WUIVAC: a wildland-urban interface evacuation trigger model applied in strategic wildfire scenarios


An evacuation trigger is a point on the landscape that, once crossed by a wildfire, triggers an evacuation for a community. The Wildland-Urban Interface Evacuation (WUIVAC) model can be used to create evacuation trigger buffers around a community using fuels, weather, and topographic inputs. A strategic, community-scale application of WUIVAC for the town of Julian, California was investigated. Eight years of wind measurements were used to determine the worst-case (strongest) winds in 16 directions. Surface fire rate of spread was used to calculate evacuation trigger buffers for the communities of Julian and nearby Whispering Pines, and for three potential evacuation routes. Multiple trigger buffers were combined to create fire planning areas, and trigger buffers that predict the closure of all evacuation routes were explored. WUIVAC trigger buffers offer several potential benefits for strategic evacuation planning, including determination of when to evacuate and locating potential evacuation routes.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in to check access.


  1. Anderson HE (1982) Aids to determining fuel models for estimating fire behavior, INT-122. U.S. Dept. of Agriculture Forest Service Intermountain Forest and Range Experiment Station, Ogden, UT

    Google Scholar 

  2. California Data Exchange Center,  < http://www.cdec.water.ca.gov > : 2005.

  3. Cova TJ (2005) Public safety in the urban-wildland interface: should fire-prone communities have a maximum occupancy? Nat Haz Rev 6(3):99–108

    Article  Google Scholar 

  4. Cova TJ, Dennison PE, Kim TH, Moritz MA (2005) Setting wildfire evacuation trigger points using fire spread modeling and GIS. Trans GIS 9:603–617

    Article  Google Scholar 

  5. Dennison PE, Roberts DA, Peterson SH, Rechel J (2005) Use of normalized difference water index for monitoring live fuel moisture. Int J Remote Sens 26:1035–1042

    Google Scholar 

  6. Dijkstra EW (1959) A note on two problems in connexion with graphs. Numer Math 1:269–271

    Article  Google Scholar 

  7. Finney MA (1998) FARSITE: fire area simulator-model development and evaluation. U.S. Dept. of Agriculture Forest Service Rocky Mountain Research Station, Fort Collins, CO

    Google Scholar 

  8. Finney MA (2002) Fire growth using minimum travel time methods. Can J For Res 32:1420–1424

    Article  Google Scholar 

  9. Keeley JE, Fotheringham CJ (2003) Impact of past, present, and future fire regimes on North American mediterranean shrublands, In: Fire and climatic change in temperate ecosystems of the Western America, New York, Springer, pp 218–262

  10. Keeley JE, Fotheringham CJ, Moritz MA (2004) Lessons from the October 2003 wildfires in Southern California. J Forestry 102(7):26–31

    Google Scholar 

  11. Kim TH, Cova TJ, Brunelle A (2006) Exploratory map animation for post-event analysis of wildfire protective action recommendations. Nat Haz Rev 7:1–11

    Article  Google Scholar 

  12. Miller C (2003) The spatial context of fire: a new approach for predicting fire occurrence. In: Proceedings of fire conference 2000: the first national congress on fire ecology, prevention, and management. Tall Timbers Research Station, Tallahassee, FL, pp 27–34

  13. Miller JD, Yool SR (2002) Modeling fire in semi-desert grassland/oak woodland: the spatial implications. Ecol Model 153:229–245

    Article  Google Scholar 

  14. Moritz MA (2003) Spatiotemporal analysis of controls on shrubland fire regimes: age dependency and fire hazard. Ecology 84:351–361

    Google Scholar 

  15. Moritz MA, Keeley JE, Johnson EA, Schaffner AA (2004) Testing a basic assumption of shrubland fire management: how important is fuel age? Front Ecol Environ 2(2):67–72

    Google Scholar 

  16. Pyne SJ, Andrews PL, Laven RD (1996) Introduction to wildland fire. Wiley, New York

    Google Scholar 

  17. Roberts DA, Dennison PE, Peterson S, Sweeney S, Rechel J (2006) Evaluation of AVIRIS and MODIS measures of live fuel moisture and fuel condition in a shrubland ecosystem in southern California, J Geophys Res-Biogeosci (in press)

  18. Rothermel RC (1972) A mathematical model for predicting fire spread in wildland fuels. USDA Forest Service, Intermountain Forest and Range Experiment Station, Ogden, Utah

    Google Scholar 

  19. Stewart SI, Radeloff VC, Hammer RB (2003) Characteristics and location of the wildland-urban interface in the United States. In: Proc. 2nd international wildland fire ecology and fire management congress. Orlando, FL, 4A.1, pp 1–6

Download references

Author information



Corresponding author

Correspondence to Philip E. Dennison.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and Permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Dennison, P., Cova, T. & Mortiz, M. WUIVAC: a wildland-urban interface evacuation trigger model applied in strategic wildfire scenarios. Nat Hazards 41, 181–199 (2007). https://doi.org/10.1007/s11069-006-9032-y

Download citation


  • Fire behavior
  • Wildfire
  • Evacuation modeling
  • Natural hazards