Advertisement

Natural Hazards

, Volume 80, Issue 3, pp 1495–1513 | Cite as

Characterizing the multi-risk with respect to plausible natural hazards in the Balasore coast, Odisha, India: a multi-criteria analysis (MCA) appraisal

  • Anirban MukhopadhyayEmail author
  • Sugata Hazra
  • Debasish Mitra
  • C. Hutton
  • Abhra Chanda
  • Sandip Mukherjee
Original Paper

Abstract

Coastal zones are often prone to several natural hazards, and where the coastal zone has high population density and infrastructural assets, these hazards can render severe loss to both life and properties. The present paper reports a comprehensive assessment of the multi-hazard and multi-risk (keeping in view the population and assets exposed to multi-hazards) in the Balasore coast, situated in the state of Odisha, India, facing the Bay of Bengal immediately to its east. In most of the multi-hazard and multi-risk assessments, the importance of any one hazard in relation to others is often determined arbitrarily. To overcome this limitation, this work presents a multi-criteria analysis implemented on six hazards, namely coastal erosion, storm surge, sea level rise, coastal flooding, tsunami, and earthquake. The respective hazards were ranked according to their relative weight computed by pair-wise comparison, and the overall multi-hazard map of the coast was prepared using weighted overlay technique in GIS environment. In order to assess the exposure, population density and urban assets of the study area were also mapped. Finally, the population and urban density data were overlain on the multi-hazard map in order to derive the final map portraying the multi-risk of the Balasore coast. Coastal erosion and storm surge inundation are the two most substantial natural hazards that regularly affect this coast. It is also observed that hazard from the perspective of coastal erosion is spatially concentrated along the central part of the coast, while in the southern part, the effect of storm surge is higher. The area in and around Chandipur, which is situated in the central portion of the Balasore coast, has been found to have the highest multi-risk, which also happens to be a popular tourist destination.

Keywords

Pair-wise comparison Multi-criteria analysis Multi-hazard Exposure Multi-risk Balasore coast 

Notes

Acknowledgments

The authors gratefully acknowledge Jadavpur University, Kolkata, India, and Indian Institute of Remote Sensing, Dehradun, India, for providing all the necessary support and infrastructure to carry out the present work. We are also grateful to Geological Survey of India (GSI), Odisha State Disaster Management Authority (OSDMA) and NASA for providing the data required. We also humbly acknowledge the efforts of Mr. Rajarshi Dasgupta for enhancing the quality of the manuscript. A Chanda is grateful to Department of Science and Technology for providing the INSPIRE fellowship. A. Mukhopadhyay is grateful to Indian National Centre for Ocean Information Services (INCOIS) for their support.

