Skip to main content
SpringerLink
Log in

Digital transformation in maritime ports: analysis and a game theoretic framework

  • Published:
NETNOMICS: Economic Research and Electronic Networking Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

Digitalization is pushing the maritime industry beyond its traditional limits and provides many new opportunities to enhance the productivity, efficiency, and sustainability of logistics. The concept of smart ports, for instance, aims to adopt modern information technologies to enable a better planning and management within and between ports. Strong facilitators of the digitalization are investments into technology and cooperations for promoting information sharing and a better coordination and collaboration, often regarded as a stumbling block in highly competitive environments. Besides many new opportunities, important economic issues and problems arise. We provide an overview of the development and state-of-the-art of digital transformation in modern seaports in order to identify current potentials and barriers. Focusing on the crucial and challenging aspects of coordination and collaboration, we present a conceptual game theoretic framework that allows benefits and cost allocations considering inter-, intra-, and meta-organizational perspectives. We further demonstrate how this framework can be used to develop tools and methods for supporting strategic decision making for driving the digital transformation in seaports and addressing new economic issues and problems.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Log in via an institution

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Institutional subscriptions

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  1. Agarwal, R., Gao, G., DesRoches, C., Jha, A. (2010). Research commentary–the digital transformation of healthcare: Current status and the road ahead. Information Systems Research, 21(4), 796–809.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  2. Aumann, R.J. (1959). Acceptable points in general cooperative n-person games. In Tucker, A., & Luce, R. (Eds.) Contributions to the theory of games (Vol. IV, pp. 287–324). Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press.

  3. Bharadwaj, A., El Sawy, O.A., Pavlou, P.A., Venkatraman, N. (2013). Digital business strategy: Toward a next generation of insights. MIS Quarterly, 37 (2), 471–482.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  4. Budler, M., & Trkman, P. (2017). The role of game theory in the development of business models in supply chains. In Proceedings of the IEEE technology engineering management conference (TEMSCON) (pp. 155–159). Santa Clara, CA.

  5. Carlan, V., Sys, C., Vanelslander, T., Roumboutsos, A. (2017). Digital innovation in the port sector: Barriers and facilitators. In Competition and regulation in network industries (pp. 1–23). https://doi.org/10.1177/1783591717734793.

  6. Choi, H.R., Kim, H.S., Park, B.J., Park, N.K., Lee, S.W. (2003). An ERP approach for container terminal operating systems. Maritime Policy & Management, 30(3), 197–210.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  7. Curiel, I. (1997). Cooperative game theory and applications: cooperative games arising from combinatorial optimization problems. New York: Springer.

    Book  Google Scholar 

  8. Davenport, T.H. (1993). Process innovation: reengineering work through information technology. Boston: Harvard Business School Press.

    Google Scholar 

  9. Davidsson, P., Hajinasab, B., Holmgren, J., Jevinger, A., Persson, J. (2016). The fourth wave of digitalization and public transport: Opportunities and challenges. Sustainability, 8(12), 1248.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  10. Drechsel, J. (2010). Cooperative lot sizing games in supply chains (pp. 55–61). Berlin: Springer. Chapter: Cooperation in supply chains.

    Google Scholar 

  11. Eurogate (2015). TRoad App – From the stone age into the future. http://www1.eurogate.de/en/Media/Blog/TRoad-App.

  12. Gillies, D.B. (1959). Solutions to general non-zero-sum games. In Tucker, A., & Luce, R. (Eds.) Contributions to the theory of games (Vol. IV, pp. 47–85). Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press.

  13. Giuliano, G., & O’Brien, T. (2007). Reducing port-related truck emissions: The terminal gate appointment system at the ports of Los Angeles and Long Beach. Transportation Research Part D: Transport and Environment, 12(7), 460–473.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  14. Guajardo, M., & Rönnqvist, M. (2015). Operations research models for coalition structure in collaborative logistics. European Journal of Operational Research, 240 (1), 147–159.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  15. Guha, S., Grover, V., Kettinger, W.J., Teng, J.T. (1997). Business process change and organizational performance: Exploring an antecedent model. Journal of Management Information Systems, 14(1), 119–154.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  16. Hakam, M.H., & Solvang, W.D. (2012). RFID communication in container ports. In Proceedings of the 3rd IEEE international conference on cognitive infocommunications (CogInfoCom) (pp. 351–358). Piscataway: IEEE.

