Skip to main content

Advertisement

Springer Nature Link
Log in

Assessing the value of intangible benefits of property level flood risk adaptation (PLFRA) measures

  • Original Paper
  • Published:
Natural Hazards Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

Studies in the UK and elsewhere have identified that flooding can result in diverse impacts, ranging from significant financial costs (tangible) to social (intangible) impacts on households. At the same time, it is now clear that large-scale flood defence schemes are not the panacea to flood risk, and there is an increasing responsibility on property owners to protect their own properties. Hence, there is an emerging expectation for homeowners to take action in the form of investing in property level flood risk adaptation (PLFRA) measures to protect their properties. However, hitherto the level of uptake of such measures remains very low. The tangible financial benefits of investing in PLFRA measures are generally well understood and have been demonstrated to be cost beneficial for many properties at risk from frequent flooding. Importantly, these estimates tend to take little account of the value of the intangible benefits of PLFRA measures and therefore may be under estimating their full benefits. There remains a need to develop an improved understanding of these intangible benefits, and this research sets out to bridge this knowledge gap. Based on a synthesis of the literature, the contingent valuation method was selected as a means to value intangible impacts of flooding on households. A questionnaire survey of homeowners affected in the 2007 flooding was employed to elicit willingness to pay (WTP) values to avoid the intangible impacts of flooding on their households. The analysis of the questionnaire survey data revealed that the average WTP per household per year to avoid intangible flood impacts was £653. This therefore represents the value of the intangible benefits of investing in PLFRA measures and is significantly higher than previously estimated. This research builds on previous research in suggesting a higher value to the intangible impacts of flooding on households by assessing wider range of intangible impacts and focussing on more experienced individuals. Furthermore, the research indicates that factors which influence the WTP values were principally stress of flood, worrying about loss of house values, worrying about future flooding and age of respondents, with income showing a weak correlation. The establishment of a new value for the intangible impacts of flooding on households in the UK is helpful in the domain of flood risk management when evaluating the total benefits (tangible and intangible) of investing in flood protection measures, thus providing a robust assessment for decision-making on flood adaptation measures at an individual property level.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Log in via an institution

Subscribe and save

Springer+ Basic
$34.99 /Month
  • Get 10 units per month
  • Download Article/Chapter or eBook
  • 1 Unit = 1 Article or 1 Chapter
  • Cancel anytime
Subscribe now

Buy Now

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Institutional subscriptions

Fig. 1
Fig. 2
Fig. 3
Fig. 4
Fig. 5
Fig. 6

Similar content being viewed by others

Explore related subjects

Discover the latest articles and news from researchers in related subjects, suggested using machine learning.

References

  • ABI (2003) Assessment of the cost and effect on future claims of installing flood damage resistant measures. Association of British Insurers, London

    Google Scholar 

  • ABI (2006) Flood resilient homes—what homeowners can do to reduce flood damage. Association of British Insurers, London

    Google Scholar 

  • ABI (2008) The Summer Floods 2007: one year on and beyond. Association of British Insurers, London

    Google Scholar 

  • ABI (2010) Fighting flood risk together. Association of British Insurers, London

    Google Scholar 

  • Alberini A (2004) Robustness of VSL estimates from contingent valuation studies, prepared for the US Environmental Protection Agency. http://yosemite.epa.gov/ee/epa/eermfile.nsf/vwAN/EE-0483-05.pdf/$File/EE-0483-05.pdf

  • Atkinson G, Mourato S, Szymanski S, Ozdemiroglu E (2008) Are we willing to pay enough to back the bid? Valuing the intangible impacts of London’s Bid to Host the 2012 Summer Olympic Games. Urban Stud 45(2):419–444

    Google Scholar 

  • Beddoes DW, Booth C (2011) Property level flood adaptation measures: a novel approach. Int J Saf Secur Eng 1(2):162–181. ISSN 2041-9031

  • Bichard E, Kazmierczak A (2009) Resilient homes: reward-based methods to motivate householders to address dangerous climate change: a report for the Environment Agency. University of Salford, Greater Manchester

