Skip to main content
SpringerLink
Log in

Farmers versus nature: managing disaster risks at farm level

  • Original Paper
  • Published:
Natural Hazards Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

Farmers have number of options available in managing disaster risks at farm and many of them utilize these risk management tools simultaneously. However, previous studies have ignored the correlation among the risk management adoption decisions. This study, therefore, aimed at investigating factors affecting the adoption of off-farm diversification and agricultural credit to manage catastrophic risks while taking into account the contemporaneous correlation in the decisions to adopt the two risk management tools simultaneously. Bivariate and multinomial probit approaches are applied to data collected from four districts of Khyber Pakhtunkhwa Province in Pakistan. Findings revealed a strong correlation between the decisions to adopt the two risk management tools and conclude that adopting one risk management tool may induce farmers to adopt the other tool at the same time. Moreover, socioeconomic characteristics, losses due to natural disasters, farmers’ risk perceptions and their risk attitude play significant role in shaping their decisions of adopting risk management tools.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Log in via an institution

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Institutional subscriptions

Fig. 1

Similar content being viewed by others

Notes

  1. PKR is abbreviation for Pakistani Rupee, 1 PKR is approximately equal to 0.01 USD.

References

  • Abedullah MN, Khalid M, Kouser S (2009) Role of agriculture credit in the growth of livestock sector: a case study of Faisalabad, Pakistan. Vet J 29(2):81–84

    Google Scholar 

  • Ahmad S, Jamal M, Ikramullah A, Himayatullah (2007) Role of extension services on the farm productivity of district Swat: a case study of two villages. Sarhad J Agric 23(4):1265–1272

    Google Scholar 

  • Anderson JR (2001) Risk management in rural development: a review. Rural Development Strategy Background Paper 7, Rural Development Department, the World Bank, Washington, DC

  • Antón J (2009) Risk management in agriculture—a holistic conceptual framework. Organization for Economic Co-operation and Development. Trade and Agriculture Directorate Committee for Agriculture. TAD/CA/APM/WP(2008)22/FINAL

  • Arrow KJ (1964) The role of securities in the optimal allocation of risk bearing. Rev Econ Stud 31:91–96

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Ashfaq M, Hassan S, Naseer MZ, Baig IA, Asma J (2008) Factors affecting farm diversification in rice–wheat. Pak J Agric Sci 45(3):91–94

    Google Scholar 

  • Binici T, Koc AA, Zulauf CR, Bayaner A (2003) Risk attitude of farmers in terms of risk aversion: a case study of lower Seyhan plain farmers in Adana-province, Turkey. Turk J Agric For 27:305–312

    Google Scholar 

  • Coble KH, Heifner RG, Zuniga M (2000) Implications of crop yield and revenue insurance for producer hedging. J Agric Resour Econ 25:432–452

    Google Scholar 

  • Cohen A, Einav L (2007) Estimating risk preferences from deductible choice. Am Econ Rev 97(3):745–788

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Cooper DF, Grey S, Raymond G, Walker P (2005) Project risk management guidelines. Wiley, Chichester

    Google Scholar 

  • Davis TD, Patrick GF, Coble KH, Knight TO, Baquet AE (2005) Forward pricing behavior of corn and soybean production. J Agric Appl Econ 37:145–160

    Google Scholar 

  • Deressa TT, Ringler C, Hassan RM (2010) Factors affecting the choices of coping strategies for climate extremes. The case of farmers in the Nile Basin of Ethiopia IFPRI Discussion Paper 01032

  • Goodwin BK, Schroeder TC (1994) Human capital, producer education programs, and the adoption of forward-pricing methods. Am J Agric Econ 76:936–947

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Government of Pakistan (GoP) (2012) Economics survey of Pakistan (2010–11), Economics Advisory Wing. Finance Division, Islamabad

    Google Scholar 

  • Harrison G, Lau M, Rutström E (2007) Estimating risk attitudes in Denmark: a field experiment. Scand J Econ 109(2):341–368

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Hellmuth ME, Mason SJ, Vaughan C, van Aalst MK, Choularton R (eds) (2011) A better climate for disaster risk management. International Research Institute for Climate and Society (IRI), Columbia University, New York

    Google Scholar 

  • Kammar SK, Bhagat R (2009) Constraints experienced by farmers in adopting risk and uncertainty management strategies in rainfed agriculture. Pusa AgriSci 32(2009):70–74

    Google Scholar 

  • Ke B, Wang HH (2002) An assessment of risk management strategies for grain growers in the Pacific Northwest. Agric Fin Rev 62(2):117–133

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Khan MA (2012) Agricultural development in Khyber Pakhtun Khwa: prospects, challenges and policy options. Pak A J Pak Stud 4(1):49–68

    Google Scholar 

  • Kouame EBH (2010) Risk, risk aversion and choice of risk management Strategies by cocoa farmers in western Cote D’ivoire. University of Cocody-AERC Collaborative PHD Program. http://www.csae.ox.ac.uk/conferences/2010-EDiA/papers/267-Kouame.pdf. Retrieved 28th September, 2012

  • Makki SS, Somwaru A (2001) asymmetric information in the market for yield and revenue insurance products. Washington, DC: USDA Economic Research Service, Technical Bulletin No. 1892, April 2001

  • Makus LD, Lin BH, Carlson J, Kreibill-Prather R (1990) Factors influencing farm- level use of futures and options in commodity marketing. Agribus Int J 6:621–631

