Natural Hazards

, Volume 79, Issue 3, pp 1867–1888 | Cite as

Storm surge damage to residential areas: a quantitative analysis for Hurricane Sandy in comparison with FEMA flood map

  • Siyuan Xian
  • Ning LinEmail author
  • Adam Hatzikyriakou
Original Paper


A quantitative assessment of storm surge damage is used to analyze structural vulnerability and evaluate the performance of flood risk mapping by the Federal Emergency Management Agency (FEMA). Using a survey of about 380 structures in heavily impacted Ortley Beach, New Jersey, following Hurricane Sandy (2012), we first assess component-level damage to each side and story of a structure based on a percentage scale. For each structure, these physical damage percentages are then integrated into a single indicator of overall damage—the economic loss ratio. These performance assessments are combined with building information to develop an integrated Geographic Information System database. This detailed database allows for a quantitative analysis of damage features and causes. Damage at the overall, story, side, and component levels all decrease as the distance to the coast increases, with most severely damaged houses concentrated in a near-shore region. Despite being heavily damaged however, this region was assessed as a low-risk zone according to FEMA’s current flood risk map. In contrast, a neighboring inland region which experienced significantly less damage was assigned as a high-risk zone. The preliminary new FEMA flood map for the area is improved by increasing the risk category for the near-shore region, but the fundamental problem, likely induced by insufficient wave modeling, needs to be addressed further. This study demonstrates a method of quantitatively assessing and documenting storm surge damage and applying the damage information to evaluate flood risk maps.


Storm surge damage Structural vulnerability Hurricane Sandy FEMA flood map 



This research was supported by NSF Grant CMMI-1314649 and the Project X Fund of Princeton University’s School of Engineering and Applied Science. The damage survey team included Ning Lin, Margaret Owensby, Emmi Yonekura, Luca Nagy, and Jonathan Glassman from Princeton University and Andrew Kennedy, Richard Estes, Tori Tomiczek, and Trenton Jackson from University of Notre Dame.


