Abstract
This study concerns about modeling the mixed equilibrium (ME) problem, including user equilibrium, system optimum, and Cournot-Nash players, with general common constraints (CCs) on transportation networks. The CCs capture the interactions of the decision variables of different players in ME, which could be internal interactions such as road link capacity constraints or external such as emission or congestion control policies. It is shown that ME with CCs can be modeled as a generalized Nash equilibrium problem (GNEP). The study proves that, under certain conditions, the GNEP-based ME is jointly convex, which can be reformulated as a variational inequality (VI). We then study the solution existence, uniqueness and solving method for the VI-based model, followed by a discussion on its potential applications. Numerical tests are conducted with common nonlinear link emission constraints as the CCs on a simple two-node, three-link network first, and then on the Nguyen Dupus network. The results show that modeling users’ route choice behavior with CCs is more general in evaluating system performance, planning link capacities, and making congestion or emission control related policies.
Similar content being viewed by others
References
Bazaraa MS, Sherali HD, Shetty CM (2006) Nonlinear programming: theory and algorithms. John Wiley & Sons, Inc., Hoboken
Beckmann M, McGuire CB, Winsten CB (1955) Studies in the Economics of Transportation. RM-1488, Rand Corporation, Santa Monica
Beckmann M, McGuire CB, Winsten CB (1956) Studies in the economics of transportation. Yale University Press, New Haven
Bliemer MCJ, Bovy PHL (2003) Quasi-variational inequality formulation of the multiclass dynamic traffic assignment problem. Transp Res B Methodol 37:501–519
Braess D (1968) Über ein Paradoxon aus der Verkehrsplanung. Zusammenfassung 12:258–268
Braess D, Naqurney A, Wakolbinger T (2005) On a paradox of traffic planning. Transp Sci 39:446–450
Bureau of Public Roads (1964) Traffic assignment manual. U.S. Dept. of commerce, Urban Planning Division, Washington D.C.
Christidis P, Leduc G (2009) Longer and heavier vehicles for freight transport. JRC Scientific and Technical Reports. European Commission, Institute for Prospective and Technological Studies, Seville
Chung BD, Cho HJ, Friesz TL, Huang H, Yao T (2014) Sensitivity analysis of user equilibrium flows revisited. Netw Spat Econ 14(2):183–207
Facchinei F, Kanzow C (2007) Generalized Nash equilibrium problems. 4OR 5:173–210
Facchinei F, Pang JS (2003) Finite-dimensional variational inequalities and complementarity problems. Springer-Verlag, New York
Ferris MC, Munson TS (2000) GAMS/PATH user guide
Harker PT (1988) Multiple equilibrium behavior on networks. Transp Sci 22:39–46
Harker PT, Pang JS (1990) Finite dimensional variational inequality and nonlinear complementarity problems: a survey of theory. Algorithms Appl Math Prog 48:161–220
Haurie A, Marcotte P (1985) On the relationship between Nash–Cournot and Wardrop equilibria. Networks 15:295–308
He F, Yin YF, Shirmohammadi N, Nie Y (2013) Tradable credit schemes on networks with mixed equilibrium behaviors. Transp Res B 57:47–65
Hizir AE (2006) Using emission functions in mathematical programming models for sustainable urban transportation: An application in bilevel optimization. Master of Science Dissertation, Sabanci University
Huang HJ, Liu TL, Guo XL, Yang H (2011) Inefficiency of logit-based stochastic user equilibrium in a traffic network under ATIS. Netw Spat Econ 11(2):255–269
Hwang M, Cho H (2016) The classical Braess paradox problem revisited: a generalized inverse method on non-unique path flow cases. Netw Spat Econ 16(2):605–622
Lewin J (2003) An interactive introduction to mathematical analysis hardback with CD-ROM. The Press Syndicate of the University of Cambridge, United Kingdom
Lin X, Tampère CMJ, Viti F et al (2016) The cost of environmental constraints in traffic networks: assessing the loss of optimality. Netw Spat Econ 16(1):349–369
