Natural Hazards

, Volume 62, Issue 3, pp 937–952 | Cite as

Seismicity and source parameters of moderate earthquakes in Sikkim Himalaya

Original Paper

Abstract

In this study, we accurately relocate 360 earthquakes in the Sikkim Himalaya through the application of the double-difference algorithm to 4 years of data accrued from a eleven-station broadband seismic network. The analysis brings out two major clusters of seismicity—one located in between the main central thrust (MCT) and the main boundary thrust (MBT) and the other in the northwest region of Sikkim that is site to the devastating Mw6.9 earthquake of September 18, 2011. Keeping in view the limitations imposed by the Nyquist frequency of our data (10 Hz), we select 9 moderate size earthquakes (5.3 ≥ Ml ≥ 4) for the estimation of source parameters. Analysis of shear wave spectra of these earthquakes yields seismic moments in the range of 7.95 × 1021 dyne-cm to 6.31 × 1023 dyne-cm and corner frequencies in the range of 1.8–6.25 Hz. Smaller seismic moments obtained in Sikkim when compared with the rest of the Himalaya vindicates the lower seismicity levels in the region. Interestingly, it is observed that most of the events having larger seismic moment occur between MBT and MCT lending credence to our observation that this is the most active portion of Sikkim Himalaya. The estimates of stress drop and source radius range from 48 to 389 bar and 0.225 to 0.781 km, respectively. Stress drops do not seem to correlate with the scalar seismic moments affirming the view that stress drop is independent over a wide moment range. While the continental collision scenario can be invoked as a reason to explain a predominance of low stress drops in the Himalayan region, those with relatively higher stress drops in Sikkim Himalaya could be attributed to their affinity with strike-slip source mechanisms. Least square regression of the scalar seismic moment (M0) and local magnitude (Ml) results in a relation LogM0 = (1.56 ± 0.05)Ml + (8.55 ± 0.12) while that between moment magnitude (Mw) and local magnitude as Mw = (0.92 ± 0.04)Ml + (0.14 ± 0.06). These relations could serve as useful inputs for the assessment of earthquake hazard in this seismically active region of Himalaya.