References

  1. Banerjee PK (2000) Holocene and late Pleistocene relative sea level fluctuations along the east coast of India. Mar Geol 167:243–260CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  2. Barman NK, Chetterjee S, Khan A (2014) Spatial variability of flood hazard risks in the Balasore coastal block, Odisha, India. J Geogr Nat Disast 4:1–7. doi: 10.4172/2167-0587.1000120 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  3. Bhatnagar NC, Sundara Rajan GV, Raghav Rao KV, Krupanidhi KVJR, Krishna Rao IVR, Ahmad M, Radhakrishna TS, Siddiquie HN, Jha BN, Kripakaran V, Kameswaran N (1970) Geology and ground water resources of parts of Balasore and Cuttack coasts, Odisha, Bull, GSI Series B-Engineering Geology and Ground WaterGoogle Scholar
  4. Bird ECF (2000) Coastal geomorphology: an introduction. Wiley, Chichester, p 322Google Scholar
  5. Boesch DF, Josselyn MN, Mehta AJ, Morris JT, Nuttle WK, Simenstad CA, Swift DJP (1994) Scientific assessment of coastal wetland loss, restoration and management in Louisiana. J Coast Res 20:1–103Google Scholar
  6. Bryant E (2005) Natural hazards, 2nd edn. Cambridge University Press, CambridgeGoogle Scholar
  7. Bryant E (2008) Tsunami: the underrated hazard, 2nd edn. Springer, HeidelbergGoogle Scholar
  8. Census of India (2011) Provisional population totals Paper 2 of 2011: Odisha. http://www.censusindia.gov.in/2011-prov-results/paper2/data_files/Odisha/Data-sheet-Odisha.pdf. Accessed 17 June 2012
  9. Chakhar S, Martel JM (2003) Enhancing geographic information system capabilities with multi-criteria evaluation functions. J Geogr Inf Decis Anal 7:47–71Google Scholar
  10. Eastman JR, Kyem PAK, Toledano J, Jin W (1993a) GIS and decision making. UNITAR, GenevaGoogle Scholar
  11. Eastman JR, Toledano J, Weigen J, Kyem PAK (1993b) Participatory multi-objective decision making in GIS. In: McMaster RB, Armstrong MP (eds) Proceedings of eleventh international symposium on computer-assisted cartography (AUTOCARTO XI). ACSM-ASPRS, Minneapolis, pp 33–42Google Scholar
  12. Eastman JR, Weigen J, Kyem PAK, Toledano J (1995) Raster procedures for multi-criteria/multi-objective decisions. Photogramm Eng Remote Sens 61:539–547Google Scholar
  13. Ferrario F, Beck MW, Storlazzi CD, Micheli F, Shepard CC, Airoldi L (2014) The effectiveness of coral reefs for coastal hazard risk reduction and adaption. Nat Commun 5(3794):1–9Google Scholar
  14. Flannery W, Lynch K, Cinnéide MO (2015) Consideration of coastal risk in the Irish spatial planning process. Land Use Policy 43:161–169CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  15. Goodchild MF (1993) The state of GIS for environmental problem-solving. In: Goodchild M, Parks B, Steyaert L (eds) Environmental modeling with GIS. Oxford University Press, Oxford, pp 8–15Google Scholar
  16. Hobbs BJ, Chankong V, Hamadeh W, Stakhiv E (1992) Does choice of multicriteria method matter? An experiment in water resource planning. Water Resour Res 28:1767–1779CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  17. Hwang CL, Yoon K (1981) Multiple attribute decision making: methods and applications. Springer, BerlinCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  18. Imamura F, Yalciner AC, Ozyurt G (2006) TUNAMI-N2 (Tohoku University’s Numerical Analysis Model for Investigation of Near field tsunamis version 2) Manual draft. http://www.tsunami.civil.tohoku.ac.jp/hokusai3/E/projects/manual-ver-3.1.pdf
  19. IPCC (2014) Climate change 2014: synthesis report. In: Core Writing Team, Pachauri RK, Meyer LA (eds) Contribution of working groups I, II and III to the fifth assessment report of the intergovernmental panel on climate change (IPCC), Geneva, p 151Google Scholar
  20. Jana A, Bhattacharya AK (2013) Assessment of coastal erosion vulnerability around Midnapur-Balasore Coast, eastern India using integrated remote sensing and GIS techniques. J Indian Soc Remote Sens 41(3):675–686. doi: 10.1007/s12524-012-0251-2 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  21. Jeanson M, Dolique F, Anthony EJ (2014) A GIS-based coastal monitoring and surveillance observatory on tropical islands exposed to climate change and extreme events: the example of Mayotte Island, Indian Ocean. J Coast Conserv 18:567–580CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  22. Jiang H, Eastman JR (2000) Application of fuzzy measures in multi-criteria evaluation in GIS. Int J Geogr Inf Sci 14:173–184CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  23. Kaiser G (2006) Risk and vulnerability analysis to coastal hazards- an approach to integrated assessment, unpublished Ph.D thesis, Christian Albrecht University of KielGoogle Scholar
  24. Kayal JR, Gaonkar SG, Chakraborty GK, Singh OP (2004) Aftershocks and seismotectonic implications of the 13 September 2002 earthquake (Mw 6.5) in the Andaman Sea basin. Bull Seismol Soc Am 94(1):326–333CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  25. Loomis DK, Paterson SK (2014) The human dimensions of coastal ecosystem services: managing for social values. Ecol Indic 44:6–10CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  26. Malczewski J (1999) GIS and multicriteria decision analysis. Wiley, New YorkGoogle Scholar
  27. Malczewski J (2006) GIS-based multicriteria decision analysis: a review of literature. Int J Geogr Inf Sci 20:703–726CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  28. Mani Murali R, Shrivastava D, Vethamony P (2009) Monitoring shoreline environment of Paradip, east coast of India using remote sensing. Curr Sci 97:79–84Google Scholar
  29. Marafa LM, Chau KC (2014) Framework for sustainable tourism development on coastal and marine zone environment. Tour Leis Glob Change 1:1–11Google Scholar