    Google Scholar 

  • Birol E, Karousakis K, Koundouri P (2006) Using economic valuation techniques to inform water resources management: a survey and critical appraisal of available techniques and an application. Sci Total Environ 365(1–3):105–122

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Blaikie N (2010) Designing social research: the logic of anticipation. Polity Press, Cambridge

    Google Scholar 

  • Bowker P, Escarameia M, Tagg A (2007) Improving the flood performance of new buildings: flood resilient construction. Guidance produced by a consortium of CIRIA, HR Wallingford Ltd, Leeds Metropolitan University, WRc and Waterman Group. RIBA Publishing. London. https://www.gov.uk/government/uploads/system/uploads/attachment_data/file/7730/flood_performance.pdf

  • Broberg T (2010) Income treatment effects in contingent valuation: the case of the Swedish predator policy. Environ Resour Econ 46:1–17

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Chatterton J, Viavattene C, Morris J, Penning-Rowsell E, Tapsell SM (2010) Delivering benefits through evidence: the costs of the summer 2007 floods in England. Environment Agency, Bristol.

  • Environment Agency (2007) Review of 2007 Summer Floods. Environment Agency, Bristol

    Google Scholar 

  • Environment Agency (2009) Flooding in England: a national assessment of flood risk. Environment Agency, Bristol

    Google Scholar 

  • Environment Agency (2010) Flood and Coastal Erosion Risk Management Appraisal Guidance (FCERM-AG). Environment Agency, Bristol

    Google Scholar 

  • Environment Agency and DEFRA (2005) The appraisal of human related intangible impacts of flooding. Joint DEFRA/EA R&D technical report FD2005/TR, DEFRA/EA

  • Evans E, Ashley R, Hall J, Penning-Rowsell E, Saul A, Sayers P, Thorne C, Watkinson A (2004). Foresight future flooding. In: Scientific summary: volume I future risks and their drivers. Office of Science and Technology, London

  • Fay M, Block R, Carrington T, Ebinger J (2009). Adapting to Climate Change in Europe and Central Asia. World Bank. http://www.worldbank.org/eca/climate/ECA_CCA_Full_Report.pdf

  • Field A (2009) Discovering statistics using SPSS, 3rd edn. Sage, London

    Google Scholar 

  • Flood Repair Forum (2006) Repairing flooded buildings: an insurance industry guide to investigation and repair. BRE Press, Watford

    Google Scholar 

  • Gee K, Burkhard B (2010) Cultural ecosystem services in the context of offshore wind farming: a case study from the west coast of Schleswig-Holstein. Ecol Complex 7:349–358

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Green CH, Penning-Rowsell EC (1989) Flooding and the quantification of ‘intangibles’. Water Environ J 3(1):27–30

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Grothmann T, Reusswig F (2006) People at risk of flooding: why some residents take precautionary action while others do not. Nat Hazards 38(1):101–120

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Halcrow (2009) Assessing the benefits of flood warning: phase 3, Halcrow Group Ltd. for SEPA (Scottish Environmental Protection Agency), SNIFFER, Edinburgh

  • Harries, T. (2007) Householder responses to flood risk. The consequences of the search for ontological security. A thesis submitted to Middlesex University in partial fulfilment of the requirements for the degree of Doctor of Philosophy. Thesis, Middlesex University

  • Hashimoto K, Nakamura T, Wada I, Yoshida K, Satoh S, Abo M, Seta H, Ohashi M (2006) How great is willingness to pay for recovery from sequelae after severe traumatic brain injury in Japan? J Rehabil Med 38:141–143

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • IPCC (2007) Climate change 2007: the physical science basis. Contribution of working group I to the fourth assessment report of the Intergovernmental panel on climate change. Cambridge University Press, Cambridge

    Google Scholar 

  • IPCC (2012) Managing the risks of extreme events and disasters to advance climate change adaptation. A special report of working groups I and II of the intergovernmental panel on climate change. Cambridge University Press, Cambridge

    Google Scholar 

  • JBA (2005) Scoping study into the cost of flooding using the August 2004 event as a case study. Scottish Executive, Edinburgh

