Skip to main content
Log in

Global Navigation Satellite System based tolling: state-of-the-art

  • Published:
NETNOMICS: Economic Research and Electronic Networking Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

Road pricing or road user charging may be understood as an economic concept regarding direct charges applied for using roads. Different pricing paradigms may be distinguished mainly refering to pricing of congested, non-expandable urban networks as well as pricing of expandable, uncongested (principally, interurban) road infrastructure. Numerous technologies within Intelligent Transport Systems can provide support in efficiently applying various charging mechanisms. Recently, among others, tolling systems have been deployed that rely on the Global Navigation Satellite System (GNSS). The purpose of this paper is to discuss the state-of-the-art of using GNSS technology in road user charging.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  1. Amdal, E., Bardsen, G., Johansen, K., Welde, M. (2008). Operating costs in Norwegian toll companies: a panel data analysis. Transportation, 34, 681–695.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  2. AS 24. http://www.as24.com. Last call 4 Nov 2012.

  3. ASFINAG Maut Service GmbH. http://www.go-maut.at/. Last call 4 Nov 2012.

  4. Balasch, J., Verbauwhede, I., Preneel, B. (2010). An embedded platform for privacy-friendly road charging applications. In DATE ’10 (pp. 867–872).

  5. Blewitt, G. (1997). Basics of the GPS technique: observation equations. In Geodetic applications of GPS. Swedish Land Survey.

  6. Blythe, P.T., & Pickford, A.T.W. (2006). Road user charging and electronic toll collection. Chapter 3: Technology options for charging. www.artechhouse.com/uploads/public/documents/chapters/pickford_858_ch03.pdf. Last call 4 Nov 2012.

  7. Caneschi, F. (2007). CEN standardization of the electronic toll systems architecture. In 7th international conference on ITS telecommunications, 2007. ITST ’07 (pp. 1–5).

  8. Catling, I. (2000). Road user charging using vehicle positioning systems. In Tenth international conference on road transport information and control (Conf. publ. no. 472) (pp. 126–130).

  9. Commission of the European Communities (2008). Impact assessment on the internalisation of external costs. Commission staff working document, Brussels.

  10. Cosmen, J., Grush, B., Hamilton, C. (2009). GPAF: GMARs performance assessment framework. GNSS metering association for road user charging.

  11. Cottingham, D.N., Beresford, A.R., Harle, R.K. (2007). Survey of technologies for the implementation of national-scale road user charging. Transport Reviews, 27(4), 499–523.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  12. Coyle, D.D., Robinson, F.O., Zhao, Z., Munnich Jr., L.W., Lari, A.Z. (2011). From fuel taxes to mileage-based user fees: rationale, technology, and transitional issues. Technical report. http://www.its.umn.edu/Publications/ResearchReports/.

  13. Danish Ministry of Taxation (2012). http://www.skat.dk/SKAT.aspx?oId=305&vId=0#pos. Last call 4 Jan 2013.

  14. de Palma, A., & Lindsey, R. (2011). Traffic congestion pricing methodologies and technologies. Transportation Research Part C: Emerging Technologies, 19, 1377–1399.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  15. Demisch, A., Iseki, H., Taylor, B.D. (2009). TASK A-3: examining the linkages between electronic roadway tolling technologies and road pricing policy goals. Technical report, California Path Program, Institute of Transportation Studies, University of California, Berkeley.

  16. Donath, M., Gorjestani, A., Shankwitz, C., Hoglund, R., Arpin, E., Cheng, P.-M., Menon, A., Newstrom, B. (2009). Technology enabling near-term nationwide implementation of distance based road user fees. Technical report, Intelligent Transportation Systems Institute, Center for Transportation Studies, University of Minnesota, Report no. CTS 09–20.

  17. EasyGo (2010). http://easygo.com/en. Last call 4 Nov 2012.

  18. Eliasson, J. (2009). A cost-benefit analysis of the Stockholm congestion charging system. Transportation Research Part A, 43, 468–480.

