Abstract
For many natural hazards, design codes include simple approaches, based on semi-probabilistic methods, which allow the engineer to check the structural safety of the construction. This framework implements the socioeconomic optimization of the resources to be used to build construction works. At present no simple approaches have been formulated for snow avalanche hazard. Recent research focuses on fully probabilistic assessment of structural safety, aimed at the estimation of the failure probability of the element at risk. This strategy requires a large amount of data and complex simulation techniques. In order to propose the implementation of snow avalanche hazard into the framework of modern design codes, we suggest an approach based on different avalanche scenarios with different snowfall return periods depending on the consequences of failure of the designed construction.
Similar content being viewed by others
References
Ancey C, Meunier M, Richard D (2003) Inverse problem in avalanche dynamics models. Water Resour Res 39(4):1099
Ancey C, Gervasoni C, Meunier M (2004) Computing extreme avalanches. Cold Reg Sci Technol 39:161–184
Arnalds T, Jónasson K, Sigurðsson S (2004) Avalanche hazard zoning in Iceland based on individual risk. Ann Glaciol 38(1):285–290
ASCE (2010) Minimum design loads for buildings and other structures, ASCE 7-10. American Society of Civil Engineers, Reston
Barbolini M, Natale L, Cordola M, Tecilla G (2005) Linee guida metodologiche per la perimetrazione delle aree esposte al pericolo di valanghe. AINEVA; Università degli studi di Pavia, Dipartimento di ingegneria idraulica e ambientale, Pavia
Basler E (1960) Untersuchungen über den Sicherheitsbegriff von Bauwerken. Ph.D. thesis, ETH Zürich
Bertrand D, Naaim M, Brun M (2010) Physical vulnerability of reinforced concrete buildings impacted by snow avalanches. Nat Hazards Earth Syst Sci 10(7):1531–1545
Bocchiola D, Medagliani M, Rosso R (2006) Regional snow depth frequency curves for avalanche hazard mapping in central Italian Alps. Cold Reg Sci Technol 46:204–221
Bocchiola D, Bianchi E, Gorni E, Marty C, Sovilla B (2008) Regional evaluation of three day snow depth for avalanche hazard mapping in Switzerland. Nat Hazards Earth Syst Sci 8:685–705
Burkard A, Salm B (1992) Die Bestimmung der Mittleren Anrissmächtigkeit \(d_0\) zur Berechnung von Fliesslawinen. Technical Report 668, Eidgenössisches Inst. für Schnee- und Lawinenforschung
Cornell CA (1968) Engineering seismic risk analysis. Bull Seismol Soc Am 58:1583–1606
Cornell CA (1969) A probability-based structural code. ACI J Proc 66:974–985
CSLLPP (2008) Nuove Norme Tecniche per le Costruzioni–DM 14.01.2008. Consiglio Superiore dei Lavori Pubblici
De Biagi V, Chiaia B, Frigo B (2015) Impact of snow avalanche on buildings: forces estimation from structural back-analyses. Eng Struct 92:15–28
Diamantidis D, Bazzurro P (2007) Safety acceptance criteria for existing structures. In: Special workshop on risk acceptance and risk communication, Stanford University, p 10
Eckert N, Naaim M, Parent E (2010) Long-term avalanche hazard assessment with a Bayesian depth-averaged propagation model. J Glaciol 56(198):563–586
Eckert N, Keylock CJ, Bertrand D, Parent E, Faug T, Favier P, Naaim M (2012) Quantitative risk and optimal design approaches in the snow avalanche field: review and extensions. Cold Reg Sci Technol 79–80:1–19
Elishakoff I (1999) Probabilistic theory of structures. Courier Dover Publications, New York
European Standard (2002) Eurocode 0: basis of structural design. European Committee for Standardization, Brussels
European Standard (2004) Eurocode 8: design of structures for earthquake resistance. Part 1: general rules, seismic actions and rules for buildings. European Committee for Standardization, Brussels
