Abstract
The Yangtze River Delta region is an area highly vulnerable to flooding. As the population density is rising concomitantly with high economic growth, this region is becoming more vulnerable to natural hazards. We conducted a survey to investigate the individual risk perception of both the local authorities and the general community, analyze the current situation regarding risk management and identify problems in the current risk management scheme. Data were collected through questionnaires distributed to some members of the community and interviews with representatives of the local authorities. The primary findings are as follows: (1) risk and disaster multipliers perceived by lay people show the stigma effect of the Wenchuan earthquake; (2) the responses of college students illustrate that the stigma effect has less influence on people who have more knowledge about hazards; (3) differences exist in comparative groups (China and USA), which shows that the society and culture influence people’s perception of risk; and (4) economic activities have complicated flood risk management such as land shortage, ground subsidence and flood diversion. Accordingly, the following measures should be taken: (1) the government should improve the risk communication and education of lay people; (2) the government must also control unsuitable land use and balance economic development and risk management; (3) flood diversion areas should be compensated through special funds collected from other cities; and (4) local governments should provide more support for hazard mitigation.
This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.
Similar content being viewed by others
Notes
Given that the two extremes of these characteristics can be labeled as positive or negative. Thus, “involuntary”, “immediate”, “not known to exposed”, “not known to science”, “not controllable”, “new”, “catastrophic”, “dread”, “certainly fatal” is more negative than “voluntary”, “delayed”, “known to exposed”, “known to science”, “controllable”, “old”, “chronic” “common” “certainly not fatal”.
References
Alcántara-Ayala I (2002) Geomorphology, natural hazards, vulnerability and prevention of natural disasters in developing countries. Geomorphol 47:107–124
Alexander DC (1993) Natural disasters. UCL Press, London
Dominey-Howes D, Minos-Minopoulos D (2004) Perceptions of hazard and risk on santorini. J Volcanol Geothermal Res 137:285–310
EM-DAT (2009) The ofda/cred international disaster database. Université Catholique de Louvain-Brussels-Belgium. http://www.emdat.be
Fischhoff B, Slovic P, Lichtenstein S, Read S, Combs B (1978) How safe is safe enough? A psychometric study of attitudes towards technological risks and benefits. Policy Sci 9:127–152
Grossi P, Kunreuther H, Windeler D (2005) An introduction to catastrophemodels and insurance. Catastrophe modeling: a new approach to managing risk. Springer Science + Business Media, New York
Grothmann T, Reusswig F (2006) People at risk of flooding: why some residents take precautionary action while others do not. Nat Hazards 38:101–120
Ho M-C, Shaw D, Lin S, Chiu Y-C (2008) How do disaster characteristics influence risk perception? Risk Anal 28(3):635–643
James L (1991) Risk taking: Perspectives and intervention. Professional Safety November: 38
Jia J, Li H, Fan C, Hao L, Wang S, Xie H (2008) Comparative analysis of risk perceptions of people in severely and slightly affected areas. Manag Rev 20(12):4–8
Lin S, Shaw D, Ho M-C (2008) Why are flood and landslide victims less willing to take mitigation measures than the public? Nat Hazards 44(2):305–314
Lindell MK (2000) Household adjustment to earthquake hazard: a review of research. Environ Behav 32:461–501
Liu Y, Wang J, Ye M, Xu S, Hu B, Zhao Q (2008) Measure and evaluation on public disaster prevention: taking shanghai city for example. Urban Probl 11:77–82
Marris C, Langford I, Saunderson T, O’Riordan T (2002) Exploring the “psychometric paradigm”: comparisons between aggregate and individual analyses. Risk Anal 17(3):303–312
Mileti DS (1999) Disasters by design: a reassessment of natural hazards in the united states. Joseph Henry Press, Washington
Seol M-S (2005) Perception of safety and usability of powered hand tools West Virginia University, Morgantown
Shaw DG, Chen SH, Lin SY, Tsai MF, Huang HH, Huang TS (2006) The executive report of the survey of social-economic impacts and risk perception of floods and landslides in 2004. Sindian, Taiwan
Slovic P (1987) Perception of risk. Science 236:280–285
Slovic P (1992) Perception of risk: reflections on the psychometric paradigm. Social theories of risk Praeger Publishers, Westport, CT
Slovic P, Fischhoff B, Lichtenstein S (1980) Facts and fears: understanding perceived risk. Societal risk assessment: how safe is safe enough? Plenum, New York
Slovic P, Fischhoff B, Lichtenstein S (1984) Behavioral decision theory perspectives on risk and safety. Acta Psychol 56:183–203
Su Y, Li N, Zhang M, Gao L (2008) Regional comparison of public trust and their flood risk perception. China Safe Sci J 18(7):5–10
Tversky A, Kahneman D (1974) Judgment under uncertainty: heuristics and biases. Science 185(4157):1124–1131
Twigg J (2002) Lessons from disaster preparedness. Paper presented at the International Conference on Climate Change and Disaster Preparedness, 26–28 June 2002
Xie X, Xu L (2002) A survey on people’s risking cognition. Psychol Sci 25(6):723–724
Yodmani S (2001) Disaster risk management and vulnerability reduction: Protecting the poor. The Asia Pacific Forum on Poverty organized by the Asia Development Bank. <http://unpan1.un.org/intradoc/groups/public/documents/APCITY/UNPAN009672.pdf>. Accessed 24 Jan 2006
Acknowledgments
This research was supported by the National Natural Science Foundation of China (NSFC) “Formation mechanism and assessment research on regional flood resilience” (No. 40701005), Key Projects in the National Science & Technology Pillar Program in the Eleventh Five-year Plan Period “Risk identification and assessment of multi-hazards in the Yangtze River Delta region” (No. 2008BAK50B07), the 111 Project and Jiangsu Provincial Natural Science Foundation of China (BK2007151).
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Corresponding author
Rights and permissions
About this article
Cite this article
Ge, Y., Xu, W., Gu, ZH. et al. Risk perception and hazard mitigation in the Yangtze River Delta region, China. Nat Hazards 56, 633–648 (2011). https://doi.org/10.1007/s11069-010-9579-5
Received:
Accepted:
Published:
Issue Date:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s11069-010-9579-5