Investigation of the variability of strong ground motions from Vrancea earthquakes
A systematic investigation of the applicability of several ground motion prediction models for Vrancea intermediate-depth seismic source is conducted in this research. Two ground motion prediction models recommended by previous evaluations (Vacareanu et al. in Bull Earthq Eng 11(6):1867–1884, 2013a; Pavel et al. in Earthq Struct 6(1):1–18, 2014), as well as two new state-of-the-art ground motion prediction equations (Vacareanu et al. in J Earthq Eng, 2013b; Earthq Struct 6(2):141–161, 2014) are tested using an increased strong ground motion database consisting of 150 recordings from Vrancea subcrustal earthquakes. The evaluation is performed by using several goodness-of-fit parameters from the literature. Moreover, the applicability of the single-station sigma method is also investigated by using the same strong ground motion database recorded in 30 seismic stations from southern and eastern Romania. The influence of the soil conditions on the numerical results obtained in this study is investigated and discussed using the results provided by the analysis of variance method. The impact of the single-station standard deviation on the levels of seismic hazard is also assessed in this study, and the results show, in the analyzed cases, significant reductions of the hazard levels.
KeywordsGround motion prediction equation Residuals Single-station sigma ANOVA Standard deviation Hazard curve
Funding for this research was provided within BIGSEES Project by the Romanian Ministry of National Education (MEN) under the Grant Number 72/2012. This support is gratefully acknowledged. The constructive feedback from two anonymous reviewers is greatly appreciated. Their comments and suggestions assisted us in considerably improving the quality of the manuscript.
- Abrahamson NA, Hollenback JC (2012) Application of single-station sigma ground motion prediction equations in practice. Proceedings of the 15th world conference on earthquake engineering, Lisbon, Portugal, paper no. 2536Google Scholar
- Ang AHS, Tang WH (2007) Probability concepts in engineering. Emphasis on applications to civil and environmental engineering. Wiley, LondonGoogle Scholar
- Dinter G, Nutto M, Schmitt G, Schmitt U, Ghitau D, Marcu C (2001) Three-dimensional deformation analysis with respect to plate kinematics in Romania. Rep Geodesy 2:1–21Google Scholar
- Eurocode 8: design of structures for earthquake resistance, Part 1: general rules, seismic actions and rules for buildings. EN 1998-1:2004. Brussels, BelgiumGoogle Scholar
- Ismail-Zadeh A, Müller B. Wenzel F (2005) Modelling of descending slab evolution beneath the SE Carpathians: implications for seismicity. In: Wenzel F (ed): Perspectives in modern seismology. Lecture Notes in Earth Sciences 105: 203–223, SpringerGoogle Scholar
- Kramer S (1996) Geotechnical earthquake engineering. Prentice Hall, Upper Saddle RiverGoogle Scholar
- Marmureanu G, Cioflan CO, Marmureanu A (2010) Research regarding the local seismic hazard (microzonation) of the Bucharest metropolitan area (in Romanian). Tehnopress, IasiGoogle Scholar
- McGuire R (1999) Probabilistic seismic hazard analysis and design earthquakes: closing the loop. Bull Seism Soc Am 85(5):1275–1284Google Scholar
- McGuire R (2004) Seismic hazard and risk analysis. Earthquake Engineering Research Institute MNO-10Google Scholar
- Vacareanu R, Radulian M, Iancovici M, Pavel F, Neagu C (2013b) Fore-arc and back-arc ground motion prediction model for Vrancea intermediate depth seismic source. J Earthq Eng (submitted)Google Scholar
- Vacareanu R, Pavel F, Lungu D, Iancovici M, Demetriu S, Aldea A, Arion C, Neagu C (2013c) Uniform hazard spectra for cities in Romania. Proceedings of the international conference on earthquake engineering SE-50 EEE, Skopje, Macedonia, Paper no. 164Google Scholar
- Wald DJ, Allen TI (2007). Topographic slope as a proxy for seismic site conditions and amplification. Bull Seism Soc Am 97(5):1379–1395Google Scholar