Natural Hazards

, Volume 60, Issue 2, pp 425–460 | Cite as

Classification of road damage due to earthquakes

  • Panjamani Anbazhagan
  • Sushma Srinivas
  • Deepu Chandran
Original Paper

Abstract

Earthquakes cause massive road damage which in turn causes adverse effects on the society. Previous studies have quantified the damage caused to residential and commercial buildings; however, not many studies have been conducted to quantify road damage caused by earthquakes. In this study, an attempt has been made to propose a new scale to classify and quantify the road damage due to earthquakes based on the data collected from major earthquakes in the past. The proposed classification for road damage due to earthquake is called as road damage scale (RDS). Earthquake details such as magnitude, distance of road damage from the epicenter, focal depth, and photographs of damaged roads have been collected from various sources with reported modified Mercalli intensity (MMI). The widely used MMI scale is found to be inadequate to clearly define the road damage. The proposed RDS is applied to various reported road damage and reclassified as per RDS. The correlation between RDS and earthquake parameters of magnitude, epicenter distance, hypocenter distance, and combination of magnitude with epicenter and hypocenter distance has been studied using available data. It is observed that the proposed RDS correlates well with the available earthquake data when compared with the MMI scale. Among several correlations, correlation between RDS and combination of magnitude and epicenter distance is appropriate. Summary of these correlations, their limitations, and the applicability of the proposed scale to forecast road damages and to carry out vulnerability analysis in urban areas is presented in the paper.

