Skip to main content

FEMA versus local governments: influence and reliance in disaster preparedness

Natural Hazards volume 82, pages 123–138 (2016)Cite this article

Abstract

This study uses an experimental approach to examine whether disaster information sourced to the Federal Emergency Management Agency (FEMA) influences intentions to adopt hazard adjustments. Survey questions are also used to determine whether individuals rely more on FEMA or local governments when preparing for disasters. Using an online sample of 2008 US employees, the results indicate that information sourced to FEMA is no more influential than information sourced to local governments and that individuals rely less on FEMA than on local agencies during disaster preparedness. These results have significant implications for practice and future research on natural hazard preparedness.

This is a preview of subscription content, access via your institution.

Access options

Buy single article

Instant access to the full article PDF.

USD 39.95

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Notes

  1. AAPOR’s Response Rate 3, or RR3, was used and calculated by dividing the 2008 interviews by the sum of 2026 known eligible cases plus 2192 estimated eligible cases among the 5480 who did not respond to the survey invitations (assuming an estimated eligibility rate of 40 %, based on the eligibility rate of the 5079 responders).

  2. The other known studies that took the employee approach are Fowler et al. (2007) and Larson and Fowler (2009).

  3. We presented information on the major organizational sectors only.

References

  • Adamski T, Kline B, Tyrrell T (2006) FEMA reorganization and the response to hurricane disaster relief. Perspect Public Aff 3:3–36

    Google Scholar 

  • Asch SE (1955) Opinions and social pressure. Sci Am 193:35

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Baker R, Blumberg SJ, Brick MJ, Couper MP, Courtright M, Dennis MJ, Don D (2010) Research synthesis AAPOR report on online panels. Public Opin Q 74(4):711–781

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Basolo V, Steinberg L, Burby RJ, Levine J, Cruz AM, Huang C (2009) The effects of confidence in government and information on perceived and actual preparedness for disasters. Environ Behav 41(3):338–364

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Carlson JR, Carlson DS, Wadsworth LL (2000) The relationship between individual power moves and group agreement type: an examination and model. SAM Adv Manag J 65(4):44–49

    Google Scholar 

  • Chang L, Krosnick JA (2009) National surveys via RDD telephone interviewing versus the internet comparing sample representativeness and response quality. Public Opin Q 73(4):641–678

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Col JM (2007) Managing disasters: the role of local government. Public Admin Rev 67(s1):114–124

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Comfort LK, Birkland TA, Cigler BA, Nance E (2010) Retrospectives and prospectives on Hurricane Katrina: five years and counting. Public Admin Rev 70(5):669–678

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Comfort LK, Waugh WL Jr, Cigler BA (2012) Emergency management research and practice in public administration: emergence, evolution, expansion, and future directions. Public Admin Rev 72(4):539–547

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Davis MS (1989) Living along the fault line: an update on earthquake awareness and preparedness in Southern California. Urban Resour 5:8–14

    Google Scholar 

  • Deutsch M, Gerard HB (1955) A study of normative and informational social influences upon individual judgment. J Abnorm Soc Psychol 51:629–636

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Egnoto MJ, Svetieva E, Vishwanath A, Ortega CJ (2013) Diffusion of emergency information during a crisis within a university. J Homel Secur Emerg 10(1):267–287. doi:10.1515/jhsem-2012-0082

    Google Scholar 

  • Federal Register (n.d.) Executive Order 12127—Federal Emergency Management Agency. http://www.archives.gov/federal-register/codification/executive-order/12127.html. Accessed 19 January 2015

  • Fowler KL, Kling ND, Larson MD (2007) Organizational preparedness for coping with a major crisis or disaster. Bus Soc 46(1):88–103

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • French PE (2011) Enhancing the legitimacy of local government pandemic influenza planning through transparency and public engagement. Public Admin Rev 71(2):253–264

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Fugate C (2014) FEMA: 35 years of commitment. FEMA. http://www.fema.gov/fema-35-years-commitment. Accessed 20 June 2015

  • Gallup (2009) Gallup study provides valuable insights on the individual experience with federal agencies. Gallup. http://media.washingtonpost.com/wp-srv/politics/documents/gov_experience_final_111609.pdf. Accessed 20 June 2015

  • Gerber BJ (2007) Disaster management in the United States: examining key political and policy challenges. Policy Stud J 35(2):227–238

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Giuffrida LO (1985) FEMA: its mission, its partners. Public Admin Rev 45:2

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Gladwin CH, Gladwin H, Peacock WG (2001) Modeling hurricane evacuation decisions with ethnographic methods. Int J Mass Emerg Disasters 19:117–143

    Google Scholar 

  • Han Z, Nigg J (2011) The influences of business and decision makers’ characteristics on disaster preparedness—a study on the 1989 Loma Prieta earthquake. Int J Disaster Risk Sci 2(4):22–31

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Henstra D (2010) Evaluating local government emergency management programs: what framework should public managers adopt? Public Admin Rev 70(2):236–246

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Hughes AL, Palen L (2012) The evolving role of the pio. J Homel Secur Emerg. doi:10.1515/1547-7355.1976

    Google Scholar 

  • Huss S, Sadiq AA, Weible C (2012) Organizations and emergency management: information, trust, and preparedness. J Emerg Manag 10(5):359–372

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Hwang SN, Sanderson WG, Lindell MK (2001) Analysis of state emergency management agencies’ hazard analysis information on the internet. Int J Mass Emerg Disasters 19:85–106

    Google Scholar 

  • Jensen JL (2007) Getting one’s way in policy debates: influence tactics used in group decision-making settings. Public Admin Rev 67(2):216–227

