Although poverty analyses have dominated post-disaster assessments, household vulnerability analyses should receive more attention. Various methods have been developed to measure household vulnerability, and some studies have attempted to apply them to post-disaster assessments in China. Based on survey data collected after the Wenchuan earthquake in China, this paper attempts to compare the following three methods for assessing household vulnerability and household economic status during disaster recovery in China: vulnerability measured by expected poverty (VEP), vulnerability measured by household income (VHI), and vulnerability measured by subjective evaluation (VSE). The VEP method is a relatively more comprehensive method when combined with poverty analysis. The VHI method is useful when the main research aim is to identify households’ vulnerability in income generation and long-term regional economic development. Studies that aim to identify the direct impact of a disaster and research on relief work will find the VSE method very relevant. Bearing this in mind, understanding the specific advantages and focus of each method is crucial to conducting needs-assessment studies on household vulnerability and to forming and implementing policies for disaster recovery and poverty alleviation.
This is a preview of subscription content, access via your institution.
Buy single article
Instant access to the full article PDF.
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.
Subscribe to journal
Immediate online access to all issues from 2019. Subscription will auto renew annually.
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.
See the detailed description of the assumptions regarding the stochastic process generating consumption in Chaudhuri et al. (2002).
Detailed sampling information refers to Dalen et al. (2012).
The main concern in this paper is to measure household vulnerability with different measures. Different measures of the poverty line will influence the vulnerability level; however, it is beyond scope of this paper.
The five categories of members’ occupation are dummy variables. They are complementary but not duplicated. The occupations are classified as five progressive types, from low to high: (1) agriculture; (2) odd jobs; (3) service and industry; (4) private or individual businesses; and (5) leaders/managers/professionals/technicians/economic business and other office workers. When households had members working in two or more types of occupations, the households are categorized as highest type of occupation. Such classification of members’ occupation at the family level is based on the assumption that household income level is affected to the largest extent by better-paying jobs.
This last group of independent variables is not eligible for the 2008 regression.
Alwang J, Siegel PB, Jorgensen SL (2001) Vulnerability: a view from different disciplines. The World Bank, Washington
Amemiya T (1977) The maximum likelihood and the nonlinear. three-stage least squares estimator in the general nonlinear simultaneous equation model. Econometrica 45:955. doi:10.2307/1912684
Bah A (2013) Estimating vulnerability to poverty using panel data: evidence from indonesia. SSRN Electronic Journal. doi:10.2139/ssrn.2411921
Bergolo M, Cruces G, Ham A (2012) Assessing the predictive power of vulnerability measures: evidence from panel data for Argentina and Chile. J Income Distrib 21:28–64
Bishop JA, Luo F, Pan X (2006) Economic Transition and subjective poverty in urban China. China Rev Income Wealth 52:625–641. doi:10.1111/j.1475-4991.2006.00209.x
Bradshaw J, Finch N (2003) Overlaps in dimensions of poverty. J Soc Pol 32:513–525. doi:10.1017/s004727940300713x
Calvo C, Dercon S (2005) Measuring individual vulnerability. Disussion Paper Series Number 229. University of Oxford. http://hite-p-5885.htmwww.rrojasdatabank.info/calvo.pdf
