Natural Hazards

, Volume 58, Issue 3, pp 865–875 | Cite as

Modelling the flood vulnerability of deltaic Kuching City, Malaysia

  • Darrien Yau Seng Mah
  • Frederik Josep Putuhena
  • Sai Hin Lai
Technical Note

Abstract

The main objective of this writing is to present a practical way to envisage the flood vulnerability in deltaic region, particularly on the concern of sea level rise. Kuching city of Malaysia is established on banks of Sarawak River, 30 km from the sea. Therefore, it is subjected to fluvial and tidal floods. Kuching Bay experiences the highest King Tides in Southeast Asia region. These tide magnitudes could be a glimpse of future sea level rise. By means of modelling these tides, it provides an understanding and preparation for the impacts of sea level rise on the flood mitigation infrastructures and the city itself. The modelling efforts had created an illustration that a 10% rise in tide levels would result in increase of flooding areas up to 6% relative to existing tide levels.

Keywords

Flood Infoworks RS Kuching River Sea level rise King Tides 

References

  1. Bindoff NL, Willebrand J, Artale V, Cazenave A, Gregory J, Gulev S, Hanawa K, Le Quéré C, Levitus S, Nojiri Y, Shum CK, Talley LD, Unni Krishnan A (2007) Observations: oceanic climate change and sea level. In: Solomon S, Qin D, Manning M, Chen Z, Marquis M, Averyt KB, Tignor M, Miller HL (eds) Climate change 2007: the physical science basis. Contribution of Working Group I to the fourth assessment report of the intergovernmental panel on climate change. Cambridge University Press, Cambridge, UK and New York, NY, USAGoogle Scholar
  2. Church J, White N (2006) A 20th century acceleration in global sea-level rise. Geophys Res Newslett 33: LO1602. doi:10.1029/2005GL024826
  3. Department of Survey and Mapping Malaysia (JUPEM) (2009) The realization of GDM2000. Available from its official website, http://www.jupem.gov.my/GDM/pdf/GDM2000Realization.pdf. Accessed 10 Dec 2010
  4. Douglas BC (1997) Global sea rise: a redetermination. Surveys Geophys 18:279–292. doi:10.1023/A:1006544227856 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  5. Galperin B, Mellor GL (1990) A time-dependent, three-dimensional model of the Delaware Bay and River System. Part 1: description of the model and tidal analysis. Estuar Coast Shelf Sci 31(3):231–253CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  6. Horritt MS, Bates PD (2002) Evaluation of 1D and 2D numerical models for predicting River flood inundation. J Hydrol 268(1–4):87–99CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  7. IPCC (2007) Climate change 2007: the physical science basis. Contribution of Working Group I to the fourth assessment report of the intergovernmental panel on climate change. In: Solomon S, Qin D, Manning M (eds). Cambridge University Press, Cambridge, UK and New York, NY, USAGoogle Scholar
  8. Jenny KK, Mah DYS, Putuhena FJ, Salim S (2007) Post-flood forensic analysis of Maong River using Infoworks river simulation (RS). J Inst Eng Malaysia (IEM) 68(4):41–46Google Scholar
  9. Jurutera Jasa Consulting Engineers (2003) Sarawak River flood mitigation options study. Final Report for the State Government of Sarawak, MalaysiaGoogle Scholar
  10. Mah DYS, Lai SH, Chan RARB, Putuhena FJ (2010) Investigative modelling of the flood bypass channel in Kuching, Sarawak by assessing its impacts on the inundations of Kuching-Batu Kawa-Bau expressway. Struct Infrastruct Eng. Online First, doi:10.1080/15732471003770167
  11. Mah DYS, Hii CP, Putuhena FJ, Lai SH (2011) River modelling to infer flood management framework. Water SA 37(1):121–126Google Scholar
  12. Meehl GA, Washington WM, Collins WD, Arblaster JM, Hu A, Buja LE, Strand WG, Teng H (2005) How much more global warming and sea level rise? Science 307:1769–1772. doi:10.1126/science.1106663 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  13. Memon A, Murtedza M (1999) Water resources management in Sarawak, Malaysia. Universiti Malaysia Sarawak, Kuching, Malaysia ISBN 983–9151-04–5Google Scholar
  14. Nicholls RJ, Hoosemans FMJ, Marchand M (1999) Increasing flood risk and wetland losses due to global sea level rise: regional and global analyses. Global Environ Change 9:S69–S87 PII: S0959-3780(99)00019-9CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  15. Salim S, Mah DYS, Sumok P, Lai SH (2009) Water quality monitoring of Maong River, Malaysia. Proc Inst Civil Eng water Manag 162(1):37–42. doi:10.1680/wama.2008.000.0.1 Google Scholar
  16. Sharp JJ, Lim YH (2000) The Sarawak River barrage—hydrotechnical and geotechnical aspects. Proc Inst Civil Eng Water Marit Eng 142(June):87–96CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  17. Sinnakaudan SK (2009) Integrated triangular irregular network (ITIN) model for flood plain analysis. Int J Geoinformatics 5(2):47–55Google Scholar
  18. Sinnakaudan SK, Ghani AA, Ahmad MSS, Zakaria NA (2003) Flood risk mapping for Pari River incorporating sediment transport. Environ Model Softw 18:119–130CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  19. Thompson B, Gnanaseelan C, Parekh A, Salvekar PS (2008) North Indian Ocean warming and sea level rise in an OGCM. J Earth Syst Sci 117(2):169–178CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  20. US Army Corps of Engineers (USACE) (1993) Engineering and design: river hydraulics CECW-EH-Y, EM 1110-2-1416Google Scholar
  21. Wallingford Software (2008) Manual for Infoworks RS version 9.5Google Scholar
  22. Whitlow C (1999) Scoping study on reducing uncertainty in River flood conveyance. The Environment Agency of England and WalesGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer Science+Business Media B.V. 2011

Authors and Affiliations

  • Darrien Yau Seng Mah
    • 1
  • Frederik Josep Putuhena
    • 2
  • Sai Hin Lai
    • 3
  1. 1.River Engineering and Urban Drainage Research Centre (REDAC)Universiti Sains MalaysiaNibong TebalMalaysia
  2. 2.Department of Civil Engineering, Faculty of EngineeringUniversiti Malaysia SarawakKota SamarahanMalaysia
  3. 3.Department of Civil Engineering, Faculty of EngineeringUniversiti MalayaKuala LumpurMalaysia

Personalised recommendations