    Google Scholar 

  19. Ercek, R., de Doncker, P., Grenez, F. (2005). Study of pseudo-range error due to non-line-of-sight-multipath in urban canyons. In Proceedings of the 18th international technical meeting of the Satellite Division of the Institute of Navigation (ION GNSS 2005) (pp. 1083–1094). Long Beach, CA.

  20. Estiot, A. (2008). The German GNSS toll system: lessons learned in ITS and environmental fields. http://www.asecap.com/english/documents/AlainEstiotTollCollect.pdf. Last call 4 Nov 2012.

  21. European Commission (2003). Standardisation mandate to CEN, CENELEC and ETSI in support of interoperability of electronic road toll systems in the community. http://www.etsi.org/WebSite/document/aboutETSI/EC_Mandates/m338en.pdf. Last call 4 Nov 2012.

  22. European Commission (2009). Commission decision of 6 October 2009 on the definition of the European electronic toll service and its technical elements. Official Journal of the European Union, 268, 11–29.

    Google Scholar 

  23. European Commission (2012). Communication from the commission: implementation of the European electronic toll service. http://eur-lex.europa.eu/LexUriServ/LexUriServ.do?uri=COM:2012:0474:FIN:EN:PDF. Last call 4 Nov 2012.

  24. European Parliament and Council (2004). Directive 2004/52/EC of the European Parliament and of the Council of 29 April 2004 on the interoperability of electronic road toll systems in the Community. Official Journal of the European Union, 200, 50–57.

    Google Scholar 

  25. European Parliament and Council (2010). Directive 2010/40/EU of the European Parliament and of the Council of 7 July 2010 on the framework for the deployment of Intelligent Transport Systems in the field of road transport and for interfaces with other modes of transport. Official Journal of the European Union, 207, 1–13.

    Google Scholar 

  26. European Space Agency. http://www.esa.int/esaNA/egnos.html. Last call 4 Nov 2012.

  27. GINA (2009). State of technology and end-user requirements: GINA: GNSS for innovative road applications. http://www.gina-project.eu/media/deliverables/GINA_SKY_StateofTechnologyandEndUserRequirements_D2%201_v2%200%20_4.pdf.

  28. GINA (2010). How can EGNOS and Galileo contribute to innovative road pricing policy? First findings and proposals from GINA project. http://www.gina-project.eu/media/GINA_Workshop_Summary.final.pdf. Last call 4 Nov 2012.

  29. GINA (2011). How can EGNOS and Galileo contribute to innovative road pricing policy? Conclusion of the GINA project. http://www.gina-project.eu/media/deliverables/GINA_Workshop_Summary_v3.pdf. Last call 4 Nov 2012.

  30. Gomez-Ibanez, J.A., & Small, K.A. (2009). Road pricing for congestion management: a survey of international practice. Technical report, Intelligent Transportation Systems Institute, Center for Transportation Studies, University of Minnesota, Report no. CTS 09-20.

  31. Grush, B. (2008). Data protection act: satisfying concerns about GPS privacy. In Traffic Technology International. October/November, 30–33.

  32. Grush, B. (2010). 11 reasons GNSS tolling is better than microwave, October 2010. Presented at 10th Slovenian Road and Traffic Congress, Skymeter Corp.

  33. Grush, B., & Khalsa, P. (2009). A new paradigm for using GNSS for road tolling. ION international technical meeting.

  34. Grush, B., Schortmann, J.C., Hamilton, C., Martínez-Olagüe, M.A. (2009). GMAR standard performance definitions for GNSS road use metering, 2009. Presented at ITS World Congress, Stockholm.

  35. Hamilton, C., & Eliasson, J. (2012). Costs and benefits of the European directive on road tolling interoperability. Transportation Research Part C: Emerging Technologies, in print.

  36. Hassan, K. (2007). The Goldilocks dilemma. Traffic Technology International, 2007(8), 101–103.

    Google Scholar 

  37. Hericko, M., Hericko, M., Zivkovic, A. (2011). An evaluation of different functional solutions for satellite-based tolling in europe. In 44th Hawaii international conference on system sciences (HICSS). Los Alamitos, CA: IEEE Computer Society. doi:10.1109/HICSS.2011.51.

