The aim of this study was to investigate human behaviour during the 2012 Northern Italy Earthquakes. Furthermore, the current study used Kuligowski and Mileti’s (Fire Saf J 44:487–496, 2009) extended model and the Social Attachment Model as a framework to explain the behavioural responses. The study included 1839 participants who were affected by the earthquake occurred in the Emilia-Romagna region (Italy) on 20 May 2012. The most frequent behavioural responses during the earthquake were moving to another room of the house, escaping from home, and waiting in bed. According to Kuligowski and Mileti’s (Fire Saf J 44:487–496, 2009) extended model, perceived risk was associated with evacuation, and emergency preparedness was related to more efficient and effective responses during the earthquake. In line with the Social Attachment Model, affiliation behaviours were more frequent than flight behaviours, while, contrary to predictions, the social context did not influence emotional responses, evacuation behaviour, and search for protection.
This is a preview of subscription content, log in to check access.
This research was supported in part by grants from the SUR of ECO, Generalitat de Catalunya, which awarded a fellowship (2012FI_B1 00157) to Elisa Saccinto for her Doctorate Programme. The authors thank Gianluca Pescaroli for his assistance with this research.
Aguirre BE (2005) Commentary on ‘Understanding mass panic and other collective responses to threat and disaster’. Emergency evacuations panic and social psychology. Psychiatry 68:121–129. doi:10.1521/psyc.2005.68.2.121Google Scholar
Becker JS, Paton D, Johnston DM, Ronan KR (2012) A model of household preparedness for earthquake: how individuals make meaning of earthquake information and how this influences preparedness. Nat Hazards 64:107–137. doi:10.1007/s11069-012-0238-xCrossRefGoogle Scholar
Benjamini Y, Hochberg Y (2000) On the adaptive control of the false discovery rate in multiple testing with independent statistics. J Educ Behav Stat 25:60–83. doi:10.3102/10769986025001060Google Scholar
Binu J, Mawson AR, Payton M, Guignard JC (2008) Disaster mythology and fact: Hurricane Katrina and social attachment. Public Health Rep 123:555–566Google Scholar
Bourque LB, Russell LA, Goltz JD (1993) Human behavior during and immediately after the earthquake. In: Bolton PA (ed) The Loma Prieta California earthquake of October 17 1989: public response. U.S. Geological Survey, Washington, DC, pp B3–B22Google Scholar
Brody LR (2000) The socialization of gender differences in emotional expression: display rules, infant temperament, and differentiation. In: Fischer AH (ed) Gender and emotion: social psychological perspectives. Cambridge University Press, New York, pp 24–47CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Dash N (2002) Decision-making under extreme uncertainty: rethinking hazard perceptions and action. Florida International University Florida, FloridaGoogle Scholar
Drury J, Cocking C (2007) The mass psychology of disasters and emergency evacuations: a research report and implications for practice. University of Sussex, SussexGoogle Scholar
Gladwin H, Peacock WG (1997) Warning and evacuation: a night for hard houses. In: Peacock WG, Morrow BH, Gladwin H (eds) Hurricane Andrew: ethnicity gender and sociology of disasters. Routledge, London, pp 52–74Google Scholar
Gosling SD, Vazire S, Srivastava S, John OP (2004) Should we trust web-based studies? A comparative analysis of six preconceptions about Internet questionnaires. Am Psychol 59:93–104. doi:10.1037/0003-066X.59.2.93CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Guha-Sapir D, Vos F (2011) Earthquakes an epidemiological perspective on patterns and trends. In: Spence R, So E, Scawthorn C (eds) Human casualties in earthquakes. Springer, New York, pp 13–24CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Heath SE, Kass PH, Beck AM, Glickman LT (2001) Human and pet-related risk factors for household evacuation failure during a natural disaster. Am J Epidemiol 153:659–665. doi:10.1093/aje/153.7.659CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Quarantelli ER (2001) Sociology of panic. In: Smelser N, Baltes PB (eds) International encyclopedia of the social and behavioral sciences. Pergamon, New York NY, pp 1020–1130Google Scholar
Sherman MF, Peyrot M, Magda LA, Gershon RRM (2011) Modeling pre-evacuation delay by evacuees in World Trade Center Towers 1 and 2 on September 11, 2001: a revisit using regression analysis. Fire Saf J 46:414–424. doi:10.1016/j.firesaf.2011.07.001CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Solberg C, Joffe H, Rossetto T (2008) How people behave in anticipation of and during earthquakes: a review of the social science literature on what drives this behaviour. Paper presented at the 14th world conference on earthquake engineering, Beijing, ChinaGoogle Scholar
Villegas J, Matyas CJ, Srinivasan S, Cahyunto I, Thapa B, Pennington-Gray L (2012) Cognitive and affective responses of Florida tourists after exposure to hurricane warning messages. Advance online publication. Nat Hazards. doi:10.1007/s11069-012-0119-3Google Scholar
Wagner R (1996) A case control study of risk factors for physical injury during the mainshock of the 1989 Loma Prieta earthquake in the county of Santa Cruz, California. Johns Hopkins University, Baltimore, MDGoogle Scholar