Advertisement

Natural Hazards

, Volume 80, Issue 1, pp 445–469 | Cite as

Flood risk perception in flood-affected communities in Lagos, Nigeria

  • Ibidun O. AdelekanEmail author
  • Adeniyi P. Asiyanbi
Original Paper

Abstract

The widespread increase in flood hazards and the ensuing impacts have guided a change in approach to flood risk management especially in developed countries. This is based on the realisation that the integration of non-structural approaches to flood mitigation, for which the understanding of the social dimensions of flood risk is an important aspect, is needful. Flooding as a consequence of changing rainfall patterns and increased frequency of storm surges in the context of urban development has become a major risk in the coastal megacity of Lagos. The focus of flood management in the city has however largely been on structural measures with little attention directed to addressing the social processes which shape the vulnerability or resilience of flood-affected population. Risk perception is an aspect of the social construction of risk, the understanding of which is important in managing risks. The paper employs a combination of theoretical and non-theoretical methods including residents’ self-perceived vulnerability and concerns about flood risk, and the psychometric paradigm approach to examine perception of flood risk by residents in flood-affected communities in the city. Data were collected through the administration of a purposely designed questionnaire to 1000 residents in flood-affected communities in the period following two major flood events in the city which occurred in 2011 and 2012. The relationship between flood risk perception and socio-demographic characteristics of residents was also examined. The implications of findings of the study for flood risk management in the city are discussed.

Keywords

Risk perception Floods Residents Flood risk management Psychometric paradigm Lagos 

Notes

Acknowledgments

This work was carried out with the aid of a grant from the International Development Research Centre (IDRC). The comments and suggestions of two anonymous reviewers and Professor Johnson O. Ayoade which enhanced the quality of the paper are gratefully acknowledged.

Supplementary material

11069_2015_1977_MOESM1_ESM.doc (154 kb)
Supplementary material 1 (DOC 153 kb)

