Skip to main content
SpringerLink
Log in

Use of site amplification and anelastic attenuation for the determination of source parameters of the Sikkim earthquake of September 18, 2011, using far-field strong-motion data

  • Original Paper
  • Published:
Natural Hazards Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

An earthquake of magnitude 6.9 (M w) occurred in the Sikkim region of India on September 18, 2011. This earthquake is recorded on strong-motion network in Uttarakhand Himalaya located about 900 km away from the epicenter of this earthquake. In this paper acceleration record from six far-field stations has been used to compute the source parameters of this earthquake. The acceleration spectra of ground motion at these far-field stations are strongly affected by both local site effects and near-site anelastic attenuation. In the present work the spectrum of S-phase recorded at these far-field stations has been corrected for anelastic attenuation at both source and site and the site amplification terms. Site amplifications at different stations and near-site shear wave attenuation factor have been computed by the technique of inversion of acceleration spectra given by Joshi et al. (Pure Appl Geophys 169:1821–1845, 2012a). For estimation of site amplification and shear wave quality factor [Q β (f)] at the recording sites, ten local events recorded at various stations between July 2011 and December 2011 have been used. The obtained source spectrum from acceleration records is compared with the theoretical source spectrum defined by Brune (J Geophys Res 76:5002, 1970) at each station for both horizontal components of the records. Iterative forward modeling of theoretical source spectrum gives the average estimate of seismic moment (M o), source radius (r o) and stress drop (Δσ) as (3.2 ± 0.8) × 1026 dyne cm, 13.3 ± 0.8 km and 59.2 ± 8.8 bars, respectively, for the Sikkim earthquake of September 18, 2011.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Log in via an institution

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Institutional subscriptions

Fig. 1
Fig. 2
Fig. 3
Fig. 4
Fig. 5
Fig. 6
Fig. 7

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  • Aki K (1967) Scaling law of seismic spectrum. J Geophys Res 72:1217–1231

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Atkinson GM, Boore DM (1995) Ground-motion relation for eastern North America. Bull Seismol Soc Am 85:17–30

    Google Scholar 

  • Atkinson GM, Boore DM (1998) Evaluation of models for earthquake source spectra in eastern North America. Bull Seismol Soc Am 88:917–934

    Google Scholar 

  • Boore DM (1983) Stochastic simulation of high-frequency ground motions based on seismological models of the radiated spectra. Bull Seismol Soc Am 73:1865–1894

    Google Scholar 

  • Boore DM, Atkinson G (1987) Stochastic prediction of ground motion and spectral response parameters at hard-rock sites in eastern North America. Bull Seismol Soc Am 73:1865–1894

    Google Scholar 

  • Boore DM, Bommer J (2005) Processing of strong motion accelerograms: needs, options and consequences. Soil Dyn Earthq Eng 25:93–115

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Boore DM, Joyner WB (1991) Estimation of ground motion at deep soil sites in eastern North America. Bull Seismol Soc Am 81:2167–2185

    Google Scholar 

  • Brune JM (1970) Tectonic stress and spectra of seismic shear waves from earthquakes. J Geophys Res 75:4997–5009

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Brune JN (1971) Correction. J Geophys Res 76:5002

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Coats DA, Kanamori H, Houston H (1984) Simulation of strong ground motion from the 1964 Alaskan earthquake (abs.). Earthq Notes 55:18

    Google Scholar 

  • Dasgupta S, Ganguly J, Neogi S (2004) Inverted metamorphic sequence in the Sikkim Himalayas: crystalline history, P–T gradient and implications. J Metamorph Geol 22:395–412

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • De R (2000) A microearthquake survey at the MBT zone: Sikkim Himalaya. J Geophys Res 21:1–8

    Google Scholar 

  • Dunn JA, Auden JB, Ghosh AMN, Roy SC (1939) The Bihar–Nepal earthquake of 1934. Geol Surv India Mem 73:280

    Google Scholar 

  • Fletcher JB (1980) Spectra from high dynamic range digital recordings at Oroville, California aftershocks and their source parameters. Bull Seismol Soc Am 70:735–755

    Google Scholar 

  • Fletcher JB (1982) A comparison between the tectonic stress measured in situ and stress parameters from induced seismicity at Monticello reservoir, South Carolina. J Geophys Res 87:6931–6944

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Fletcher JB (1995) Source parameters and crustal Q for four earthquakes in South Carolina. Seismol Res Lett 66:44–58

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • GSI (2000) Seismotectonic atlas of India and its environs. In: Dasgupta S, Pande P, Ganguly D, Iqbal Z, Sanyal E, Venkatraman NV, Dasgupta S, Sural B, Harendranath L, Mazumdar K, Sanyal S, Roy A, Das LK, Mishra PS Gupta HK (eds) Geol. Soc. India, vol 43