Cannon T (1994) Vulnerability analysis and the explanation of ‘natural’ disasters. Disaster, Development and Environment. Wiley, New Jersey, pp 13–30
Chambers R (1989) Editorial introduction: vulnerability, coping and policy. IDS Bull 20:1–7. doi:10.1111/j.1759-5436.1989.mp20002001.x
Chaudhuri S (2003) Assessing vulnerability to poverty: concepts, empirical methods, and illustrative examples. World Bank, Washington
Chaudhuri S, Jalan J, Suryahadi A (2002) Assessing household vulnerability to poverty from cross-sectional data: a methodology and estimates from indonesia. Columbia University, New York
Christianensen L, Boisvert RN (2010) On measuring household food vulnerability: case evidence from Northern Mali. World Bank, Washington
Coudouel A, Hentschel J (2000) Poverty data and measurement. Preliminary draft for a sourcebook on poverty reduction strategies. The World Bank, Washington
Cutter SL, Barnes L, Berry M, Burton C, Evans E, Tate E, Webb J (2008) A place-based model for understanding community resilience to natural disasters. Glob Environ Change 18:598–606. doi:10.1016/j.gloenvcha.2008.07.013
Dalen K, Flatø H, Liu J, Zhang H (2012) Recovering from the Wenchuan earthquake: Living Conditions and Development in Disaster Areas 2008–2011. Fafo, Oslo
Easterlin RA (2001) Income and happiness: towards a unified theory. Economic Journal 111:465–484. doi:10.1111/1468-0297.00646
Flanagan BE, Gregory EW, Hallisey EJ, Heitgerd JL, Lewis B (2011) A social vulnerability index for disaster management. J Homel Secur Emerg Manag 8(1):1–22. doi:10.2202/1547-7355.1792
Gaiha R, Imai K (2008) Measuring vulnerability and poverty: estimates for rural India. World Institute for Development Economic Research (UNU-WIDER), Helsingfors
Günther I, Harttgen K (2009) Estimating households vulnerability to idiosyncratic and covariate shocks: a novel method applied in Madagascar. World Dev 37:1222–1234. doi:10.1016/j.worlddev.2008.11.006
Harttgen K, Gunther I (2006) Households’ vulnerability to covariate and idiosyncratic shocks. Verein für Socialpolitik, Research Committee Development Economics
Henry M, Kawasaki A, Takigawa I, Meguro K (2015) The impact of income disparity on vulnerability and information collection: an analysis of the 2011 Thai Flood. J Flood Risk Manag. doi:10.1111/jfr3.12144
Herrera J, Razafindrakoto M, Roubaud F (2006) The determinants of subjective poverty: a comparative analysis between Madagascar and Peru. DIAL, Paris
Hu X, Salazar MA, Zhang Q, Lu Q, Zhang X (2010) Social protection during disasters: evidence from the Wenchuan earthquake. IDS Bull 41:107–115. doi:10.1111/j.1759-5436.2010.00157.x
IASC (2009) Initial Rapid Assessment (IRA): Guidance Notes
ICRC (2008) Guidelines for Assessment in Emergencies
Kahneman D, Krueger AB (2006) Developments in the measurement of subjective well-being. J Econ Perspect 20:3–24. doi:10.1257/089533006776526030
Kamanou G, Morduch J (2004) Measuring vulnerability to poverty. Oxf Univ Press (OUP). doi:10.1093/0199276838.003.0009
King D, MacGregor C (2000) Using social indicators to measure community vulnerability to natural hazards. Aust J Emerg Manag 15:52–57
Kingdon GG, Knight J (2006) Subjective well-being poverty vs. Income poverty and capabilities poverty? J Dev Stud 42:1199–1224. doi:10.1080/00220380600884167
Kochar A (1995) Explaining household vulnerability to idiosyncratic income shocks. Am Econ Rev 85:159–164
Kun P, Chen X, Han S, Gong X, Chen M, Zhang W, Yao L (2009) Prevalence of post-traumatic stress disorder in Sichuan Province, China after the 2008 Wenchuan earthquake. Public Health 123:703–707. doi:10.1016/j.puhe.2009.09.017
Landau K, Klasen S, Zucchini W (2012) Measuring vulnerability to poverty using long-term panel data. Verein für Socialpolitik/German Economic Association
Ligon E, Schechter L (2003) Measuring vulnerability. Econ J 113:C95–C102. doi:10.1111/1468-0297.00117
