Natural Hazards

, Volume 84, Issue 2, pp 1487–1499 | Cite as

Potential effects of climate changes on soil–atmosphere interaction and landslide hazard

  • Guido Rianna
  • Luca Comegna
  • Paola Mercogliano
  • Luciano Picarelli
Short Communication


In the recent years, the scientific community is involved in an intense debate around the effects of global warming. In fact, this could determine valuable changes in atmospheric forcing that govern the soil–atmosphere interaction and, in turn, water budget in the subsoil, with unpredictable consequences, inter alia, on geohydrological hazards. An early and proper assessment of the magnitude of such phenomena would be of great importance in establishing the priorities and timing in adaptation strategies. The paper reports some results obtained through a simulation chain which accounts for the potential climatic changes induced by two different socioeconomic concentration scenarios in atmospheric forcing and consequent changes in soil moisture and, then, slope response. The analyses concern a site located in Southern Italy, representative of Mediterranean area, deemed an “hot spot” for future climate changes. It is shown that, beyond the variations induced by climate changes, soil nature and land cover could play a major role.


Slope stability Climate changes Soil–atmosphere interaction Representative Concentration Pathways Soil moisture 


  1. Anderson E (1973) National Weather Service river forecast system—snow accumulation and ablation model. Hydrologic Research Laboratory, National Oceanic and Atmospheric Administration, Silver Spring, MDGoogle Scholar
  2. Arnold JG, Williams JR, Nicks AD, Sammons NB (1989) SWRRB, a simulator for water resources in rural basins, Agricultural Research Service, USDA. Texas A&M University Press, College Station, TXGoogle Scholar
  3. Bormann H (2012) Assessing the soil texture-specific sensitivity of simulated soil moisture to projected climate change by SVAT modelling. Geoderma 185–186:73–83. doi: 10.1016/j.geoderma.2012.03.021 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  4. Bucchignani E, Montesarchio M, Zollo AL, Mercogliano P (2015) High resolution climate simulations with COSMO-CLM over Italy: performance evaluation and climate projections for the XXI century. Int J Climatol. doi: 10.1002/joc.4379 Google Scholar
  5. Campbell GS (1974) A simple method for determining unsaturated hydraulic conductivity from moisture retention data. Soil Sci 117(6):311–314CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  6. Comegna L, Picarelli L, Bucchignani E, Mercogliano P (2013) Potential effects of incoming climate changes on the behaviour of slow active landslides in clay. Landslides 10:373–391CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  7. Cook J, Nuccitelly D, Green SA et al (2013) Quantifying the consensus on anthropogenic global warming in the scientific literature. Environ Res Lett 8:1–7. doi: 10.1088/1748-9326/8/2/024024 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  8. Damiano E, Mercogliano P (2013) Potential effects of climate change on slope stability in unsaturated pyroclastic soils. In: Margottini C., Canuti P., Sassa K. (Eds) Book Series “Landslide Science and Practice”, Vol. 4 “Global Environmental Change”, 4:15–25Google Scholar
  9. Ehret U, Zehe E, Wulfmeyer V, Warrach-Sagi K, Liebert J (2012) Should we apply bias correction to global and regional climate model data? Hydrol Earth Syst Sci 16:3391–3404. doi: 10.5194/hess-16-3391-2012 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  10. Fowler HJ, Blenkinsop S, Tebaldi C (2007) Linking climate change modelling to impact studies: recent advances in downscaling techniques for hydrological modelling. Int J Climatol 27:1547–1578CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  11. Gudmundsson L, Bremnes JB, Haugen JE, Engen Skaugen T (2012) Technical Note: downscaling RCM precipitation to the station scale using statistical transformations—a comparison of methods. Hydrol Earth Syst Sci 9:6185–6201CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  12. Horton RE (1919) Rainfall interception. Mon Weather Rev 47(9):603–623CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  13. IPCC (2013) Summary for policymakers. In: Stocker TF, Qin D, Plattner G-K, Tignor M, Allen SK, Boschung J, Nauels A, Xia Y, Bex V, Midgley PM (eds) Climate change 2013: the physical science basis. Contribution of working group I to the fifth assessment report of the intergovernmental panel on climate change, Cambridge (United Kingdom) and New York (NY, USA). Cambridge University Press, Cambridge, p 29Google Scholar
