Skip to main content
Log in

On Confounding Preference Heterogeneity and Income Effect in Discrete Choice Models

  • Published:
Networks and Spatial Economics Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

A substantial part of the discrete choice model literature has been concerned with specifications accounting for preference heterogeneity. In contrast, only a few studies have been interested in the presence of income effect, and it is much rarer still to come across models trying to account for both effects simultaneously. In this paper we use a specification that accounts for income effect and preference heterogeneity, both of a systematic and of a random nature. Our results point out that care should be taken with conclusions drawn from studies that only consider these effects separately, since they can be confounding from an empirical point of view. In fact, we provide empirical evidence that a random cost parameter can account for the existence of income effect.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  • Amador FJ, González RM, Ortúzar JdeD (2005) Preference heterogeneity and willingness to pay for travel time savings. Transportation 32:627–647

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Bates JJ (1987) Measuring travel time values with a discrete choice model: a note. Econ J 97:493–498

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Bhat CR (1998) Accommodating variations in responsiveness to level-of-service measures in travel mode choice modeling. Transp Res 32A:495–507

    Google Scholar 

  • Carrasco JA, Ortúzar JdeD (2002) Review and assessment of the nested logit model. Econ J 22:197–218

    Google Scholar 

  • Cherchi E, Ortúzar JdeD (2003a) Multimodal choice models with mixed RP/SP data: correlation, non-linearities and income effect. Selected proceedings of the 9th World Conference on Transport Research. Pergamon, Amsterdam

    Google Scholar 

  • Cherchi E, Ortúzar JdeD (2003b) Alternative specific variables in non-linear utility functions: influence of correlation, homoscedasticity and taste variations. 10th International Conference on Travel Behaviour Research, Lucerne, Switzerland

  • Cherchi E, Ortúzar JdeD (2005) Estimation and prediction with the mixed logit model: analysis of some confounding effects. Actas XII Congreso Chileno de Ingeniería del Transporte, Valparaíso

  • Cherchi E, Ortúzar JdeD (2006) Using mixed RP/SP models with non-linear effects in forecasting. Transp Res Rec 1977:27–34

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Daly AJ (2004) Properties of random utility models of consumer choice. TraLog Conference, Molde, 2004

  • Gaudry MJI, Jara-Díaz SR, Ortúzar JdeD (1989) Value of time sensitivity to model specification. Transp Res 23B:151–158

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Hensher DA, Greene WH (2003) The mixed logit model: the state of practice. Transportation 30:133–176

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Herriges J, Kling C (1999) Nonlinear income effects in random utility models. Rev Econ Stat 81:62–72

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Jara-Díaz SR, Farah M (1986) Transporte y Gasto Familiar en Sectores de Bajos Ingresos en Santiago. Actas IV Congreso Panamericano de Ingeniería de Tránsito y Transporte, Santiago

  • Jara-Díaz SR, Ortúzar JdeD (1989) Introducing the expenditure rate in the estimation of mode choice models. J Transp Econ Policy 23:293–308

    Google Scholar 

  • Jara-Díaz SR, Videla J (1989) Detection of income effect in mode choice: theory and application. Transp Res 23B:393–400

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Jara-Díaz SR, Guerra R (2003) On non-linearities in travel choice utility. European Transport Conference, Strasbourg

  • McFadden D (1999) Computing willingness-to-pay for transport improvements. In: Moore J, Riezman R, Melvin J (eds) Trade, theory and econometrics: essays in honour of John S. Chipman. Routledge, London

    Google Scholar 

  • Munizaga MA, Alvarez-Daziano R (2005) Testing mixed logit and probit by simulation. Transp Res Rec 1921:53–62

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Ortúzar JdeD, Donoso PCF (1983) Survey design, implementation, data coding and evaluation for the estimation of disaggregate choice models in Santiago de Chile. Second International Conference on New Survey Methods in Transport. Hungerford Hill Village, September 1983

  • Ortúzar JdeD, Ivelic AM (1987) Effects of using more accurately measured level-of-service variables on the specification and stability of mode choice models. Proceedings 15th PTRC Summer Annual Meeting, Bath University

  • Ortúzar JdeD, Willumsen LG (2001) Modelling transport, 3rd edn. Wiley, Chichester

    Google Scholar 

  • Sillano M, Ortúzar JdeD (2005) Willingness to pay estimation with mixed logit models: some new evidence. Environ Plan 37A:525–550

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Train KE (1998) Recreation demand models with taste differences over people. Land Econ 74:230–239

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Train KE (2003) Discrete choice methods with simulation. Cambridge University Press, Cambridge

    Google Scholar 

  • Williams HCWL (1977) On the formation of travel demand models and economic evaluation measures of user benefit. Environ Plan 9A:285–344

    Article  Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Juan de Dios Ortúzar.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Amador, F.J., González, R.M. & de Dios Ortúzar, J. On Confounding Preference Heterogeneity and Income Effect in Discrete Choice Models. Netw Spat Econ 8, 97–108 (2008). https://doi.org/10.1007/s11067-007-9043-6

Download citation

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s11067-007-9043-6

Keywords

Navigation