    Google Scholar 

  38. Hofmann-Wellenhof, B., Lichtenegger, H., Wasle, E. (2008). GNSS—Global Navigation Satellite Systems: GPS, GLONASS, Galileo & more. Wien: Springer.

    Google Scholar 

  39. Hollard (2012). http://www.hollard.co.za/pay-as-you-drive. Last call 16 Sept 2012.

  40. International Civil Aviation Organization. (2005). Global Navigation Satellite System (GNSS) manual.

  41. International Organization for Standardization (2009). ISO/TS 12813:2009, Compliance check communication for autonomous systems. Geneva, Switzerland.

  42. International Organization for Standardization (2010). ISO 17575-1:2010, Electronic fee collection—Application interface definition for autonomous systems—Part 1: charging. Geneva, Switzerland.

  43. International Organization for Standardization (2010). ISO 17575-2:2010, Electronic fee collection—Application interface definition for autonomous systems—Part 2: communication and connection to the lower layers. Geneva, Switzerland.

  44. International Organization for Standardization (2011). ISO 17575-3:2011, Electronic fee collection—Application interface definition for autonomous systems—Part 3: Context data. Geneva, Switzerland.

  45. International Organization for Standardization (2011). ISO 17575-4:2011, Electronic fee collection—Application interface definition for autonomous systems—Part 4: Roaming. Geneva, Switzerland.

  46. International Working Group on Data Protection in Telecommunications (2009). Measuring system performance of road user charging schemes. Report and Guidance on Road Pricing--“Sofia Memorandum”, Sofia. Bulgaria. http://www.datenschutz-berlin.de/attachments/647/WP_Road_Pricing_Final_675.38.12.pdf?1264411301. Last call 4 Jan 2013.

  47. Jakobsson, C., Fujii, S., Gärling, T. (2000). Determinants of private car users’ acceptance of road pricing. Transport Policy, 7(2), 153–158.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  48. Mackie, P. (2005). The London congestion charge: a tentative economic appraisal: a comment on the paper by Prud’homme and Bocajero. Transport Policy, 12, 288–290.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  49. Masters, J. (2012). Preparations building for French national truck toll. ITS International, 18, 38–39.

    Google Scholar 

  50. Matheson, D. (2013). Where to now? TOLLTRANS. www.TrafficTechnologyToday.com.

  51. Murphy, T.J. (2004). Road user charging using satellite positioning technology. In 12th IEE international conference on road transport information and control, RTIC 2004 (pp. 222–225).

  52. N.A. (2012). http://www.vlabruwa.be/. Last call 4 Jan 2013.

  53. Netherlands Ministry of Transport, Public Works and Water Management (2006). Cost benchmark for kilometre pricing in the Netherlands. Technical report, English translation of report Kostenmonitor Kilometerprijs submitted to the Dutch Parliament. http://english.verkeerenwaterstaat.nl/kennisplein/uploaded/MIN/2007-07/341099/Cost_Benchmark.pdf. Last call 4 Jan 2013.

  54. Nicodme, C. (2009). The European national road associations forum. The European Union Road Federation.

  55. Noordegraaf, D.V., Heijligers, B., van de Riet, O., van Wee, B. (2009). Technology options for distance-based road user charging schemes. In 88th annual meeting of the Transportation Research Board. Paper No. 09-2477, Washington, D.C.

  56. NZTA. http://www.nzta.govt.nz. Last call 5 Jan 2013.

  57. Odeck, J. (2008). How efficient and productive are road toll companies? Evidence from Norway. Transport Policy, 15(4), 232–241.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  58. Pfitzinger, B., Baumann, T., Jestadt, T. (2012). Analysis and evaluation of the German toll system using a holistic executable specification. In 45th Hawaii international conference on system sciences (HICSS). Los Alamitos, CA: IEEE Computer Society. doi:10.1109/HICSS.2012.111.

    Google Scholar 

  59. Pickford, A. (2007). Measuring system performance of road user charging schemes. Paper 2175 in 14th World Congress on Intelligent Transport Systems, Beijing.