References

  1. Adelekan IO (2010) Vulnerability of poor urban coastal communities to flooding in Lagos, Nigeria. Environ Urban 22:443–450CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  2. Adelekan IO (2015a) Integrated global change research in West Africa: flood vulnerability studies. In: Werlen B (ed) Global sustainability: cultural perspectives and challenges for transdisciplinary integrated research. Springer, Zurich, pp 163–184CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  3. Adelekan IO (2015b) Flood risk management in the coastal city of Lagos, Nigeria. J Flood Risk Manag. doi: 10.1111/jfr3.12179 Google Scholar
  4. Adeloye AJ, Rustum R (2011) Lagos (Nigeria) flooding and influence of urban planning. Proc Inst Civ Eng Urban Des Plan 164(3):175–187Google Scholar
  5. Adger WN (1999) Social vulnerability to climate change and extremes in coastal Vietnam. World Dev 27(2):249–269CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  6. Ajibade I, McBean G, Bezner-Kerr R (2013) Urban flooding in Lagos, Nigeria: patterns of vulnerability and resilience among women. Glob Environ Change 23(6):1714–1725CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  7. Ajibola S (2012) Lagosians count losses after 12 hours of torrential rainfall. Tribune Newspaper of Saturday, June 30, 2012, p 7Google Scholar
  8. Ayoade JO, Akintola FO (1980) Public perception of flood hazard in two Nigerian cities. Environ Int 4:277–280CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  9. Baan PJA, Klijn F (2004) Flood risk perception and implications for flood risk management in the Netherlands. Int J River Basin Manag 2(2):113–122CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  10. Bhamani A, Sobani ZA, Baqir M, Bham NS, Beg MA, Fistein E (2012) Mental health in the wake of flooding in Pakistan: an ongoing humanitarian crisis. J Coll Phys Surg Pak 22(1):66–68Google Scholar
  11. Blackburn S, Pelling M (2014) Coastal megacities: risks and opportunities. Glob Change 82:8–11Google Scholar
  12. Blaikie P, Cannon T, Davis I, Wisner B (1994) At risk: natural hazards, people’s vulnerability, and disasters. Routledge, LondonGoogle Scholar
  13. Blake J (1999) Overcoming the ‘value-action gap’ in environmental policy: tensions between national policy and local experience. Local Environ 4(3):257–278CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  14. Bosher L (2011) Household and governmental perceptions of risk: implications for the appropriateness of housing provision in South India. Hous Stud 26(2):241–257CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  15. Botzen WJW, Aerts JCJH, van den Bergh JCJM (2009) Dependence of flood risk perceptions on socioeconomic and objective risk factors. Water Resour Res. doi: 10.1029/2009WR007743 Google Scholar
  16. Bowling A (2005) Mode of questionnaire administration can have serious effects on data quality. J Public Health 27(3):281–291CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  17. Bradford RA et al (2012) Risk perception—issues for flood management in Europe. Nat Hazards Earth Syst Sci 12(7):2299–2309CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  18. Breitmeier H, Kuhn J, Schwindenhammer S (2009) Analyzing urban adaptation strategies to climate change: a comparison of the coastal cities of Dhaka, Lagos and Hamburg. Contribution to the Panel, Regieren im Klimawandel Section, Regierungssystem und Regieren in der Bundesrepublik Deutschland, DVPW-Kongress, vol 21, 25 August 2009Google Scholar
  19. Brilly M, Polic M (2005) Public perception of flood risks, flood forecasting and mitigation. Nat Hazards Earth Syst Sci 5:345–355CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  20. Correia FN, Fordham M, da Grača Saraiva M, Bernardo F (1998) Flood hazard assessment and management: interface with the public. Water Resour Manag 12(3):209–227CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  21. Cutter SL, Emrich CT, Webb JJ, Morath D (2009) Social vulnerability to climate variability hazards: a review of the literature. Final report to Oxfam America. Columbia, South Carolina: Hazards and Vulnerability Research Institute, University of South Carolina. http://adapt.oxfamamerica.org/resources/Literature_Review.pdf. Accessed on 4 Feb 2013
  22. Daily Times (1947) Rain causes considerable damage to roads and buildings. Daily Times Newspaper, Tuesday, July 15, 1947Google Scholar
  23. De Wit, MS, van der Most H, Gutteling JM, Bočkarjova M (2008) Governance of flood risks in The Netherlands: interdisciplinary research into the role and meaning of risk perception. http://www.levenmetwater.nl/static/media/files/SRA_2008_integratie_paper_.pdf
  24. Few R, Ahern M, Matthies F, Kovats S (2004) Floods, health and climate change: a strategic review. Tyndall Centre working paper no. 63. Tyndall Centre for Climate Change Research, University of East AngliaGoogle Scholar
  25. Fielding J, Gray K, Burningham K, Thrush D (2005) Flood warning for vulnerable groups: secondary analysis of flood data. R&D Report W5C-018/2. Environment Agency, BristolGoogle Scholar