  17. Hart, S., & Kurz, M. (1983). Endogenous formation of coalitions. Econometrica: Journal of the Econometric Society, 51(4), 1047–1064.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  18. Hayut, Y. (1981). Containerization and the load center concept. Economic Geography, 57, 160–176.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  19. Heilig, L., & Voß, S. (2017). Information systems in seaports: a categorization and overview. Information Technology and Management, 18(3), 179–201.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  20. Heilig, L., Lalla-Ruiz, E., Voß, S. (2017). port-IO: an integrative mobile cloud platform for real-time inter-terminal truck routing optimization. Flexible Services and Manufacturing Journal, 29(3-4), 504–534.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  21. Heilig, L., Schwarze, S., Voß, S. (2017). An analysis of digital transformation in the history and future of modern ports. In Proceedings of the 50th Hawaii international conference on system sciences (HICSS) (pp. 1341–1350). Piscataway: IEEE.

  22. Jiang, Y., & Katsamakas, E. (2010). Impact of e-book technology: Ownership and market asymmetries in digital transformation. Electronic Commerce Research and Applications, 9(5), 386–399.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  23. Laxe, F.G., Seoane, M.J.F., Montes, C.P. (2012). Maritime degree, centrality and vulnerability: Port hierarchies and emerging areas in containerized transport (2008–2010). Journal of Transport Geography, 24, 33–44.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  24. Lee, H.L., & Whang, S. (2000). Information sharing in a supply chain. International Journal of Manufacturing Technology and Management, 1(1), 79–93.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  25. Luftman, J. (2003). Assessing IT/business alignment. Information Systems Management, 20(4), 9–15.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  26. Myerson, R.B. (2013). Game theory. Cambridge: Harvard University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  27. NDR (2017). Digitale Vorzeigestadt? Hamburg stellt Verkehrs-App ein. https://www.ndr.de/nachrichten/hamburg/Hamburger-Hafen-Aus-fuer-Vorzeigeprojekt,smartport100.html.

  28. Neo, B.S. (1994). Managing new information technologies: Lessons from Singapore’s experience with EDI. Information & Management, 26(6), 317–326.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  29. Pallis, A.A., & De Langen, P.W. (2010). Seaports and the structural implications of the economic crisis. Research in Transportation Economics, 27(1), 10–18.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  30. PEMA. (2012). Container terminal yard automation. Tech. rep. Brussels: Port Equipment Manufacurers Association.

    Google Scholar 

  31. PEMA. (2015). Laser technology in ports and terminals. Tech. rep. Brussels: Port Equipment Manufacurers Association.

    Google Scholar 

  32. Petersen, K.J., Ragatz, G.L., Monczka, R.M. (2005). An examination of collaborative planning effectiveness and supply chain performance. Journal of Supply Chain Management, 41(2), 14–25.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  33. Schmeidler, D. (1969). The nucleolus of a characteristic function game. SIAM Journal on Applied Mathematics, 17(6), 1163–1170.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  34. Shapley, L.S. (1953). A value for n-person games. In Kuhn, H., & Tucker, A. (Eds.) Contributions to the theory of games (Vol. II, pp. 307–317). Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press.

  35. Shapley, L.S., & Shubik, M. (1966). Quasi-cores in a monetary economy with nonconvex preferences. Econometrica: Journal of the Econometric Society, 34(4), 805–827.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  36. Shi, X., & Voß, S. (2011). Game theoretical aspects in modeling and analyzing the shipping industry. In Proceedings of the international conference on computational logistics (ICCL) (pp. 302–320).

  37. Tilson, D., Lyytinen, K., Sørensen, C. (2010). Research commentary–digital infrastructures: The missing IS research agenda. Information Systems Research, 21 (4), 748–759.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  38. United Nations. (2002). Value-added services of logistics centres in port areas. In Commercial development of regional ports as logistics centres (pp. 19–34).

  39. Venkatraman, N. (1994). IT-enabled business transformation: From automation to business scope redefinition. Sloan Management Review, 35(2), 73–87.

    Google Scholar 

  40. Von Neumann, J., & Morgenstern, O. (1953). Theory of games and economic behavior. Princeton: Princeton University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  41. Voß, S., & Schneidereit, G. (2002). Interdependencies between supply contracts and transaction costs. In Seuring, S., & Goldbach, M. (Eds.) Cost management in supply chains (pp. 253–272). Heidelberg: Physica.

  42. Wiegmans, B.W., Hoest, A.V.D., Notteboom, T.E. (2008). Port and terminal selection by deep-sea container operators. Maritime Policy & Management, 35(6), 517–534.

    Article  Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

  1. Institute of Information Systems (IWI), University of Hamburg, Hamburg, Germany

    Leonard Heilig, Eduardo Lalla-Ruiz & Stefan Voß

Authors
  1. Leonard Heilig
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  2. Eduardo Lalla-Ruiz
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  3. Stefan Voß
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Leonard Heilig.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Heilig, L., Lalla-Ruiz, E. & Voß, S. Digital transformation in maritime ports: analysis and a game theoretic framework. Netnomics 18, 227–254 (2017). https://doi.org/10.1007/s11066-017-9122-x

Download citation

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s11066-017-9122-x

Keywords

Search

Navigation