  60. Prud’homme, R., & Bocarejo, J.P. (2005). The London congestion charge: a tentative economic appraisal. Transport Policy, 12, 279–287.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  61. Quddus, M.A., Ochieng, W.Y., Noland, R.B. (2007). Current map-matching algorithms for transport applications: state-of-the art and future research directions. Transportation Research Part C, 15, 312–328.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  62. Quoy, O., & Jacob, B. (2010). French national heavy good vehicle eco tax. Presented at HVTT11: International Heavy Vehicle Symposium, Melbourne, Australia.

  63. Salos, D., Macabiau, C., Martineau, A., Bonhoure, B., Kubrak, D. (2010). Analysis of gnss integrity requirements for road user charging applications. In 5th ESA workshop on satellite navigation technologies and European workshop on GNSS signals and signal processing (NAVITEC) (pp. 1–8).

  64. Schweizerische Eidgenossenschaft (2011). Leistungsabhängige Schwerverkehrsabgabe: LSVA—Übersicht.

  65. Skymeter Corp. http://www.skymetercorp.com/. Last call 4 Nov 2012.

  66. SkyToll (2011). http://www.skytoll.sk/index-en.html. Last call 4 Nov 2012.

  67. SkyToll (2012). http://www.emyto.sk, Last call 4 Nov 2012.

  68. Small, K.A., & Verhoef, E.T. (2007). The economics of urban transportation. London: Routledge.

    Google Scholar 

  69. Sorasen, R., & Lykkja, O.M. (2012). GNSS based tolling—possibilities: challenges and opportunities. Technical report, Q-Free ASA, Norway.

  70. Sorensen, P.A., & Taylor, B.D. (2005). Review and synthesis of road-use metering and charging systems. Technical report, UCLA Institute of Transportation Studies, Los Angeles.

  71. Swedish Transport Agency. http://www.transportstyrelsen.se/en/road/Congestion-tax/Congestion-tax-in-gothenburg/. Last call 4 Jan 2013.

  72. T-Systems International GmbH, Satellic Traffic Management. http://www.satellic.com/en/page/faq.html. Last call 4 Nov 2012.

  73. Toledo-Moreo, R., Ubeda, B., Santa, J., Zamora-Izquierdo, M.A., Gomez-Skarmeta, A.F. (2010). An analysis of positioning and map-matching issues for GNSS-based road user charging. In 13th international IEEE conference on intelligent transportation systems (ITSC) (pp. 1486–1491).

  74. Toll Collect GmbH. http://www.toll-collect.de/home.html. Last call 4 Nov 2012.

  75. TollCollect (2012). Current state of the truck toll system in Germany. http://www.toll-collect.de/en/press/press-releases/current-state-of-the-truck-toll-system-in-germany.html. Last call 4 Jan 2013.

  76. Transport for London. http://www.tfl.gov.uk. Last call 4 Nov 2012.

  77. Tsekeris, T., & Voß, S. (2009). Design and evaluation of road pricing: state-of-the-art and methodological advances. Netnomics, 10, 5–52.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  78. Ubeda, B., Toledo, R., Jordan, J.G., Montes, S. (2004). A theoretical practical analysis of GNSS based road pricing systems, considering the EGNOS/SISNET contributions. Noordwijk, The Netherlands: ESA/ESTEC.

    Google Scholar 

  79. Vrhovski, D., Moore, T., Bennett, L. (2004). GNSS-based road user charging. The Journal of Navigation, 57(1), 1–13.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  80. Walker, J. (2011). The acceptability of road pricing. Technical report, RAC Foundation, London.

  81. Welde, M., & Odeck, J. (2011). The efficiency of Norwegian road toll companies. Utilities Policy, 19(3), 162–171.

    Google Scholar 

  82. Zabic, M. (2011). GNSS-based road charging systems: Assessment of vehicle location determination. PhD thesis, Technical University of Denmark.

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Stefan Voß.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Numrich, J., Ruja, S. & Voß, S. Global Navigation Satellite System based tolling: state-of-the-art. Netnomics 13, 93–123 (2012). https://doi.org/10.1007/s11066-013-9073-9

Download citation

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s11066-013-9073-9

Keywords

Navigation