  26. Filatova T, Mulde JPM, van der Veen A (2011) Coastal risk management: how to motivate individual economic decisions to lower flood risk. Ocean Coast Manag 54(2):164–172CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  27. Fischhoff B, Slovic P, Lichtenstein S, Read S, Combs B (1978) How safe is safe enough—psychometric study of attitudes towards technological risk and benefits. Policy Sci 9(2):127–152CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  28. Ge Y, Xu W, Gu Z-H, Zhang Y-C, Chen L (2011) Risk perception and hazard mitigation in the Yangtze River Delta region, China. Nat Hazards 56(3):633–648CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  29. Grothmann T, Patt A (2005) Adaptive capacity and human cognition: the process of individual adaptation to climate change. Glob Environ Change 15:199–213CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  30. Grothmann T, Reusswig F (2006) People at risk of flooding: why some residents take precautionary action while others do not. Nat Hazards 38:101–120CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  31. Haines A, Kovats RS, Campbell-Lendrum D, Corvalán C (2006) Climate change and human health: impacts, vulnerability and public health. Public Health 120(7):585–596CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  32. Hallegatte S, Green C, Nicholls RJ, Corfee-Morlot J (2013) Future flood losses in major coastal cities. Nat Clim Change 3(9):802–806CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  33. Hargreaves J, Seale C (1981) The use of a semi-structured questionnaire to reveal participants’ perceptions of an in-service Masters course in Biological Education. Br J Inserv Educ 7(2):118–124. doi: 10.1080/0305763810070206 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  34. Harvatt J, Petts J, Chilvers J (2011) Understanding householder responses to natural hazards: flooding and sea-level rise comparisons. J Risk Res 14(1):63–83CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  35. Heitz C, Spaeter S, Auzet AV, Glatron S (2009) Local stakeholders’ perception of muddy flood risk and implications for management approaches: a case study in Alsace (France). Land Use Policy 26(2):443–451CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  36. Ho MC, Shaw D, Lin SY, Chiu YC (2008) How do disaster characteristics influence risk perception? Risk Anal 28(3):635–643CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  37. IFRC (2011) Nigeria: flash floods. A release of the Disaster Relief Emergency Fund of the International Federation of Red Cross and Red Crescent 25 July, 2011. http://www.ifrc.org/docs/appeals/11/MDRNG010.pdf. Accessed on 02/03/2012
  38. IPCC (2012) Managing the risks of extreme events and disasters to advance climate change adaptation. In: Field CB et al (eds) A special report of working groups I and II of the intergovernmental panel on climate change. Cambridge University Press, Cambridge, UK, and New York, NY, USA, 582 ppGoogle Scholar
  39. IPCC (2014) Climate change 2014: impacts, adaptation, and vulnerability. Part A: global and sectoral aspects. In: Field CB et al (eds) Contribution of working group II to the fifth assessment report of the intergovernmental panel on climate change. Cambridge University Press, Cambridge, United Kingdom and New York, NY, USA, 1132 pp. https://www.ipcc.ch/pdf/assessment-report/ar5/wg2/WGIIAR5-Chap5_FINAL.pdf
  40. Ittelson WH (1978) Environmental perception and urban experience. Environ Behav 10(2):193–213CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  41. Jha KA, Bloch R, Lamond J (2012) Cities and flooding: a guide to integrated urban flood risk management for the 21st century. The World Bank, Washington, DCCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  42. Jonkman SN (2005) Global perspectives of loss of human life caused by floods. Nat Hazards 34:151–175CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  43. Kellens W, Zaalberg R, Neutens T, Vanneuville W, De Maeyer P (2011) An analysis of the public perception of flood risk on the Belgian coast. Risk Anal 31(7):1055–1068CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  44. Kellens W, Terpstra T, De Maeyer P (2013) Perception and communication of flood risks: a systematic review of empirical research. Risk Anal 33(1):24–49CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  45. Kelly PM, Adger WN (2000) Theory and practice in assessing vulnerability to climate change and facilitating adaptation. Clim Change 47:325–352CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  46. Kollmuss A, Agyeman J (2010) Mind the gap: why do people act environmentally and what are the barriers to pro-environmental behavior? Environ Educ Res 8(3):239–260CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  47. Kraus NN, Slovic P (1988) Taxonomic analysis of perceived risk: modeling individual and group perceptions within homogeneous hazard domains. Risk Anal 8(3):435–455CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  48. Kreibich H, Thieken AH, Petrow T, Müller M, Merz B (2005) Flood loss reduction of private households due to building precautionary measures—lessons learned from the Elbe flood in August 2002. Nat Hazards Earth Syst Sci 5:117–126CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  49. Kunreuther H (2008) Reducing losses from catastrophic risks through long-term insurance and mitigation. Soc Res Int Q 75(3):905–930Google Scholar