  1. Aerts JCJH, Botzen WJW, Emanuel K, Lin N, de Moel H, Michel-Kerjan EO (2014) Evaluating flood resilience strategies for coastal megacities. Science 344(6183):472–474CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  2. Algeo L, Mahoney T (2011) FEMA’s update process for coastal surge and wave analysis for flood insurance rate maps. Solut Coast Disasters 2011:569–580. doi: 10.1061/41185(417)49 Google Scholar
  3. ATC (2004) ATC-45 Field manual: safety evaluation of buildings after windstorms and floods. Applied Technology Council, Redwood CityGoogle Scholar
  4. Bellomo D, Pajak MJ, Sparks J (1999) Coastal flood hazards and the national flood insurance program. J Coastal Res 28:21–26Google Scholar
  5. Blake ES, Kimberlain TB, Berg RJ, Cangialosi JP, Beven JL II (2013) Tropical cyclone report: Hurricane Sandy (AL 182012), 22–29 October 2012. National Hurricane Center, pp 1–157Google Scholar
  6. Crandell JH (1996) Assessment of damage to homes caused by Hurricane Opal. NAHB Research Center, Upper MarlboroGoogle Scholar
  7. Crandell JH (1998) Statistical assessment of construction characteristics and performance of homes in Hurricanes Andrew and Opal. J Wind Eng Ind Aerodyn 77:695–701CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  8. Crandell J, Nowak M, Laatsch E, van Overeem A, Barbour C, Dewey R, Reigel H, Angleton H (1993) Assessment of damage to single-family homes caused by Hurricanes Andrew and Iniki. US Department of Housing and Urban Development, Washington DCGoogle Scholar
  9. Crowell M, Hirsch E, Hayes TL (2007) Improving FEMA’s coastal risk assessment through the National Flood Insurance Program: an historical overview. Mar Technol Soc J 41(1):18–27CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  10. Dalrymple RA, Kriebel DL (2005) Lessons in engineering from the tsunami in Thailand. Bridge Natl Acad Eng 35(2):4–13Google Scholar
  11. Dhakal RP (2010) Damage to non-structural components and contents in 2010 Darfield earthquake. Bull N Z Soc Earthq Eng 43(4):404–411Google Scholar
  12. Douglass SL, Sanchez TA, Jenkins S (1999) Mapping erosion hazard areas in Baldwin County, Alabama and the use of confidence intervals in shoreline change analysis. J Coastal Res 28:95–105Google Scholar
  13. Eamon CD, Fitzpatrick P, Truax DD (2007) Observations of structural damage caused by Hurricane Katrina on the Mississippi Gulf coast. J Perform Constr Facil 21(2):117–127CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  14. Farrell S, Lepp T, Speer B, Mauriello M (1999) Mapping erosion hazard areas in Ocean County, New Jersey. J Coastal Res 28:50–57Google Scholar
  15. FEMA (2006) Mitigation assessment team report: Hurricane Katrina in the Gulf coast: building performance observations, recommendations, and technical guidance. FEMA, Washington DCGoogle Scholar
  16. FEMA (2009) Mitigation assessment team report Hurricane Ike in Texas and Louisiana building performance observations: recommendations, and technical guidance. FEMA, Washington DCGoogle Scholar
  17. FEMA (2011) Coastal construction manual: principles and practices of planning, siting, designing, constructing, and maintaining residential buildings in coastal areas. FEMA P-55, Washington DCGoogle Scholar
  18. FEMA (2013a) Hurricane Sandy in New Jersey and New York: building performance observations, recommendations, and technical guidance. FEMA, New YorkGoogle Scholar
  19. FEMA (2013b) Preliminary flood maps and data. FEMA Region II Coastal Analysis and Mapping, Washington, DC.
  20. FEMA (2014) Flood insurance study: ocean county. New Jersey. FEMA, Washington, DCGoogle Scholar
  21. Friedland CJ (2009) Residential building damage from hurricane storm surge: proposed methodologies to describe, assess and model building damage. Ph.D. Dissertation, Louisiana State UniversityGoogle Scholar
  22. Hatzikyriakou A, Lin N, Gong J, Xian S, Hu X, Kennedy A (2015) Component-based vulnerability analysis of storm surge damage to residential structures from Hurricane Sandy using manual and mobile LiDAR surveys. Nat Hazards Rev (ASCE)Google Scholar
  23. Kennedy A, Rogers S, Sallenger A, Gravois U, Zachry B, Dosa M, Zarama F (2011) Building destruction from waves and surge on the Bolivar Peninsula during Hurricane Ike. J Waterw Port Coast Ocean Eng 137(3):132–141CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  24. Klima K, Lin N, Emanuel K, Morgan MG, Grossmann I (2011) Hurricane modification and adaptation in Miami-Dade county, Florida. Environ Sci Technol 46(2):636–642CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  25. Kunreuther H, Michel-Kerjan EO (2009) At war with the weather. The MIT Press, CambridgeCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  26. Maidment D (2009) FEMA flood map accuracy. World Environmental and Water Resources Congress 2009, Kansas, Missouri, pp. 4875–4884. doi: 10.1061/41036(342)492
  27. Mullens M, Hoekstra B, Nahmens I, Martinez F (2006) Water intrusion in central Florida homes during Hurricane Jeanne in September 2004. UCF Housing Constructability Lab, OrlandoGoogle Scholar
  28. NOAA (National Oceanic and Atmospheric Administration) (2013) Hurricane/post-tropical cyclone Sandy October 22–29, 2012. NOAA, Silver SpringGoogle Scholar
  29. Norman C (2009) Distinguishing between storm surge and wind damages to buildings and structures. Forensic Eng 2009:729–738. doi: 10.1061/41082(362)74 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  30. Robertson I, Riggs H, Yim S, Young Y (2007) Lessons from Hurricane Katrina storm surge on bridges and buildings. J Waterw Port Coast Ocean Eng 133:463–483CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  31. RS Means (2013) Estimate with accuracy. RS Means Online Database:
  32. Shan J, Hussain E, Kim K, Biehl L (2009) Geospatial technology for earth observations. Springer, New York, pp 473–495Google Scholar
  33. Tezak E, Rogers S (2005) FEMA sponsored coastal structures damage assessment in North Carolina for Hurricane Isabel (HMTAP Task Order 274 Sep 2003). Solut Coast Disasters 2005:524–537. doi: 10.1061/40774(176)53 Google Scholar
  34. Tomiczek T, Kennedy A, Rogers S (2014) Collapse limit state fragilities of wood-framed residences from storm surge and waves during Hurricane Ike. J Waterw Port Coast Ocean Eng 140(1):43–55CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  35. Tomiczek T, Kennedy A, Zhang Y, Owensby M, Hope ME, Lin N, Flores A (2015) Hurricane damage classification methodology and fragility functions derived from Hurricane Sandy’s effects in Coastal New Jersey. J Waterw Port Coast Ocean EngGoogle Scholar
  36. U.S. Department of Homeland Security (2014) FEMA’s progress in clarifying its “50 percent rule” for the public assistance grant program. US Department of Homeland Security, Washington DCGoogle Scholar
  37. USGS (2012) Barnegat bay at seaside heights NJ. United States Geological Survey.
  38. USGS (2013) Historic digital elevation models (DEMs).
  39. van de Lindt JW, Graettinger A, Gupta R, Skaggs T, Pryor S, Fridley KJ (2007) Performance of wood-frame structures during Hurricane Katrina. J Perform Constr Facil 21(2):108–116CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer Science+Business Media Dordrecht 2015

Authors and Affiliations

  1. 1.Department of Civil and Environmental EngineeringPrinceton UniversityPrincetonUSA
  2. 2.Department of Civil and Environmental EngineeringPrinceton UniversityPrincetonUSA
  3. 3.Department of Civil and Environmental EngineeringPrinceton UniversityPrincetonUSA

Personalised recommendations