    Google Scholar 

  • JBA (2012) Evaluation of the DEFRA property-level flood protection scheme. Environment Agency, Bristol

    Google Scholar 

  • JBA (2013) Establishing the cost effectiveness of property flood protection: FD2657. Final Report. Department for Environment Food and Rural Affairs, London

  • Jha AK, Bloch R, Lamond J (2012) Cities and flooding: a guide to integrated urban flood risk management for the 21st century. The World Bank, Washington, DC

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • Joseph R, Proverbs D, Lamond J, Wassell P (2011a) A critical synthesis of the intangible impacts of flooding on households. In: International conference in building resilience: interdisciplinary approaches to disaster risk reduction and the development of sustainable communities. Sri Lanka

  • Joseph R, Proverbs D, Lamond J, Wassell P (2011b) An analysis of the costs of resilient reinstatement of flood affected properties: a case study of the 2009 flood event in Cockermouth. Struct Surv 9(4):279–293

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Koerth J, Vafeidis A, Hinkel J, Sterr H (2013) What motivates coastal households to adapt pro-actively to sea-level rise and increasing flood risk? Reg Environ Change 13(4):1–13

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Kreibich H, Seifert I, Thieken AH, Lindquist E, Wagner K, Merz B (2011) Recent changes in flood preparedness of private households and businesses in Germany. Reg Environ Change 11:59–71

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Lekuthai A, Vongvisessomjai S (2001) Intangible flood damage quantification. Water Resour Manage 15(5):343–362

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Lloyd’s (2008) Coastal communities an climate change. Maintaining Future Insurability. London. http://www.lloyds.com/~/media/lloyds/reports/360/360%20climate%20reports/360_coastalcommunitiesandclimatechange.pdf

  • Mark EK (2008) Building human resilience: the role of public health preparedness and response as an adaptation to climate change. Am J Prev Med 35(5):508–516

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Markandya A (1997) Granges action plan—CVM for Rivers Water Quality of the Granges River. Report for Government of India and DFID

  • Mitchell RC, Carson RT (1989) Using surveys to value public goods: the contingent valuation method. Johns Hopkins University Press, Baltimore

    Google Scholar 

  • O’Garra T, Mourato S, Garrity L, Schmidt P, Beerenwinkel A, Altmann M, Hart D, Graesel C, Whitehouse S (2007) Is the public willing to pay for hydrogen buses? A comparative study of preferences in four cities. Energy Policy 35:3630–3642

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Office of the Deputy Prime Minister (2003) Preparing for floods: interim guidance for improving the flood resistance of domestic and small business properties. ODPM Publications Centre, London

    Google Scholar 

  • OST (2007) Climate change science. Postnote No. 295. Parliamentary Office of Science and Technology, London

  • Owusu S, Wright G, Arthur S (2013) Public attitudes towards flooding and property level flood protection measures. International conference on flood resilience; experiences in Asia and Europe. 5–7th September 2013, Exeter, UK

  • Özbafli A (2011) Estimating the willingness to pay for a reliable electricity supply in the Turkish Republic of Northern Cyprus. Doctor of Philosophy (Ph.D.). Thesis, University of Birmingham

  • Penning-Rowsell E, Johnson C, Tunstall S, Tapsell S, Morris J, Chatterton J, Green C (2005) The benefits of flood and coastal risk management: a manual of assessment techniques. Flood Hazard Research Centre: Middlesex University Press

  • Pitt M (2008) The Pitt review—learning lessons from the 2007 floods. H.M. Government Cabinet Office, London

    Google Scholar 

  • Priest S, Tapsell S, Parker D (2008) New developments in maximizing flood warning response and benefit strategies. In: Flood risk management: research and practice. CRC Press

  • Proverbs D, Lamond J (2008) The barriers to resilient reinstatement of flood damaged homes. In: Proceedings of 4th international i-Rec conference-building resilience: achieving effective post-disaster reconstruction. Christchurch, New Zealand

  • Proverbs D, Soetanto R (2004) Flood damaged property: a guide to repair. Blackwell, Oxford

