Skip to main content

Risk assessment of Tunguska-type airbursts

Abstract:

The Tunguska airburst, which devastated a taiga forest over an area greater than 2,000 km2 in a remote region of Central Siberia in 1908, is a classic example of extraterrestrial encounter discussed in the asteroid/comet impact hazard and risk assessment literature (e.g. Longo 2007; Carusi et al. 2007). Although it is generally agreed that the cosmic body caused damage by bursting in the air rather than through direct impact on the Earth’s surface, the Tunguska event is often referred to as an impact event. To the best of our knowledge, no detailed studies have been performed to quantify the risk of a similar-sized event over a populated region. We propose here a straightforward probabilistic risk model for Tunguska-type events over the continental United States and use established risk metrics to determine the property (buildings and contents) and human losses. We find an annual average property loss of ~USD 200,000/year, a rate of ~0.3 fatalities/year and ~1.0 injuries/year ranging from a factor 3 below and to a factor 3 above the indicated values when a reasonable rate uncertainty for Tunguska-type events is taken into account. We then illustrate the case of an extreme event over the New York metropolitan area. While we estimate that this “nightmare” scenario would lead to ~USD 1.5 trillion of property loss, ~3.9 millions of fatalities and ~4.7 millions of injuries, such event is almost impossible (occurrence once every ~30 million years) and should only be considered as an illustrative example.

This is a preview of subscription content, access via your institution.

Fig. 1
Fig. 2
Fig. 3
Fig. 4
Fig. 5

References

  1. Bailey ME, Markham DJ, Massai S, Scriven JE (1995) The 1930 August 13 ‘Brazilian Tunguska’ event. Observatory 115:250–253

    Google Scholar 

  2. Bailie M (2007) The case for significant numbers of extraterrestrial impacts through the late Holocene. J Quat Sci 22:101–109

    Article  Google Scholar 

  3. Ben-Menahem A (1975) Source parameters of the Siberian explosion of June 30, 1908, from analysis and synthesis of seismic signals at four stations. Phys Earth Planet Int 11:1–35

    Article  Google Scholar 

  4. Boslough MBE, Crawford DA (2008) Low-altitude airbursts and the impact threat. Int J Impact Eng 35:1441–1448

    Article  Google Scholar 

  5. Brown P, Spalding RE, ReVelle DO, Tagliaferri E, Worden SP (2002) The flux of small near-Earth objects colliding with the Earth. Nature 420:294–296

    Article  Google Scholar 

  6. Carusi A, Carusi A, Pozio L (2007) May land impacts induce a catastrophic collapse of civil societies? Comet/asteroid impacts and human society, an interdisciplinary approach. Springer, Berlin, pp 419–436 Chapter 25

    Google Scholar 

  7. Collins GS, Artemieva N, Wünnemann K, Bland PA, Reimold WU, Koeberl C (2008) Evidence that Lake Cheko is not an impact crater, Terra Nova, 20. doi:10.1111/j.1365-3121.2008.00791.x

  8. Gasperini L, Alvisi F, Biasini G, Bonatti E, Longo G, Pipan M, Ravaioli M, Serra R (2007) A possible impact crater for the 1908 Tunguska Event, Terra Nova, 19. doi:10.1111/j.1365-3121.2007.00742.x

  9. Gasperini L, Bonatti E, Longo G (2008) Lake Cheko and the Tunguska Event: impact or non-impact?, Terra Nova, 20. doi:10.1111/j.1365-3121.2008.00792.x

  10. Gasperini L, Bonatti E, Albertazzi S, Forlani L, Accorsi CA, Longo G, Ravaioli M, Alvisi F, Polonia A, Sacchetti F (2009) Sediments from Lake Cheko (Siberia), a possible impact crater for the 1908 Tunguska Event. Terra Nova, 21. doi:10.1111/j.1365-3121.2009.00906.x

  11. Glasstone S, Dolan PJ (1977) The effects of nuclear weapons, United States Department of Defense and Energy Research and Development Administration, Washington

  12. Gusiakov VK (2007) Tsunami as a destructive aftermath of oceanic impacts, comet/asteroid impacts and human society, an interdisciplinary approach. Springer, Berlin, pp 247–263 Chapter 14

    Google Scholar 

  13. Harris A (2008) What spaceguard did. Nature 453:1178–1179

    Article  Google Scholar 

  14. HAZUS-MH. Available at http://www.fema.gov/plan/prevent/hazus/

  15. Kovacs P, Hallak A (2007) Insurance coverage of meteorites, asteroid and comet impacts—issues and options, comet/asteroid impacts and human society, an interdisciplinary approach. Springer, Berlin, pp 469–478 Chapter 28

    Google Scholar 

  16. LandScan™ (2005) Global Population Database, Oak Ridge, TN: Oak Ridge National Laboratory. Available at http://www.ornl.gov/landscan/

  17. Longo G (2007) The Tunguska event, comet/asteroid impacts and human society, an interdisciplinary approach. Springer, Berlin, pp 303–330 Chapter 18

    Google Scholar 

  18. Longo G, Di Martino M, Andreev G, Anfinogenov J, Budaeva L, Kovrigin E (2005) A new unified catalogue and a new map of the 1908 tree fall in the site of the Tunguska Cosmic Body explosion, asteroid-comet hazard, Institute of Applied Astronomy Russian Academy of Science, St Petersburg, Russia, pp 222–225

  19. Melosh HJ, Beyer RA (1998) Crater. Available at http://www.lpl.arizona.edu/tekton/crater.html

  20. Office of Technology Assessment (1979) The effects of nuclear war, NTIS order #PB-296946

  21. Risk Management Solutions (2008) RMS® U.S. Industry exposure database and industry loss curves user documentation 2008

  22. Serra R, Cecchini S, Galli M, Longo G (1994) Experimental hints on the fragmentation of the Tunguska Cosmic Body. Planet Space Sci 42(9):777–783

    Article  Google Scholar 

  23. Shoemaker EM (1983) Asteroid and comet bombardment on the Earth. Annu Rev Earth Planet Sci 11:461–494

    Article  Google Scholar 

  24. Simon SB, Grossman L, Clayton RN, Mayeda TK, Schwade JR, Sipiera PP, Wacker JF, Wadhwa M (2004) The fall, recovery, and classification of the Park Forest meteorite. Meteorit Planet Sci 39:625–634

    Article  Google Scholar 

  25. Smolka A (2006) Natural disasters and the challenge of extreme events: risk management from an insurance perspective. Phil Trans R Soc 364:2147–2165

    Article  Google Scholar 

  26. Stokes GH (2003) Study to determine the feasibility of extending the search for near-earth objects to smaller limiting diameters. Report of the NASA NEO Science Definition Team, http://neo.jpl.nasa.gov/neo/report.html

Download references

Acknowledgments

The authors wish to thank two anonymous referees for their valuable comments that significantly enhanced the manuscript. We acknowledge the Oak Ridge National Laboratory for providing the 2005 LandScan™ Global Population Database used in this study.

Author information

Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Arnaud Mignan.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and Permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Mignan, A., Grossi, P. & Muir-Wood, R. Risk assessment of Tunguska-type airbursts. Nat Hazards 56, 869–880 (2011). https://doi.org/10.1007/s11069-010-9597-3

Download citation

Keywords

  • Tunguska event
  • Asteroid/comet impact hazard
  • Catastrophe risk model
  • Economic losses
  • Human losses