Skip to main content

Advertisement

Log in

Green technology innovation and energy intensity in China

  • Original Paper
  • Published:
Natural Hazards Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

This paper investigates the relationship between green technology innovation and energy intensity for 29 provinces in Mainland China from 1999 to 2010. Based on changes in energy intensity in the data, the provinces are divided into four groups: the conventional group, the gradational group, the contemporary group, and the low-carbon group. Industrial structure is included in the study because of its impact on energy intensity, thus avoiding the problem of omitted variable bias. The empirical results indicate that there is a negative, long-run, cointegrated relationship between energy intensity and green technology innovation. We also discover unidirectional causality from green technology innovation to energy intensity in the conventional and low-carbon groups, whereas green technology innovation directly affects energy intensity through a feedback system for the gradational and contemporary groups. To achieve the goal of energy intensity, policymakers should encourage green technology diffusion from the low-carbon group to the conventional group and improve the share of green technology innovation in the gradational and contemporary groups.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Fig. 1
Fig. 2
Fig. 3

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  • Acemoglu D, Aghion P, Bursztyn L, Hemous D (2012) The environment and directed technical change. Am Econ Rev 102(1):131–166

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Aghion P, Dechezlepretre A, Hemous D et al (2014) Carbon taxes, path dependency and directed technical change: Evidence from the auto industry. J Political Econ (forthcoming)

  • Asafu-Adjaye J (2000) The relationship between energy consumption, energy prices and economic growth: time series evidence from Asian developing countries. Energy Econ 22:615–625

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Elena V, Marzio G (2011) At home and abroad: an empirical analysis of innovation and diffusion in energy technologies. J Environ Econ Manag 61:119–134

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Fan Y, Liu LC, Wu G, Wei YM (2007) Changes in carbon intensity in China: empirical findings from 1980–2003. Ecol Econ 62:683–691

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Feng T, Sun L, He Z (2008) An empirical study of technology progress moderating effect on energy intensity in China. Stud Sci Sci 23(1):1–6

    Google Scholar 

  • Feng D, Long R, Zhou D et al (2012) The relationship between industrial structure, technical progress, and opening degree with unit GDP energy consumption approach. Chin J Manag 9(4):603–610

    Google Scholar 

  • Fisher-Vanden K, Jefferson GH (2008) Technology diversity and development: evidence from China’s industrial enterprises. J Comp Econ 36(4):658–672

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Garbccio RF et al (1999) Why has the energy output ratio fallen in China? J Energy 20(3):73–82

    Google Scholar 

  • Hang and Tu (2007) The impacts of energy prices on energy intensity: evidence from China. Energy Policy 35:2978–2988

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Hart R (2004) Growth, environment and innovation—a model with production vintages and environmentally oriented research. J Environ Econ Manag 48:1078–1098

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Jin L et al (2011) Energy consumption per GDP in various regions of China and its mode. Energy Procedia 5:2335–2339

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Kao C, Chiang MH (2000) On the estimation and inference of a cointegrated regression in panel data. In: Baltagi BH (ed) Nonstationary panels, panel cointegration, and dynamic panels. Elsevier, Amsterdam

    Google Scholar 

  • Lun R (2010) Mechanism analysis and empirical study on inter-industry spillovers of energy saving techniques. Stud Sci Sci 28:865–871 (In Chinese)

    Google Scholar 

  • Ma C, Stern DI (2008) China’s changing energy intensity trend: a decomposition analysis. Energy Econ 30(3):1037–1053

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Masih AMM, Masih R (1997) On the temporal causal relationship between energy consumption, real income and prices: some new evidence from Asian-energy dependent NICs based on a multivariate cointegration/vector error-correction approach. J Policy Model 19(4):417–440

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • OECD (2011a) Patent search strategies for the identification of selected environment-related technologies. http://www.oecd.org/environment/innovation. Accessed 25 March 2012

  • OECD (2011b) Invention and transfer of environmental technologies. OECD Studies on Environmental Innovation, OECD Publishing, Paris

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • Pedroni P (1999) Critical values for cointegration tests in heterogeneous panels with multiple regressors. Oxford Bull Econ Stat 61(4):653–670

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Phillips PCB, Moon HR (1999) Linear regression limit theory for nonstationary panel data. Econometrica 67:1057–1111

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Popp D (2006) International innovation and diffusion of air pollution control technologies: the effects of NOX and SO2 regulation in the US, Japan, and Germany. J Environ Econ Manag 51(1):46–71

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • SIPO (2013) State Intellectual Property Office of the People’s Republic of China website. http://www.sipo.gov.cn/. Accessed 25 May 2013

  • Smulders S, Bretschger L, Egli H (2011) Economic growth and the diffusion of clean technologies: explaining environmental Kuznets curves. Environ Resource Econ 49:79–99

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Vanessa O, Maider SJ (2005) The dynamics of environmental innovations: three stylised trajectories of clean technology. Econ Innov New Technol 14(3):189–212

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Wang B (2010) Can CDM bring technology transfer to China?-An empirical study of technology transfer in China’s CDM projects. Energy Policy 38(5):2572–2585

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Xu B, Chiang E (2005) Trade, patents and international technology diffusion. J Int Trade Econ Dev Taylor & Francis J 14(1):115–135

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Yang F (1993) Enterprise green technology innovation process and pattern. Zhejiang University, Hangzhou (In Chinese)

    Google Scholar 

  • Zeng S, Chen Q (2009) The comparative study of the influence of economic growth on environmental quality in eastern China and the central China and the western China. Stat Decision 278:113–115 (In Chinese)

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Acknowledgments

This paper was supported by the National Nature Science Foundation of China (Grant No. 70973011), the China Postdoctoral Foundation (Grant No. 2014M560882), and the social science research project of Hebei Province (Grant No. HB14YJ018). This work could not have been completed without the support of the Engineering Construction Management Key Research Institute of Humanities and Social Science of the Hebei Education Department.

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Yanchun Chen.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Chen, Y., Han, B. & Liu, W. Green technology innovation and energy intensity in China. Nat Hazards 84 (Suppl 1), 317–332 (2016). https://doi.org/10.1007/s11069-016-2158-7

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s11069-016-2158-7

Keywords

Navigation