Skip to main content

Framing vulnerability, risk and societal responses: the MOVE framework

Abstract

The paper deals with the development of a general as well as integrative and holistic framework to systematize and assess vulnerability, risk and adaptation. The framework is a thinking tool meant as a heuristic that outlines key factors and different dimensions that need to be addressed when assessing vulnerability in the context of natural hazards and climate change. The approach underlines that the key factors of such a common framework are related to the exposure of a society or system to a hazard or stressor, the susceptibility of the system or community exposed, and its resilience and adaptive capacity. Additionally, it underlines the necessity to consider key factors and multiple thematic dimensions when assessing vulnerability in the context of natural and socio-natural hazards. In this regard, it shows key linkages between the different concepts used within the disaster risk management (DRM) and climate change adaptation (CCA) research. Further, it helps to illustrate the strong relationships between different concepts used in DRM and CCA. The framework is also a tool for communicating complexity and stresses the need for societal change in order to reduce risk and to promote adaptation. With regard to this, the policy relevance of the framework and first results of its application are outlined. Overall, the framework presented enhances the discussion on how to frame and link vulnerability, disaster risk, risk management and adaptation concepts.

This is a preview of subscription content, access via your institution.

Fig. 1

Notes

  1. 1.

    The term disaster risk management (DRM) also encompasses the concept of disaster risk reduction (DRR). Thus, these terms are used almost synonymously.

  2. 2.

    Interestingly, the term sensitivity means different things to different communities; however, the actual factors used to assess sensitivity of a system in CCA can be closely linked to factors that are used to characterize susceptibility or fragility in the DRM context.

References

  1. Adger WN (2006) Vulnerability. Glob Environ Change 16(3):268–281

    Article  Google Scholar 

  2. Alexander DE (1993) Natural disasters. UCL Press Limited, London

    Google Scholar 

  3. Alexander DE (2000) Confronting catastrophe. Terra Publishing, Harpenden

    Google Scholar 

  4. Aysan Y (1993) Vulnerability assessment. In: Merriman P, Browitt CWA (eds) Natural disasters: protecting vulnerable communities. Thomas Telford, London

  5. Barbat AH, Carreño ML, Cardona OD, Marulanda MC (2011) Evaluación holística del riesgo sísmico en zonas urbanas. Revista Internacional de Métodos Numéricos para Cálculo y Diseño en Ingeniería 27:3–27. Available from: http://www.cimne.com/tiendaCIMNE/productoscon.asp?id_prod=1857

  6. Berkes F, Colding J, Folke C (2003) Introduction. In: Berkes F, Colding J, Folke C (eds) Navigating social-ecological systems: building resilience for complexity and change. Cambridge University Press, Boston

    Google Scholar 

  7. Birkmann J (ed) (2006a) Measuring vulnerability to natural hazards—towards disaster resilient societies. United Nations University Press, Tokyo

    Google Scholar 

  8. Birkmann J (2006b) Measuring vulnerability to promote disaster-resilient societies: conceptual frameworks and definitions. In: Birkmann J (ed) Measuring vulnerability to natural hazards: towards disaster resilient societies. United Nations University Press, Tokyo, pp 9–54

    Google Scholar 

  9. Birkmann J (2006c) Indicators and criteria for measuring vulnerability: theoretical bases and requirements. In: Birkmann J (ed) Measuring vulnerability to natural hazards—towards disaster resilient societies. United Nations University Press, Tokyo, pp 55–77

    Google Scholar 

  10. Birkmann J (2011). Regulation and coupling of society and nature in the context of natural hazards—different theoretical approaches and conceptual frameworks and their applicability to analyse social-ecological crises phenomena. In: Brauch HG, Oswald Spring U, Mesjasz C, Grin J, Kameri-Mbote P, Chourou B, Dunay P, Birkmann J (eds) Coping with global environmental change, disasters and security—threats, challenges, vulnerabilities and risks. Hexagon Series on Human and Environmental Security and Peace, vol 5. Springer, Berlin

  11. Birkmann J, Fernando N (2008) Measuring revealed and emergent vulnerabilities of coastal communities to tsunamis in Sri Lanka. Disasters 32(1):82–104

    Article  Google Scholar 

  12. Birkmann J, von Teichman K (2010) Integrating disaster risk reduction and climate change adaptation: key challenges—scales, knowledge, and norms. Sustain Sci 5(2):171–184

    Article  Google Scholar 

  13. Birkmann J, Buckle P, Jaeger J, Pelling M, Setiadi N, Garschagen M, Fernando N, Kropp J (2010) Extreme events and disasters: a window of opportunity for change? Analysis of changes, formal and informal responses after mega-disasters. Nat Hazards 55(3):637–655

