Skip to main content

Advertisement

Log in

An observability–controllability model of urban earthquake disaster risk based on system periphery theory

  • Original Paper
  • Published:
Natural Hazards Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

Urban earthquake disaster prevention is regarded as an integrated systematic engineering. Urban earthquake disaster prevention system is made up of all the earthquake disaster prevention activities. The concept and composition of urban earthquake disaster prevention system periphery were presented based on system periphery theory. A seismic risk-control mechanism model of system periphery was deduced using exchange rate of periphery as a dependent variable, and an observability–controllability model of system periphery was established and crystallized in its application to the quantitative analysis of practice problem. The input sets of urban earthquake disaster prevention system are determined as the maximum earthquake magnitude happened in or around the city, the measurable earthquake frequency, population density and fixed assets density. The inside state sets of urban earthquake disaster prevention system are determined as disaster resistant ability of buildings, disaster resistant ability of lifelines and investment dynamics in disaster prevention per urban built-up area. The system output is urban seismic risk. The calculative results show the model presented in this study can analyze the influence of system periphery intensity and inside state on seismic risk and can control urban seismic risk by adjusting the parameters of system periphery, the system inside state and human influence intensity.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Fig. 1
Fig. 2
Fig. 3
Fig. 4
Fig. 5
Fig. 6
Fig. 7
Fig. 8

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  • Becker JS, Paton D, Johnston DM et al (2013) Salient beliefs about earthquake hazards and household preparedness. Risk Anal 33(9):1710–1727

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Benson C, Twigg J (2004) ‘Measuring mitigation’ methodologies for assessing natural hazard risks and the net benefits of mitigation—a scoping study. ProVention Consortium, Geneva

    Google Scholar 

  • Blaikie P, Cannon T, Davis I et al (1994) At risk: natural hazards, people’s vulnerability and disasters. Routledge, London

    Google Scholar 

  • Burton I, Katers RW, White GF (1993) The environment as hazard, 2nd edn. The Guilford Press, New York

    Google Scholar 

  • Cao HX (1993) General theory of system perimeter—JieKe theory. Meteorology Press, Beijing

    Google Scholar 

  • Cao HX (2011) Essential of periphery theory and its applications. Science Press, Beijing

    Google Scholar 

  • Chang HY, Lin KC (2013) Reconnaissance observations on the buildings damaged by the 2010 Taiwan Kaohsiung earthquake. Nat Hazards 69(1):237–249

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Chou JS, Ou YC, Cheng MY et al (2013) Emergency shelter capacity estimation by earthquake damage analysis. Nat Hazards 65(2):2031–2061

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Huang Q, Chang JX (2007) Multidimensional critical regulation theory and methods of water resource system. China Water Power Press, Beijing

    Google Scholar 

  • Huang DS, Li HQ (1989) Fractal dimension and economy elasticity: a possible way from linear economies to non-linear economics. J Quant Tech Econ (12):54–56

  • Huang Q, Li XG, Feng L et al (2005) Observation–control model of boundary of system and its application. Syst Eng Theory Pract 25(3):101–106

    Google Scholar 

  • Hung H-C, Ho M-C, Chen YJ et al (2013) Integrating long-term seismic risk changes into improving emergency response and land-use planning: a case study for the Hsinchu City, Taiwan. Nat Hazards 69(1):491–508

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Li FW, Feng P (2007) Model and application of evacuation system for flood control. J Tianjin Univ 40(6):731–735

    Google Scholar 

  • Li XG, Wei X (2011) Soil erosion analysis of human influence on the controlled basin system of check dams in small watersheds of the Loess Plateau, China. Expert Syst Appl 38(4):4228–4233

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Li XG, Huang Q, Feng L et al (2005) Pansystems observation–control model of periphery and its application to water resources. J Lanzhou Univ 41(5):14–19

    Google Scholar 

  • Li XG, Wei X, Li ZB (2010) Human activity impact from basin system controlled by typical check dam based on system periphery model. J Lanzhou Univ 46(l):1–6

    Google Scholar 

  • Li XG, Cui YF, Feng LY (2012) Observability-controllability model of Periphery to quantitative analysis of human influence. J Syst Eng 27(5):692–698

    Google Scholar 

  • Liu CF, Su JY, Wang W (2012) ArcGIS-based regional seismic hazard environment evaluation based on catastrophe progression method. Res J Chem Environ 16(2):122–127

    Google Scholar 

  • Neighbors CJ, Cochran ES, Caras Y et al (2013) Sensitivity analysis of FEMA HAZUS earthquake model: case study from King County, Washington. Nat Hazards Rev 14(2):134–146

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Shi PJ (2009) Theory and practice on disaster system research in a fifth time. J Nat Disasters 18(5):1–9

    Google Scholar 

  • Tong CS, Liu JP, Huang Q et al (2004) Jieke analysis of river basin water resources management system. J Irrig Drain 23(1):21–25

    Google Scholar 

  • Wang HL, Cao W, Gong L et al (2010) Jieke theory of freeway and its application. J Lanzhou Jiaotong Univ 29(6):137–140

    Google Scholar 

  • Wei N, Bian KJ, Xu Z (2008) Application of observation–control model of boundary to erosion research on controlled area of check dam. Math Pract Theory 38(4):78–85

    Google Scholar 

  • Xu JH (1995) Influence of human activities on natural environmental evolution and quantitative evaluation model. J Lanzhou Univ Soc Sci Ed 23(3):144–150

    Google Scholar 

  • Yon B, Sayin E, Koksal TS (2013) Seismic response of buildings during the May 19, 2011 Simav, Turkey earthquake. Earthq Struct 5(3):343–357

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Zhang MY (2008) Research on the assessment of disaster carrying capability and disaster comprehensive risk in urban place. Dalian University of Technology, Dalian

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Acknowledgments

This research is supported by the National Twelfth Five-year Technology Support Projects of China (Grant Nos. 2011BAK07B01, 2011BAJ08B03 and 2011BAJ08B05) and the National Natural Science Foundation of China (Grant No. 51208017).

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Chao-feng Liu.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Liu, Cf., Su, Jy., Wang, W. et al. An observability–controllability model of urban earthquake disaster risk based on system periphery theory. Nat Hazards 73, 303–315 (2014). https://doi.org/10.1007/s11069-014-1072-0

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s11069-014-1072-0

Keywords

Navigation