Skip to main content

What is responsible for increasing flood risks? The case of Gangwon Province, Korea

Abstract

We examined the anthropogenic and natural causes of flood risks in six representative cities in the Gangwon Province of Korea. Flood damage per capita is mostly explained by cumulative upper 5% summer precipitation amount and the year. The increasing flood damage is also associated with deforestation in upstream areas and intensive land use in lowlands. Human encroachment on floodplains made these urban communities more vulnerable to floods. Without changes in the current flood management systems of these cities, their vulnerability to flood risks will remain and may even increase under changing climate conditions.

This is a preview of subscription content, access via your institution.

Fig. 1
Fig. 2
Fig. 3
Fig. 4
Fig. 5
Fig. 6
Fig. 7

References

  1. Barredo JI (2008) Major flood disasters in Europe: 1950–2005. Nat Hazards 42(1):125–148. doi:10.1007/s11069-006-9065-2

    Article  Google Scholar 

  2. Brouwer R, van Ek R (2004) Integrated ecological, economic, and social impact assessment of alternative flood control policies in the Netherlands. Ecol Econ 50:1–21. doi:10.1016/j.ecolecon.2004.01.020

    Article  Google Scholar 

  3. Chang H (2004) Water quality impacts of climate change in southeastern Pennsylvania. Prof Geogr 56:240–257

    Google Scholar 

  4. Chang H, Franczyk J (2008) Climate change, land-use change, and floods: toward an integrated assessment. Geogr Comp 2. doi:10.1111/j.1749-8198.2008.00136.x

  5. Chang H, Kwon W-T (2007) Spatial variations of summer precipitation trends in South Korea. Environ Res Lett 2:045012. doi:10.1088/1748-9326/2/4/045012

  6. Changnon SA (2003) Shifting economic impacts from weather extremes in the United States: a result of societal changes, not global warming. Nat Hazards 29(2):273–290. doi:10.1023/A:1023642131794

    Article  Google Scholar 

  7. Changnon SA, Kunkel KE, Andsager K (2001) Causes for record high flood losses in the central United States. Water Int 26:223–230

    Article  Google Scholar 

  8. Choi Y (2004) Trends on temperature and precipitation extreme events in Korea. J Korean Geogr Soc 39:711–721

    Google Scholar 

  9. Chung YS, Yoon MB, Kim HS (2004) On climate variations and changes observed in south Korea. Clim Change 66:151–161. doi:10.1023/B:CLIM.0000043141.54763.f8

    Article  Google Scholar 

  10. Dorland C, Tol RSJ, Palutik JP (1999) Vulnerability of the Netherlands and northwest Europe to storm damage under climate change. Clim Change 43:513–535. doi:10.1023/A:1005492126814

    Article  Google Scholar 

  11. Frei C, Davies HC, Gurtz J, Schar C (2000) Climate dynamics and extreme precipitation and flood events in central Europe. Integr Assess 1:513–535. doi:10.1023/A:1018983226334

    Article  Google Scholar 

  12. Graham T, Burrell M (1997) Natural hazards: explanation and integration. Guilford Press, New York

    Google Scholar 

  13. Groisman PY, Knight RW, Karl TR, Easterling DR, Sun B, Lawrimore JH (2004) Contemporary changes of the hydrological cycle over the contiguous United States: trends derived from in situ observations. J Hydrometeorol 5:64–85. doi :10.1175/1525-7541(2004)005<0064:CCOTHC>2.0.CO;2

    Article  Google Scholar 

  14. Hall JW, Evans EP, Penning-Rowsell EC, Sayers PB, Thorne CR, Saul AJ (2003) Quantified scenarios analysis of drivers and impacts of changing flood risk in England and Wales: 2030–2100. Environ Hazards 5:51–65. doi:10.1016/j.hazards.2004.04.002

    Article  Google Scholar 

  15. Haylock MR, Goodess CM (2004) Interannual variability of extreme European winter rainfall and links with mean large-scale circulation. Int J Climatol 24:759–776. doi:10.1002/joc.1033

    Article  Google Scholar 

  16. Huntington TG (2006) Evidence for intensification of the global water cycle: review and synthesis. J Hydrol (Amst) 319:83–95. doi:10.1016/j.jhydrol.2005.07.003

    Article  Google Scholar 

  17. Ikeda T, Yoshitani J, Terakawa A (2005) Flood management under climatic variability and its future perspective in Japan. Water Sci Technol 51:133–140

    Google Scholar 

  18. Jiang FQ, Zhu C, Mu GJ, Hu RJ, Meng QX (2005) Magnification of flood disasters and its relation to regional precipitation and local human activities since the 1980s in Xinjiang, Northwestern China. Nat Hazards 36:307–330. doi:10.1007/s11069-005-0977-z

    Article  Google Scholar 

  19. Kerr RA (2006) Rivers in the sky are flooding the world with tropical waters. Science 313:435. doi:10.1126/science.313.5786.435

    Article  Google Scholar 

  20. Kim SJ, Kwon HJ, Park GA, Lee MS (2005) Assessment of land-use impact on streamflow via a grid-based modelling approach including paddy fields. Hydrol Process 19:3801–3817. doi:10.1002/hyp.5982

    Article  Google Scholar 

  21. Kim JW, Kim CH, Shim WB (2006a) Recent flood hazard conditions and policy direction for minimizing flood hazards. Policy Brief 100:1–8