    Article  Google Scholar 

  14. Blaikie P, Cannon T, Davis I, Wisner B (1994) At risk: natural hazards, people, vulnerability, and disasters. Routledge, London

    Google Scholar 

  15. Blaikie P, Cannon T, Davis I, Wisner B (1996) Vulnerabilidad, el entorno social de los desastres. La RED-ITDG, Bogota

    Google Scholar 

  16. Bogardi J, Birkmann J (2004) Vulnerability assessment: the first step towards sustainable risk reduction. In: Malzahn D, Plapp T (eds) Disasters and society—from hazard assessment to risk reduction. Logos, Berlin, pp 75–82

    Google Scholar 

  17. Bohle H-G (2008) Krisen, Katastrophen, Kollaps—Geographien von Verwundbarkeit in der Risikogesellschaft. In: Kulke E, Popp H (eds) Umgang mit Risiken. Katastrophen—Destabilisierung—Sicherheit. Deutscher Geographentag 2007, Bautzen. Lausitzer Druck- und Verlagshaus GmbH, Bayreuth, pp 69–82

  18. Bohle H-G, Glade T (2008) Vulnerabilitätskonzepte in Sozial- und Naturwissenschaften. In: Felgentreff C, Glade T (eds) Naturrisiken und Sozialkatastrophen. Spektrum Verlag, Berlin, pp 99–119

    Google Scholar 

  19. Boin A, McConnell A (2007) Preparing for critical infrastructure breakdowns: the limits of crisis management and the need for resilience. J Contingencies Crisis Manag 15(1):50–59

    Article  Google Scholar 

  20. Bonanno G (2008) Loss, trauma, and human resilience: have we underestimated the human capacity to thrive after extremely aversive events? Am Psychol 59(1):20–28

    Article  Google Scholar 

  21. Bonanno GA, Galea S, Bucciarelli A, Vlahov D (2006) Psychological Resilience after Disaster: new York City in the Aftermath of the September 11th Terrorist Attack. Psychol Sci 17(3):181–186

    Article  Google Scholar 

  22. Bründl M, Bartelt P, Schweizer J, Keiler M, Glade T (2010) Snow avalanche risk analysis—review and future challenges. In: Alcantara-Ayla I, Goudie A (eds) Geomorphological hazards and disaster. Cambridge University Press, Boston, pp 49–61

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  23. Burton I, Kates RW, White GF (1993) The environment as hazard. Guildford Press, London

    Google Scholar 

  24. Cannon T (1994) Vulnerability analysis and the explanation of ‘natural’ disasters. In: Varley A (ed) Disasters, development and environment. Wiley, Chichester, pp 13–29

    Google Scholar 

  25. Cannon T (2006) Vulnerability analysis, livelihoods and disasters. In: Ammann WJ, Dannenmann S, Vulliet L (eds) Risk 21: coping with risks due to natural hazards in the 21st century. Taylor and Francis Group plc, London, pp 41–49

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  26. Cardona OD (1986) Estudios de Vulnerabilidad y Evaluación del Riesgo Sísmico: Pla-nificación Física y Urbana en Áreas Propensas. Boletín Técnico de la Asociación Colombiana de Ingeniería Sismica 33(2):32–65

    Google Scholar 

  27. Cardona OD (1990) Terminología de Uso Común en Manejo de Riesgos, AGID reporte no. 13, EAFIT, Medellín, actualizado y reimpreso en Ciudades en Riesgo, Fernández MA (ed) La RED, USAID

  28. Cardona OD (1999a) Diagnóstico local de riesgos naturales en Santa Fe de Bogotá para la planificación y medidas de mitigación. Panamericana-Secretaría de Salud, Bogotá

    Google Scholar 

  29. Cardona OD (1999b) Environmental management and disaster prevention: two related topics. In: Fernandez MA (ed) Cities at risk: environmental degradation, urban risks and disasters in Latin America. A/H Editorial, La RED, US AID, Quito, pp 77–102

    Google Scholar 

  30. Cardona OD (2001). Estimación Holística del Riesgo Sísmico utilizando Sistemas Dinámicos Complejos. Doctoral dissertation, Technical University of Catalonia, Department of Terrain Engineering. Available from: http://www.desenredando.org/public/varios/2001/ehrisusd/index.html

  31. Cardona OD (2004) The need for rethinking the concepts of vulnerability and risk from a holistic perspective: a necessary review and criticism for effective risk management. In: Bankoff G, Frerks G, Hilhorst D (eds) Mapping vulnerability: disasters, development and people. Publishers, London, pp 37–51