Keywords

Seismicity Source parameters Sikkim Himalaya hypoDD 

References

  1. Abercrombie RE (1995) Earthquake source scaling relationship from −1 to 5 ML using seismograms recorded at 2.5-km depth. J Geophys Res 100:24015–24036CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  2. Aki K (1967) Scaling law of seismic spectrum. Bull Seismol Soc Am 72:1217–1231Google Scholar
  3. Aki K, Richards PG (2002) Quantitative seismology, 2nd edn. University Science Books, Sausalito, CAGoogle Scholar
  4. Allen I, Trevor Gibson G, Brown A, Cull JP (2004) Depth variation of seismic source scaling relations: implications for earthquake hazard in southeastern Australia. Tectonophysics 390:5–24CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  5. Allmann BP, Shearer PM (2009) Global variation of stress drop for moderate to large earthquakes. J Geophys Res 114:B-131. doi:10.1029/2008JB005821 Google Scholar
  6. Andrews DJ (1986) Objective determination of source parameters and similarity of earthquakes of different size. In: Das et al. (Eds) Earthquake source mechanics. Ewing Series, 6, AGU, Washington DC www1986, pp 259–267Google Scholar
  7. Archuleta RJ, Cranswick E, Mueller C, Spudich P (1982) Source parameters of the 1980 Mammoth Lakes. California, earthquake sequence. J Geophys Res 87:4595–4607CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  8. Baltay A, Ide S, Prieto G, Beroza G (2011) Variability in earthquake stress drop and apparent stress. Geophys Res Lett 38:L06303. doi:10.1029/2011GL046698 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  9. Bansal BK (1998) Determination of source parameters for small earthquake in the Koyna region, 11th symposium on earthquake engineering. Roorkee 1:57–66Google Scholar
  10. Boatwright J (1980) A spectral theory for seismic sources: simple estimates of source dimension, dynamic stress drop and radiator energy. Bull Seism Soc Am 70:1–27Google Scholar
  11. Boore DM, Campbell WC, Atkinson GM (2010) Determination of stress parameters for eight well-recorded earthquakes in Eastern North America. Bull Seism Soc Am 100:1632–1645. doi:10.1785/0120090328 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  12. Brune JN (1970) Tectonic stress and seismic shear waves from earthquakes. J Geophys Res 75:4997–5009CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  13. Brune JN (1971) Correction. J Geophys Res 76:5002CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  14. Chevrot S, Cansi Y (1996) Source spectra and site-response estimates using the coda of Lg waves in western Europe. Geophys Res Lett 23:1605–1608CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  15. Chouliaras G, Stavrakakis GN (1997) Seismic source parameters from a new dial-up seismological network in Greece. Pure Appl Geophys 150:91–111CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  16. Cotte N, Pedersen H, Campillo M, Mars J, Ni J, Kind R, Sandvol E, Zhao W (1999) Determination of the crustal structure in Southern Tibet by dispersion and amplitude analysis of Rayleigh waves. Geophys J Int 138:809–819Google Scholar
  17. Deichmann N (2006) Local magnitude. A moment revisited. Bull Seism Soc Am 96:1267–1277. doi:10.1785/0120050115 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  18. Drouet S, Souriau A, Cotton F (2005) Attenuation, seismic moment, and site effects for weak-motion events: application to the Pyrenees. Bull Seismol Soc Am 95(5):1731–1748CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  19. Drouet S, Chevrot S, Cotton F, Souriau A (2008) Simultaneous Inversion of Source Spectra, Attenuation Parameters and Site Responses: Application to the data of the French Accelerometric Network. Bull Seism Soc Am 98:198–219. doi:10.1785/0120060215 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  20. Drukpa D, Velasco AA, Doser DI (2006) Seismicity in the Kingdom of Bhutan (1937–2003): evidence for crustal transcurrent deformation. J Geophys Res B Solid Earth Planets 111:B06301Google Scholar
  21. Eshelby J (1957) The determination of the elastic field of an ellipsoidal inclusion and related problems. Proc R Soc Lond A 241:376–396CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  22. Fletcher JB (1980) A comparison between high-dynamic range digital recordings of Oroville, California aftershocks and their source parameters. Bull Seism Soc Am 70:735–755Google Scholar
  23. Fletcher JB, Boatwright J, Harr L, Hanks T, McGarr A (1984) Source parameters for aftershocks of the Oroville, California earthquake. Bull Seism Soc Am 74:1101–1123Google Scholar
  24. GSI (2000) Seismotectonic Atlas of India and its environsGoogle Scholar
  25. Gupta DI, Rambabu V (1993) Source parameters of some significant earthquakes near Koyna Dam, India. Pageop 140:403–413CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  26. Gupta HK, Singh DD (1980) Spectral analysis of body waves for earthquakes in Nepal Himalaya and vicinity: their focal parameters and tectonic implications. Tectonophysics 62:53–66CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  27. Hanks TC, Boore DM (1984) Moment-Magnitude relations in theory and practice. J Geophys Res 89:6229–6235CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  28. Hanks TC, Kanamori H (1979) A moment magnitude scale. J Geophys Res 84:2348–2350CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  29. Havskov J, Ottemöller L (2003) SEISAN: the earthquake analysis software, version 8.0, Institute of Solid Earth Physics, University of Bergen, Bergen, NorwayGoogle Scholar
  30. Hazarika P, Kumar MR, Srijayanthi G, Raju PS, Rao NP, Srinagesh D (2010) Transverse Tectonics in Sikkim Himalaya: evidences from seismicity and focal mechanism data. Bull Seism Soc Am 100:1816–1822. doi:10.1785/0120090339 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  31. Herrmann RB, Kijko A (1983) Modelling some empirical vertical component Lg relations. Bull Seismol Soc Am 75:157–171Google Scholar
