Skip to main content
Log in

Seismic risk in the city of Al Hoceima (north of Morocco) using the vulnerability index method, applied in Risk-UE project

  • Original Paper
  • Published:
Natural Hazards Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

Al Hoceima is one of the most seismic active regions in north of Morocco. It is demonstrated by the large seismic episodes reported in seismic catalogs and research studies. However, seismic risk is relatively high due to vulnerable buildings that are either old or don’t respect seismic standards. Our aim is to present a study about seismic risk and seismic scenarios for the city of Al Hoceima. The seismic vulnerability of the existing residential buildings was evaluated using the vulnerability index method (Risk-UE). It was chosen to be adapted and applied to the Moroccan constructions for its practicality and simple methodology. A visual inspection of 1102 buildings was carried out to assess the vulnerability factors. As for seismic hazard, it was evaluated in terms of macroseismic intensity for two scenarios (a deterministic and probabilistic scenario). The maps of seismic risk are represented by direct damage on buildings, damage to population and economic cost. According to the results, the main vulnerability index of the city is equal to 0.49 and the seismic risk is estimated as Slight (main damage grade equal to 0.9 for the deterministic scenario and 0.7 for the probabilistic scenario). However, Moderate to heavy damage is expected in areas located in the newer extensions, in both the east and west of the city. Important economic losses and damage to the population are expected in these areas as well. The maps elaborated can be a potential guide to the decision making in the field of seismic risk prevention and mitigation strategies in Al Hoceima.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Fig. 1
Fig. 2
Fig. 3
Fig. 4
Fig. 5
Fig. 6
Fig. 7
Fig. 8
Fig. 9
Fig. 10
Fig. 11
Fig. 12
Fig. 13
Fig. 14
Fig. 15

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  • Ait Brahim L, Tadili B, Nakhcha C, Mouayn I, Ramdani M, Limouri M, El Qadi A, Sossey Alaoui F, Benhalima M (2004) Using active faults and seismicity for the strong motion modeling in the eastern Rif (northern Morocco). Pure Appl Geophys 161(2004):1081–1091. doi:10.1007/s00024-003-2487-9

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Akoglu AM, Cakir Z, Meghraoui M, Belabbes S, El Alami SO, Ergintav S, Akyüz HS (2006) The 1994–2004 Al Hoceima (Morocco) earthquake sequence: conjugate fault ruptures deduced from InSAR. Earth Planet Sci Lett 252(3–4):467–480. doi:10.1016/j.epsl.2006.10.010

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • ATC-13 (1985) Earthquake damage evaluation data for California, ATC-13. Applied Technology Council, Redwook City

    Google Scholar 

  • BAEL 91 (1992) Règles techniques de conception et de calcul des ouvrages et constructions en béton armé suivant la méthode des états-limites. Décret n092-72 du 16 janvier 1992

  • Bard PY (1997) Local effects on strong motion ground motion: basic physical phenomena and estimation methods for microzoning studies. In: SERINA: seismic risk and integrated seismological, geotechnical and structural approaches. ITSAK, European Commission, Directorate General for Science and Development

  • Benedetti D, Petrini V (1984) Sulla vulnerabilitá sismica di edifici in muratura: proposte di un metodo di valutazione. L’industria delle Construzioni 149:66–78

    Google Scholar 

  • Bezzeghoud M, Buforn E (1999) Source parameters of the 1992 Melilla (Spain, Mw = 4.8), 1994 Al Hoceima (Morocco Mw = 5. 8) and Mascara (Algeria, Mw = 5.7) earthquakes and seismotectonic implications. Bull Seismol Soc Am 89:359–372

    Google Scholar 

  • Casado CL, Henares J, Badal J, Peláez JA (2014) Multifractal images of the seismicity in the Ibero-Maghrebian region (westernmost boundary between the Eurasian and African plates). Tectonophysics 627(2014):82–97

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Cherkaoui T, El Hassani A (2012) Seismicity and seismic hazard in Morocco 1901–2010. Bulletin de l’Institut Scientifique, Rabat, section Sciences de la Terre 2012(34):45–55

    Google Scholar 

  • Cherkaoui T, Hatzfeld D, Jebli H, Medina F, Caillot V (1990) Etude microsismique dela région d’Al Hoceima. Bull Inst Sci Rabat 4:25–34

    Google Scholar 

  • Choubert G, Faure-Muret A (1984) Carte géologique du Rif: Al Hoceima-Echelle 1/50 000. No 302