  14. Istanbulluoglu E, Bras RL (2006) On the dynamics of soil moisture, vegetation and erosion: implications of climate variability and change. Water Resour Res 42(6):W06418. doi: 10.1029/2005WR004113 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  15. Knisel WG, Moffitt DC, Dumper TA (1985) Representing seasonally frozen soil with the CREAMS model. Am Soc Agric Eng 28:1487–1492CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  16. Lafon T, Dadson S, Buys G, Prudhomme C (2013) Bias correction of daily precipitation simulated by a regional climate model: a comparison of methods. Int J Climatol 33:1367–1381CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  17. Lenderink G, van Meijgaard E (2008) Increase in hourly precipitation extremes beyond expectations from temperature changes. Nat Geosci 1:511–514. doi: 10.1038/ngeo262 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  18. Maraun D (2013) Bias correction, quantile mapping, and downscaling: revisiting the inflation issue. J Clim 26:2137–2143. doi: 10.1175/JCLI-D-12-00821.1 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  19. Maraun D, Wetterhall F, Ireson AM, Chandler RE, Kendon EJ, Widmann M, Brienen S, Rust HW, Sauter T, Themessl M, Venema VKC, Chun KP, Goodess CM, Jones RG, Onof C, Vrac M, Thiele-Eich I (2010) Precipitation downscaling under climate change: Recent developments to bridge the gap between dynamical models and end user. Rev Geophys 48:RG3003. doi: 10.1029/2009RG00314
  20. Meinshausen M, Smith S, Calvin K, Daniel J, Kainuma M, Lamarque JF, Matsumoto K, Montzka S, Raper S, Riahi K, Thomson A, Velders G, van Vuuren DP (2011) The RCP greenhouse gas concentrations and their extensions from 1765 to 2300. Clim Change 19(1–2):213–241. doi: 10.1007/s10584-011-0156-z CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  21. Naden PS, Watts CD (2001) Estimating climate-induced change in Soil Moisture at the Landscape Scale: an application to five areas of ecological interest in the UK. Clim Change 49(4):411–440CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  22. Olivares L, Picarelli L (2003) Shallow flowslides triggered by intense rainfalls on natural slopes covered by loose unsaturated pyroclastic soils. Géotechnique 53(2):283–288CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  23. Penman HL (1963) Vegetation and hydrology Technical Comment No. 53. Commonwealth Bureau of Soils, HarpendenGoogle Scholar
  24. Ritchie JT (1972) A model for predicting evaporation from a row crop with incomplete cover. Water Resour Res 8(5):1204–1213CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  25. Rockel B, Will A, Hense A (2008) The regional climate model COSMO–CLM (CCLM). Meteorol Z 17(4):347–348. doi: 10.1127/0941-2948/2008/0309 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  26. Schroeder PR, Dozier TS, Zappi PA, McEnroe BM, Sjostrom JW, Peyton RL (1994) The hydrologic evaluation of landfill performance (HELP) model: engineering documentation for Version 3. EPA/600/R-94/168b. U.S Environmental Protection Agency Office of Research and Development, Washington, DCGoogle Scholar
  27. Scoccimarro E, Gualdi S, Bellucci A, Sanna A, Fogli P, Manzini E, Vichi M, Oddo P, Navarra A (2011) Effects of tropical cyclones on ocean heat transport in a high resolution coupled general circulation model. J Clim 24:4368–4384CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  28. Teutschbein C, Seibert J (2012) Bias correction of regional climate model simulations for hydrological climate change impact studies: review and evaluation of different methods. J Hydrol 456–457:12–29CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  29. Trenberth KE (2011) Changes in precipitation with climate change. Clim Res 47:123–138. doi: 10.3354/cr00953 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  30. USDA Soil Conservation Service (1985) National engineering handbook, section 4, hydrology. US Government Printing Office, Washington, DCGoogle Scholar
  31. van Vuuren DP, Edmonds J, Thomson A, Riahi K, Kainuma M, Matsui T, Hurtt GC, Lamarque JF, Meinshausen M, Smith S, Granier C, Rose SK, Hibbard KA (2011) Representative concentration pathways: an overview. Clim Change 109:5–31CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  32. Villani V, Rianna G, Mercogliano P, Zollo AL (2015) Statistical approaches versus weather generator to downscale RCM outputs to slope scale for stability assessment: a comparison of performances. Electron J Geotech Eng 20(4):1495–1515Google Scholar
  33. Zollo AL, Rillo V, Bucchignani E, Montesarchio M, Mercogliano P (2015) Extreme temperature and precipitation events over Italy: assessment of high resolution simulations with COSMO-CLM and future scenarios. Int J Climatol. doi: 10.1002/joc.4401 Google Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer Science+Business Media Dordrecht 2016

Authors and Affiliations

  1. 1.REMHI Regional Models and Geo-Hydrological Impacts Research DivisionCMCC Foundation Euro-Mediterranean Center on Climate ChangeCapuaItaly
  2. 2.DICDEA Dipartimento di Ingegneria CivileDesign, Edilizia e Ambiente, Seconda Università di NapoliAversaItaly
  3. 3.Laboratorio di Meteorologia Applicata CIRA Centro Italiano Ricerche AerospazialiCapuaItaly

Personalised recommendations