Skip to main content
Log in

A review of strong motion studies in Gujarat State of western India

  • Review Article
  • Published:
Natural Hazards Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

The present work reviews the strong motion studies done in Gujarat State of western India. Prior to the 2001 Bhuj earthquake, no strong motion instrument was in operation in Gujarat. After the earthquake, number of research institutes/universities from India and abroad deployed strong motion instruments to study aftershock activity, source dynamics, path and site effects. The strong motion recordings have enhanced the general understanding of the physics of earthquakes in the region. An attempt has been made to develop attenuation relationship for the Gujarat region from the actual ground motions recorded by the strong motion networks. The Government of Gujarat with the help from Asian Development Bank, World Bank (WB), Ministry of Science and Technology and Ministry of Earth Sciences, Government of India, has established a permanent dense network of strong motion accelerograph (SMA) all over Gujarat. In addition, the Institute of Seismological Research has been established in Gandhinagar, Gujarat, with the help of WB for carrying out seismological research. Recently, many important studies have been carried out using actual acceleration data obtained from a dense network of 54 SMA, as well as synthetic data generated using region-specific ground motion parameters. The recorded data are used to obtain region-specific ground motion parameters and ground motion prediction equation. A deterministic hazard analysis for the entire state of Gujarat has been carried out using site-specific ground motion parameters. The estimated peak ground acceleration and modified Mercalli intensity values have been used to estimate the vulnerability of the different types of buildings in 31 cities of Gujarat. As Gujarat has three distinct regions having varied geological conditions, the recorded strong motion data gave an opportunity to study the effect of geological and local-site conditions on the response spectra. This study for an intra-plate region like Gujarat is a pioneer work. Still, lots of research work need to be carried out as more and more data are available, such as development of more robust ground motion prediction equations and a 3D-velocity structure of Gujarat. Generation of shake maps in real time and a credible early earthquake warning system is need of the hour for disaster mitigation and management.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Fig. 1
Fig. 2
Fig. 3
Fig. 4
Fig. 5
Fig. 6
Fig. 7
Fig. 8
Fig. 9

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  • Anon (2001) Bhuj earthquake of Jan. 26, 2001. IMD consolidated preliminary report 44

  • BIS (2002) Criteria for earthquake resistant design of structures, Part I—General provisions and buildings Bureau of Indian Standards. IS 1893 (Part I) 2002

  • Biswas SK (1980) Structure of Kutch-Kathiawar Regio. W India Proc 3rd Ind Geol Cong, Pune, 255–272

  • Biswas SK (1987) Regional tectonic framework, structure and evolution of the western marginal basins of India. Tectonophysics 135:307–327

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Biswas SK (2005) A review of structure and tectonics of Kutch basin, western India, with special reference to earthquake. Curr Sci 88:1592–1600

    Google Scholar 

  • Bodin P, Horton S (2004) Source parameters and tectonic implications of aftershocks of the Mw7.6 Bhuj earthquake of January 26, 2001. Bull Seismol Soc Am 94:818–827

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Bodin P, Malagnini L, Akinci A (2004) Ground-Motion Scaling in the Kachchh Basin, India, deduced from aftershocks of the 2001 Mw 7.6 Bhuj earthquake. Bull Seismol Soc Am 94:1658–1669

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Chandra U (1977) Earthquakes of peninsular India-A Seismotectonic study. Bull Seisml Soc Am 67:1387–1413

    Google Scholar 

  • Chopra S, Choudhury P (2011) A study of response spectra for different geological conditions in Gujarat. India. Soil Dyn Earthquake Eng 31:1551–1564

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Chopra S, Yadav RBS, Patel H, Kumar S, Rao KM, Rastogi BK, Hameed A, Srivastava S (2008) The Gujarat (India) seismic network. Seism Res Lett 79:799–808

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Chopra S, Kumar D, Rastogi BK, Choudhury P, Yadav RBS (2012) Deterministic seismic scenario in Gujarat, India. Nat Haz 60:517–540

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Chopra S, Kumar D, Rastogi BK, Choudhury P, Yadav RBS (2013) Estimation of seismic hazard in Gujarat region, India. Nat Haz 65:1157–1178

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Choudhury P, Chopra S, Rastogi BK (2011) Advances in generating design ground motion, proceedings of post-SMiRT conference seminar on “Advances in Seismic Design of Structures, Systems and Components of Nuclear Facilities”, Nov 14-15, BARC, Mumbai, pp 37–45

  • Cramer Chris H, Ashok Kumar (2003) 2001 Bhuj, India, earthquake engineering seismoscope recordings and Eastern North America ground-motion attenuation relations. Bull Seismol Soc Am 93:91390–91394