    Google Scholar 

  32. Cardona OD (2011) Disaster risk and vulnerability: notions and measurement of human and environmental insecurity. In: Brauch HG, Oswald Spring U, Mesjasz C, Grin J, Kameri-Mbote P, Chourou B, Dunay P, Birkmann J (eds) Coping with global environmental change, disasters and security—threats, challenges, vulnerabilities and risks. Hexagon Series on Human and Environmental Security and Peace, vol 5. Springer, Berlin

  33. Carreño ML (2006) Técnicas innovadoras para la evaluación del riesgo sísmico y su gestión en centros urbanos: Acciones ex ante y ex post. Doctoral dissertation, Technical University of Catalonia, Department of Terrain Engineering. Available from: http://www.tdx.cat/TDX-1102106-110455

  34. Carreño ML, Cardona OD, Barbat AH (2007a) Urban seismic risk evaluation: a holistic approach. Nat Hazards 40(1):137–172

    Article  Google Scholar 

  35. Carreño ML, Cardona OD, Barbat AH (2007b) Disaster risk management performance index. Nat Hazards 41(1):1–20

    Article  Google Scholar 

  36. Carreño ML, Cardona OD, Barbat AH (2012) New methodology for urban seismic risk assessment from a holistic perspective. Bull Earthq Eng 10(2):547–565

    Article  Google Scholar 

  37. Chambers Robert (1989) Vulnerability, coping and policy. Inst Dev Stud Bull 20(2):1–7

    Google Scholar 

  38. Cutter S, Finch C (2008) Temporal and spatial changes in social vulnerability to natural hazards. PNAS 105(7):2301–2306

    Article  Google Scholar 

  39. Cutter SL, Boruff BJ, Shirley WL (2003) Social vulnerability to environmental hazards. Soc Sci Q 84(2003):242–261

    Article  Google Scholar 

  40. Cutter S, Barnes L, Berry M, Burton C, Evans E, Tate E, Webb J (2008) A place-based model for understanding community resilience to natural disasters. Glob Environ Change 18(4):598–606

    Article  Google Scholar 

  41. DFID (Department for International Development) (1999) Sustainable livelihood guidance sheets. DFID, London

    Google Scholar 

  42. Folke C (2006) Resilience: the emergence of a perspective for social–ecological systems analyses. Glob Environ Change 16:253–267

    Article  Google Scholar 

  43. Fuchs S (2009) Susceptibility versus resilience to mountain hazards in Austria—paradigms of vulnerability revisited. Nat Hazards Earth Syst Sci 9:337–352

    Article  Google Scholar 

  44. Füssel HM (2007a) Adaptation planning for climate change: concepts, assessment approaches and key lessons. Sustain Sci 2(2):265–275

    Article  Google Scholar 

  45. Füssel HM (2007b) Vulnerability: a generally applicable conceptual framework for climate change research. Glob Environ Change 17(2):155–167

    Article  Google Scholar 

  46. Füssel HM, Klein R (2006) Climate change vulnerability assessment: an evolution of conceptual thinking. Clim Change 75:301–329

    Article  Google Scholar 

  47. Galaz V, Moberg F, Olsson E-K, Paglia E, Parker C (2011) Institutional and political leadership dimensions of cascading ecological crises. Public Adm 89(2):361–380

    Article  Google Scholar 

  48. Gunderson LH, Holling CS (eds) (2002) Panarchy: understanding transformations in social-ecological systems. Island Press, London

    Google Scholar 

  49. Handmer JW, Dovers SR (1996) A typology of resilience: rethinking institutions for sustainable development. Organ Environ 9(4):482–511

    Article  Google Scholar 

  50. Hewitt K (ed) (1983) Interpretations of calamity. Allen and Unwin, London

    Google Scholar 

  51. Hilhorst D (2004) Complexity and diversity: unlocking social domains of disaster response. In: Bankoff G, Frerks G, Hilhorst D (eds) Mapping vulnerability: disasters, development and people. Earthscan Publishers, London, pp 52–67

    Google Scholar 

  52. Holling C (1973) Resilience and stability of ecological systems. Annu Rev Ecol Syst 4:1–23

    Article  Google Scholar 

  53. ICSU-LAC (2010) Science for a better life: developing regional scientific programs in priority areas for Latin America and the Caribbean. In: Cardona OD, Bertoni JC, Gibbs A, Hermelin M, Lavell A (eds) Understanding and managing risk associated with natural hazards: an integrated scientific approach in Latin America and the Caribbean, vol 2. ICSU Regional Office for Latin America and the Caribbean, Rio de JaneiroCity