  • Hadley DM, Helmberger DV (1980) Simulation of ground motions. Bull Seismol Soc Am 70:610–617

    Google Scholar 

  • Hadley DM, Helmberger DV, Orcutt JA (1982) Peak acceleration scaling studies. Bull Seismol Soc Am 72:959–979

    Google Scholar 

  • Hanks TC (1977) Earthquake stress drops, ambient tectonic stresses and stresses that drive plate motions. Pure Appl Geophys 115:441–458

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Hanks TC, Kanamori H (1979) A moment magnitude scale. J Geophys Res 84(B5):2348–2350

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Hanks TC, McGuire RK (1981) The character of high frequency ground motion. Bull Seismol Soc Am 71:2071–2095

    Google Scholar 

  • Harris N (2007) Channel flow and the Himalayan–Tibetan orogen: a critical review. J Geol Soc Lond 164:511–523

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Hartzell SH (1978) Earthquake aftershocks as Green’s functions. Geophys Res Lett 5:1–4

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Hartzell SH (1982) Simulation of ground accelerations for May 1980 Mammoth Lakes, California earthquakes. Bull Seismol Soc Am 72:2381–2387

    Google Scholar 

  • Hazarika P, Kumar MR, Srijayanthi G, Raju PS, Rao NP, Srinagesh D (2010) Transverse tectonics in the Sikkim Himalaya: evidence from seismicity and focal-mechanism data. Bull Seismol Soc Am 100:1816–1822

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Heaton TH, Hartzell SH (1986) Estimation of strong ground motions from hypothetical earthquakes on the Cascadia subduction zone, Pacific Northwest. US Geol Surv Open file Report, pp 86–328

  • Housner GW, Jennings PC (1964) Generation of artificial earthquakes. Proc ASCE 90:113–150

    Google Scholar 

  • Houston H, Kanamori H (1984) The effect of asperities on short period seismic radiation with application on rupture process and strong motion. Bull Seismol Soc Am 76:19–42

    Google Scholar 

  • Hudson DE (1962) Some problems in the application of spectrum techniques to strong-motion earthquake analysis. Bull Seismol Soc Am 52:417–430

    Google Scholar 

  • Hutchings L (1985) Modeling earthquakes with empirical Green’s functions (abs). Earthq Notes 56:14

    Google Scholar 

  • Imagawa K, Mikami N, Mikumo T (1984) Analytical and semi empirical synthesis of near field seismic waveforms for investigating the rupture mechanism of major earthquakes. J Phys Earth 32:317–338

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Irikura K (1983) Semi empirical estimation of strong ground motion during large earthquakes. Bull Disaster Prevent Res Inst 33:63–104

    Google Scholar 

  • Irikura K, Muramatu I (1982) Synthesis of strong ground motions from large earthquakes using observed seismograms of small events. In: Proceedings of the third international microzonation conference, Seattle, pp 447–458

  • Joshi A (2006a) Use of acceleration spectra for determining the frequency dependent attenuation coefficient and source parameters. Bull Seismol Soc Am 96:2165–2180

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Joshi A (2006b) Analysis of strong motion data of the Uttarkashi earthquake of 20th October 1991 and the Chamoli earthquake of 28th March 1999 for determining the mid crustal Q value and source parameters. J Earth Tech 43:11–29

    Google Scholar 

  • Joshi A, Kumar P, Mohanty M, Bansal AR, Dimri VP, Chadha RK (2012a) Determination of Qβ(f) at different places of Kumaon Himalaya from the inversion of spectral acceleration data. Pure Appl Geophys 169:1821–1845

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Joshi A, Kumari P, Singh S, Sharma ML (2012b) Near-field and far-field simulation of accelerograms of Sikkim earthquake of September 18, 2011 using modified semi-empirical approach. Nat Hazards 64:1029–1054

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Kanamori H (1979) A semi empirical approach to prediction of long period ground motions from great earthquakes. Bull Seismol Soc Am 69:1645–1670

    Google Scholar 

  • Kumar D, Sarkar I, Sri Ram V, Khattri KN (2005) Estimation of the source parameters of the Himalaya earthquake of October 19, 1991, average effective shear wave attenuation parameter and local site effects from accelerograms. Tectonophysics 407:1–24

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Lai SP (1982) Statistical characterization of strong ground motions using power spectral density function. Bull Seismol Soc Am 72:259–274

    Google Scholar 

  • Lancose C (1961) Linear differential operators. D. Van Nostrand Co., Landon

    Google Scholar 

  • Langston CA (1979) Structure under Mount Rainier, Washington, inferred from teleseismic body waves. J Geophys Res 84:4749–4762

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Lee WKH, Lahr JC (1972) HYPO71: a computer program for determination of hypocenter, magnitude, and first motion pattern of local earthquakes. Open File Report, US Geological Survey, p 100