    Google Scholar 

  22. Kim NW, Won YS, Chung IM (2006b) The scale of typhoon RUSA. Hydrol Earth Syst Sci Discuss 3:3147–3182

    Google Scholar 

  23. Korea Meteorological Administration (2006) Historical precipitation data. http://gangwon.kma.go.kr/winfo/winfo51.php?tar=100. Accessed 13 Feb

  24. Korea Water Resources Corporation (KOWACO) (2005) Water management information system. http://www.wamis.go.kr/. Accessed 12 Dec

  25. Kundzewicz ZW, Ulbrich U, Brucher T, Graczyk D, Kruger A, Leckebusch GC et al (2005) Floods in central Europe—climate change track? Nat Hazards 36(1–2):162–189. doi:10.1007/s11069-004-4547-6

    Google Scholar 

  26. Lee S, Kwon W (2004) A variation of summer rainfall in Korea. J Korean Geogr Soc 39:819–832

    Google Scholar 

  27. Lee SW, Chung AY, Chun HS (2006) Samcheok: 13 big floods in 10 years. Chosunilbo (15 May)

  28. Milly PCD, Wetherald RT, Dunne KA, Delworth TL (2002) Increasing risk of great floods in a changing climate. Nature 415:514–517. doi:10.1038/415514a

    Article  Google Scholar 

  29. Ministry of Construction and Transportation (2000) Estimation of possible maximum precipitation for Korea. Gwachun

  30. Ministry of Government Administration and Home Affairs (2003) Annual statistics of hazards. Seoul

  31. Mitchell JK (2003) European river floods in a changing world. Risk Anal 23:567–574. doi:10.1111/1539-6924.00337

    Article  Google Scholar 

  32. National Emergency Management Agency (2007) Annual statistics of natural hazards. http://www.nema.go.kr/data/statistic/list.jsp. Accessed 8 Sept 2007

  33. Nicholls N, Alexander L (2007) Has the climate become more variable or extreme? Progress 1996–2002. Prog Phys Geogr 31:77–87. doi:10.1177/0309133307073885

    Article  Google Scholar 

  34. Nirupama N, Simonovic SP (2007) Increase of flood risk due to urbanization: a Canadian example. Nat Hazards 40:25–41. doi:10.1007/s11069-006-0003-0

    Article  Google Scholar 

  35. Park SK, Lee E (2007) Synoptic features of orographically enhanced heavy rainfall on the east coast of Korea associated with Typhoon Rusa (2002). Geophys Res Lett 34:L02803. doi:10.1029/2006GL028592

    Article  Google Scholar 

  36. Penning-Rowsell E, Wilson T (2006) Gauging the impact of natural hazards: the pattern and cost of emergency response during flood events. Trans Inst Br Geogr 31:99–115. doi:10.1111/j.1475-5661.2006.00200.x

    Article  Google Scholar 

  37. Pielke RA, Downton MW (2000) Precipitation and damaging floods: trends in the United States, 1932–97. J Clim 13:3625–3637. doi :10.1175/1520-0442(2000)013<3625:PADFTI>2.0.CO;2

    Article  Google Scholar 

  38. Seidel DJ, Fu Q, Randel WJ, Reichler TJ (2008) Widening of the tropical belt in a changing climate. Nat Geosci 1:21–24. doi:10.1038/ngeo.2007.38

    Google Scholar 

  39. Shi PJ, Ge Y, Yuan Y, Guo WP (2005) Integrated risk management of flood disasters in metropolitan areas of China. Int J Water Resour Dev 21:613–627. doi:10.1080/07900620500258455

    Article  Google Scholar 

  40. Teng WH, Hsu MH, Wu CH, Chen AS (2006) Impact of flood disasters on Taiwan in the last quarter century. Nat Hazards 37(1–2):191–207. doi:10.1007/s11069-005-4667-7

    Article  Google Scholar 

  41. Travis J (2005) Hurricane Katrina—scientists’ fears come true as hurricane floods New Orleans. Science 309:1656–1659. doi:10.1126/science.309.5741.1656

    Article  Google Scholar 

  42. Vogel G (2002) Central Europe floods: labs spared as climate change gets top billing. Science 297:1256. doi:10.1126/science.297.5585.1256

    Article  Google Scholar 

  43. Werritty A (2006) Sustainable flood management: oxymoron or new paradigm? Area 38:16–23. doi:10.1111/j.1475-4762.2006.00658.x

    Article  Google Scholar 

  44. Zong YQ, Chen XQ (2000) The 1998 flood on the Yangtze, China. Nat Hazards 22:165–184. doi:10.1023/A:1008119805106

    Article  Google Scholar 

Download references

Acknowledgments

This research was funded by a grant (code no. 1-9-3) from the Sustainable Water Resources Research Center of the 21st century Frontier Research Program in Korea. Additional support was provided by an internationalization mini-grant at Portland State University, USA. The Gangwon Province of Korea kindly provided population, 5-m DEM, and land cover data. We appreciate the comments of the anonymous reviewers, which greatly improved the quality of the manuscript.

Author information

Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Heejun Chang.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and Permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Chang, H., Franczyk, J. & Kim, C. What is responsible for increasing flood risks? The case of Gangwon Province, Korea. Nat Hazards 48, 339 (2009). https://doi.org/10.1007/s11069-008-9266-y

Download citation

Keywords

  • Flood risks
  • Climate change
  • Land use management
  • Vulnerability
  • GIS
  • Korea