  • Coburn A, Spence R (2002) Earthquake protection, 2nd edn. Wiley, Chichester

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • Corella PM (2004) Al-Hoceima earthquake. Field report

  • d’Acremont E, Gutscher M-A, Rabaute A, Mercier de Lépinay B, Lafosse M, Poort J, Ammar A, Tahayt A, Le Roy P, Smit J, Do Couto D, Cancouët R, Prunier C, Ercilla G, Gorini C (2014) High-resolution imagery of active faulting offshore Al Hoceima, Northern Morocco. Tectonophysics 632:160–166. doi:10.1016/j.tecto.2014.06.008

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • El Alami SO, Tadili BA, Cherkaoui TE, Medina F, Ramdani M, Ait Brahim L, Har-nafi M (1998) The Al Hoceima earthquake of May 26, 1994 and its aftershocks: a seismotectonic study. Ann. Geofisica 41:519–537

    Google Scholar 

  • Faccioli E (2006) Seismic hazard assessment for derivation of earthquake scenarios in Risk-UE. Bull Earthq Eng 4:341–364

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Faradi (2004) Seisme d’Al Hoceima du 24-2-2004 constat technique, p 3

  • Giovinazzi S, Lagomarsino S (2002) Wp04: guidelines for the implementation of the level I methodology for the vulnerability assessment of current buildings. RISK-UE project: an advanced approach to earthquake risk scenarios with applications to different European towns. Contract No. EVK4-CT-2000-00014, Genoa

  • Goula X, Gonzalez M (2004) Visite technique à la zone endommagé par le séisme d’Al-hoceima du 24 février 2004. Generalitat de Catalunya. Institut Cartogràfic de Catalunya, ICC-GS-192/2004 (fr)

  • Grünthal G (1998) European macroseismic scale 1998. Centre Européen de Géodynamique et de Séismologie, Luxemburg

    Google Scholar 

  • HAZUS (1999) Earthquake loss estimation methodology technical manual, prepared by the National Institute of Building Sciences for Federal Emergency Management Agency (FEMA), Washington, DC

  • Jabour N, Kasmi M, Menzhi M, Birouk A, Hni L, Hahou Y, Timoulali Y, Bedrane S (2004) The February 24th, 2004 Al Hoceima earthquake, Newsletter of European-Mediterranean Seismological Centre, No 21, ISSN:1607-1980

  • Lagomarsino S, Giovinazzi S (2006) Macroseismic and mechanical models for the vulnerability and damage assessment of current buildings. Bull Earthq Eng 4:415–443

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Lantada N, Irizarry J, Barbat AH, Goula X, Roca A, Susagna T, Pujades LG (2010) Seismic hazard and risk scenarios for Barcelona, Spain, using the Risk-UE Vulnerability Index Method. Bull Earthq Eng. doi:10.1007/s10518-009-9148-z

    Google Scholar 

  • Louhibi S, Chourak M, El Kihel E, El Hammoumi A, Douiri A (2013) Evaluation of the seismic vulnerability of buildings in Al Hoceima (Morocco). Int J Earth Sci Eng. 06(01):1505–1511. ISSN:0974-5904

  • Lungu D, Aldea A, Arion A, Vacareanu R, Petrescu F, Cornea T (2001) WP1 report: European distinctive features, inventory database and typology. RISK-UE project: an advanced approach to earthquake risk scenarios with applications to different European towns. Contract No. EVK4-CT-2000-00014

  • Milutinoviç ZV, Trendafiloski GS (2003) WP04: vulnerability of current buildings handbook. RISK-UE project: an advanced approach to earthquake risk scenarios with applications to different European towns. Contract No. EVK4-CT-2000-00014, Institute of Earthquake Engineering and Engineering Seismology (IZIIS), Skopje

  • Mourabit T, Abou Elenean KM, Ayadi A, Benouar D, Ben Suleman A, Bezzeghoud M, Cheddadi A, Chourak M, ElGabry MN, Harbi A, Hfaiedh M, Hussein HM, Kacem J, Ksentini A, Jabour N, Magrin A, Maouche S, Meghraoui M, Ousadou F, Panza GF, Peresan A, Romdhane N, Vaccari F, Zuccolo E (2013) Neo-deterministic seismic hazard assessment in North Africa. J Seismol. doi:10.1007/s10950-013-9375-2

