Abstract
The asymmetrical distribution of debris-flow velocity in a cross-section has long been observed and is currently regarded as one of the most essential issues in debris-flow research. Due to a lack of quantitative models for the velocity distributions of debris flows, most studies consider only the mean velocity. However, to optimize countermeasure structures, to estimate the erosion rate, or to evaluate the constitutive equations for shear behavior, it is beneficial to know the velocity profile in a cross-section. In this paper, a generalized model of typical channel geometries (e.g., rectangular, trapezoid, or V-shape) is proposed. A description of the velocity distribution that optimizes the Manning–Strickler velocity equation for transverse distribution and Egashira’s velocity equation for vertical distribution is presented; thus, the debris-flow velocity at any point in the cross-section can be calculated and the distribution profile therefore obtained. A well-documented debris-flow reference case and the Jiasikou debris flow in the high-seismic-intensity zone of the Wenchuan earthquake are selected as case studies to demonstrate the model. Analyses of both cases confirm the asymmetrical distribution of debris-flow velocity in cross-section, as originally expected. This shows that the velocity at the top surface in the middle of the channel is much larger than that at each sidewall and than the mean value calculated by former equations. The obtained velocity distribution profile is a better approximation of the observed field profiles.
Similar content being viewed by others
References
Arattano M, Grattoni P (2000) Using a fixed video camera to measure debris flow surface velocity. In: Rickenmann D, Chen C (eds) Debris-flow hazards mitigation: mechanics, prediction, and assessment. Millpress, Rotterdam, pp 273–281
Arcement GJ, Jr., Schneider VR (1989) Guide for selecting manning’s roughness coefficients for natural channels and flood plains. U.S. Geological Survey Water Supply Paper 2339
Azmon B (1992) Manning coefficient of roughness—a case study along Soreq stream, 1971–1981. J Hydrol 132:361–377. doi:10.1016/0022-1694(92)90186-Y
Berger C, McArdell BW, Schlunegger F (2011) Sediment transfer patterns at the illgraben catchment, Switzerland: implications for the time scales of debris flow activities. Geomorphology 125:421–432. doi:10.1016/j.geomorph.2010.10.019
Berti MR, LaHusen Genevois R et al (2000) Debris flow monitoring in the Acquabona watershed on the Dolomites (Italian Alps). Phys Chem Earth Part B 25(9):707–715. doi:10.1016/S1464-1909(00)00090-3
Brayshaw D, Hassan M (2009) Debris flow initiation and sediment recharge in gullies. Geomorphology 109:122–131. doi:10.1016/j.geomorph.2009.02.021
Breien H, Fabio D et al (2008) Erosion and morphology of a debris flow caused by a glacial lake outburst flood, Western Norway. Landslides 5:271–280. doi:10.1007/s10346-008-0118-3
Chen J, Zhang L, Ruan S (2003) Synchronic exposure controller for nonmetric cameras. J Nanjing Univ Technol 25(5):92–100 (in Chinese). doi:10.3969/j.issn.1671-7627.2003.05.023
Chen NS, Yue ZQ, Cui P (2007) A rational method for estimating maximum discharge of a landslide-induced debris flow: a case study from south western China. Geomorphology 84:44–58. doi:10.1016/j.geomorph.2006.07.007
China Digital Science and Technology Museum (2013) Science column of mountain hazard. http://amuseum.cdstm.cn/moundisaster/page/. Accessed 19 Mar 2014
Díaz RG (2005) Analysis of Manning coefficient for small-depth flows on vegetated beds. Hydrol Process 19:3221–3233. doi:10.1002/hyp.5820
Doncker LD, Troch P, Verhoeven R et al (2009) Determination of the Manning roughness coefficient influenced by vegetation in the river Aa and Biebrza river. Environ Fluid Mech 9:549–567. doi:10.1007/s10652-009-9149-0
Downie W (1858) Report to Governor Douglas on a proposed route. British Columbia Archives, Victoria, BC
Drago M (2002) A coupled debris flow-turbidity current model. Ocean Eng 29:1769–1780. doi:10.1016/S0029-8018(02)00008-2
Egashira S, Ashida K, Yajima H, Takahama J (1989) Constitutive equation of debris flow. Ann Disaster Prev Res Inst Kyoto Univ 32(B-2):487–501 (in Japanese)
Han Z, Xu LR, Su ZM (2012) Research on lateral distribution features of debris flow velocity and structural optimization of prevention and control works. Rock Soil Mech 12(33):3715–3720 (in Chinese)
Hotta N, Ohta T (2000) Pore-water pressure of debris flow. Phys Chem Earth Part B 25(4):381–385. doi:10.1016/S1464-1909(00)00030-7
Hotta N, Miyamoto K, Suzuki M, Ohta T (1998) Pore-water pressure distribution of solid-water phase flow in a rolling mill. J Jpn Soc Eros Control Eng 50(6):11–16 (in Japanese). doi:10.4408/IJEGE.2011-03.B-037
Hungr O (1995) A model for the run out analysis of rapid flow slides. Can Geotech J 32:610–623. doi:10.1139/t95-063
Hungr O, Morgan GC, Kellerhals R (1984) Quantitative analysis of debris torrent hazards for design of remedial measures. Can Geotech J 21:663–677. doi:10.1139/t84-073
Hürlimann M, Rickenmann D, Graf C (2003) Field and monitoring data of debris flow events in the Swiss Alps. Can Geotech J 40(1):161–175. doi:10.1139/t02-087