  50. Lave TR, Lave LB (1991) Public perception of the risks of floods: implications for communication. Risk Anal 11:255–267CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  51. Lavell A, Oppenheimer M, Diop C, Hess J, Lempert R, Li J, Muir-Wood R and Myeong S (2012) Climate change: new dimensions in disaster risk, exposure, vulnerability, and resilience. In: Field CB et al (eds) Managing the risks of extreme events and disasters to advance climate change adaptation. A special report of working groups I and II of the intergovernmental panel on climate change (IPCC). Cambridge University Press, Cambridge, UK, and New York, NY, USA, pp 25–64Google Scholar
  52. Lawrence J, Reisinger A, Mullan B, Jackson B (2013) Exploring climate change uncertainties to support adaptive management of changing flood-risk. Environ Sci Policy 33:133–142CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  53. Leiserowitz A (2007) International public opinion, perception and understanding of global climate change. Human Development Report Office Occasional Paper. hdr.undp.org/en/reports/global/hdr2007-2008/papers/leiserowitz_anthony6.pdf
  54. Lindell MK, Perry RW (2000) Household adjustment to earthquake hazard—a review of research. Environ Behav 32(4):461–501CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  55. López-Marrero T, Yarnal B (2010) Putting adaptive capacity into the context of people’s lives: a case study of two flood-prone communities in Puerto Rico. Nat Hazards 52(2):277–297CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  56. Maplecroft (2012) World’s fastest growing populations increasingly vulnerable to the impacts of climate change—4th global atlas reports. http://maplecroft.com/about/news/ccvi_2012.html. Accessed on 09/06/2012
  57. McGranahan G, Balk D, Anderson B (2007) The rising tide: assessing the risks of climate change and human settlements in low elevation coastal zones. Environ Urban 19(1):17–37CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  58. Meijerink S, Dicke W (2008) Shifts in the public-private divide in flood management. Int J Water Resour Dev 24(4):499–512CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  59. Merz B, Kreibich H, Schwarze R, Thieken A (2010) Assessment of economic flood damage. Nat Hazards Earth Syst Sci 10:1697–1724CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  60. Messner F, Meyer V (2006) Flood damage, vulnerability and risk perception—challenges for flood damage research. In: Schanze J, Zeman E, Marsalek J (eds) Flood risk management—hazards, vulnerability and mitigation measures. Springer, Berlin, pp 149–167CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  61. Miceli R, Sotgiu I, Settanni M (2008) Disaster preparedness and perception of flood risk: a study in an alpine valley in Italy. J Environ Psychol 28(2008):164–173CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  62. Mileti DS (1980) Human adjustment to the risk of environmental extremes. Sociol Soc Res 64(3):327–347Google Scholar
  63. Nicholls RJ, Hanson S, Herweijer C, Patmore N, Hallegatte S, Corfee-Morlot J, Château J, Muir-Wood R (2007) Ranking port cities with high exposure and vulnerabilitiy to climate extremes: exposure estimates. OECD environment working paper no. 1. www.oecd.org/env/workingpapers
  64. Nye M, Tapsell S, Twigger-Ross C (2011) New social directions in UK flood risk management: moving towards flood risk citizenship? J Flood Risk Manag 4:288–297CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  65. Paul SK, Routray JK (2010) Household response to cyclone and induced surge in coastal Bangladesh: coping strategies and explanatory variables. Nat Hazards. doi: 10.1007/s11069-010-9631-5 Google Scholar
  66. Pelling M, Blackburn S (2014) Megacities and the coast: risk, resilience and transformation, 1st edn. Earthscan from Routledge, OxfordGoogle Scholar
  67. Perry RW, Lindell MK (1990) Predicting long term adjustment to volcano hazard. Int J Mass Emergencies Disasters 8(2):117–136Google Scholar
  68. Poortinga W, Pidgeon N (2003) Public perceptions of risk, science and governance: main findings of a British survey of five risk cases. University of East Anglia and MORI, NorwichGoogle Scholar
  69. Popoola N (2011) Lagos floods: Insurers put losses at N30bn. The Punch Newspaper, Tuesday August 23, 2011Google Scholar
  70. Quarantelli EL (2003) Urban vulnerability to disasters in developing countries: managing risks. In: Kreimer A, Arnold M, Carlin A (eds) Building safer cities. Disaster risk management series no 3, The World Bank Group, Washington, DC, pp 211–232Google Scholar
  71. Raaijmakers R, Krywkow J, van der Veen A (2008) Flood risk perceptions and spatial multi-criteria analysis: an exploratory research for hazard mitigation. Nat Hazards 46:307–322CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  72. Reese S, Johnston DM, Tuohy R, Becker JS, Coomer M (2011) Flood perception, preparedness and response to warning in Kaitaia Northland, New Zealand: results from survey in 2006 and 2009. Geolo Nucl Sci Sci Rep 2011(10):90pGoogle Scholar
  73. Renn O (1992) Concepts of risk: a classification. In: Krimsky S, Golding D (eds) Social theories of risk. Praeger, Wesport, CT, pp 53–79. http://elib.uni-stuttgart.de/opus/volltexte/2010/5416/pdf/ren63.pdf. Accessed on 02 July 2015