    Google Scholar 

  54. IDEA (2005) Indicators of disaster risk and risk management—main technical report. English and Spanish edition, National University of Colombia/Manizales, Institute of Environmental Studies/IDEA, Inter-American Development Bank, Washington, DC. Available from: http://idea.unalmzl.edu.co

  55. IPCC (2007) Assessing key vulnerabilities and the risk from climate change. In: Parry ML, Canziani OF, Palutikof JP, van der Linden PJ, Hanson CE (eds) Climate change 2007: impacts, adaptation and vulnerability, contribution of working group II to the fourth assessment report of the intergovernmental panel on climate change. Cambridge University Press, Cambridge, pp 7–22

  56. IPCC (2012) Managing the risk of extreme events and disasters to advance climate change adaptation. Special report of the intergovernmental panel on climate change (IPCC). Cambridge University Press, Cambridge

    Google Scholar 

  57. Keiler M, Sailer R, Jörg P, Weber C, Fuchs S, Zischg A, Sauermoser S (2006) Avalanche risk assessment—a multi-temporal approach, results from Galtür, Austria. Nat Hazards Earth Syst Sci 6:637–651

    Article  Google Scholar 

  58. Keiler M, Knight J, Harrison S (2010) Climate change and geomorphological hazards in the Eastern European Alps. Philos Trans R Soc A 368:2461–2479

    Article  Google Scholar 

  59. Kelly PM, Adger WN (2000) Theory and practice in assessing vulnerability to climate change and facilitating adaptation. Clim Change 47(4):325–352

    Article  Google Scholar 

  60. Kienberger S, Lang S, Zeil P (2009) Spatial vulnerability units—expert-based spatial modelling of socio-economic vulnerability in the Salzach catchment, Austria. Nat Hazards Earth Syst Sci 9:767–778

    Article  Google Scholar 

  61. Lavell A (1999) Environmental degradation, risks and urban disasters. issues and concepts: towards the definition of a research agenda. In: Fernandez MA (ed) Cities at risk: environmental degradation, urban risks and disasters in Latin America. A/H Editorial, La RED, US AID, Quito, pp 19–58

    Google Scholar 

  62. Liverman DM (1990) Chapter 26—vulnerability to global environmental change. In: Kasperson RE, Dow K, Golding D, Kasperson JX (eds) Understanding global environmental change: the contributions of risk analysis and management. Clark University, Worcester, pp 27–44

    Google Scholar 

  63. Maskrey A (1984) Community based hazard mitigation. Disasters mitigation program implementation. Virginia Polytechnic Institute, Virginia

    Google Scholar 

  64. McCarthy JJ, Canziani OF, Leary NA, Dokken DJ, White KS (eds) (2001) Climate Change 2001: impacts, adaptation, and vulnerability. Working group II of the intergovernmental panel on climate change. Cambridge University Press, Cambridge

    Google Scholar 

  65. Mitchell T, van Aalst MK (2009) Convergence of disaster risk reduction and climate change adaptation—a review for DFID. IDS, Brighton

    Google Scholar 

  66. O’Brien K, Eriksen S, Schjolen A, Nygaard L (2004) What’s in a word? Conflicting interpretations of vulnerability in climate change research. CICERO working paper, no. 4, CICERO, Oslo University

  67. O’Brien K, Eriksen S, Schjolen A, Nygaard L (2007) Why different interpretations of vulnerability matter in climate change discourses. Clim Policy 7:73–88

    Article  Google Scholar 

  68. O’Brien K, Sygna L, Leinchenko R, Adger WN, Barnett J, Mitchell T, Schipper L, Tanner T, Vogel C, Mortreux C (2008a). Disaster risk reduction, climate change adaptation and human security. GECHS report 2008, vol 3

  69. O’Brien K, O’Keefe P, Meena H, Rose J, Wilson L (2008b) Climate adaptation from a poverty perspective. Clim Policy 8(2):194–201

    Article  Google Scholar 

  70. Oxfam America (2009) Exposed—social vulnerability and climate change in the US. Southeast Press, Boston

    Google Scholar 

  71. Papathoma-Köhle M, Kappes MS, Keiler M, Glade T (2011) Physical vulnerability assessment for alpine hazards: state of the art and future needs. Nat Hazards 58:645–680

    Google Scholar 

  72. Pelling M (1997) What determines vulnerability to floods; a case study in Georgetown. Guyana, Environ Urban 9(1):203–226

