Skip to main content
SpringerLink
Log in

Earthquake hazard analysis for East Anatolian Fault Zone, Turkey

  • Original Paper
  • Published:
Natural Hazards Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

The aim of this study was to investigate the earthquake hazard of the East Anatolian Fault Zone by determining the a and b parameters in a Gutenberg–Richter magnitude–frequency relationship. For this purpose, the East Anatolian Fault Zone is divided into five different source zones based on their tectonic and seismotectonic regimes. We calculated the b value, which is the slope of the frequency–magnitude Gutenberg–Richter relationship, from the maximum likelihood method (ML). Also, we estimated the mean return periods, the most probable maximum magnitude in the time period of t years and the probability for an earthquake occurrence for an earthquake magnitude ≥M during a time span of t years. We then produced a and b value maps using the ML. We obtained the lowest b value in Region 1 covered Karlıova triple junction. This conclusion is strongly supported from the probability value, which shows the largest value (90 %) for an earthquake with magnitude greater than or equal to 6.0. The mean return period for such a magnitude is the lowest in this region (43 years). The most probable magnitude in the next 100 years was calculated, and we determined the highest value around Karlıova triple junction. According to these parameters, Region 1 covered the Karlıova triple junction and is the most dangerous area around the East Anatolian Fault Zone.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Log in via an institution

Subscribe and save

Springer+ Basic
$34.99 /Month
  • Get 10 units per month
  • Download Article/Chapter or eBook
  • 1 Unit = 1 Article or 1 Chapter
  • Cancel anytime
Subscribe now

Buy Now

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Institutional subscriptions

Fig. 1
Fig. 2
Fig. 3
Fig. 4
Fig. 5
Fig. 6
Fig. 7

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  • Aki K (1965) Maximum likelihood estimate of b in the formula log N = a − bM and its confidence limits. Tokyo Univ. Bull. Earthq. Res. Inst 43:237–239

    Google Scholar 

  • Aktuğ B, Dikmen U, Dogru A, Ozener H (2013) Seismicity and strain accumulation around Karliova triple junction (Turkey). J Geodyn 67:21–29

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Allen CR (1969) Active faulting in northern Turkey. California Institute of Technology, Division of Geological Sciences, Contribution No. 1577. 32

  • Alptekin Ö (1978) Magnitude–frequency relationships and deformation release for the earthqukes in and around Turkey. Thesis for Promoting to Associate Professor Level, Karadeniz Technical University, 107

  • Arpat E, Şaroğlu F (1972) Doğu Anadolu fayı ile ilgili bazı gözlem ve düşünceler (Some observations and thoughts on the East Anatolian fault). Bull Miner Res Explor Inst Turk 73:44–50

    Google Scholar 

  • Arpat E, Şaroğlu F (1975) Turkiye’deki bazı önemli genç tektonik olaylar (On some important young tectonic events in Turkey). Bull Geol Soc Turk 18:29–41

    Google Scholar 

  • Aslan E (1972) Magnitude and time distributions of earthquakes in Turkey. Bull Int Inst Seismol Earthq Eng 7:1–10

    Google Scholar 

  • Barka AA, Kadinsky-Cade K (1988) Strike-slip fault geometry in Turkey and its influence on earthquake activity. Tectonics 7(3):663–684

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Bath M (1979) Seismic risk in Turkey—a preliminary approach. Tectonophysics 54:T9–T16

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Bayrak Y, Öztürk S, Erduran A, (2002) The relationships between maximum magnitudes and modal values for different regions of Turkey. 3rd balkan geophysical congress and exibition 8–4, 24–28 June, Sofia, Bulgaria

  • Bayrak Y, Yılmaztürk A, Öztürk S (2005) Relationships between fundamental seismic hazard parameters for the different source regions in Turkey. Nat Hazards 36:445–462

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Bayrak Y, Öztürk S, Çınar H, Kalafat D, Tsapanos TM, Ch Koravos G, Leventakis GA (2009) Estimating earthquake hazard parameters from instrumental data for different regions in and around Turkey. Eng Geol 105:200–210

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Chorowicz J, Luxey P, Lyberis N, Carvalho J, Parrot JF, Yurur T, Gundogdu N (1994) The Maras triple junction (southern Turkey) based on digital elevation model and satellite imagery interpretation. J Geophys Res 99(B10):20225–20242

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Crowell JC (1974) Origin of late cenozoic basins in southern California. Soc Econ Paleontol Miner Spec Publ 22:190–204

    Google Scholar 

  • Dewey JF, Şengör AMC (1979) Aegean and surrounding regions: complex multi-plate and continuum tectonics in a convergent zone. Geol Soc Am Bull 90:84–92

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Dewey JF, Pitman WC, Ryan WBF, Bonnin J (1973) Plate tectonics and the evolution of the Alpine system. Geol Soc Am Bull 84:3137–3180

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Erdik M, Alpay BY, Onur T, Sesetyan K, Birgoren G (1999) Assesment of earthquake hazard in Turkey and neighboring regions. Ann Geophys 42:1125–1138

    Google Scholar 

  • Felzer K (2006) Calculating the Gutenberg–Richter b-value. AGU talk, USGS

  • Frohlich C, Davis SC (1993) Teleseismic b values; or, much ado about 1.0. J Geophys Res 98:631–644

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Gutenberg R, Richter CF (1944) Earthquake magnitude, intensity, energy and acceleration. Bull Seismol Soc Am 32:163–191

    Google Scholar 

  • Hempton MR, Dewey JF (1981) Structure and tectonics of the lake Hazar pull-apart basin, SE Turkey. Trans Am Geophys Union EOS 62:1033

