Abstract
Compulsory trips (e.g., work trips) contribute with the major part of the congestion in the morning peak. It also prevents the society to reach a social optimum (the solution that maximizes welfare) because the presence of the private utility of one the agents (the firm), acting as a dominant agent, does not account for the additional costs imposed in their workers (congestion) as well as the costs imposed to the rest of the society (i.e., congestion, pollution). In this paper, a study of a strategy to influence the demand generator by relaxing the arrival constraints is presented. Bi-level programming models are used to investigate the equilibrium reached from the firm-workers interplay which helps to explain how the market failure arises. The evaluation includes the use of incentives to induce the shift to less congested periods and the case of the social system optimum in which a planner objective is incorporated as a third agent usually seeking to improve social welfare (improve productivity of the firm while at the same time reduce the total system travel time). The later is used to show that it is possible to provide a more efficient solution which better off society. A numerical example is used to (1) show the nature of the market failure, (2) evaluate the social system optimum, and (3) show how a congestion tax or an optimal incentive can help to correct the market failure. The results also corroborate that these mechanisms are more likely to be more efficient when firms face little production effects on time and workers do not high opportunity costs for starting at off peak periods.
Similar content being viewed by others
Notes
A “take it, or leave it” option of the single offer that is given (Addition and Steel 2012).
References
Addition J, Steel SR (2012). The spectator no. 509 1712. http://www.gutenberg.org/files/12030/12030-h/SV3/Spectator3.html#section509. Accessed 31 Jan 2012
Arnott R, de Palma A, Lindsey R (1990a) Economics of a bottleneck. J Urban Econ 27(1):111–130
Arnott R, de Palma A, Lindsey R (1990b) Heterogeneous travelers. (Unpublished manuscript)
Arnott R, Rave T, Schob R (2005) Staggered work hours for dominant employers. In: Alleviating urban traffic congestion. MIT, Cambridge, pp 135–185
Ban X, Ferris M, Liu HX (2010) Numerical studies on reformulation techniques for continuous network design problems with asymmetric user equilibrium. Int J Oper Res Inf Syst 1(1):52–72
Ban X, Liu HX (2009) A link-node discrete-time dynamic second best toll pricing model with a relaxation solution algorithm. Netw Spat Econ 9(2):243–267
Ban X, Liu HX, Ferris MC (2008) A link-node complementarity model and solution algorithm for dynamic user equilibria with exact flow propagations. Transp Res B Methodol 42(9):823–842
Bliemer MCJ, Bovy PHL (2003) Quasi-variational inequality formulation of the multiclass dynamic traffic assignment problem. Transp Res B Methodol 37(6):501–519
Chu X (2003) Endogenous trip scheduling: the Henderson approach reformulated and compared with the Vickrey approach. J Urban Econ 37(3):324–343
Emmerink RHM, van Beek P (1997) Empirical analysis of work schedule flexibility: implications for road pricing and driver. Urban Stud (Routledge) 34(2):217–234
Facchinei F, Pang JS (2003a) Finite-dimensional variational inequalities and complementarity problems, vol I, 1st edn. Springer-Verlag, New York
Facchinei F, Pang JS (2003b) Finite-dimensional variational inequalities and complementarity problems, vol II, 1st edn. Springer-Verlag, New York
Federal Highway Administration (2011) Office of highway policy information. Travel time to work 2000. Retrieved from http://www.fhwa.dot.gov/ohim/onh00/map1.htm. Accessed 20 Jul 2011
Fujita M, Thisse J-F (2002) Economics of agglomeration: cities, industrial location, and regional growth, 1st edn. Cambridge University, Cambridge
