Advertisement

Natural Hazards

, Volume 84, Issue 3, pp 1637–1659 | Cite as

Local politicians as linking social capital: an empirical test of political behavior after Japan’s 3/11 disasters

  • Daniel P. AldrichEmail author
  • Yoshikuni Ono
Original Paper

Abstract

After a massive catastrophe, local decision makers have a large number of potential sources of advice and assistance. Yet, we know little about those to whom politicians reach out at the local, regional, and national levels, and what drives the intensity of contact with these targets. Using original survey data drawn from more than 240 council members from cities, towns, and villages in the Tohoku region of Japan, we investigate the factors influencing consultation after the March 11, 2011, compounded disasters. We find strong variation in their outreach to actors, including national-level politicians, governors, prefectural politicians, civil servants, and local constituents. Controlling for a number of compounding factors, such as town size, financial capability, and personal characteristics of the politician, we find that the degree of damage in their own communities robustly influences outreach after crisis. The more damage, the more local politicians reach out to a broader network of potentially useful connections more often. Partisan and independent town council members behave differently; those with party connections (especially those with connections to a governing party) reach out more than those without. Our findings about diversity and intensity of outreach bring important implications for residents, politicians, and non-governmental organizations after disaster.

Keywords

Political behavior Japan Disaster 3/11 Vertical ties Linking social capital 

References

  1. Aldrich DP (1999) Localities that can say no? Autonomy and dependence in Japanese local government. Asian J Polit Sci 7(1):60–76CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  2. Aldrich DP (2012) Building resilience: social capital in post-disaster recovery. University of Chicago Press, ChicagoCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  3. Aldrich DP (2015) It’s who you know: factors driving recovery from Japan 11 March 2011 disaster. Public Adm 94(2):399–413CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  4. Aldrich DP, Sawada Y (2015) The physical and social determinants of mortality in the 3.11 tsunami. Soc Sci Med 124:66–75CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  5. Anglin MD, Hser YI, Chou CP (1993) Reliability and validity of retrospective behavioral self report by narcotics addicts. Eval Rev 17(1):91–108CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  6. Boin A, McConnell A, ‘T Hart P (eds) (2008) Governing after crisis: the politics of investigation, accountability, and learning. Cambridge University Press, New YorkGoogle Scholar
  7. Cox GW (1990) Centripetal and centrifugal incentives in electoral systems. Am J Polit Sci 34:903–935CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  8. Curtis G (1999) The logic of Japanese politics. Columbia University Press, New YorkGoogle Scholar
  9. DuPont W, Noy I, Okuyama Y, Sawada Y (2015) The long run socio-economic consequences of a large disaster. PLoS One. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0138714 Google Scholar
  10. Fenno RF Jr (1978) Home style: house members and their districts. Little and Brown, BostonGoogle Scholar
  11. Heitshusen V, Yong G, Wood DM (2005) Electoral context and mp constituency focus in Australia, Canada, Ireland, New Zealand, and the United Kingdom. Am J Polit Sci 49:32–45CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  12. Hirano S (2006) Electoral institutions, hometowns, and favored minorities: evidence from Japanese electoral reforms. World Polit 59(1):51–82CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  13. Holbrook A (2011) Attitude change experiments in political science. In: James D (ed) Cambridge handbook of experimental social science. Cambridge University Press, New York, pp 252–279Google Scholar
  14. Horiuchi Y, Saito J, Yamada K (2015) Removing boundaries, losing connections: electoral consequences of local government reform in Japan. J East Asian Stud 15:99–125CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  15. Ikawa H (2008) 15 Years of decentralization reform in Japan. Council of Local Authorities for International Relations (CLAIR), TokyoGoogle Scholar
  16. Johnson C (1995) Japan: who governs? The rise of the developmental state. W.W. Norton, New YorkGoogle Scholar
  17. King G, Tomz M, Wittenberg J (2000) Making the most of statistical analyses: improving interpretation and presentation. Am J Polit Sci 44:347–361CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  18. Krauss ES, Pekkanen RJ (2011) The rise and fall of Japan’s LDP: political party organizations as historical institutions. Cornell University Press, IthacaGoogle Scholar
  19. Krosnick JA, Presser S (2010) Question and questionnaire design. In: Marsden P, Wright J (eds) Handbook of survey research, 2nd edn. Emerald GroupGoogle Scholar
  20. Lancaster TD, Patterson DW (1990) Comparative pork barrel politics: perceptions from the West German Bundestag. Comp Polit Stud 22(4):458–477CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  21. Lieberman E (2005) Nested analysis as a mixed-method strategy for comparative research. Am Polit Sci Rev 99(3):435–452CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  22. Mayhew D (1974) Congress: the electoral connection. Yale University Press, New HavenGoogle Scholar
  23. Muramatsu M (1988/1997) Local power in the Japanese state. University of California Press, BerkeleyGoogle Scholar
  24. National Police Agency of Japan (2016) Damage situation and police countermeasures associated with 2011 Tohoku district-off the Pacific Ocean Earthquake. Accessed at https://www.npa.go.jp/archive/keibi/biki/higaijokyo_e.pdf
  25. Oliver JE, Ha SE, Callen Z (2012) Local elections and the politics of small-scale democracy. Princeton University Press, PrincetonGoogle Scholar
  26. Ono Y, Yamada K (2015) Tohoku chiho ni okeru shichoson gikaigiin no chousa kekka houkoku (survey results of municipal council members in the Tohoku region of Japan). Hougaku 79(3):111–181Google Scholar
  27. Phelan S (n.d.) Planning for disaster: learning lessons from Onagawa. http://planningexchangefoundation.org.uk/reports/PEF3%20(1).pdf
  28. Richardson LE, Russell BE, Cooper CA (2004) Legislative representation in a single-member versus multiple-member district system: the Arizona State Legislature. Polit Res Q 57:337–344CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  29. Samuels R (2013) 3.11: Disaster and change in Japan. Cornell University Press, IthacaGoogle Scholar
  30. Shimizu K (2012) Electoral consequences of municipal mergers. J East Asian Stud 12:381–408CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  31. Svedberg P, Ropponen A, Lichtenstein P, Alexanderson K (2010) Are self-report of disability pension and long-term sickness absence accurate? Comparisons of self-reported interview data with national register data in a Swedish Twin Cohort. BMC Public Health 10:763CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer Science+Business Media Dordrecht 2016

Authors and Affiliations

  1. 1.Northeastern University, Security and Resilience Studies ProgramBostonUSA
  2. 2.School of Law, Tohoku UniversitySendai, MiyagiJapan

Personalised recommendations