  30. Mathur UB, Pandey DK, Bahadur T (2004) Falling late Holocene sea-level along the Indian coast. Curr Sci 87:439–440Google Scholar
  31. McGranahan G, Balk D, Anderson B (2007) The rising tide: assessing the risk of climate change and human settlements in low elevation coastal zones. Environ Urban 19:17–37CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  32. Mukherjee KK, Das S, Chakrabarti A (1987) Common physical sedimentary structures in a beach-related open sea siliciclastic tropical tidal flat at Chandipur, Odisha and evaluation of weather conditions through discriminant analysis. Senckenbergianamaritima 19:261–293Google Scholar
  33. Mukhopadhyay A, Mukherjee S, Hazra S, Mitra D (2011) Sea level rise and shoreline changes: a geoinformatic appraisal of Chandipur coast, Odisha. Int J Geol Earth Environ Sci 1:9–17Google Scholar
  34. Mukhopadhyay A, Dasgupta R, Hazra S, Mitra D (2012) Coastal hazards and vulnerability: a review. Int J Geol Earth Environ Sci 2:57–69Google Scholar
  35. Neumann B, Vafeidis AT, Zimmermann J, Nicholls RJ (2015) Future coastal population growth and exposure to sea-level rise and coastal flooding—a global assessment. PLoS One 10(3):e0118571. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0118571 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  36. Nicholls RJ, Wong PP, Burkett VR, Codignotto JO, Hay JE, McLean RF, Ragoonaden S, Woodroffe CD (2007) Coastal systems and low-lying areas. Climate change. In: Parry ML, Canziani OF, Palutikof JP, van den Linden PJ, Hanson CE (eds) impacts, adaptation and vulnerability. Contributions of working group II to the fourth assessment report of the intergovernmental panel on climate change. Cambridge University Press, Cambridge, pp 315–356Google Scholar
  37. Orams M (1999) Marine tourism: development, impacts and management. Routledge, LondonCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  38. Oxfam (2000) India disasters report. Oxford University Press, New DelhiGoogle Scholar
  39. Palanisamy H, Cazenave A, Meyssignac B, Soudarin L, Woppelmann Becker M (2014) Regional sea level variability, total relative sea level rise and its impacts on islands and coastal zones of Indian Ocean over the last 60 years. Glob Planet Change 116:54–67CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  40. Rao NSB (1968) On some aspects of local and tropical storms in the Indian Ocean area, Ph.D. thesis. Jadavpur University, Kolkata, p 325Google Scholar
  41. Ronco P, Bullo M, Torresan S, Critto A, Olschewski R, Zappa M, Marcomini A (2015) KULTURisk regional risk assessment methodology for water-related natural hazards–Part 2: application to the Zurich case study. Hydrol Earth Syst Sci 19:1561–1576CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  42. Saaty TL (1980) The analytical hierarchy process. McGraw-Hill, New YorkGoogle Scholar
  43. Sanil Kumar V, Pathak KC, Pednekar P, Raju NSN, Gowthaman R (2006) Coastal processes along the Indian coastline. Curr Sci 91:530–536Google Scholar
  44. Sarma KGS, Sundar V (1988) Analysis of nearshore profiles off Paradip port, east coast of India. Indian J Mar Sci 17:94–98Google Scholar
  45. Sharma U, Patwardhan A (2008) Methodology for identifying vulnerability hotspots to tropical cyclone hazard in India. Mitig Adapt Strat Glob Change 13:703–717CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  46. Small C, Nicholls RJ (2003) A global analysis of human settlements in coastal zones. J Coast Res 19:584–599Google Scholar
  47. Srinivasa Kumar T, Mahendra RS, Nayak S, Radhakrishnan K, Sahu KC (2010) Coastal vulnerability assessment for Odisha state, east coast of India. J Coast Res 26:523–534CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  48. Stephen L, Downing TE (2001) Getting the scale right: a comparison of analytical methods for vulnerability assessment and household-level targeting. Disasters 25:113–135CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  49. Thomalla F, Schmuck H (2004) “We all knew that a cyclone was coming”: disaster preparedness and the cyclone of 1999 in Odisha, India. Potsdam EVA Working Paper 8:1–23Google Scholar
  50. Torresan S, Critto A, Valle MD, Harvey N, Marcomini A (2008) Assessing coastal vulnerability to climate change: comparing segmentation at global and regional scales. Sustain Sci 3:45–65CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  51. Torresan S, Critto A, Rizzi J, Marcomini A (2012) Assessment of coastal vulnerability to climate change hazards at the regional scale: the case study of the North Adriatic Sea. Nat Haz Earth Syst Sci 12:2347–2368CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  52. Triantaphyllou E, Mann SH (1989) An examination of the effectiveness of multi-dimensional decision making methods: a decision-making paradox. Decis Supp Sys 5:303–312CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  53. Webe S, Mikacic V (1994) The importance of market research in planning the development of nautical tourism in Croatia. Turizam 42:71–74Google Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer Science+Business Media Dordrecht 2015

Authors and Affiliations

  • Anirban Mukhopadhyay
    • 1
    Email author
  • Sugata Hazra
    • 1
  • Debasish Mitra
    • 2
  • C. Hutton
    • 3
  • Abhra Chanda
    • 1
  • Sandip Mukherjee
    • 1
  1. 1.School of Oceanographic StudiesJadavpur UniversityKolkataIndia
  2. 2.Department of Marine and Atmospheric SciencesIndian Institute of Remote SensingDehradunIndia
  3. 3.Geo Data, School of Geography and EnvironmentUniversity of SouthamptonSouthamptonUK

Personalised recommendations