GAMS. http://www.gams.com/
Gowdy J (2009) Microeconomic theory old and new: a student’s guide. Stanford Economics and Finance, Stanford
Guiliano G, Golob TF (1990) Staggered work hours for traffic management: a case study. Transp Res Rec 1280:46–58
Gutiérrez-i-Puigarnau E, Ommeren JV (2012) Work start time and worker compensation for staggered-hours programmes. J Transp Econ Policy 46(2):205–220
Henderson JV (1981) The economics of staggered work hours. J Urban Econ 9(3):349–364
Heydecker BG, Verlander NQ (1999) Calculation of dynamic traffic equilibrium assignments. In: (Proceedings) European transport conference, seminar F, P343, London, pp 79–91
Holguín-Veras J, Ozbay K, de Cerreño A (2005) Evaluation study of port authority of New York and New Jerseys time of day pricing initiative. Federal highway administrations/US Department of transportation, Report FHWA/NJ-2005-005
Holguín-Veras J, Polimeni J, Cruz B, Xu N, List G, Nordstrom J, Haddock J (2005) Off-peak freight deliveries: challenges and stakeholders perceptions. Transp Res Rec 1906:42–48
Holguín-Veras J, Wang Q, Xu N, Ozbay K, Cetin M, Polimeni J (2006) The impacts of time of day pricing on the behavior of freight carriers in a congested urban area: implications to road pricing. Transp Res A Policy Pract 40(9):744–766
Holguín-Veras J, Pérez N, Cruz B, Polimeni J (2006) On the effectiveness of financial incentives to off-peak deliveries to restaurants in Manhattan, New York. Transp Res Rec 1966:51–59
Holguín-Veras J (2008) Necessary conditions for off-hour deliveries and the effectiveness of urban freight road pricing and alternative financial policies in competitive markets. Transp Res A Policy Pract 42(3):392–413
Holguín-Veras J, Wang Q, Xu N, Ozbay K (2011) The impacts of time of day pricing on car user behavior: findings from the port authority of New York and New Jersey’s initiative. Transportation 38(3):27–443
Holguín-Veras J (2011) Urban delivery industry response to cordon pricing, time-distance pricing, and carrier-receiver policies in competitive markets. Transp Res A Policy Pract 45(8):802–824
Holguín-Veras J, Ozbay K, Kornhauser AL, Ukkusuri S, Brom M, Iyer S, Yushimito W, Allen B, Silas M (2011) Overall impacts of off-hour delivery programs in the New York city metropolitan area. Transp Res Rec 2238:68–76
Jones DW Jr, Nakamoro T, Cilliers MP (1977) Implications for travel behavior and transport investment policy: Implications for travel Behavior and transport investment policy. University of California, Berkeley
Ledyard JO (2008) Market failure. In: Durlauf SN, Blume LE (eds) The new palgrave dictionary of economics. Palgrave Macmillan, Basingstoke
Lucas RE Jr (1970) Capacity overtime, and empirical production functions. Am Econ Rev 60(2):23–27
Luo ZQ, Pang JS, Ralph D (1996) Mathematical programs with equilibrium constraints, 1st edn. Cambridge University, New York
Maric D (1977) Staggered working hours. In Adapting working hours to modern needs. International Labour Organisation. Geneva, Switzerland
Mas-Colell A, Whinston MD, Green JR (1995) Microeconomic theory, 1st edn. Oxford University
Mills ES (1967) An aggregative model of resource allocation in a metropolitan area. Am Econ Rev 57(2):197–210
Moore AJ, Jovanis PP, Koppelman FS (1984) Modeling the choice of work schedule with flexible work hours. Transp Sci 18(2):141–164
Mun S, Yonekawa M (2006) Flextime, traffic congestion and urban productivity. J Urban Econ 40(3):329–358
O’Malley B, Selinger CS (1973) Staggered work hours in Manhattan. Traffic Eng Control 14(9):418–423
Ott M, Slavin H, Ward D (1980) Behavioral impacts of flexible working hours. Trans Res Rec 767:1–6
Owens RD, Van Warmer GH (1973) The effect of staggered working hours on traffic volumes at a large industrial complex. Traffic Eng 13(11):61–64