    Google Scholar 

  73. Pelling M (2001) Natural disasters? In: Castree N, Braun B (eds) Social nature. Blackwells, London

    Google Scholar 

  74. Pelling M (2010) Adaptation to climate change: from resilience to transformation. Routledge, London

    Google Scholar 

  75. Pelling M, Dill K (2010) Disaster politics: tipping points for change in the adaptation of sociopolitical regimes. Prog Hum Geogr 34(1):21–23

    Article  Google Scholar 

  76. Phillips BD, Fordham M (2009) Introduction: chapter 1. In: Phillips BD, Thomas DSK, Fothergill A, Blinn-Pike L (eds) Social vulnerability to disasters. CRC Press, Boca Raton

    Google Scholar 

  77. Quarantelli EL (1998) What is a disaster?. Routledge, New York

    Google Scholar 

  78. Renaud FG (2006) Environmental components of vulnerability. In: Birkmann J (ed) Measuring vulnerability to natural hazards: towards disaster resilient societies. United Nations University Press, Tokyo, pp 117–127

    Google Scholar 

  79. Renn O (2008) Risk governance—coping with uncertainty in a complex world. Earthscan, London

    Google Scholar 

  80. Romieu E, Welle T, Schneiderbauer S, Pelling M, Vinchon C (2010) Vulnerability assessment within climate change and natural hazard contexts: revealing gaps and synergies through costal applications. Sustain Sci 5(2):159–170

    Article  Google Scholar 

  81. Thomalla F, Downing T, Spanger-Siegfried E, Han G, Rockström J (2006) Reducing hazard vulnerability: towards a common approach between disaster risk reduction and climate adaptation. Disasters 30(1):39–48

    Article  Google Scholar 

  82. Timmerman P (1981) Vulnerability, resilience and the collapse of society. Environmental monograph no. 1. Institute for Environmental Studies, University of Toronto, Toronto

    Google Scholar 

  83. Turner BL, Kasperson RE, Matson PA, McCarthy JJ, Corell RW, Christensen L, Eckley N, Kasperson JX, Luers A, Martello ML, Polsky C, Pulsipher A, Schiller A (2003) A framework for vulnerability analysis in sustainability science. In: PNAS (Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences), vol 100, no. 14, pp 8074–8079

  84. UNDRO (1980) Natural disasters and vulnerability analysis. Report of experts group meeting of 9–12 July 1979, Geneva

  85. UNISDR (2004) Living with risk. UNISDR, Geneva

    Google Scholar 

  86. UNISDR (2009) Terminology on disaster risk reduction, Geneva. Available from: http://unisdr.org/eng/library/lib-terminology-eng.htm

  87. Vayda AP, McCay B (1975) New directions in ecology and ecological anthropology. Annu Rev Anthropol 4:293–306

    Article  Google Scholar 

  88. Vester F (2008) Die Kunst vernetzt zu denken—Ideen und Werkzeuge für einen neuen Umgang mit Komplexität. Deutscher Taschenbuch Verlag, München

    Google Scholar 

  89. Vichon C, Carreño M-L, Contreras-Mojica DM, Kienberger S, Schneiderbauer S, Alexander D, Barbat AH, Cardona OD, Decker B, Eidsvig U, Papathoma-Köhle M, Miniati R, Pratzler-Wanczura S, Ulbrich T, Vangelsten BV, Welle T (2011). Assessing vulnerability to natural hazards in Europe: from principles to practice. A manual on concept, methodology and tools. MOVE deliverable no. 4.2., Available from: http://www.move-fp7.eu/documents/MOVE_Manual.pdf

  90. Wisner B (2006) Self-assessment of coping capacity: Participatory, proactive, and qualitative engagement of communities in their own risk management. In: Birkmann J (ed) Measuring vulnerability to natural hazards—towards disaster resilient societies. United Nations University Press, Tokyo, pp 316–328

    Google Scholar 

  91. Wisner B, Blaikie P, Cannon T, Davis I (2004) At risk, natural hazards. People’s Vulnerability and Disasters, Routledge

    Google Scholar 

  92. Yohe G, Tol RSJ (2002) Indicators for social and economic coping capacity: moving toward a working definition of adaptive capacity. Glob Environ Change 12(1):25–40

    Article  Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to J. Birkmann.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and Permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Birkmann, J., Cardona, O.D., Carreño, M.L. et al. Framing vulnerability, risk and societal responses: the MOVE framework. Nat Hazards 67, 193–211 (2013). https://doi.org/10.1007/s11069-013-0558-5

Download citation

Keywords

  • Vulnerability
  • Conceptual framework
  • Holistic approach
  • Exposure
  • Interventions