    Google Scholar 

  • Gupta HK, Purnachandra Rao N, Rastogi BK, Sarkar D (2001a) The deadliest intraplate earthquake: perspectives. Science 291:2101–2102

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Gupta HK, Harinarayana T, Kousalya M, Mishra DC, Mohan I, Rao N, Purnachandra N, Raju PS, Rastogi BK, Reddy PR, Sarkar D (2001b) Bhuj earthquake of 26 January 2001. J Geol Soc India 57:275–278

    Google Scholar 

  • Iyengar RN, Raghukant STG (2002) Strong ground motion at Bhuj City during the Kutch earthquake. Curr Sci 82:1366–1372

    Google Scholar 

  • Malik JN, Sohoni PS, Karanth RV, Merh SS (1999) Modern and historic seismicity of Kachchh Peninsula, western India. J Geol Soc India 54:545–550

    Google Scholar 

  • Mandal P (2007) Sediment thicknesses and Qs vs. Qp relations in the Kachchh Rift Basin, Gujarat, India using Sp converted phases. Pure App Geophys 164:135–160

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Mandal P, Johnston A (2006) Estimation of source parameters for the aftershocks of the 2001 Mw 7.7 Bhuj earthquake India. Pure Appl Geophys 163:1537–1560

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Mandal P, Narsaiah R, Sairam B, Satyamurty C, Raju IP (2006) Relocation of early and late aftershocks of the 2001 Bhuj earthquake using joint hypocentral determination (JHD) technique: implication toward the continued aftershock activity for more than four years. Pure Appl Geophys 163:1561–1581

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Mandal P, Dutta U, Chadha RK (2008) Estimation of site response in the Kachchh seismic zone, Gujarat, India. Bull Seismol Soc Am 98:2559–2566

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Mandal P, Kumar N, Satyamurthy C, Raju IP (2009) Ground Motion attenuation relation from strong motion records of the 2001 Mw7.7 Bhuj earthquake sequence (2001–2006), Gujarat India. Pure Appl Geophys 166:451–469

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Merh SS (1995) Geology of Gujarat. Geol Soc Ind, 222

  • Motazedian D, Atkinson GM (2005) Stochastic finite-fault modeling based on dynamic corner frequency. Bull Seismol Soc Am 95:995–1010

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Oldham T (1883) A catalogue of Indian earthquakes from the earliest time to the end of AD 1869. Mem Geol Surv India 19(3):53

    Google Scholar 

  • Quittmeyer RC, Jacob KH (1979) Historical and modern seismicity of Pakistan, Afghanistan, northwestern India, and southeastern Iran. Bull Seismol Soc Am 69:773–823

    Google Scholar 

  • Rastogi BK (2001) Ground deformation study of Mw 7.7 Bhuj earthquake of 2001. Episode 24:160–165

    Google Scholar 

  • Rastogi BK (2004) Damage due to the Mw7.7 Kutch, India earthquake of 2001. Tectonophysics 390:85–103

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Rastogi BK, Gupta HK, Mandal P, Satyanarayana HVS, Kousalya M, Raghavan R, Jain R, Sarma ANS, Kumar N, Satyamurthy C (2001) The deadliest stable continental region earthquake occurred near Bhuj on 26 January 2001. J Seismol 5:609–615

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Singh SK, Bansal BK, Bhattarchya S N, Pacheco JF, Dattatrayam RS, Ordaz M, Suresh G, Kamal, Hough SE (2003) Estimation of ground motion for Bhuj (26 January 2001; Mw 7.6) and for future earthquakes in India. Bull Seismol Soc Am 93:353–370

  • Singh UP, Dastageer F, Mittal R, Singh A, Khandve S, Kumar BS, Ingole SM, Chhatre A G (2011) Earthquake ground motion generation for nuclear power plant, Transactions, SMiRT 21, 6–11 Nov 2011, New Delhi, pp 3582–3589

  • Yadav RBS, Tripathi JN, Rastogi BK, Chopra S (2008) Probabilistic assessment of earthquake hazard in Gujarat and adjoining region, India. Pure Appl Geophys 165:1813–1833

    Article  Google Scholar 

Download references

Acknowledgments

The authors wish to thank the Editor in Chief for his constructive comments to enhance the quality of this manuscript. The Science and Technology Department, Government of Gujarat, and Ministry of Earth Sciences, Government of India, supported this study.

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Pallabee Choudhury.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Choudhury, P., Chopra, S., Roy, K.S. et al. A review of strong motion studies in Gujarat State of western India. Nat Hazards 71, 1241–1257 (2014). https://doi.org/10.1007/s11069-013-0962-x

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s11069-013-0962-x

Keywords

Navigation