Itakura Y, Suwa H (1989) Measurement of surface velocity of debris flows by spatial filtering velocitmetry. In: Proceedings of the Japan China symposium on landslides and debris flows. Niitata, Tokyo, Japan, pp 199–203
Itakura Y, Koga Y, Takahama J et al (1997) Acoustic detect ion sensor for debris flow. In: Chen C (ed) Debris flow hazard mitigation: mechanics, prediction and assessment. ASCE, New York, pp 747–756
Iverson RM, Vallance JW (2001) New views of granular mass flows. Geology 29:115–118. doi:10.1130/0091-7613(2001)029<0115:NVOGMF>2.0.CO;2
Iverson RM, LaHusen RG, Major JJ, Zimmerman CL (1994) Debris flow against obstacles and bends: dynamics and deposits. EOS Trans Am Geophys Union 4:274
Jakob M, Hungr O (2005) Debris-flow hazards and related phenomena. Springer, Berlin. ISBN 978-3-540-27129-1
Johnson AM (1984) Debris flow. In: Brunsden D, Prior DB (eds) Slope instability. Wiley, Chichester, pp 257–361
Kang ZC, Li ZF, Ma EN (2004) Debris flow research of China. Science Press, Beijing, pp 159–162 (in Chinese)
Koch T (1998) Testing of various constitutive equations for debris flow modelling. Hydrology, water resources and ecology in headwaters. IAHS Publication, Merano
Li Y, Liu JJ, Hu KH, Su PC (2012) Probability distribution of measured debris-flow velocity in Jiangjia Gully, Yunnan Province, China. Nat Hazards 60:689–701. doi:10.1007/s11069-011-0033-0
Lo DOK (2000) Review of natural terrain landslide debris- resistant barrier design.GEO report no. 104. Geotechnical Engineering Office, Civil Engineering Department. The Government of Hong Kong Special Administrative Region
Logan M, Iverson RM (2007) Video documentation of experiments at the USGS debris flow flume, 1992–2006. USGS open file rep. no. 2007-1315, USGS, U.S. Dept. of the Interior, Version 1.0. http://pubs.usgs.gov/of/2007/1315/
McClung DM (2001) Superelevation of flowing avalanches around curved channel bends. J Geophys Res 106(16):489–498. doi:10.1029/2001JB000266
Prochaska AB, Santi PM, Higgins JD et al (2008) A study of methods to estimate debris flow velocity. Landslides 5:431–444. doi:10.1007/s10346-008-0137-0
PWRI (1988) Technical standard for measures against debris flow (Draft). Tech. Mem. PWRI, 2632 Ministry of Construction, Japan (in Japanese)
Rickenmann D (1999) Empirical relationships for debris flows. Nat Hazards 19:47–77. doi:10.1023/A:1008064220727
Stock JD, Dietrich WE (2006) Erosion of steep land valleys by debris flows. Geol Soc Am Bull 118(9–10):1125–1148
Suwa H, Yamakoshi T (2000) Estimation of debris-flow motion by field surveys. In: Wieczorek GF, Naeser ND (eds) Debris-flow hazards mitigation: mechanics, prediction, and assessment. Proceedings of the second international conference. AA Balkema, Rotterdam, pp 293–299
Takahashi T (2003) Debris flow mechanics, prediction and countermeasures. Taylor & Francis Group, London
Takahashi T (2009) A review of Japanese debris flow research. Int J Eros Control Eng 2:1–14
Takahashi T, Sawada T, Suwa H (1991) IAHR monography series. The Netherlands debris flow. Balkema Publishers, Boca Raton
Tecca PR, Deganutti AM, Genevois R (2003) Velocity distributions in a coarse debris flow. Debris flow hazards mitigation: mechanics, prediction, and assessment. Millpress, Rotterdam, pp 905–916
Uddin M, Inaba H, Itakura Y et al (1999) Adaptive computer based spatial filtering method for more accurate estimation of the surface velocity of debris flow. Appl Opt 38(32):6714–6721
Wang JK (1996) Debris flow mitigation engineering technique. China Railway Press, Beijing (in Chinese)
Wu JS, Tian LQ, Kang ZC (1993) Debris flow and its comprehensive mitigation. Science Press, Beijing (in Chinese)
Wu J, Chen GQ, Zheng L et al (2013) GIS-based numerical simulation of Amamioshima debris flow in Japan. Front Struct Civil Eng 7(2):206–214. doi:10.1007/s11709-013-0198-6
Zeng X, Huang GB, Duan WG (1999) Summarization of Investigation on roughness of concrete channels. J Yangtze River Sci Res Inst 16(6):1–4 (in Chinese)
Zhao G (2012) Debris flow in Xinyuan of Xinjiang. http://www.xj.xinhuanet.com/2012-08/01/content_25525545.html. Access 19 Mar 2014
Acknowledgments
This study has received financial support from Kyushu University Interdisciplinary Programs in Education and Projects in Research Development; JSPS KAKENHI Grant Number 22310113 and the Global Environment Research Found of Japan (S-8); and the National Natural Science Foundation of China (Grant No. 41272376, L. Xu). These financial supports are gratefully acknowledged. We also thank Mohammad Reza Ghulami for revising the manuscript. And we thank Dr. Glade and two anonymous reviewers for providing helpful comments and revisions on the earlier draft of this paper.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Corresponding author
Rights and permissions
About this article
Cite this article
Han, Z., Chen, G., Li, Y. et al. A new approach for analyzing the velocity distribution of debris flows at typical cross-sections. Nat Hazards 74, 2053–2070 (2014). https://doi.org/10.1007/s11069-014-1276-3
Received:
Accepted:
Published:
Issue Date:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s11069-014-1276-3