  • Lermo J, Chavez-Garcia F (1993) Site effect evaluation using spectral ratios with only one station. Bull Seismol Soc Am 83:1574–1594

    Google Scholar 

  • McGuire RK, Becker AM, Donovan NC (1984) Spectral estimates of seismic shear waves. Bull Seismol Soc Am 74:2167–2185

    Google Scholar 

  • Mikumo T, Irikura K, Imagawa K (1981) Near field strong motion synthesis from foreshock and aftershock records and rupture process of the main shock fault (abs.). In: IASPEI 21st general assembly, London

  • Munguia L, Brune JM (1984) Simulations of strong ground motions for earthquakes in the Mexicali-Imperial Valley. In: Proceedings of the workshop on strong ground motion simulation and earthquake engineering applications. Pub. 85-02. Earthquake Engineering Research Institute, Los Altos, CA, pp 21-1–21-19

  • Nakamura Y (1988) Inference of seismic response of surficial layer based on microtremor measurement. Quarterly report on railroad research 4. Railway Technical Railway Institute, pp 18–27 (In Japanese)

  • Nath SK, Thingbaijam KKS (2009) Seismic hazard assessment—a holistic microzonation approach. Nat Hazards Earth Syst Sci 9:1445–1459

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Nath SK, Sengupta P, Sengupta S, Chakrabarti A (2000) Site response estimation using strong motion network: a step towards microzonation of the Sikkim Himalayas. Curr Sci 79:1316–1326

    Google Scholar 

  • Nath SK, Vyas M, Pal I, Singh AK, Mukherjee S, Sengupta P (2005) Spectral attenuation models in the Sikkim Himalaya from the observed and simulated strong motion events in the region. Curr Sci 88(2):295–303

    Google Scholar 

  • Neogi S, Dasgupta S, Fukuoka M (1998) High P–T polymetamorphic, dehydration melting and generation of migmatites and granites in the Higher Himalayan Crystalline, Sikkim, India. J Petrol 39:61–99

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Papageorgiou A, Aki K (1983) A specific barrier model for the quantitative description of inhomogeneous faulting and the prediction of strong ground motion. Part 1. Description of the model. Bull Seismol Soc Am 73:693–722

    Google Scholar 

  • Paul A, Gupta SC, Pant CC (2003) Coda Q estimates for Kumaon Himalaya. Proc Ind Acad Sci (Earth Planet Sci) 112:569–576

    Google Scholar 

  • Press WH, Teukolsky SA, Vetterling WT, Flannery BP (1992) Numerical recepies. Cambridge University Press, Cambridge

    Google Scholar 

  • Raju PS, Rao NP, Singh A, Kumar MR (2007) The 14 February 2006 Sikkim earthquake of magnitude 5.3. Curr Sci 93:6

    Google Scholar 

  • Ruff LJ (1999) Dynamic stress drop of recent earthquakes: variations within subduction zones. Pure Appl Geophys 154(1999):409–431

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Sharma ML, Wason HR (1994) Occurrence of low stress drop earthquakes in the Garhwal Himalaya region. Phys Earth Planet Interior 34:159–172

    Google Scholar 

  • Singh SK, Ordaz M, Dattatrayam RS, Gupta HK (1999) A spectral analysis of the 21 May 1997, Jabalpur, India, earthquake (Mw = 5.8) and estimation of ground motion from future earthquakes in the Indian shield region. Bull Seismol Soc Am 89:1620–1630

    Google Scholar 

  • Sinozuka M, Sato Y (1967) Simulation of nonstationary random processes. Proc ASCE 93:11–40

    Google Scholar 

  • Wells LD, Coppersmith KJ (1994) New empirical relationships among magnitude, rupture length, rupture width, rupture area and surface displacement. Bull Seismol Soc Am 84:974–1002

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Acknowledgments

Authors sincerely thank Indian Institute of Technology Roorkee for supporting the research work presented in this paper. The work presented in this paper is an outcome of the sponsored project from ministry of Earth Sciences, Government of India, with Grant No. MoES/P.O.(Seismo)/1(42)/2009.

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

  1. Department of Earth Sciences, Indian Institute of Technology Roorkee, Roorkee, 247667, Uttaranchal, India

    A. Joshi, Parveen Kumar & Sandeep Arora

Authors
  1. A. Joshi
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  2. Parveen Kumar
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  3. Sandeep Arora
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Parveen Kumar.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Joshi, A., Kumar, P. & Arora, S. Use of site amplification and anelastic attenuation for the determination of source parameters of the Sikkim earthquake of September 18, 2011, using far-field strong-motion data. Nat Hazards 70, 217–235 (2014). https://doi.org/10.1007/s11069-013-0806-8

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s11069-013-0806-8

Keywords

Search

Navigation