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Mesfin W, Fufa B, Haji J (2011) Pattern, trend and determinants of crop diversification: empirical evidence from smallholders in eastern Ethiopia. J Econ Sust Dev 2(8):78–89

    Google Scholar 

  • Olarinde LO, Manyong VM, Akintola JO (2007) Attitudes towards risk among maize farmers in the dry savanna zone of Nigeria: some prospective policies for improving food production. Afr J Agric Res 2(8):399–408

    Google Scholar 

  • Pratt J (1964) Risk Aversion in the small and in the large. Econometrica 32(1):122–136

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Rehima M, Belay K, Dawit A, Rashid S (2013) Factors affecting farmers’ crops diversification: evidence from SNNPR, Ethiopia. Int J Agric Sci 3(6):558–565

    Google Scholar 

  • RISE (2010) Road to innovative social entrepreneurship (Pakistan). 2010 floods in Pakistan. The aftermath, the lives affected. http://rise-pak.com/flood-facts/. Retrieved 23rd August, 2012

  • Robinson LJ, Barry PJ (1987) the competitive firm’s response to risk. MacMillan Publishing Company, New York

    Google Scholar 

  • Shahbaz B, Ali T, Khan IA, Ahmad M (2010) An analysis of the problems faced by farmers in the mountains of northwest Pakistan: challenges for agricultural extension. Pak J Agric Sci 47(4):417–420

    Google Scholar 

  • Shapiro BI, Brorsen BW (1988) Factors affecting farmers’ hedging decisions. North Cent J Agric Econ 10:145–153

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Sherrick BJ, Barry PJ, Ellinger PN, Schnitkey GD (2004) Factors influencing farmers’ crop insurance decisions. Am J Agric Econ 86(1):103–114

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Skees JR (1999) Agricultural risk management or income enhancement? Regul CATO Rev Bus Gov 22(1):35–43

    Google Scholar 

  • Tanaka T, Camerer CF, Nguyen Q (2010) Risk and time preferences: linking experimental and household survey data from Vietnam. Am Econ Rev 100(1):557–571

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Tangermann S (2011) Risk management in agriculture and the future of the EU’s Common Agricultural Policy; ICTSD Programme on Agricultural Trade and Sustainable Development; Issue Paper No. 34; ICTSD International Centre for Trade and Sustainable Development, Geneva, Switzerland

  • Tavernier EM, Onyango BM (2008) Utilization of farm management risk strategies at rural/urban fringe. Afr J Agric Res 3(8):554–565

    Google Scholar 

  • Torkamani J, Rahimi MH (2001) Evaluation of farmer’s risk attitudes using alternative utility functional forms. J Agric Sci Technol 3(2001):243–248

    Google Scholar 

  • Ullah R, Shivakoti GP (2014) Adoption of on-farm and off-farm diversification to manage agricultural risks: are these decisions correlated? Outlook Agric 43(4):265–271. doi:10.5367/oa.2014.0188

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Ullah R, Jourdain D, Shivakoti GP, Dhakal S (2015a) Managing catastrophic risks in agriculture: simultaneous adoption of diversification and precautionary savings. Int J Disaster Risk Reduct 12(2015):268–277. doi:10.1016/j.ijdrr.2015.02.001

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Ullah R, Shivakoti GP, Ali G (2015b) Factors effecting farmers’ risk attitude and risk perceptions: the case of Khyber Pakhtunkhwa, Pakistan. Int J Disaster Risk Reduct 13(2015):151–157. doi:10.1016/j.ijdrr.2015.05.005

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • United Nations (2014) Agriculture and disaster risk. http://www.wcdrr.org/documents/wcdrr/prepcom1/UN/ATTFONWO.pdf. Retrieved 9th February 2015

  • Velandia M, Rejesus RM, Knight TO, Sherrick J (2009) Factors affecting farmers’ utilization of agricultural risk management tools: the case of crop insurance, forward contracting and spreading sales. J Agric Appl Econ 41(1):107–123

    Google Scholar 

  • WFP (2010) World Food Programme. September. Pakistan Flood Impact Assessment. http://vam.wfp.org.pk/Publication/WFP%20Pakistan%20Flood%20Impact%20Assessment_Sept%202010.pdf. Retrieved 28th July, 2012

  • Yamane T (1967) Statistics, an introductory analysis, 2nd edn. Harper and Row, New York

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

  1. Department of Agricultural and Applied Economics, The University of Agriculture Peshawar, Peshawar, Pakistan

    Raza Ullah

  2. Natural Resources Management, School of Environment, Resources and Development, Asian Institute of Technology, Khlong Luang, Thailand

    Ganesh P. Shivakoti

  3. Nuclear Institute for Agriculture and Biology (NIAB), Faisalabad, Pakistan

    Asif Kamran

  4. Regional and Rural Development Planning (RRDP), School of Environment, Resources and Development, Asian Institute of Technology, Khlong Luang, Thailand

    Farhad Zulfiqar

Authors
  1. Raza Ullah
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  2. Ganesh P. Shivakoti
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  3. Asif Kamran
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  4. Farhad Zulfiqar
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Raza Ullah.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Ullah, R., Shivakoti, G.P., Kamran, A. et al. Farmers versus nature: managing disaster risks at farm level. Nat Hazards 82, 1931–1945 (2016). https://doi.org/10.1007/s11069-016-2278-0

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s11069-016-2278-0

Keywords

Search

Navigation