  74. Renn O (1995) Individual and social perception of risk. In: Fuhrer U (ed) Ökologisches Handeln als sozialerProzess. Birkhäuser, Basel, pp 27–50CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  75. Samuels P, Gouldby B (2009) Language of risk-project definitions, 2nd edn. Floodsite project report T32-04-01Google Scholar
  76. Satterthwaite D (2011) How urban societies can adapt to resource shortage and climate change. Philos Trans R Soc A 369:1762–1783CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  77. Schanze J (2007) A conceptual framework for flood risk management research. In: Schanze J (ed) Flood risk management research—from extreme events to citizens involvement. Proceedings of European symposium on flood risk management (EFRM 2007), Dresden, pp 1–10Google Scholar
  78. Shen X (2010) Flood risk perception and communication within risk management in different cultural contexts. United Nations University Institute for Environment and Human Security (UNU-EHS), Bonn, GermanyGoogle Scholar
  79. Siegrist M, Gutscher H (2006) Flooding risks: a comparison of lay people’s perceptions and expert’s assessments in Switzerland. Risk Anal 26(4):971–979CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  80. Slovic P (1987) Perception of risk. Science 236:280–285CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  81. Slovic P (1992) Perception of risk: reflections on the psychometric paradigm. In: Krimsky S, Golding D (eds) Social theories of risk. Praeger, London, pp 117–152Google Scholar
  82. Slovic P, Fischhoff B, Lichtenstein S (1982) Why study risk perception. Risk Anal 2(2):83–93CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  83. Slovic P, Fischhoff B, Lichtenstein S (1984) Behavioral decision theory perspectives on risk and safety. Acta Psychol 56:183–203CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  84. Stenchion P (1997) Development and disaster management. Aust J Emerg Manag 12(3):40–44Google Scholar
  85. Terpstra T, Gutteling JM, Geldof GD, Kappe LJ (2006) The perception of flood risk and water nuisance. Water Sci Technol 54(6–7):431–439CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  86. Terpstra T, Lindell MK, Gutteling JM (2009) Does communicating (flood) risk affect (flood) risk perceptions? Result of a quasi-experimental study. Risk Anal 29(8):1141–1155CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  87. The Nation (2012) Mixed grill as rain pound city. Available from http://issuu.com/thenation/docs/june_29__2012. Accessed on 17/06/2015
  88. The Nation (2012) Govt advises residents of flood prone areas to relocate. The Nation Newspaper, Friday, June 29, 2012, p 3Google Scholar
  89. Tran P, Marincioni F, Shaw R, Sarti M, van An L (2008) Flood risk management in Central Viet Nam: challenges and potentials. Nat Hazards 46:119–138CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  90. Trenberth KE (2006) The impact of climate change and variability on heavy precipitation, floods, and droughts: encyclopedia of hydrological sciences. Wiley, New YorkGoogle Scholar
  91. Trenberth KE (2011) Changes in precipitation with climate change. Clim Res 47:123–138CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  92. UN-DESA (2012) World urbanization prospects: the 2011 revision. United Nations, Department of Economic and Social Affairs, Population Division, United Nations, New YorkGoogle Scholar
  93. UNEP (2012) 21 Issues for the 21st century: result of the UNEP foresight process on emerging environmental issues. United Nations Environment Programme (UNEP), Nairobi, Kenya, 56 ppGoogle Scholar
  94. UN-Habitat (2014) The state of African cities 2010: re-imagining sustainable urban transitions. NairobiGoogle Scholar
  95. UN-ISDR (2002) Disaster reduction and sustainable development: understanding the links between vulnerability and risk related to development and environment. Background document for the World summit on sustainable development. http://www.unisdr.org
  96. UN-ISDR (United Nations International Strategy for Disaster Reduction) (2004) Living with risk: a global review of disaster reduction initiatives, 2004 version. UN Publications, Geneva. Available at http://www.unisdr.org/eng/about_isdr/bd-lwr-2004-eng.htm
  97. Whitmarsh L (2007) Are flood victims more concerned about climate change than other people? The role of direct experience in risk perception and behavioral response. J Risk Res 11(3):351–374CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  98. Whyte AVT (1986) From hazard perception to human ecology. In Kates RW, Burton I (eds) Geography, resources and environment, volume 2: themes from the work of Gilbert F. White. University of Chicago Press, ChicagoGoogle Scholar
  99. Wisner B, Luce HR (1993) Disaster vulnerability: scale, power and daily life. GeoJournal 30(2):127–140CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  100. Wisner B, Blaikie P, Cannon T, Davis I (2004) At risk: natural hazards, people’s vulnerability and disasters, 2nd edn. Routledge, LondonGoogle Scholar
  101. World Bank (2010) World development report 2010: development and climate change. World Development Report. World Bank, WashingtonCrossRefGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer Science+Business Media Dordrecht 2015

Authors and Affiliations

  1. 1.Department of GeographyUniversity of IbadanIbadanNigeria

Personalised recommendations