European Standard (2005) Eurocode 1: actions on structures. Part 1–4: general actions–Wind actions. European Committee for Standardization, Brussels
European Standard (2006) Eurocode 1: actions on structures. Part 1–7: general actions–accidental actions. European Committee for Standardization, Brussels
Faber MH, Sørensen JD (2002) Reliability based code calibration. The Joint Committee on Structural Safety, Zürich
Favier P, Bertrand D, Eckert N, Naaim M (2014) A reliability assessment of physical vulnerability of reinforced concrete walls loaded by snow avalanches. Nat Hazards Earth Syst Sci 14(3):689–704
Favier P, Eckert N, Bertrand D, Naaim M (2014) Sensitivity of avalanche risk evaluation to vulnerability relations. Cold Reg Sci Technol 108:163–177
FEMA (2000) Prestandard and commentary for the seismic rehabilitation of buildings: FEMA-356. Federal Emergency Management Agency, Washington
ISO (1998) General principles on reliability for structures ISO 2394:1998. International Organization for Standardization, Genève
Jónasson K, Sigurðsson SÞ Arnalds Þ (1999) Estimation of avalanche risk. Technical report, Rit Veðurstofu Íslands
Keiler M, Sailer R, Jörg P, Weber C, Fuchs S, Zischg A, Sauermoser S (2006) Avalanche risk assessment—a multi-temporal approach, results from Galtür, Austria. Nat Hazards Earth Syst Sci 6:637–651
Keylock CJ, McClung DM, Mar Magnússon M (1999) Avalanche risk mapping by simulation. J Glaciol 45(150):303–314
Leporati E (1979) The assessment of structural safety. Research Studies Press, Forest Grove
Lied K (1993) Snow avalanche experience through 20 years. Norges Geotekniske Institutt (Laurits Bjerrums Minneforedrag 14), Oslo
Madsen HO, Krenk S, Lind NC (2006) Methods of structural safety. Courier Dover Publications, New York
Melchers RE (1999) Structural reliability analysis and prediction. Wiley, New York
Mihaylov B (2006) Analysis of code procedures for assessment of existing buildings: Italian Seismic Code, EC8, ATC-40, FEMA356, FEMA440. Ph.D. thesis, European School for Advanced Studies in Reduction of Seismic Risk. Univeristy of Pavia
Naaim M, Durand Y, Eckert N, Chambon G (2013) Dense avalanche friction coefficients: influence of physical properties of snow. J Glaciol 59(216):771–782
Salm B, Burkhard A, Gubler H (1990) Berechnung von Fliesslawinen: eine Anleitung fuer Praktiker; mit Beispielen. Eidgenössisches Inst. für Schnee- und Lawinenforschung
Santucci de Magistris F (2011) Beyond EC8: the new Italian seismic code. Geofizika 28:65–82
Schläppy R, Eckert N, Jomelli V, Stoffel M, Grancher D, Brunstein D, Naaim M, Deschatres M (2014) Validation of extreme snow avalanches and related return periods derived from a statistical-dynamical model using tree-ring techniques. Cold Reg Sci Technol 99:12–26
Schneider J (2006) Introduction to safety and reliability of structures, vol 5. IABSE, Zurich
Schweizer J, Mitterer C, Stoffel L (2009) On forecasting large and infrequent snow avalanches. Cold Reg Sci Technol 59(2):234–241
Schweizerischer Ingenieur- und Architektenverein (2003) SIA 261: actions on structures. Swiss Society of Engineers and Architects, Zürich
SLF (2005) AVAL-1D–Manual. Institut für Schnee-und Lawinenforschung SLF, Davos
Wang Z, Ormsbee L (2005) Comparison between probabilistic seismic hazard analysis and flood frequency analysis. EOS Trans Am Geophys Union 86:45–52
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Corresponding author
Rights and permissions
About this article
Cite this article
De Biagi, V., Barbero, M. & Borri-Brunetto, M. A reliability-based method for taking into account snowfall return period in the design of buildings in avalanche-prone areas. Nat Hazards 81, 1901–1912 (2016). https://doi.org/10.1007/s11069-016-2161-z
Received:
Accepted:
Published:
Issue Date:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s11069-016-2161-z