  32. Hiramatsu Y, Yamanaka H, Tadokoro K, Nishigami K, Ohmi S (2002) Scaling law between corner frequency and seismic moment of microearthquakes: is the breakdown of cube law a nature of earthquake? Geophys Res Lett 29:1211. doi:10.1029/2001GL013894 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  33. Hough SE (1996) Observational constraints on earthquake source scaling: understanding the limits in resolution. Tectonophysics 261:83–95CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  34. Johnson LR, McEvilly TV (1974) Near field observations and source parameters of Central California earthquakes. Bull Seismol Soc Am 64:1855–1886Google Scholar
  35. Kato N (2009) A possible explanation for difference in stress drop between intraplate and interplate earthquakes. Geophys Res Lett 36:L23311. doi:10.1029/2009GL040985 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  36. Kayal JR, Baruah S, Baruah S, Gautam JL, Arefiev SS, Tatevossian R (2011) The September 2011 Sikkim deeper centroid Mw 6.9 earthquake: role of transverse faults in eastern Himalaya, DCS-DST NewsGoogle Scholar
  37. Kim WY, Wahlstrom R, Uski M (1989) Regional spectral scaling relations of source parameters for earthquakes in the Baltic Shield. Tectonophysics 166:151–161CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  38. Kumar D, Ram VS, Khattri KN (2006) A study of source parameters, site amplification functions and average effective shear wave quality factor qseff from analysis of accelerograms of the 1999 Chamoli earthquake, Himalaya. Pure Appl Geophys 163:1369–1398Google Scholar
  39. Kumar D, Sarkar I, Sriram V, Khattri KN (2005) Estimation of the source parameters of the Himalaya earthquake of October 19, 1991, average effective shear wave attenuation parameter and local site effects from accelerograms. Tectonophysics 407:1–24CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  40. Mandal PK, Rastogi BK, Sarma CSP (1998) Source parameters of Koyna earthquakes, India. Bull Seism Soc Am 88:833–842Google Scholar
  41. Mayeda K, Malagnini L, Walter WR (2007) A new spectral ratio method using narrow band coda envelopes: evidence for non-self-similarity in the Hector Mine sequence. Geophys Res Lett 34:L11303. doi:10.1029/2007GL030041
  42. O’Neill ME (1984) Source dimension and stress drops of small earthquakes near Parkfield, California. Bull Seism Soc Am 71:27–40Google Scholar
  43. Ottemoller L, Havskov J (2003) Moment magnitude determination for local and regional earthquakes based on source spectra. Bull Seism Soc Am 93:203–214CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  44. Pearson C (1982) Parameters and a magnitude moment relationship for small earthquakes observed during hydraulic fracturing experiments in crystalline rocks. Geophys Res Lett 9:404–407CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  45. Prieto GA, Shearer PM, Vernon FL, Kilb D (2004) Earthquake source scaling and self-similarity estimation from stacking P and S spectra. J Geophys Res 109:B08310. doi:10.1029/2004JB003084 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  46. Raj A, Nath SK, Bansal BK, Thingbaijam KKS, Kumar A, Thiruvengadam N, Yadav A, Arrawatia ML (2009) Rapid estimation of source parameters using finite fault modeling-Case studies from the Sikkim and Garhwal Himalayas. Seism Res Lett 80(1):89–96CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  47. Rajendran K, Rajendran CP, Thulasiraman N, Andrews R, Sherpa N (2011) The 18 September, North Sikkim earthquake: a preliminary report. Curr Sci 101:1475–1479Google Scholar
  48. Ram VS, Kumar D, Khattri KN (2005) The 1986 Dharamsala earthquake of Himachal Himalaya – estimates of source parameters, average intrinsic attenuation and site amplification functions. J Seismol 9:473–485Google Scholar
  49. Sharma ML, Wason HR (1994) Occurrence of low stress drop earthquakes in the Garhwal Himalaya region. Phys Earth Planet Inter 85:265–722CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  50. Shi J, Kim WY, Richards PG (1998) The corner frequencies and stress drops of intraplate earthquakes in the Northeastern United States. Bull Seism Soc Am 88:531–542Google Scholar
  51. Singh DD, Rastogi BK, Gupta HK (1978) Spectral analysis of body waves for earthquakes and their source parameters in the Himalaya and nearby regions. Phys Earth Planet Inter 18:143–152CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  52. Singh SK, Apsel RJ, Fried J, Brune JN (1982) Spectral attenuation of SH-waves along the Imperial fault. Bull Seism Soc Am 72:2003–2016Google Scholar
  53. Thatcher W, Hanks TC (1973) Source parameters of southern California earthquakes. J Geophys Res 78:8547–8576CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  54. Tucker BE, Brune JN (1977) Source mechanism and mb–Ms analysis of aftershocks of the San Fernando earthquake. Geophys J 74:6617–6672Google Scholar
  55. Waldhauser F (2001) HypoDD—a program to compute double-difference hypocenter locations. US Geol Survey Open File Report 113:1–25Google Scholar
  56. Wyss M, Brune JN (1968) Seismic moment, stress and source dimensions for earthquakes in the California-Nevada region. J Geophys Res 73:4681–4694CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  57. Wyss M, Brune JN (1971) Regional variation of source properties in southern California estimated from the ratio of short to long period amplitudes. Bull Seismol Soc Am 61:1153–1168Google Scholar
  58. Yen YT, Ma KF (2011) Source-scaling relationship for M 4.6-8.9 earthquakes, specifically for earthquakes in the collision zone of Taiwan. Bull Seismol Soc Am 101:464–481. doi:10.1785/0120100046 CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer Science+Business Media B.V. 2012

Authors and Affiliations

  1. 1.National Geophysical Research Institute (CSIR)HyderabadIndia

Personalised recommendations