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Jones JM, Steve A (2013) Americans praise gov’t work on natural disasters, parks. Gallup. http://www.gallup.com/poll/163487/americans-praise-gov-work-naturaldisasters-parks.aspx. Accessed 2 March 2015

  • Kahan J (2015) Future of FEMA—preparedness or politics? J Homel Secur Emerg 12(1):1–21. doi:10.1515/jhsem-2014-0048

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Kapucu N, Van Wart M (2006) The emerging role of the public sector in managing extreme events: lessons learned. Admin Soc 38:279–308

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Kapucu N, Arslan T, Collins ML (2010) Examining intergovernmental and interorganizational response to catastrophic disasters toward a network-centered approach. Admin Soc 42:222–247

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Larson MD, Fowler KL (2009) Anticipation is in the eye of the beholder: top-level managers see things differently when it comes to crises preparedness. J Bus Manag 15(2):129–141

    Google Scholar 

  • Levi D (2007) Group dynamics for teams, 3rd edn, vol 127. Sage, California

    Google Scholar 

  • Lindell MK, Perry RW (2000) Household adjustment to earthquake hazard a review of research. Environ Behav 32(4):461–501

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Magee JC, Frasier CW (2014) Status and power: the principal inputs to influence for public managers. Public Admin Rev 74(3):307–317. doi:10.1111/puar.12203

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Maxfield M, Babbie E (2014) Research methods for criminal justice and criminology, 7th edn. Cengage Learning, Stamford

    Google Scholar 

  • May PJ (1985) FEMA’s role in emergency management: examining recent experience. Public Admin Rev 45:40–48

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • McLoughlin D (1985) A framework for integrated emergency management. Public Admin Rev 45:165–172

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Naylor B (2012) Lessons from Katrina Boost FEMA’s Sandy Response. National Public Radio. http://www.npr.org/2012/11/03/164224394/lessons-from-katrina-boost-femas-sandy-response. Accessed 4 April 2015

  • Olson K, Parkhurst B (2013) Collecting paradata for measurement error evaluations. In: Kreuter F (ed) Improving surveys with paradata: analytic uses of process information. Wiley, New Jersey, pp 33–64

    Google Scholar 

  • Perry RW, Nigg JM (1985) Emergency management strategies for communicating hazard information. Public Admin Rev 45:72–77

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Pew Research Center for the People and the Press (2013) Trust in government nears record low, but most federal agencies are viewed favorably. http://www.people-press.org/2013/10/18/trust-in-government-nears-record-low-but-most-federal-agencies-are-viewed-favorably/. Accessed 10 June 2015

  • Sadiq AA (2009) Mitigating and preparing for disasters: a survey of Memphis organizations. Dissertation, Georgia State University-Georgia Institute of Technology

  • Sadiq AA (2011) Adoption of hazard adjustments by large and small organizations: who is doing the talking and who is doing the walking? Risk Hazards Crisis Public Policy 2(3):1–17

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Sadiq AA, Weible CM (2010) Obstacles and disaster risk reduction: survey of Memphis organizations. Nat Hazards Rev 11(3):110–117

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Schmalzried HD, Fallon LF Jr, Keller EA, McHugh CE (2011) Importance of uniformity in local EMA websites. J Homel Secur Emerg. doi:10.2202/1547-7355.1936

    Google Scholar 

  • Scholz JT, Berardo R, Kile B (2008) Do networks solve collective action problems? credibility, search, and collaboration. J Polit 70(2):393–406

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Sulitzeanu-Kenan R (2006) If they get it right: an experimental test of the effects of the appointment and reports of UK public inquiries. Public Admin 84(3):623–653

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • U.S. Federal Emergency Management Agency (2011) Business continuity and disaster preparedness planning: patterns and findings from current research. Citiz Prep Rev 7:2–7

    Google Scholar 

  • Vogel S (2012) Officials and experts praising FEMA for its response to Hurricane Sandy. Washington Post. http://www.washingtonpost.com/politics/decision2012/officials-and-experts-praising-fema-for-its-response-to-hurricane-sandy/2012/11/01/7a6629d8-2447-11e2-ac85-e669876c6a24_story.html. Accessed 3 May 2015

  • Waugh WL Jr (2007) Local emergency management in the post-9/11 world. In: Waugh WL Jr, Tierney KJ (eds) Emergency management: principles and practice for local government. ICMA Press, Washington, pp 3–21

    Google Scholar 

  • Wray R, Rivers J, Jupka K, Clements B (2006) Public perceptions about trust in emergency risk communication: qualitative research findings. Int J Mass Emerg Disasters 24(1):45–75

    Google Scholar 

  • Yeager DS, Krosnick JA, Chang L, Javitz HS, Levendusky MS, Simpser A, Wang R (2011) Comparing the accuracy of RDD telephone surveys and internet surveys conducted with probability and non-probability samples. Public Opin Q 75(4):709–747

    Article  Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

  1. School of Public and Environmental Affairs, Indiana University-Purdue University Indianapolis, 801 West Michigan Street, Indianapolis, IN, 46202, USA

    Abdul-Akeem Sadiq & John D. Graham

  2. Indiana University Center for Survey Research, Bloomington, IN, USA

    Kevin Tharp

Authors
  1. Abdul-Akeem Sadiq
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  2. Kevin Tharp
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  3. John D. Graham
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Abdul-Akeem Sadiq.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and Permissions

About this article

Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Sadiq, AA., Tharp, K. & Graham, J.D. FEMA versus local governments: influence and reliance in disaster preparedness. Nat Hazards 82, 123–138 (2016). https://doi.org/10.1007/s11069-016-2183-6

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s11069-016-2183-6

Keywords

  • Natural hazards
  • Disasters
  • FEMA
  • Preparedness
  • Local government
  • Experiment