Lo AY, Cheung LTO (2015) Seismic risk perception in the aftermath of Wenchuan earthquakes in southwestern China. Nat Hazards 78:1979–1996. doi:10.1007/s11069-015-1815-6
Malilay J, Flanders WD, Brogan D (1996) A modified cluster-sampling method for post-disaster rapid assessment of needs. Bull World Health Organ 74:399–405
Mincer J (1974) Schooling, experience, and earnings. National Bureau of Economic Research, Inc
Morduch J (1994) Poverty and vulnerability. Am Econ Rev 84:221–225
National Bureau of Statistics of China (2002) Population data on China’s counties, townships and neighborhood committees [in Chinese]. Beijing
OCHA (2009) Assessment and classification of emergencies (ACE) Project—mapping of key emergency needs assessment and analysis initiatives
Oswald AJ (2008) On the curvature of the reporting function from objective reality to subjective feelings. Econ Lett 100:369–372. doi:10.1016/j.econlet.2008.02.032
Paton D, Johnston D (2001) Disasters and communities: vulnerability, resilience and preparedness. Disaster Prev Manag 10:270–277. doi:10.1108/eum0000000005930
Philip D, Rayhan MI (2004) Vulnerability and poverty: what are the causes and how are they related. ZEF Bonn, Center for Development Research, Bonn
Ravallion M, Lokshin M (1999) Subjective economic welfare. The World Bank. doi:10.1596/1813-9450-2106
Strömberg D (2007) Natural disasters, economic development, and humanitarian aid. J Econ Perspect 21:199–222. doi:10.1257/jep.21.3.199
Sun M, Chen B, Ren J, Chang T (2010a) Natural disaster’s impact evaluation of rural households’ vulnerability: the case of Wenchuan earthquake. Agric Agric Sci Proc 1:52–61. doi:10.1016/j.aaspro.2010.09.007
Sun M, Chen B, Shi G (2010b) Comparative analysis of influence factors for household income before and after the natural disaster:a study of Wenchuan. Technology Economics 2010–05
Suryahadi A, Sumarto S (2003) Poverty and vulnerability in Indonesia before and after the economic crisis. Asian Econ J 17:45–64. doi:10.1111/1351-3958.00161
Suryahadi A, Sumarto S, Pritchett L (2000) Quantifying vulnerability to poverty: a proposed measure. The World Bank, Indonesia. doi:10.1596/1813-9450-2437
The State Planning Group of Post-Wenchuan Earthquake Restoration and Reconstruction (2008) The state overall planning for the post-Wenchuan earthquake restoration. Central Government of the People’s Republic of China, Beijing
US Geological Survey (2008) Earthquakes with 1,000 or more deaths since 1900. USGS. http://earthquake.usgs.gov/earthquakes/world/world_deaths_sort.php. Accessed Sept 26 2015
Villagran JC (2006) Vulnerability: A conceptual and methodological review. Source. No. 2/2006, Bonn, Germany
Wang X, Ding X, Wang L, Wang Y (2009) Fast assessment of earthquake loss and its application to the 2008 MS8.0 Wenchuan earthquake Earthquake. Science 22:129–133. doi:10.1007/s11589-009-0129-8
Wang Y, Zou Z, Li J (2014) Influencing factors of households disadvantaged in post-earthquake life recovery: a case study of the Wenchuan earthquake in China. Nat Hazards 75:1853–1869. doi:10.1007/s11069-014-1400-4
Wisner B, Blaikie P, Cannon T, Davis I (1994) At risk. Inf UK Lim. doi:10.4324/9780203428764
Wu J, Li N, Hallegatte S, Shi P, Hu A, Liu X (2011) Regional indirect economic impact evaluation of the 2008 Wenchuan earthquake. Environ Earth Sci 65:161–172. doi:10.1007/s12665-011-1078-9
Yang S, Du J, He S, Shi M, Sun X (2014) The emerging vulnerable population of the urbanisation resulting from post-disaster recovery of the Wenchuan earthquake. Nat Hazards 75:2103–2118. doi:10.1007/s11069-014-1413-z
About this article
Cite this article
Huafeng, Z. Household vulnerability and economic status during disaster recovery and its determinants: a case study after the Wenchuan earthquake. Nat Hazards 83, 1505–1526 (2016). https://doi.org/10.1007/s11069-016-2373-2
- Household vulnerability
- Post-disaster assessment