    Google Scholar 

  • Mouroux P, Bertrand M, Bour M, Brun BL, Depinois S, Masure P, Risk-UE Team (2004) The European Risk-UE project: an advanced approach to earthquake risk scenarios. In: Proceedings of the 13th world conference earthquake engineering, Vancouver (CD-ROM, paper no. 3329)

  • Pitilakis K, Alexoudi M, Argyroudis S, Anastasiadis A (2006) Seismic risk scenarios for an efficient seismic risk management: the case of Thessaloniki (Greece). Adv Earthq Eng Urban Risk Reduct. doi:10.1007/1-4020-4571-9_15

    Google Scholar 

  • Poujol A, Ritz J-F, Tahayt A, Vernant P, Condomines M, Blard P-H, Billant J, Vacher L, Tibari B, Hni L, Koulali Idrissi A (2014) Active tectonics of the Northern Rif (Morocco) from geomorphic and geochronological data. J Geodyn 77:70–88. doi:10.1016/j.jog.2014.01.004

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • PS92 (1995) Règles PS applicables aux bâtiments. NF P 06-013-DTU Règles PS 92, Décembre 1995

  • RGPH 2004 (2004) Recensement général de la population et de l’habitat 2004. http://www.hcp.ma/Recensement-general-de-la-population-et-de-l-habitat-2004_a633.html

  • RGPH 2014 (2014) Population légale des régions, provinces, préfectures du royaume d’après les résultats du RGPH 2014 (12 Régions). http://www.rgph2014.hcp.ma/Note-sur-les-premiers-resultats-du-Recensement-General-de-la-Population-et-de-l-Habitat-2014_a369.html

  • RMSI (2012) Morocco natural hazards probabilistic analysis and national strategy development. Earthquake hazard report. Department of Economic and General Affairs, Kingdom of Morocco

    Google Scholar 

  • R.P.S. 2000 (2002) Règlement de construction parasismique. Ministère de l’Aménagement du Territoire, de l’Urbanisme, de l’Habitat et de l’Environnement. Secrétariat d’Etat à l’Habitat

  • R.P.S. 2000, Version 2011 (2011) Règlement de construction parasismique. Ministère de l’Habitat, de l’Urbanisme et de l’Aménagement de l’Espace

  • Secanell R (1999) Avaluació de la perillositat sísmica a Catalunya: anàlisi de sensibilitat per a diferents models d’ocurrència i paràmetres sísmics, Ph.D. thesis, University of Barcelona

  • Tahayt A, Feigl KL, Mourabit TL, Rigo A, Reilinger R, McClusky S, Fadil A, Dorbath L, Serroukh M, Gomez F, Ben Sari D, Berthier E (2009) The Al Hoceima (Morocco) earthquake of 24 February 2004, analysis and interpretation of data from ENVISAT ASAR and SPOT5 validated by ground-based observations. Remote Sens Environ 113(2009):306–316. doi:10.1016/j.rse.2008.09.015

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Talhaoui A, Brahim AI, Aberkan MH, Kasmi M, El Mouraouah A (2008) Seismic microzonation and site effects at Al Hoceima city, Morocco. J Earthq Eng 8(4):585–596

    Google Scholar 

  • USGS (2016) M6.3-50 km NNE of Al Hoceima, Morocco. http://earthquake.usgs.gov/earthquakes/eventpage/us10004gy9#general_region

  • Woerd JVD, Dorbath C, Ousadou F, Dorbath L, Delouis B, Jacques E, Tapponnier P, Hahou Y, Menzhi M, Frogneux M, Haessler H (2014) The Al Hoceima Mw 6.4 earthquake of 24 February 2004 and its aftershocks sequence. J Geodyn 77:89–109. doi:10.1016/j.jog.2013.12.004

    Article  Google Scholar 

Download references

Acknowledgments

This research benefited from the ICTP-OEA (Trieste) Programme in the framework of the North African Group for Earthquake and Tsunami studies (NAGET) activities. We also thank two anonymous reviewers’ valuable comments which helped to improve this paper.

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Seif-eddine Cherif.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Cherif, Se., Chourak, M., Abed, M. et al. Seismic risk in the city of Al Hoceima (north of Morocco) using the vulnerability index method, applied in Risk-UE project. Nat Hazards 85, 329–347 (2017). https://doi.org/10.1007/s11069-016-2566-8

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s11069-016-2566-8

Keywords

Navigation