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • Ramanathan C, Narayanan SP, Idrus AB (2012) Construction delays causing risks on time and cost—a critical review. Australas J Constr Econ Build 12(1):37–57

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Royal Haskoning (2012) Assessing the economic case for property level measures in England. Committee on Climate Change, Peterborough

    Google Scholar 

  • Soetanto R, Proverbs DG (2004) Impact of flood characteristics on damage caused to UK domestic properties: the perceptions of building surveyors. Struct Surv 22(2):95–104

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Soetanto R, Proverbs DG, Samwinga V, Lamond JE (2008) Strategies towards attaining flood resilience. In: Bosher L (ed) Hazards and the built environment-attaining built-in resilience. Taylor & Francis Group, London, pp 124–149

    Google Scholar 

  • Stuart-Menteth A (2007) U.K. Summer 2007 Floods. Risk Management Solutions, Inc., Newark

    Google Scholar 

  • Tapsell SM, Penning-Rowsell EC, Tunstall SM, Wilson TL (2002) Vulnerability to flooding: health and social dimensions. Flood Hazard Research Centre, Middlesex University

  • Thurston N, Finlinson B, Breakspear R, Williams N, Shaw J, Chatterton J (2008) Developing the evidence base for flood resistance and resilience. Joint Defra/EA Flood and Coastal Erosion Risk Management R&D. DEFRA, London

    Google Scholar 

  • UKCIP (2009) UK Climate Projections. UK Climate Impacts Programme, Defra. http://www.defra.gov.uk/publications/files/pb13274-uk-climate-projections-090617.pdf. Accessed 14 Dec 2013

  • Vaughan WJ, Russell CS, Rodriguez DJ, Darling AC (1999) Central tendency measures of willingness to pay from referendum contingent valuation data: issues and alternatives in project analysis, Washington, D.C

  • Walker G, Deeming H, Watson N, Kasheri E, Tapsell S, Twigger-Ross C, Fernandez-Bilbao A (2008) Flood warning in the UK. In: Flood risk management: research and practice. CRC Press

  • Warren R, Tindle A, Whalley R (2011) Flood resilient repairs and resistance measures: qualitative and quantitative research to examine the views of consumers. ABI Research Paper No 28. Association of British Insurers, London

  • Wassell P, Ayton-Robinson R, Robinson D, Joseph R, Hack K, Butler D, Salkeld I, Twomey J (2009) Resilient reinstatement: the costs of flood resilient reinstatement of domestic properties. Association of British Insurers, London

    Google Scholar 

  • Wedawatta G, Ingirige B, Proverbs D (2013) Small- and medium-sized enterprises and flood impacts: the case of the 2009 flood event in Cockermouth. J Flood Risk Manag 7(1):1–12

    Google Scholar 

  • Werritty A, Houston D, Ball T, Tavendale A, Black A (2007) Exploring the social impacts of flood risk and flooding in Scotland: Scottish Executive Social Research

  • Whittington D, Laura DT, Mu X (1991) A study of water vending and willingness to pay for water in onitsha, Nigeria. World Development 19, pp. 179–198

  • Yang JB, Wei PR (2010) Causes of delay in the planning and design phases for construction projects. J Archit Eng 16(2):80–83

    Article  Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

  1. Construction and Property, University of the West of England, Frenchay Campus, Coldharbour Lane, Bristol, BS16 1QY, UK

    Rotimi Joseph, David Proverbs & Jessica Lamond

Authors
  1. Rotimi Joseph
    View author publications

    Search author on:PubMed Google Scholar

  2. David Proverbs
    View author publications

    Search author on:PubMed Google Scholar

  3. Jessica Lamond
    View author publications

    Search author on:PubMed Google Scholar

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Rotimi Joseph.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Joseph, R., Proverbs, D. & Lamond, J. Assessing the value of intangible benefits of property level flood risk adaptation (PLFRA) measures. Nat Hazards 79, 1275–1297 (2015). https://doi.org/10.1007/s11069-015-1905-5

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s11069-015-1905-5

Keywords