Keywords

Earthquake Damages Road Scale Magnitude Distance 

References

  1. ASCE-TCLEE (2001) Lifelines performance Atico, Peru, Earthquake, June 23, 2001. A preliminary reconnaissance survey. Published by American Society of Civil Engineering Technical Council on Lifeline Earthquake Engineering [ASCE-TCLEE], P-7. http://apps.asce.org/pdf/atico_peru_report.pdf. Last accessed 15 Oct 2008
  2. CBC (2011) Road damaged due to Myanmar (Burma) Earthquake 2001. http://www.cbc.ca/m/touch/news/story/2011/03/25/burma-quake-friday.html. Last accessed 25 May 2011
  3. Day RW (2002) Geotechnical earthquake engineering handbook. McGraw-Hill, New YorkGoogle Scholar
  4. DCRC [Disaster Control Research Center] (2003) Miyagi-Oki, Japan earthquake May 26, 2003. http://www.disaster.archi.tohoku.ac.jp/eng/topicse/030526htm/030526e.htm. Last accessed 24 Oct 2008
  5. EERI [Earthquake Engineering Research Institute] Special Report (2007) Learning from earthquakes, The Pisco, Peru, Earthquake of August 15, 2007. http://www.eeri.org/lfe/pdf/peru_pisco_eeri_preliminary_reconnaissance.pdf. Last accessed 15 Oct 2008, P-12
  6. FEWW (2011) Myanmar quake update—fire earth. http://feww.wordpress.com/2011/03/26/myanmar-quake-update. Last accessed 16 May 2011
  7. GEER (2008) Recent Geo-Engineering Earthquake Reconnaissance efforts. (Sponsored through the NSF SGER Program). http://gees.usc.edu/GEER/recent_geotechnical_engineering.htm. Last accessed 12 Oct 2008
  8. IMC [Inter-Municipality Crisis and Rehabilitation Committee] (2002) Earthquake damage assessment and rehabilitation plan. A United Nations Interim Administration Mission in Kosovo, P-45. http://www.mirror.undp.org/kosovo/news/eqmonrep.pdf. Last accessed 12 Nov 2008
  9. JSCE [Japan Society of Civil Engineers] (2003) Preliminary report on December 26, 2003 Iran Bam earthquake. Prepared by JSCE Iran Bam Earthquake Disaster Investigation Team. http://www.jsce-int.org/disaster_report/bam_iran.pdf. Last accessed 20 Oct 2008
  10. Kiremidjiam AS, Stergiou E, and Lee R (2007) Issues in seismic risk assessment of transportation networks. In: Pitilakis KD (ed) Earthquake geotechnical engineering, Chap. 19. Springer, Netherlands, pp 461–480Google Scholar
  11. Marshall J, Orange D and Hochstaedter A (1989) “EARTHQUAKES” html by Joe Overton. http://www.es.ucsc.edu/~es10/fieldtripEarthQ/EarthQ8.html. Last accessed 22 Oct 2008
  12. MCEER [Multidisciplinary Center for Earthquake Engineering Research reconnaissance] (2007) Team investigates highway damage following Pisco earthquake in Peru. http://mceer.buffalo.edu/research/Reconnaissance/Peru8-15-07/01-lg.jpg. Last accessed 5 Oct 2008
  13. Nakamura T (2000) Clear identification of fundamental idea of Nakamura’s technique and its applications. In: Proceedings of 12th world conference on earthquake engineering, Paper ID 2656Google Scholar
  14. Navin P, Matthew F (2006) Comparison of post-earthquake damage observations from satellite images with field surveys case study following October 7, 2005 Kashmir earthquake. In: 4th international workshop on remote sensing for disaster response session 2, P-6Google Scholar
  15. Shanmuganathan S (2005) Performance of highway bridges under Chuetsu earthquake. In: Proceeding of NZSEE international conference, pp 16–23Google Scholar
  16. Tung PT (2004) Road vulnerability assessment of earthquakes. Master of Science thesis, International Institute for Geo-information Science and Earth Observation Enschede, The Netherlands, P-89Google Scholar
  17. USGS (2008) Magnitude 7.9—Eastern Sichuan, China. http://earthquake.usgs.gov/earthquakes/eqinthenews/2008/us2008ryan/. Last accessed 18 May 2011
  18. USGS (2010) Magnitude 7.0—South Island of New Zealand. http://earthquake.usgs.gov/earthquakes/recenteqsww/Quakes/us2010atbj.php#details. Last accessed 20 May 2011
  19. USGS (2011a) Magnitude 6.1—South Island of New Zealand. http://earthquake.usgs.gov/earthquakes/eqinthenews/2011/usb0001igm/. Last accessed 20 May 2011
  20. USGS (2011b) Magnitude 9.0—Near the East Coast of Honshu, Japan. http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/2011_T%C5%8Dhoku_earthquake. Last accessed 18 May 2011
  21. USGS (2011c) Magnitude 6.8—MYANMAR. http://earthquake.usgs.gov/earthquakes/recenteqsww/Quakes/usc0002aes.php#details. Last accessed 18 May 2011
  22. Washington DNR (2011) Road damage at Sunset Lake, Tumwater, from the 2001 Nisqually earthquake. http://washingtondnr.wordpress.com/2010/03/04/chilean-quake-and-tsunami-are-reminders-of-washington-states-hazards/. Last accessed 25 May 2011
  23. Wikipedia (2008) 2008 Sichuan earthquake. http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/2008_Sichuan_earthquake#cite_note-asualty_0805-92. Last accessed 18 May 2011
  24. Wikipedia (2010a) 2001 Nisqually earthquake. http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/2001_Nisqually_earthquake. Last accessed 21 May 2011
  25. Wikipedia (2010b) 2010 Canterbury earthquake. http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/2010_Canterbury_earthquake. Last accessed 20 May 2011
  26. Wikipedia (2010c) 2010 Haiti earthquake. http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/2010_Haiti_earthquake. Last accessed on 21 May 2011
  27. Wikipedia (2011a) 2010 Chile earthquake. http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/2010_Chile_earthquake. Last accessed 18 May 2011
  28. Wikipedia (2011b) 2011 Tōhoku earthquake and tsunami. http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/2011_T%C5%8Dhoku_earthquake. Last accessed 18 May 2011
  29. Young Kim W (2002) The Lamont cooperative seismic network and the national seismic system: earthquake hazard studies in the Northeastern United States. Annual project summary October 1, 2001–September 30, 2002. External Grant Award Number: 01HQAG-0137 Lamont-Doherty Earth Observatory of Columbia University Palisades, NY 10964, USA P-12. http://www.ldeo.columbia.edu/LCSN/Report/APS_AG0137_2002.PDF. Last accessed 12 Oct 2008
  30. Zifa W (2008) Strong motion, damage, and loss of Wenchuan earthquake. Institute of Engineering Mechanics, China Earthquake Administration, August 18, 2008 NCREE Newsletter, vol 3, no. 3, P-97Google Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer Science+Business Media B.V. 2011

Authors and Affiliations

  • Panjamani Anbazhagan
    • 1
  • Sushma Srinivas
    • 1
  • Deepu Chandran
    • 1
  1. 1.Department of Civil EngineeringIndian Institute of ScienceBangaloreIndia

Personalised recommendations