Bell MGH, Shield CM, Busch F, Kruse G (1997) A stochastic user equilibrium path flow estimator. Transp Res, Part C Emerg Technol 5(3–4):197–210
Article
Google Scholar
Bovy P, Stern E (1990) Wayfinding in transport networks. Kluwer Academic Publishers
Bovy PH, Fiorenzo-Catalano S (2007) Stochastic route choice set generation: behavioral and probabilistic foundations. Transportmetrica 3(3):173–189
Article
Google Scholar
Carey M, Ge YE (2011) Comparison of methods for path flow reassignment for dynamic user equilibrium. Netw Spat Econ. doi:10.1007/s11067-011-9159-6
Google Scholar
Cascetta E, Nuzzolo A, Russo F, Vitetta A (1996) A modified logit route choice model overcoming path overlapping problems: specification and some calibration results for interurban networks. In: Proceedings from the thirteenth international symposium on transportation and traffic theory
Daganzo C (1998) Queue spillovers in transportation networks with a route choice. Transp Sci 32(1):3–11
Article
Google Scholar
Daganzo CF (1994) The cell transmission model: a dynamic representation of highway traffic consistent with the hydrodynamic theory. Transp Res, Part B 28:269–287
Article
Google Scholar
Daganzo CF (1995) The cell transmission model, part II: network traffic. Transp Res, Part B 29:79–93
Article
Google Scholar
Dia H, Harney D, Boyle A (2001) Dynamics of drivers’ route choice decisions under advanced traveler information systems. Roads and Transp Res 10:2–12
Google Scholar
Friesz TL, Bernstein D, Smith TE, Tobin RL, Wei BW (1993) A variational inequality formulation of the dynamic network equilibrium problem. Oper Res 41:179–191
Article
Google Scholar
Gao S, Frejinger E, Ben-Akiva M (2011) Cognitive cost in route choice with real-time information: an exploratory analysis. Transp Res, Part A Policy Pract 45(9):916–926
Article
Google Scholar
Ghali M (1995) A note on the minimum instantaneous cost path of the dynamic traffic assignment problem. Ann Oper Res 60:115–120
Article
Google Scholar
Hawas YE (2004) Development and calibration of route choice utility models: neuro-fuzzy approach. J Transp Eng 130(2):171–182
Article
Google Scholar
Jin W, Zhang HM (2003) On the distribution schemes for determining flows through a merge. Transp Res, Part B 37:521–540
Article
Google Scholar
Jin W, Zhang HM (2004) Multicommodity kinematic wave simulation model for network traffic flow. Transp Res Rec 1883:59–67
Article
Google Scholar
Kant P (2008) Route choice modelling in dynamic traffic assignment. Master thesis, University of Twente. http://essay.utwente.nl/58303/
Kuwahara M, Akamatsu T (2001) Dynamic user optimal assignment with physical queues for many-to-many od pattern. Transp Res, Part B 35:461–479
Article
Google Scholar
Lebacque J (1996) The godunov scheme and what it means for first order traffic flow models. In: Procedings of international symposium of transport and traffic theory, pp 79–102
Lee C, Ran B, Yang F, Loh WY (2010) A hybrid tree approach to modeling alternate route choice behavior with online information. J of Intell Transp Sys: Technology, Planning, and Operations 14(4):209–219
Google Scholar
Lighthill MJ, Whitham GB (1955) On kinematic waves. ii. a theory of traffic flow on long crowded roads. Proc Royal Soc 229:317–345
Article
Google Scholar
Mahmassani HS, Jayakrishnan R (1991) System performance and user response under real-time information in a congested traffic corridor. Transp Res, Part A 25(5):293–307
Article
Google Scholar
Mahmassani HS, Liu YH (1999) Dynamics of commuting decision behaviour under advanced traveller information systems. Transp Res, Part C 7(2–3):91–107
Article
Google Scholar
Merchant D, Nemhauser G (1978) A model and an algorithm for the dynamic traffic assignment problem. Transp Sci 12:183–199
Article
Google Scholar
Nie X, Zhang HM (2005) A comparative study of some macroscopic link models used in dynamic traffic assignment. Netw Spat Econ 5:89–115
Article
Google Scholar
Nie Y (2006) A variational inequality approach for inferring dynamic origin-destination travel demands. PhD thesis, University of California at Davis
Nie Y, Zhang HM (2010) Solving the dynamic user optimal assignment problem considering queue spillback. Netw Spat Econ 10(1):49–71
Article
Google Scholar
Nie YM, Wu X, de Mello TH (2011) Optimal path problems with second-order stochastic dominance constraints. Netw Spat Econ. doi:10.1007/s11067-011-9167-6
Google Scholar
Peeta S, Mahmassani HS (1995) Multiple user classes real-time traffic assignment for online operations: a rolling horizon solution framework. Transp Res, Part C Emerg Technol 3(2):83–98
Article
Google Scholar
Peeta S, Yu JW (2005) A hybrid model for driver route choice incorporating en-route attributes and real-time information effects. Netw Spat Econ 5:21–40
Article
Google Scholar
Pel AJ, Bliemer MC, Hoogendoorn SP (2009) Hybrid routing choice modeling in dynamic traffic assignment. Transp Res Rec 2091:100–107
Article
Google Scholar
Ramming S (2002) Network knowledge and route choice. PhD thesis, Massachusetts Institute of Technology
Ran B, Boyce DE, Leblanc LJ (1993) A new class of instantaneous dynamic user-optimal traffic assignment models. Oper Res 41(1):192–202
Article
Google Scholar
Reddy PDVG, Yang H, Vaughn KM, Abdel-Aty MA, Kitamura R, Jovanis PP (1995) Design of an artificial simulator for analyzing route choice behavior in the presence of information system. Math Comput Model 22(4–7):119–147
Article
Google Scholar
Richards PI (1956) Shock waves on the highway. Proc R Soc 4:42–51
Google Scholar
Smith M (1993) A new dynamic traffic model and the existence and calculation of dynamic user equilibria on congested capacity-constrained road networks. Transp Res, Part B 26:49–36
Google Scholar
Ukkusuri S, Patil G (2007) Exploring user behavior in online network equilibrium problems. Transp Res Rec: Journal of the Transportation Research Board 2029:31–38
Article
Google Scholar
Vovsha P, Bekhor S (1998) The link-nested logit model of route choice: overcoming the route overlapping problem. Transp Res Rec 1645:133–142
Article
Google Scholar
Xu H, Zhou J, Xu W (2011) A decision-making rule for modeling travelers route choice behavior based on cumulative prospect theory. Transp Res, Part C Emerg Technol 19(2):218–228
Article
Google Scholar