Ma R, Ban XG, Szeto WY (2015) Emission Modeling and Pricing in Dynamic Traffic Networks. 21st International Symposium on Transportation and Traffic Theory: 1–123
Minderhoud MM, Botma H, Bovy PHL (1997) Assessment of roadway capacity estimation methods. In Transportation Research Record: J Transp Res Board 1572:59–67
Nagurney A (1999) Network economics: a variational inequality approach. Kluwer Academic Publishers, The Netherlands, pp. 10–20
Ng M, Lo HK (2013) Regional air quality conformity in transportation networks with stochastic dependencies: a theoretical copula-based model. Netw Spat Econ 13(4):373–397
Nguyen S, Dupuis C (1984) An efficient method for computing traffic equilibria in networks with asymmetric transportation costs. Transp Sci 18:185–202
Nie Y (2015) A New Tradable Credit Scheme for the Morning Commute Problem. Netw Spat Econ 15(3):719–741
Nie Y, Zhang HM, Lee DH (2004) Models and algorithms for the traffic assignment problem with link capacity constraints. Transp Res B 38:285–312
Pang JS, Fukushima M (2005) Quasi-variational inequalities, generalized Nash equilibria, and multi-leader-follower games. Comput Manag Sci 2:21–56
Prato CG (2007) Route choice modeling: past, present and future research directions. J Choice Modelling 2:65–100
Quak HJ (2008) Sustainability of Urban Freight Transport: Retail Distribution and Local Regulations in Cities (No. EPS-2008-124-LIS). Erasmus Research Institute of Management (ERIM). Retrieved from http://hdl.handle.net/1765/11990
Ryu S, Chen A, Xu XD, Choi K (2014) A dual approach for solving the combined distribution and assignment problem with link capacity constraints. Netw Spat Econ 14(2):245–270
Sharma S, Mishra S (2011) Optimal emission pricing models for containing carbon footprints due to vehicular pollution in a city network. Proceedings of the 90th Transportation Research Board Annual Meeting. Washington, D.C.
Susan S, Daniel S, Conrad W (1998) Car sharing in Europe and north American: past, present, and future. Transp Q 52(3):35–52
Szeto WY, Jiang Y, Wang DZW, Sumalee A (2015) A sustainable road network design problem with land use transportation interaction over time. Netw Spat Econ 15(3):791–822
Wallace C, Courage K, Hadi M, Gan A (1998) TRANSYT-7F user’s guide. University of Florida, Gainesville
Wardrop JG (1952) Some theoretical aspects of road traffic research. Proceedings of the Institution of Civil Engineers, 325–378.
Xu X, Chen A, Cheng L (2015) Reformulating environmentally constrained traffic equilibrium via a smooth gap function. Int J Sustain Transp 9(6):419–430
Yang H, Huang HJ (2004) The multi-class, multi-criteria traffic network equilibrium and systems optimum problem. Transp Res B Methodol 38:1–15
Yang H, Zhang X, Meng Q (2007) Stackelberg games and multiple equilibrium behavior on networks. Transp Res B 41:841–861
Yang Y, Yin Y, Lu H (2014) Designing emission charging schemes for transportation conformity. J Adv Transp 48:766–781
Yin Y, Lawphongpanich S (2006) Internalizing emission externality on road networks. Transp Res Part D: Transp Environ 11(4):292–301
Yin Y, Lu H (1999) Traffic equilibrium problems with environmental concerns. Journal of the Eastern Asia Society for Transportation Studies 3:195–206
Acknowledgments
The authors would like to thank Dr. Jong-Shi Pang from the University of Southern California for helpful discussions and suggestions on the Generalized Nash Equilibrium formulation of the ME problem. This research is partially funded by the National Science Foundation (NSF) grant CMMI-1055555. Any opinions, findings, and conclusions or recommendations expressed in this paper are those of the authors and do not necessarily reflect the views of the NSF.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Corresponding author
Rights and permissions
About this article
Cite this article
Yang, X., Ban, X.J. & Ma, R. Mixed Equilibria with Common Constraints on Transportation Networks. Netw Spat Econ 17, 547–579 (2017). https://doi.org/10.1007/s11067-016-9335-9
Published:
Issue Date:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s11067-016-9335-9