Natural Hazards

, Volume 67, Issue 2, pp 811–828 | Cite as

Impact of the 11 March 2011, Great East Japan earthquake and tsunami on the chemical industry

  • Elisabeth KrausmannEmail author
  • Ana Maria Cruz
Original Paper


The Great East Japan earthquake and tsunami damaged or destroyed many industrial facilities housing or processing hazardous substances, such as refineries, petrochemical facilities and other types of chemical industry. This showed that also generally well prepared countries are at risk of suffering natural hazard triggered technological (Natech) accidents. An analysis of data collected from open sources and through interviews with authorities was performed to understand the main reasons for the industrial damage and downtime as well as the extent of hazardous-materials releases and the associated impact on society. The analysis of the data set confirmed the findings from other studies with respect to main damage and failure modes, as well as hazardous-materials release paths. In addition, gaps in Natech risk management were identified. Based on the data analysis and interviews lessons learned in support of a more far-reaching Natech risk management are presented.


Industrial safety Natech Earthquake Tsunami Fire Hazardous material 



The authors would like to acknowledge the invaluable help of Prof. Hirokazu Tatano, Prof. Yoshio Kajitani and Naho Ikeda as well as many others at the Disaster Prevention Research Institute of Kyoto University in helping us prepare the field visits to the affected areas and guiding us in the interviews.