Ran B, Boyce DE (1996) Modeling dynamic transportation networks: an intelligent transportation systems oriented approach, 2nd edn. Springer-Verlag, New York
Ran B, Hall RW, Boyce DE (1996) A link-based variational inequality model for dynamic departure time/route choice. Transp Res B Methodol 30(1):31–46
Santos G, Behrendt H, Maconi L, Shirvani T, Teytelboym A (2010) Part I: externalities and economic policies in road transport. Res Transp Econ 28(1):2–45
Shepard III EM, Clifton TJ, Kruse D (1996) Flexible work hours and productivity: some evidence from the pharmaceutical industry. Ind Relat 35(1):123–139
Sloane PJ (1975) Changing patterns of working hours. UK Department of Employment
Small KA (1982) The scheduling of consumer activities: work trips. Am Econ Rev 72(3):467–479
Transportation Research Board (1980) Alternative work schedules: impacts on transportation. NCHRP Synthesis of Highway Practice 73
Vickrey WS (1969) Congestion theory and transport investment. Am Econ Rev 59(2):251–260
Von Stackerlberg H (1952) The theory of market economy. Oxford University, Oxford
Walras L (1954) Elements of pure economics (translated by William Jaffé). Richard D. Irwin, Inc., Homewood
Wardrop JG (1952) Some theoretical aspects of road traffic research. Proc Inst Civ Eng 1:325–378
Wilson PW (1988) Wage variation resulting from staggered work hours. J Urban Econ 24(1):9–26
Yoshimura M, Okumura M (2001) Optimal commuting and work start time distribution under flexible work hours system on motor commuting. Proc East Asia Soc Transp Stud 10 3:455–469
Yushimito WF (2011) Mitigating peak congestion with staggered work hours: effects, models, and implications. Ph.D. Thesis Rensselaer Polytechnic Institute
Yushimito WF, Ban X, Holguín-Veras J (2013) A two stage optimization model for staggered work hours. J Intell Trans Syst Technol Plan Oper (in press)
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Corresponding author
Appendix A: Notation for the DUE Model
Appendix A: Notation for the DUE Model
- M :
-
Defines the workers time schedule as time m (group of workers or “class m”)
- K :
-
Time intervals of length Δ
- \(d_{is}^{km}\) :
-
Flow departing from node i at time interval k for people under starting work time schedule m to destination s
- \(\pi _{is}^{km}\) :
-
Equilibrium travel time for flow departing from node i at time interval k for people under starting work time schedule m to destination s
- \(u_{as}^{km}\) :
-
Inflow of group of workers with starting time m for departing at the beginning of time interval k to link a to destination s
- \(v_{as}^{km}\) :
-
Exit flow of group of workers with starting time m departing at the beginning of interval k from link a to destination s
- \(\mu_{as}^{km}\) :
-
Disutility value for flow of group of workers with starting time m’ for flow departing from origin node i to destination s
- \(dd_{is}^{m}\) :
-
Total departure flow of group of workers with starting time m from node i to s
- Q :
-
Total number of workers in the firm, which is the summation of the workers departing from any node i to destination s (firms location), \(Q=\displaystyle \sum\limits_{\forall i} Q_{is}\)
- \(\theta \) :
-
Incentive per worker by a unit shift in his/her schedule
- \(\alpha _{1}\) :
-
Early arrival disutility factor
- \(\alpha _{2}\) :
-
Late arrival disutility factor
Rights and permissions
About this article
Cite this article
Yushimito, W.F., Ban, X. & Holguín-Veras, J. Correcting the Market Failure in Work Trips with Work Rescheduling: An Analysis Using Bi-level Models for the Firm-workers Interplay. Netw Spat Econ 15, 883–915 (2015). https://doi.org/10.1007/s11067-013-9213-7
Published:
Issue Date:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s11067-013-9213-7