (1980) An analytical model of the wind and pressure profiles in hurricanes. Mon Weather Rev 108(8):1212–1218

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Hope ME, Westerink JJ, Kennedy AB, Kerr PC, Dietrich JC, Dawson C, Bender CJ, Smith JM, Jensen RE, Zijlema M, Holthuijsen LH, Luettich RA, Powell MD, Cardone VJ, Cox AT, Pourtaheri H, Roberts HJ, Atkinson JH, Tanaka S, Westerink HJ, Westerink LG (2013) Hindcast and validation of Hurricane Ike (2008) waves, forerunner, and storm surge. J Geophys Res Oceans 118:4424–4460

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Irish JL, Resio DT (2010) A hydrodynamics-based surge scale for hurricanes. Ocean Eng 37:69–81

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Irish JL, Resio DT, Ratcliff JJ (2008) The influence of storm size on hurricane surge. J Phys Oceanogr 38:2003–2013

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Kantha L (2006) Time to replace the Saffir–Simpson Hurricane Scale? EOS Trans Am Geophys Union 87(1):3–6

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Kantha L (2008) Comments: tropical cyclone destructive potential by integrated kinetic energy. Bull Am Meteorolog Soc 88(4):513–526

    Google Scholar 

  • Kantha L (2010) Discussion of “A hydrodynamics-based surge scale for hurricanes.”. Ocean Eng 37:1081–1084

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Kimberlain TB, Blake ES, Cangialosi JP (2016) Tropical cyclone report: hurricane patricia 20–24 October 2015. National Hurricane Center, University Park

    Google Scholar 

  • Landsea CW, Franklin JL (2013) Atlantic hurricane database uncertainty and presentation of a new database format. Mon Weather Rev 141:3576–3592

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Luettich RA, Westerink HJ (2004) Formulation and numerical implementation of the 2D/3D ADCIRC finite element model version 44. XX

  • Moyer AC, Evans JL, Powell M (2007) Comparison of observed gale radius statistics. Meteor Atmos Phys 97:41–55

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • National Geophysical Data Center (2015) ETOPO1 1-minute gridded bathymetric data. https://www.ngdc.noaa.gov/mgg/global/global.html. doi:10.7289/V5C8276M. Accessed 18 Feb 2016

  • National Weather Service (2007) The Saffir–Simpson Hurricane Scale. http://www.nhc.noaa.gov/aboutsshws.php. Accessed 25 Mar 2016

  • Powell MD (2012) Use cases for IKE from operational quantities. http://www.aoml.noaa.gov/hrd/ike/Calculator_AllQuad.php. Accessed 5 Aug 2015

  • Powell MD, Ginis I (2006) Drag coefficient distribution and wind speed dependence in tropical cyclones. In: Final report to the National Oceanic and Atmospheric Administration (NOAA) Joint Hurricane Testbed (JHT) Program

  • Powell MD, Reinhold TA (2007) Tropical cyclone destructive potential by Integrated Kinetic Energy. Bull Am Meteorolog Soc 88(4):513–526

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Powell MD, Houston SH, Amat LR, Morisseau-Leroy N (1998) The HRD real-time hurricane wind analysis system. J Wind Eng Ind Aerodyn 77–78:53–64

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Powell MD, Vickery PJ, Reinhold TA (2003) Reduced drag coefficient for high wind speeds in tropical cyclones. Nature 422:279–283

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Rappaport EN, Franklin JL, Avila LA, Baig SR, Beven JL, Blake ES, Burr CA, Jiing JG, Juckins CA, Knabb RD, Landsea CW, Mainelli M, Mayfield M, McAdie CJ, Pasch RJ, Sisko C, Stewart SR, Tribble AN (2009) Advances and challenges at the National Hurricane Center. Weather Forecast 24:395–419

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Rego JL, Li C (2009) On the importance of the forward speed of hurricanes in storm surge forecasting: a numerical study. Geophys Res Lett 36(7). doi:10.1029/2008GL036953

  • Sebastian A, Proft J, Dietrich JC, Du W, Bedient PB, Dawson CN (2014) Characterizing hurricane storm surge behavior in galveston bay using the SWAN+ADCIRC model. Coast Eng 88:171–181

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Simpson RH (1974) The hurricane disaster-potential scale. Weatherwise 27:169–186

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Thompson EF, Cardone VJ (1996) Practical modeling of hurricane surface wind fields. J Waterw Port Coast Ocean Eng 122:195–205

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Torres JM, Bass B, Irza N, Fang Z, Proft J, Dawson C, Kiani M, Bedient P (2015) Characterizing the hydraulic interactions of hurricane storm surge and rainfall-runoff for the Houston-Galveston region. Coast Eng 106:7–19

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Wesiberg RH, Zheng L (2006) Hurricane storm surge simulations for Tampa Bay. Estuar Coasts 29:899–913

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Westerink JJ, Luettich RA, Feyen JC, Atkinson JH, Dawson C, Roberts HJ, Powell MD, Dunion JP, Kubatko EJ, Pourtaheri H (2008) A basin- to channel-scale unstructured grid hurricane storm surge model applied to Southern Louisiana. Mon Weather Rev 136:833–864

    Article  Google Scholar 

Download references

Acknowledgments

This research was supported by the Houston Endowment under the Severe Storm Prediction, Education, and Evacuation from Disasters (SSPEED) Center. C. Dawson also acknowledges the support of National Science Foundation grant ACT-1339801, the Extreme Science and Engineering Discovery Environment (XSEDE) grant TG-DMS080016N, and the Texas Advanced Computing Center for the use of their computing resources. The authors would also like to thank Saffir and Simpson, Powell and Reinhold, Kantha, and Irish and Resio for their contributions toward developing a reliable surge index.

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Benjamin Bass.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Bass, B., Irza, J.N., Proft, J. et al. Fidelity of the integrated kinetic energy factor as an indicator of storm surge impacts. Nat Hazards 85, 575–595 (2017). https://doi.org/10.1007/s11069-016-2587-3

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s11069-016-2587-3

Keywords

Navigation