  1. Argus (2011) Japanese refineries face lengthy disruption, 16 March 2011. Accessed 18 Mar 2011
  2. Asahi Shimbun (2011a) With thermal station offline, Tohoku faces tight power supply, 11 October, 2011 Accessed 1 Oct 2012
  3. Asahi Shimbun (2011b) Tohoku tsunami washed arsenic ashore, 3 September, 2011. Accessed 1 Oct 2012
  4. Bird WA, Grossman E (2011) Chemical aftermath—contamination and cleanup following the Tohoku earthquake and tsunami. Environ Health Perspect 119(7):A290–A301CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  5. Campedel M (2008) Analysis of major industrial accidents triggered by natural events in the principal available chemical accident databases. Report EUR 23391 EN, Office for Official Publications of the European Communities, LuxemburgGoogle Scholar
  6. CAO (2012) 39. Petroleum Refinery Complex, Etc. Disaster Prevention Law, Cabinet Office Government of Japan. Accessed 17 Oct 2012
  7. Cosmo Oil (2011a) Overview of the Fire and Explosion at Chiba Refinery, the Cause of the Accident and the Action Plan to Prevent Recurrence. Press Release 2 August 2011. Accessed 1 Oct 2012
  8. Cosmo Oil (2011b) Overview of business results of fiscal year ending March 2011, 9 May, 2011. Accessed 3 Oct 2012
  9. Cosmo Oil (2012) Overview of business results of fiscal year ending March 2012, 8 May, 2012. Accessed 3 Oct 2012
  10. Cozzani V, Campedel M, Renni E, Krausmann E (2010) Industrial accidents triggered by flood events: analysis of past accidents. J Hazard Mater 175:501–509CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  11. CRED (2011) CRED Crunch Newsletter Issue No. 25, September 2011. Accessed 22 Nov 2012
  12. Cruz AM, Krausmann E (2009) Hazardous-materials releases from offshore oil and gas facilities and emergency response following Hurricanes Katrina and Rita. J Loss Prev Process Ind 22:59–65CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  13. Cruz AM, Okada N (2008) Consideration of natural hazards in the design and risk management of industrial facilities. Nat Hazard 44:213–227CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  14. Cruz AM, Krausmann E, Kajitani Y, Tatano H (2013) The Great East Japan earthquake and tsunami: Natech case study analysis. Submitted to J Loss Prev Proc IndGoogle Scholar
  15. Daily Caller (2011) Japan PMr: Quake crisis worst since World War II, 11 March 2011 (update). Accessed 15 Mar 2011
  16. ERI (2012) 2011 Tohoku Earthquake. Earthquake Research Institute, University of Tokyo. Accessed 28 Sep 2012
  17. EXSKF (2011) Depleted uranium storage facility next to Cosmo Oil refinery in Chiba burned after earthquake hit on March 11, 3 July, 2011. Accessed 1 Oct 2012
  18. FDMA (2011) Fire and Disaster Management Agency. Accessed 5 Oct 2012 (in Japanese)
  19. FSL (2008) Fire Service Law, Law No. 186 of 1948, Amendment Law No. 41 of 2008. Cabinet Office, Government of Japan. Accessed 3 Oct 2012
  20. Girgin S (2011) The natech events during the 17 August 1999 Kocaeli earthquake: aftermath and lessons learned. Nat Hazard Earth Syst Sci 11:1129–1140CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  21. HPGSIJ (2005) High Pressure Gas Safety Law, Law No. 204 of June 7, 1951, Amendment: Law No. 73 of 2005. High Pressure Gas Safety Institute of Japan. Accessed 17 Oct 2012
  22. IEEJ (2011) Eastern Japan paralysed by unprecedented earthquake, IEEJ Japan Energy Brief, 28 March, 2011. Accessed 4 Oct 2012
  23. Iio Y (2011) Lessons from the Tohoku earthquake from a scientific point of view. JRC-DPRI Seminar, Kyoto University, Japan, 6–7 December 2011Google Scholar
  24. JMA (2011) Tsunami Information NUMBER 64 (Tsunami Observations), 13 March 2011. Japan Meteorological Agency.
  25. JX Holdings (2011) Notification with respect to recording of special losses by the JX Group resulting from the Great East Japan Earthquake, 27 April, 2011. Accessed 3 Oct 2012
  26. JX Nippon Mining and Metals (2012) Casualties Caused by the Great East Japan Earthquake and Responses at the Oya Mine. Accessed 1 Oct 2012
  27. Krausmann E, Cruz AM, Affeltranger B (2010) The impact of the 12 May 2008 Wenchuan earthquake on industrial facilities. J Loss Prev Process Ind 23:242–248CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  28. Krausmann E, Cozzani V, Salzano E, Renni E (2011a) Industrial accidents triggered by natural hazards: an emerging risk issue. Nat Hazard Earth Syst Sci 11:921–929CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  29. Krausmann E, Renni E, Campedel M, Cozzani V (2011b) Industrial accidents triggered by earthquakes, floods and lightning: lessons learned from a database analysis. Nat Hazard 59:285–300CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  30. Lindell MK, Perry RW (1997) Hazardous materials releases in the Northridge earthquake: implications for seismic risk assessment. Risk Anal 17(2):147–156CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  31. Mori N, Takahashi T, The 2011 Tohoku Earthquake Tsunami Joint Survey Group (2012) Nationwide post event survey and analysis of the 2011 Tohoku Earthquake Tsunami. Coast Eng J 54(1):1250001–1250027Google Scholar
  32. Nishi H (2012) Damage on hazardous materials facilities. In: Proceedings of the international symposium on engineering lessons learned from the 2011 Great East Japan Earthquake, Tokyo, Japan, 1–4 March 2012Google Scholar
  33. NPAJ (2012) National Police Agency of Japan. Damage Situation and Police Countermeasures (September 12, 2012). Accessed 22 Oct 2012
  34. PAJ (2011) Petroleum Industry in Japan: 2011, Petroleum Association of Japan, September 2011. Accessed 17 Oct 2012
  35. PARI (2011) Executive summary of urgent field survey of earthquake and tsunami disasters by the 2011 off the Pacific coast of Tohoku earthquake. Port and Airport Research Institute, 25 March, 2011.
  36. Sakai Chemical Industry (2011a) The impact of the Tohoku district-off the Pacific Ocean earthquake (No. 2), 18 March, 2011. Accessed 1 Oct 2012
  37. Sakai Chemical Industry (2011b) The impact of the Tohoku district-off the Pacific Ocean earthquake (No. 4), 26 April, 2011. Accessed 3 Oct 2012
  38. Salzano E, Iervolino I, Fabbrocino G (2003) Seismic risk of atmospheric storage tanks in the framework of quantitative risk analysis. J Loss Prev Process Ind 16:403–409CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  39. Showalter PS, Myers MF (1994) Natural disasters in the United States as release agents of oil, chemicals, or radiological materials between 1980–9: analysis and recommendations. Risk Anal 14(2):169–181CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  40. Steinberg LJ, Cruz AM (2004) When natural and technological disasters collide: lessons from the Turkey earthquake of August 17, 1999. Nat Hazard Rev 5(3):121–130CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  41. Sumitomo Metal Industry (2011a) Sumitomo Metals restarts Kashima No.1 blast furnace and Sumitomo Metals Kashima thermal power station, 26 March, 2011. Accessed 1 Oct 2012
  42. Sumitomo Metal Industry (2011b) Sumitomo Metals announces estimated loss caused by East Japan Earthquake, 14 April, 2011. Accessed 3 Oct 2012
  43. Tatano H, Kajitani Y (2012) Production capacity losses due to the 311 disaster—facility damage and lifeline disruption impacts. International Disaster and Risk Conference, 26–30 August, 2012, Davos, SwitzerlandGoogle Scholar
  44. USGS (2011) Magnitude 9.0—near the East coast of Honshu, Japan. Accessed 22 Nov 2012
  45. USGS (2012) March 11, 2011 M9.0 Tohoku, Japan Earthquake, US Geological Survey. Accessed 27 Sep 2012
  46. Wada Y, Wakakura M (2011) Japan Report. 21st Meeting of the OECD Working Group on Chemical Accidents, 5–7 October, 2011, Paris, FranceGoogle Scholar
  47. Young S, Balluz L, Malilay J (2004) Natural and technologic hazardous material releases during and after natural disasters: a review. Sci Total Environ 322:3–20CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© European Union 2013

Authors and Affiliations

  1. 1.Institute for the Protection and Security of the CitizenEuropean Commission, Joint Research CentreIspraItaly
  2. 2.BordeauxFrance
  3. 3.Disaster Prevention Research InstituteKyoto UniversityKyotoJapan

Personalised recommendations