    Google Scholar 

  • Hempton MR, Dewey JF, Şaroğlu F (1981) The East Anatolian transform fault: along strike variations in geometry and behavior. Trans Am Geophys Union EOS 62:393

    Google Scholar 

  • Kayabali K (2002) Modeling of seismic hazard for Turkey using the recent neotectonic data. Eng Geol 63:221–232

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Kayabalı K, Akın M (2003) Seismic hazard map of Turkey using the deterministic approach. Eng Geol 69:127–137

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Ketin I (1948) Ü ber die tektonisch-mechanischen Folgerungen aus den grossen anatolischen Erdbeben des letzten Dezenniums. Geol Rundsch 36:77–83

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Lopez Casado C, Sanz de Galdano C, Delgado J, Peinado MA (1995) The b parameter in the Betic Cordillera, Rif and nearby sectors. Relations with the Tectonics of the region. Tectonophysics 248:277–292

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Lovelock PER (1984) A review of the tectonics of the northern middle east region. Geol Mag 121:577–587

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Manakou MV, Tsapanos TM (2000) Seismicity and seismic hazard parameters evaluation in the island of Crete and the surrounding area inferred from mixed files. Tectonophysics 321:157–178

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • McKenzie DP (1970) Plate tectonics of the mediterranean region. Nature 226:239–243

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • McKenzie DP (1972) Active tectonics of the mediterranean region. Geophys J R Astron Soc 30:109–185

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • McKenzie DP (1976) The East Anatolian fault: a major structure in eastern Turkey. Earth Planet Sci Lett 29:189–193

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • McNally KC (1989) Earthquakes and seismicity. In: James DE (ed) The encyclopedia of solid earth geophysics. Springer, pp 308–315

  • Miyamura S (1962) Magnitude–frequency relations and its bearing on geotectonics. Proc Jpn Acad 38:27–30

    Google Scholar 

  • Mogi K (1962) Magnitude–frequency relationship for elastic shocks accompanying fractures of various materials and some related problems in earthquakes. Bull Earthq Res Inst Univ Tokyo 40:831–883

    Google Scholar 

  • Mogi K (1967) Earthquakes and fractures. Tectonophysics 5:35–55

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Muehlberger WB, Gordon MB (1987) Observations on the complexity of the East Anatolian fault, Turkey. J Struct Geol 9(7):899–903

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Nalbant SS, McCloskey J, Steacy S, Barka A (2002) Stress accumulation and increased seismic risk in Eastern Turkey. Earth Planet Sci Lett 195:291–298

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Oral MB, Reilinger R, Toksoz R (1992) Deformation of the Anatolian block as deduced from GPS measurements. Trans Am Geophys Union EOS 73:120

    Google Scholar 

  • Pacheco JF, Scholz C, Sykes L (1992) Changes in frequency–size relationship from small to large earthquakes. Nature 355:71–73

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Perinçek D, Çemen I (1990) The structural relationship between the East Anatolian and Dead Sea fault zones in southeastern Turkey. Tectonophysics 172:331–340

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Reasenberg P (1985) Second-order moment of central California seismicity, 1969–82. J Geophys Res 90:5479–5495

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Reilinger RE, McClusky SC, Oral MB, King RW, Toksoz MN (1997) Global positioning system measurements of present-day crustal movements in the Arabia–Africa–Eurasia plate collision zone. J Geophys Res 102(B5):9983–9999

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Şaroğlu F, Emre Ö, Kuşçu I (1992) The East Anatolian Fault Zone of Turkey. Annales Tectonicae, 99–125 (Special Issue-Supplement to Volume VI)

  • Scholz CH (1968) The Frequency–magnitude relation of microfracturing in rock and its relation to earthquakes. Bull Seismol Soc Am 58:399–415

    Google Scholar 

  • Udias A, Mezcua J (1997) Fundamentos de Geofisica, QE 501. Alianza Editorial, Madrid

    Google Scholar 

  • Wiemer S (2001) A software package to analyze seismicity: ZMAP. Seismol Res Lett 72:373–382

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Wiemer S, Wyss M (1997) Mapping the frequency–magnitude distribution in asperities: an improved technique to calculate recurrence times. J Geophys Res 102:15115–15128

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Wiemer S, Wyss M (2000) Minimum magnitude of complete reporting in earthquake catalogs: examples from Alaska, the Western United States, and Japan. Bull Seismol Soc Am 90:859–869

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Yalçin H (2012) Türkiye Ve Kafkaslarin Depremselliği Deprem Tehlikesinin İncelenmesi. MSc thesis, Sakarya University

  • Yarar R, Ergünay O, Erdik M, Gülkan P (1980) A preliminary probabilistic assessment of the seismic hazard in Turkey. In: Proceedings of the 7th World conference on earthquake Engineering, Istanbul, pp 309–316

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

  1. Department of Geophysics, Karadeniz Technical University, Trabzon, Turkey

    Erdem Bayrak, Şeyda Yılmaz & Tuğba Türker

  2. Department of Geology, Dokuz Eylül University, Izmir, Turkey

    Mustafa Softa

  3. Agri Ibrahim Cecen University, Agri, Turkey

    Yusuf Bayrak

Authors
  1. Erdem Bayrak
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  2. Şeyda Yılmaz
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  3. Mustafa Softa
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  4. Tuğba Türker
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  5. Yusuf Bayrak
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Erdem Bayrak.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Bayrak, E., Yılmaz, Ş., Softa, M. et al. Earthquake hazard analysis for East Anatolian Fault Zone, Turkey. Nat Hazards 76, 1063–1077 (2015). https://doi.org/10.1007/s11069-014-1541-5

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s11069-014-1541-5

Keywords

Search

Navigation